Australia: Health care: State-by-state round-up

Last Updated: 22 May 2017
Article by Kerri Thomas and Mark Doepel

NSW UPDATE:

The importance of experts and evidence

Zora v St Vincent's Hospital Sydney Ltd [2016] NSWDC 365 serves as a reminder of the need for strong expert evidence in medical negligence cases and the importance the Court may place on evidence when making its determination.

In this case, the Plaintiff underwent a coronary angiogram procedure at Liverpool Hospital, which required a catheter to be inserted in his left and right coronary arteries (of his heart) via the artery in his wrist. This day surgery involved contrast dyes being injected into the arteries to detect any blockages in the heart.

During the procedure, blockages were detected. However, because they did not require immediate treatment and did not affect the Plaintiff's vital signs, he was discharged that afternoon.

The next day, the Plaintiff suffered chest pains and was re-admitted into Hospital. Investigations found that the Plaintiff had suffered a myocardial infarction (heart attack) requiring surgery. While not conclusive, the investigations also suggested the Plaintiff's heart attack may have been caused by a dissection of the artery during the angiogram, which became the basis of the Plaintiff's claim against the Hospital.

The Court had to determine whether there was a dissection during the procedure and if the angiogram was performed negligently or in line with acceptable professional standards.

The Plaintiff's cardiology expert gave two reports on the matter (and subsequently gave a joint report with the Defendant's expert). However, the reports were inconsistent and included different findings on whether or not there was a visible dissection, and if the procedure was performed according to professional standards. By contrast, the Hospital's cardiology expert gave one report stating that the catheter was reasonably placed (and in line with peer professional standards) and there was no evidence of dissection.

Ultimately, the Court favoured the Hospital's expert evidence and held that if a dissection had occurred, it was not caused by the angiogram. The Court also rejected that the angiogram was performed negligently, despite the catheter not being in the optimal position.

We would like to acknowledge the contribution of Mark Doepel, Steven Canton and Dylan Moller to this article.

Significant damages for young plaintiffs in negligence cases

The decision of Pierce v Metro North Hospital and Health Service [2016] NSWSC 1559 is a recent example of where medical negligence, particularly involving younger patients, can lead to significant damages being awarded (when assessed over the patient's lifetime).

The Plaintiff in this case was a 21 year-old woman with epilepsy caused by an antenatal stroke. To determine if she was eligible for surgical treatment, the Plaintiff underwent telemetry testing at Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital—a test that required an induced seizure under hospital supervision, through medication withdrawal and sleep deprivation. The Plaintiff claimed that during the procedure, hospital staff did not intervene as promptly as they should have to end the seizure, instead allowing her to descend into a prolonged period of seizure activity lasting two hours and 44 minutes. The Plaintiff claimed this led to a permanent deterioration of her epilepsy.

The Hospital admitted a breach of duty of care by failing to:

  • treat the Plaintiff's seizure in a timely manner
  • properly instruct staff on how to give appropriate care and treatment, and
  • take steps to terminate the Plaintiff's seizure within an appropriate time.

The issue remaining was one of causation: did the Hospital cause the deterioration of the Plaintiff's epilepsy or was any deterioration a natural regression? In determining this issue, the Supreme Court of New South Wales looked at diaries and clinical notes, as well as expert evidence identifying the frequency of the Plaintiff's seizure activity before and after the Hospital's test. The Court determined that there was a significant increase in seizure frequency after the Hospital test, caused by the Hospital's breach of duty.

As the injury occurred in Queensland, Queensland law was used to assess damages. The Court awarded damages in the amount of $1,672,790.75. The most significant area of damages was for future care, as the Plaintiff was assessed as 41% on the injury scale value.

We would like to acknowledge the contribution of Mark Doepel, Steven Canton and Dylan Moller to this article.

VICTORIA UPDATE:

Commissioning a healthier complaints process in 2017

Earlier in the year, Victorian lawmakers passed legislation to revamp and expand the existing health complaints system. The Health Complaints Act 2016, which came into force on 1 February 2017, incorporates the recommendations of a government-appointed expert panel that reviewed perceived deficiencies in the existing system. We covered these changes earlier in the year, which can be read about in this article.

QUEENSLAND UPDATE:

Mental health reforms to impact hospitals and medical practitioners

The Mental Health Act 2016 (Qld) (MHA) recently came into effect in Queensland, with the aim of overhauling many aspects of patient interaction with hospitals and clinicians, including changes to policies and procedures surrounding patient rights, assessments, restraint, treatment and care.

Specific changes include:

  • authorised doctors will be required to discuss matters with patients (and support persons where appropriate) when:
    • recommending assessment of a patient
    • treatment authority is issued for a patient, and
    • deciding (or amending) the recommended treatment plan proposed for a patient.
  • authorised doctors must take reasonable steps to ensure the patient understands the information given
  • recommended treatment plans for patients and, subsequently, the actual treatment received by the patient must be recorded in health records, and
  • before treating any patient, medical practitioners must direct their attention to the presence of an advance health directive.

While future changes to the MHA have been flagged to reduce the number of forms medical practitioners need to complete, it is clear from the new requirements that there is an increased emphasis on recording clinical decisions and treatment. Hospital and medical practitioners must be aware of these requirements and ensure they adopt appropriate practices to comply with the MHA.

For medical indemnity insurers, increased reporting obligations are generally a welcome development and, when complied with, assist to defend medical negligence claims.

Validity of Mental Health Review Tribunal decisions at risk

Shortly before the MHA came into force, the Queensland Government took the uncommon approach of expediting the Mental Health Amendment Act 2017 (Amending Act) to retrospectively confirm the validity of decisions made by the Mental Health Review Tribunal.

This arose after a Tribunal member was discovered to lack the necessary legal admission qualifications necessary to hold such a position.

While the Amending Act confirms the validity of previous decisions, it also permits potentially affected individuals to seek review of decisions via a special tribunal. A review request must be made within six months of the start of the Amending Act.

Accordingly, insurers should be on notice that existing Tribunal decisions can be re-heard and potentially overturned.

We would like to acknowledge the contribution of Mark Sainsbury and Monica Jaynes to this article.

SOUTH AUSTRALIA UPDATE:

Amendments to the Court Rules relating to expert reports

The Supreme Court of South Australia has amended the Supreme Court (Civil) Rules 2006 (SA) and District Court (Civil) Rules 2006 (SA), altering the manner in which these Courts deal with expert reports. The amendment, Supreme Court Civil Rules 2006 (Amendment No.33) (Rules), came into effect on 1 October 2016.

Practitioners must now set out in letters of instruction to experts the assumptions the expert is requested to make, the materials provided and questions on which the expert is asked to express an opinion under rule 160(2A) of the amendment. While this was previously common practice, it was not mandated by the Rules and should bring consistency to the engagement of experts. Rule 160(2B) requires this letter to be sent to other parties within five days of sending to the expert.

Rule 160 now provides that where an expert (expert one) is responding to another expert (expert two) in the same field of expertise, or where another expert deals with the same subject matter, expert one should confer with expert two and state in their report if they have done so and if not, why not. When experts confer, they are directed by rule 160(3)(h) to identify the differences in assumptions made in each other's reports.

The Courts are clearly seeking to have experts engaged at an earlier stage in proceedings. Previously, only in certain cases would the Court order experts to participate in a "conclave" before trial to discuss and advise on issues on which they had reached a consensus.

A party can now apply to the Court to be relieved of the obligation to disclose an expert report, or information relating to the report, but must make its application within 60 days of disclosure (rather than five days after, as applied under incumbent rule 160).

The amendment also enables a party to file a summary expert report, in which the expert provides a summary of the assumptions made and opinions held in the proceedings, without obligation for the expert to confer with previous experts [or to comply with the requirements set out in rule 160(3)].

Rule 160(10) clarifies that an expert report, including a summary expert report, is not subject to legal professional privilege and, if admissible, may be tendered at trial.

The Rules still provide that parties must obtain all expert reports they intend to use for the trial before the relevant time limit, being 60 days after disclosure. Rule 160(11) now provides that even if a party obtains an expert report before the relevant timeframe, including a summary expert report, the report must still be disclosed within five days of receipt, unless the Court orders otherwise.

It will be interesting to see whether the changes will impact matters that heavily rely on expert opinion by leading to earlier settlement. The amendment will undoubtedly encourage practitioners to understand and engage with expert opinions at an earlier stage in proceedings and challenge experts to discuss and justify their conclusions to their colleagues at an earlier stage.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Kerri Thomas
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.