Australia: Trade And Transport Bulletin: A New Wave Of Environmental Activism

Last Updated: 19 February 2008
Article by Andrew Tulloch

There is no doubt that the new millennium has brought with it a heightened sensitivity towards environmental issues and an increase in the use of the legal system to address environmental concerns.

Two recent Australian decisions illustrate the growing trend of environmental activism in Australian courts, which is likely to have a significant impact on shipping activities and all transport in the future.

Channel Deepening

Blue Wedges Inc v Minister for the Environment, Heritage & the Arts [2008] FCA 8


On 15 February 2002, the predecessor of the Port of Melbourne Corporation referred a proposal to the Federal Minister to deepen shipping channels at Port Phillip Heads, in Port Phillip Bay and the Yarra River in a bid to permit entry of larger container vessels to Melbourne. The proposal was made under section 68 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999(EPBC Act).

The EPBC Act's stated objectives include the protection of the environment particularly for matters of national environmental significance, conservation of bio diversity and heritage and promotion of ecologically sustainable development.

The approval process under the EPBC Act is quite complicated. The process adopted is to first 'refer' to the Federal Minister an 'action' which may have an environmental impact on areas of Federal responsibility. The Minister then decides whether the action needs Federal approval because of its potential impact on those areas, that is, whether it is a 'controlled action' for the purposes of section 75 and 523 of the EPBC Act.

The proposal is then subjected to a number of independent inquiries where the environmental and economic merits of the proposal are assessed.

On 2 November 2007, the relevant Victorian Minister provided his assessment on the environmental effects of the Port Phillip Bay and Yarra River project to the Federal Minister. On 20 December 2007, the newly appointed Federal Minister, the Honourable Peter Garrett MP approved the decision and effectively gave the green light for dredging to commence, subject to strict environmental controls monitored by an environmental management plan.

In the Federal Court of Australia, the applicant, Blue Wedges Inc,challenged the legal validity of the Federal Minister's decision.Blue Wedges submitted that the project, which was the subject of assessment in 2007, had substantially changed since it was first referred to the Government in 2002, and was now of 'greater scale nature and included different actions'. Blue Wedges argued that the Federal Minister had no lawful basis for approving the project because it had not been the subject of a 'referral' for the purposes of section 75, 87 and 133 of the EPBC Act.

In the alternative, Blue Wedges submitted that even if the project, approved in 2007, was not found to be 'relevantly different' from what was described in the 2002 referral, the assessment undertaken did not adequately assess the relevant impact of the project and/or provide enough information to enable the Federal Minister to make an informed decision.

The second and third respondents, the Port of Melbourne Corporation and the State of Victoria, argued that the 2007 project was not relevantly different from the project described in the 2002 referral. Rather, they were both the same 'action' within the scope and meaning of section 75 of the EPBC Act

The Judgment

In his judgment, Heerey J accepted that there were 'differences' between the 2002 referral and the final project approved in 2007. His Honour concluded that 'in a project of this magnitude, it would be surprising if there were not'.

Much of Heerey J's judgment concerned application of the EPBC Act and whether the project approved by the Minister in 2007 related to the same 'action' that was described in the 2002 proposal. His Honour noted, it was not to the point whether the differences in the project were described as 'significant' or 'substantial', rather, whether or not the 'action' described in the referral was the same. The 'action' was described in the referral in these terms:

To deepen shipping channels at Port Phillip Heads, in Port Phillip Bay and the Yarra River and its approaching channels.

In dismissing Blue Wedges application, his Honour held:

The project is to take place at Port Phillip Heads, in Port Phillip Bay and the Yarra River and its approaching channels, and nowhere else. It is the same 'action'. The Approval Decision is lawful. The law does not require the process to be started all over again.

Blue Wedges Inc has now made a further application to the Federal Court on the basis that the Federal Minister's reasons for his decision to approve the project are insufficient. This application is set to be heard by Justice North in mid February and seems likely to delay the start of dredging operations as the dredging contractor is currently preparing to perform its contract.

Japanese Whaling Case

Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd [2008] FCA 3


Since the end of Australia's whaling industry in 1978, the Australian government has long campaigned to protect many whale species, both at a domestic and international level.

The scope and application of the EPBC Act is quite broad. It applies throughout Australia, including its external territories (section 5(1)), and to adjacent waters claimed as Australia's Exclusive Economic Zone. It applies to all persons and vessels within territorial Australia and the exclusive economic zone, which includes persons who are not Australian citizens and vessels that are not registered Australian vessels (section 5(4)).

The Australian Whale Sanctuary

In order to ensure the stated objectives (section 3) of the EPBC Act are performed and achieved, the EPBC Act has established the Australian Whale Sanctuary (AWS). Section 3(2)(e)(ii) of the EPBC Act provides that the AWS was set up to 'to ensure the conservation of whales and other cetaceans'.

The AWS is established by section 225 of the EPBC Act:

... to give formal recognition of the high level of protection and management afforded to cetaceans in the Commonwealth marine areas and prescribed waters.

Sections 229 to 230 make it illegal to 'kill, injure, intentionally or otherwise deal with a cetacean in the AWS'.

Territorial Sovereignty

Australia's declared Exclusive Economic Zone extends to the waters adjacent to the base of Australia's external territories, including the Australian Antarctic Territory. Section 225 of the EPBC Act declares that the waters within 200 nautical miles from the Australian Antarctic Territory land mass is within the Australian Whale Sanctuary.

However, Australia's claim to sovereignty over the Australian Antarctic territory is a very sensitive issue. Australia's claim to the territory is only recognised by four nations, those being France, Norway, the United Kingdom and New Zealand. Relevantly, Japan has rejected Australia's declaration of jurisdiction over the territory, which is considered by Japan as being within international waters.

Litigation History

The 2008 Federal Court of Australia judgment in Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd [2008] FCA 3, is the latest in a long line of decisions aimed at restricting activities of Japanese whalers.

On 19 October 2004, the applicant, Humane Society International Inc (HSI), filed an application in the Federal Court seeking leave from the court to serve the respondent, Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd, in Japan (outside the Australian jurisdiction).

On 27 May 2005, Allsop J dismissed the application for leave following submissions received by the Commonwealth Attorney-General that the subject matter of the proceedings was best dealt with by the Government. The applicant then appealed to the Full Court of the Federal Court who allowed the appeal and granted leave to issue the proceedings in Japan.

Following the Full Court's judgment, HSI attempted, although unsuccessfully, to serve the respondent in Japan through diplomatic channels. The Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs refused the service and stated that 'the issue relates to waters and a matter over which Japan does not recognise Australia's jurisdiction'.

Consequently, the applicant then filed a motion in January 2007 seeking substituted service, which allowed the applicant to serve the respondent with the documents in Japan.

Following this, the matter was called for hearing on 18 September 2007.

The 2008 Judgment

HSI made an application under section 475 of the EPBC Act for injunctive relief in relation to the respondent's suspected whaling activities in the Australian Whale Sanctuary in contravention of sections 229-230 of the EPBC Act.

The applicant argued that 'the respondent had intentionally engaged in a series of activities that have resulted in the Antarctic minke and fin whales being killed, taken and interfered with in the Australian Whale Sanctuary'.

In declaring that the respondent had 'killed, injured, taken and interfered with Antarctic minke whales in the Australian Whale Sanctuary in contravention of sections 229, 229A, 229B, 229C of the EPBC Act', Justice Allsop relied on reports submitted by the respondent to the International Whaling Commission from 2005/2006. The reports indicated that a compound crossbow was used to take 'biopsy samples' from humpback whales and other whale species. His Honour held:

I am satisfied that this non-lethal method of sampling amounted to injuring, interfering with and treating a cetacean within the definition of the EPBC Act.

Allsop J ordered that the respondent was to be restrained from 'killing, injuring, taking or interfering with any Antarctic minke whale or any other whale species in the Australian Whale Sanctuary', unless permitted to do so under the EPBC Act.


While the decisions themselves are of limited application, the implications these decisions have on the transport industry are significant. While Blue Wedges has not been successful to date in its challenge to prevent the channel deepening at Port Phillip Heads, they have aroused much public support for the protection of the marine environment in the process, and have already delayed the start of the dredging operations. That will impact upon shipping operations and is proving to be a significant 'thorn in the side' for the Port of Melbourne Corporation and its plans for port development. The decisions demonstrate the effectiveness of using the legal system to generate awareness towards environmentally sensitive projects. Furthermore, the dredging of Port Phillip Bay shipping channels has promised to generate numerous economic benefits for Melbourne and Australia's shipping industry, an estimated $2 billion in revenue is predicted over the next 30 years. It will be interesting to see if the project is stymied.

Similarly, the Japanese whaling litigation confirms the progression and development of environmental law in Australia under the auspices of the EPBC Act. While it remains to be seen whether Allsop J's injunction to prevent the killing of whales in the AWS will be enforced, the decision's symbolic impact is huge. Again, use of the courts has brought this environmental issue into the consciousness of the Australian and global public.

These cases serve as a warning to the Australian transport industry and all its stakeholders that the environmental lobby cannot be taken for granted. As environmental issues continue to dominate life in the 21st century, the transport industry must either choose to 'shape up' and continue to improve its environmental practices, or they will be forced to 'ship out'.

Phillips Fox has changed its name to DLA Phillips Fox because the firm entered into an exclusive alliance with DLA Piper, one of the largest legal services organisations in the world. We will retain our offices in every major commercial centre in Australia and New Zealand, with no operational change to your relationship with the firm. DLA Phillips Fox can now take your business one step further − by connecting you to a global network of legal experience, talent and knowledge.

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances and no liability will be accepted for any losses incurred by those relying solely on this publication.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.