Australia: Federal Court rules Signature wine trade marks not deceptively similar

Last Updated: 11 January 2017
Article by Stuart Green
Services: Intellectual Property & Technology

What you need to know

  • The Federal Court has considered the deceptive similarity of THE SIGNATURE and BAROSSA SIGNATURE in a recent trade mark battle between the owners of the Yalumba and Jacob's Creek wine brands.
  • The decision is a reminder that deceptive similarity will be assessed by examining the overall impression created by each mark, and that reputation will only be taken into account if a sufficient level of familiarity is established.
  • The decision also demonstrates that those seeking to defend an infringement claim by arguing that they have used their mark merely to describe their product, or to indicate its geographic origin, may struggle if their mark has been used in a unique or unconventional way.

Arguing that trade marks are 'deceptively similar' is one of the grounds most frequently relied on by trade mark owners asserting that another person's mark infringes their own registered rights. It can also be one of the most difficult concepts to grasp, as the question whether two marks are 'deceptively similar' has been answered in unexpected ways in some cases.

In a decision issued just before the close of 2016, the Federal Court considered deceptive similarity alongside the alleged infringer's arguments that it had only used its mark descriptively and to indicate the geographic origin of its product.1

Background

In September 2015, Pernod Ricard, owner of the Jacob's Creek brand, launched its BAROSSA SIGNATURE line of red wines as part of its premium Reserve sub-brand range.

A few months later, Samuel Smith & Son, owner of the Yalumba brand, commenced trade mark infringement proceedings in the Federal Court against Pernod Ricard on grounds that 'BAROSSA SIGNATURE' was deceptively similar to 'THE SIGNATURE' (the Yalumba Mark), which has been registered in Australia for wines in class 33 since September 1999.

In dismissing the case, Charlesworth J considered three principal issues:

  1. whether Pernod Ricard had used BAROSSA SIGNATURE as a trade mark within the meaning of section 17 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (the Act)
  2. whether BAROSSA SIGNATURE was deceptively similar to THE SIGNATURE under section 120(1) of the Act
  3. if there was deceptive similarity, whether Pernod Ricard's unauthorised use was excused on the basis that Pernod Ricard had, in good faith, intended to use the mark for the purposes of indicating the geographic origins of the goods, enabling it to rely on the defence to infringement available under section 122(1)(b)(i) of the Act.

Use as a trade mark

Pernod Ricard argued that it had not 'used' BAROSSA SIGNATURE as a trade mark to indicate the origin of its goods because the sign was merely descriptive of the goods, rather than characteristic of a brand. It submitted that the only signs it had used as a trade mark on its label were JACOB'S CREEK and RESERVE.

Charlesworth J was not persuaded. In acknowledging that BAROSSA SIGNATURE contained descriptive elements pointing to the regional source of the goods, her Honour concluded that the unusual combination of words, outside the wine industry's typical vocabulary, strengthened a conclusion that the sign functioned 'as a badge of origin'.

Her Honour found further support for this finding in considering the prominence of BAROSSA SIGATURE on the label, and accepted that ordinary consumers of wine would recognise and rely on sub-brands like BAROSSA SIGNATURE to inform their decision-making.

Evidence of Pernod Ricard's subjective intentions, though admissible, had little weight in determining the question of use, which is assessed objectively.

Deceptive similarity

Assessing deceptive similarity ordinarily involves considering the impression that the impugned mark produces in the mind of an ordinary consumer with imperfect recollection when compared with the plaintiff's mark. Evidence of reputation conveyed in a mark may be taken into account if it is "so notoriously ubiquitous and of such long standing that consumers generally must be taken to be familiar with it and with its use in relation to particular goods or services."2

Samuel Smith & Son contended that the word 'SIGNATURE' was the distinctive element of the Yalumba Mark that created an impression that would be recalled by an ordinary consumer. It submitted that by incorporating the word into its mark, Pernod Ricard was likely to deceive consumers or cause them to wonder whether the respective goods originated from the same source.

Although Charlesworth J accepted that Pernod Ricard had used a distinctive part of the Yalumba Mark, her Honour nonetheless concluded that this alone was not sufficient to create a likelihood of deception or confusion.

In considering the Yalumba Mark, Charlesworth J held that when 'SIGNATURE' is taken together with the word 'THE' (as it must be), this has the effect of presenting the word 'SIGNATURE' in its nominal form and imparting a message of importance. Charlesworth J noted that the significance of the definitive article was sufficiently memorable to 'register in the consumer's conscious or unconscious mind'.3

Turning to Pernod Ricard's mark, her Honour held that the distinctive feature of BAROSSA SIGNATURE was the grammatical nonsense produced by the unusual word combination including use of SIGNATURE in its adjectival sense. When compared with the Yalumba mark, this produced an impression sufficient to remove any likelihood of deception or confusion.

Charlesworth J also declined to take into account Samuel Smith & Son's reputation stored within the Yalumba Mark on the basis that evidence it had adduced about the volume of production and sales was, without more, insufficient to meet the requisite standard of familiarity.

Pernod Ricard's subjective intentions

Relying on the defence to infringement in section 122(1)(b)(i) of the Act, Pernod Ricard submitted that it had intended to use BAROSSA SIGNATURE for the sole purpose of indicating that the grapes used to make the wines were sourced from the geographical region of the Barossa Valley, as this was a characteristic of the underlying goods.

Determination of the issue was ultimately unnecessary, since deceptive similarity between the marks was not established. Nevertheless, Charlesworth J found it improbable that Pernod Ricard would have subjectively intended to use BAROSSA SIGNATURE for the sole purpose of indicating the geographical origin of the goods. Having regard to stylistic presentation of the mark and Pernod Ricard's sophisticated marketing strategies, her Honour considered that the mark served a "dual imperative: to develop a sign that conveyed a descriptive meaning ... [and] an effective and attractive sub-brand (so as to distinguish Pernod Ricard's goods from those of other traders)."4 While this did not indicate a lack of good faith on Pernod Ricard's behalf, it would, had infringement been established, have been sufficient to deprive Pernod Ricard from the protection afforded by the section 122(1)(b)(i) defence.

Key takeaways

For those who seek to rely on the deceptive similarity ground to argue that another mark infringes their own:

  • for the purposes of assessing deceptive similarity, it is the distinctive element of a mark that will create an impression in the mind of the consumer
  • while reputation may be taken into account for the purpose of assessing deceptive similarity, evidence of sales, without more, will not be sufficient to establish reputation.

For those who seek to counter a claim for trade mark infringement by arguing that their 'use' of their mark has been merely descriptive, or to indicate geographic origin:

  • signs that include a descriptive element can still function as a badge of origin when presented in a unique or unconventional way
  • marks that contain a geographic name can still serve a branding function.

Thanks to Laura Holmes for her assistance in preparing this article.

Footnotes

1 Samuel Smith & Son Pty Ltd v Pernod Ricard Winemakers Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 1515.

2 C A Henschke & Co v Rosemount Estates Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1539 [52] (per curiam).

3 Samuel Smith & Son Pty Ltd v Pernod Ricard Winemakers Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 1515 [105] (Charlesworth J).

4 Ibid, [123].

This article is intended to provide commentary and general information. It should not be relied upon as legal advice. Formal legal advice should be sought in particular transactions or on matters of interest arising from this article. Authors listed may not be admitted in all states and territories

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Stuart Green
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.