Australia: Clearing the smoke – use and consent of trademark clarified

Last Updated: 8 December 2016
Article by Patricia Monemvasitis

The decision of the Full Federal Court in Scandinavian Tobacco Group Eersel BV v Trojan Trading Company Pty Ltd [2016] FCFC 91 (24 June 2016) (STG v Trojan) has provided some useful clarity to the conceptual complexities surrounding use and consent under Sections 120 and 123 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) ("TMA" or "the Act").

The decision deals with the technicalities of the concept of "use as a trade mark" in relation to importation and resale of trade-marked goods as well as the question of whether repackaging or reapplication of trade-marks on goods prior to re-sale extinguishes the defence of "consent" available to importers and re-sellers under Section 123 of the Trade Marks Act.

Dismissing the appeal and agreeing with the primary decision of Allsop CJ, the Full Federal Court confirmed that where goods are sold or resold under a trade mark which was not applied to the goods (including packaging and other ancillary or promotional materials) by the registered owner, the importer, seller or reseller will be considered to be using the trade mark for the purposes of an infringement action under Section 120 TMA. The Court however also confirmed that Section 123 TMA will provide a defence to an infringement action where the above use of the trade mark can be said to be "use" with the consent of the registered owner of that trade mark.

Issues on appeal

The contention between the parties concerned two main issues:

  1. Did Trojan's conduct at any stage in its operations use the STG's trade marks within the meaning of Section 120 TMA?
  2. And, if Trojan's conduct did amount to use, was that use of the trade marks with consent of STG within the scope of Section 123 TMA?


The appeal was brought by Scandinavian Tobacco Group Eersel ("STG"), a large manufacturer of tobacco and cigars, and the registered trade mark owner of a number of famous cigar brand name trade marks including: "Café Crème", "La Paz", and "Henri Wintermans". The respondent, Trojan Trading Company Pty Ltd ("Trojan"), is an importer and supplier of cigars and tobacco products Trojan acquired STG cigar products in Europe and imported and sold them in Australia. With the introduction of the Australian Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011 (Cth) ("TPPA"), Trojan could no longer simply import the cigar products from Europe in their original packaging which would contravene the TPPA. As such, Trojan had to repackage the cigar products into packaging that would comply with the TPPA before it could legally sell the products in Australia. STG claimed that Trojan's repackaging of its cigar product and further sale of the repackaged products was an infringement of its registered trade marks which were displayed in plain text on the repackaging.

Use of the trade marks

Section 120 provides that:

A person infringes a registered trade mark if the person uses as a trade mark a sign that is substantially identical with, or deceptively similar to, the trade mark in relation to goods or services in respect of which the trade mark is registered. (emphasis added)

The phrase "use as a trade mark" however has been significantly interpreted by the courts which have pointed to the importance of context in determining whether a particular use is "use as a trade mark" or not.1 In the present appeal, the Full Federal Court grappled (amongst other things) with two competing strains of jurisprudence on "use by importation" flowing from the decisions in of Rothmans2 and Estex3.

In Rothmans the Court rejected the argument by the trade mark owner that importation of its trade marked goods into Australia by overseas purchasers constituted use of the trade mark. It was held that as the goods were imported for consumption (and not for sale) there was no "use" and that even if the goods had been imported for resale, that would have been use but not use by the registered owner, but rather (infringing) use by the importer. Estex on the other hand has been described as authority for the proposition that: there will be use of a trade mark in Australia by the registered owner if the registered owner sells the trade marked goods to Australian retailers for import and sale in Australia.

As observed by the Court in this appeal, the case law gives rise to a somewhat difficult conceptual position whereby:

a reseller of goods to which the trade mark owner has applied its mark does not use the mark, whereas a reseller of goods who has acquired goods from a third party who has applied a trade mark to the goods without the trade mark owner's consent does use the trade mark

The conceptual difficulty here being that identical acts of a reseller can in one instance be use of a trade mark and in another instance not use of a trade mark all depending on who applied the trade mark to the goods (and if there was consent to this application from the registered owner of the trade mark to the application of the trade mark on the goods).

Despite, this conceptual tension, the Full Federal Court endorsed the position explaining it on policy grounds –principally that it is a protection of parallel imports (genuine goods imported from overseas other than by the registered trade mark owner or its direct distributors) as opposed to imports of non-genuine goods where the trade mark is applied by a third party without the registered owner's consent.

Applying these principles to the present case, Trojan's repackaging of the products and reselling the repackaged goods was used for the purposes of Section 120 TMA given that the trade marks on the repackaging were not applied by the registered trade mark owner (STG) or with its consent.


Having found that Trojan's conduct was "use" of the trade marks for the purposes of infringement under Section 120 TMA, the Court had to consider the second issue: did Section 123 TMA apply to make the use of the trade mark a use with the consent of the registered proprietor of the mark.

Section 123(1) provides that:

in spite of Section 120, a person who uses a registered trade mark in relation to goods that are similar to the goods in respect of which the trade mark is registered, does not infringe the trade mark if the trade mark has been applied to, or in relation to, the goods by, or with the consent of the owner of the trade mark.

The Court identified that two competing interpretations of this provision:

  1. That Section 123(1) requires that the use of trade mark occur in relation to goods which continue to bear the trade mark that was applied by or with the consent of the registered trade mark owner; and
  2. Section 123(1) is directed to any prior application of the trade mark on or in relation to the goods that occurred by or with the consent of the registered owner. This would include an application of a mark to goods by or with the consent of the registered owner where the trade mark was later removed from the goods.

The Court opted for the second interpretation which was advanced by Trojan and had been previously adopted by the primary judge. In its reasoning the Court noted there is nothing in Section 123(1) which either expressly or impliedly limits it to situations of the goods having to still bear the trade mark as applied by the registered owner. In other words, Section 123(1) only requires that the goods have at some time in the past had the trade mark applied by or with the consent of the registered owner. If this has occurred, later use of the trade mark on those same goods in the same manner as previously used by the registered owner will engage Section 123(1) in defence of the subsequent user of the trade mark.

Resisting this interpretation, STG submitted that it could lead purchasers of Trojan's repacked goods to falsely assume that STG was responsible for the product packaging and that it had either applied or consented to the application of the registered trade marks on that packaging (when it had not). STG further submitted that allowing this unauthorised repackaging could damage goodwill associated with the trade mark if resellers could remove and (re)apply the trade mark.

These submissions were rejected given that they are properly addressed by the law of passing off and consumer law protections (which would permit the registered owner of the trade mark to sue for any adverse effects arising from the repackaging of the goods). The Trade Marks Act at Section 121 also allows trade mark owners to display a notice prohibiting certain acts in relation to the goods including prohibited acts such as applying the trade mark to goods or using the trade mark in physical relation to goods after the packaging in which the goods were originally offered had been altered.

The Court thus upheld the primary judge's interpretation of Section 123(1), noting that the critical point remains whether the trade mark has been previously applied to the goods by, or with, the consent of the registered trade mark owner.


Most directly, the decision safeguards importers and resellers from trade mark liability based on seeking compliance with legislative requirements such as the Tobacco Plain Packaging Act. The interpretations of Section 120 and Section 123 however take the decision even further. The decision emphasises the significance of the application of the trade mark to the goods by or with consent of the registered owner (as opposed to application by a third party or the importer/reseller themselves without the registered owner's consent). Where this occurs, the importation and/or resale of the goods will not constitute "use" within the meaning of Section 120.

Further, where subsequently the importer/reseller removes and/or (re)applies the trade mark in a manner that does not dilute the trade mark or cause deception, the defence of Section 123(1) will be available against an infringement action. Conversely, where "use" is found due to the application of the trade mark by a third party without the registered owner's consent, the act of importation and/or resale will be considered to be a "use" for the purposes of Section 120. Subsequent removal and (re)application of the trade mark will then not be protected by Section 123(1) since there was not original application of the trade mark to the goods by the registered owner so as to create the temporal consent argument successfully relied on by Trojan in these proceedings.


1 Shell Co of Australia Ltd v Esso Standard Oil (Australia) Ltd (1963) 109 CLR 407 (per Kitto J) ("Shell Co")

2 WD & HO Wills (Australia) Ltd v Rothmans (1956) 94 CLR 182 (Rothmans)

3 Estex Clothing Manufacturers Pty Ltd v Ellis and Goldstein Limited (1967) 116 CLR 254 (Estex)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Patricia Monemvasitis
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Colin Biggers & Paisley
Coleman Greig Lawyers
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Colin Biggers & Paisley
Coleman Greig Lawyers
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions