Australia: FWC: Enterprise bargaining requires employers - to enter into the theatre of the absurd

A recent decision by the Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission (FWC) in Uniline Australia Limited [2016] has, yet again, made it clear that the FWC will adopt a strict approach to technical deficiencies when employers issue a Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR). But what sets the Uniline decision apart is a strong dissenting opinion delivered by Vice President Watson that speaks to the absurdity of such an approach.

In Uniline Australia Limited [2016] FWCFB 4969, the majority (Deputy President Gostencnik and Commissioner Riordan) found that an NERR issued more than 14 days after the start of bargaining was invalid. It therefore had no effect, despite the fact that the majority of employees had voted in favour of the agreement and all had received the NERR more than 21 days prior to the vote taking place.

Watson VP's judgment highlights the real risk facing employers when an unnecessarily heightened role is given to such perceived technical deficiencies as it "arms those opposed to an agreement with the means to dismantle an agreement otherwise genuinely agreed."1


The Uniline Australia Limited Enterprise Agreement 2011 passed its nominal expiry date on 21 July 2014. In February 2014, Uniline began initial discussions with a group of employees who would became known as the Uniline Employee Committee. During 2014 and 2015, negotiations stalled between Uniline and its employees.

In February 2016, Uniline recommenced negotiations with the Uniline Employee Committee and on 11 February 2016 issued an NERR to the employees in a form consistent with the statutory requirements. On 9 March 2016 (more than 21 clear days later), the agreement was made when 25 of the 30 employees who cast a valid vote voted to approve the agreement.

On 13 May 2016, Commissioner Roe rejected Uniline's application for approval of the agreement on the basis that he could not be satisfied that there was genuine agreement because the NERR was not issued in conformance with s 173(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act).

Roe C relied heavily on the reasoning of Vice President Hatcher in TWU v Hunter Operations Pty Ltd [2014] FWC 7469 and found that the statutory purpose of the NERR could not be met unless it was given shortly after the commencement of bargaining and therefore in accordance with s173(3) of the FW Act – that is, not later than 14 days after the 'notification time' for the agreement, when bargaining is effectively deemed to begin.

Importantly, neither s173 nor any other provision in the FW Act specifies any consequence in the event that the '14 day rule' is not observed.


Uniline appealed Roe C's decision to the Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission, arguing that on a proper construction of the relevant provisions of the FW Act, whether the NERR was issued in accordance with s173(3) of the FW Act is not a proper consideration to be taken into account for the purpose of approving the agreement.

Rather, the delineating factor to consider in relation to provision of the NERR is the 21 day period, referred to in s181(2) of the FW Act. An agreement cannot be submitted for a vote until 21 days after the NERR has been issued. This is the provision that was intended to (and does sufficiently) protect the rights of employees.


The majority found that, because the 14 day rule was not observed, the employees had not genuinely agreed to the proposed enterprise agreement (Proposed Agreement). This was so despite the fact that over 80% of employees had in fact voted in favour of it, and there was no suggestion that employees' bargaining rights had been affected in the slightest way.

In coming to their decision, the majority found that the employees could not have genuinely agreed to the Proposed Agreement because Uniline Australia Limited (Uniline) had, by breaching the 14 rule, also contravened the 21 day rule in s181(2) of the FW Act – it had requested that the employees approve the Proposed Agreement by voting for it before the requisite 21 days had passed since the last valid NERR was given.2

On the face of it, it appears that Uniline had complied with the s 181(2) requirements. After all, Uniline did not hold a vote until after 21 days had passed from when the last NERR was given under s 173(1). However, the majority decided that this was not enough to comply with s 181(2).

The majority found that by focusing only on the 21 day requirement, Uniline had ignored what they called "the full effect" of s 181(2). According to the majority, s 181(2) is not only concerned with time but with "time in relation to the giving of a [NERR]". Gostencnik DP and Riordan C found that "the last notice under s 173(1)" could only mean an NERR that, amongst other things, was given as soon as practicable and not later than 14 days after the employer agrees to bargain or initiates bargaining for the agreement, as required by s 173(3) of the FW Act.3

Uniline did not dispute the fact that it took no steps to give and did not give, an NERR to any employee until well after 14 days had passed. As a result, the majority found that "it cannot be said to be a Notice as contemplated by the Act and in particular for the purposes of s 181(2) was given." According to the majority, it therefore logically followed that Uniline's request for employees to approve the Proposed Agreement was made prematurely, because the 21 day period had not in fact yet begun, as no valid NERR had been given.


Watson VP's decision differed markedly from the majority decision. His Honour took what he called a "common sense approach", emphasising that the FW Act encourages enterprise bargaining and agreement making, and is intended to provide "a simple, flexible and fair framework for agreement making and the facilitation of enterprise agreements".

In Watson VP's view, the proposition that a notice issued more than 14 days after the commencement of bargaining advising employees of their representation rights renders an agreement, otherwise genuinely agreed, to be incapable of approval is "demonstrably inconsistent with the statutory scheme". He went as far as to call such a view "the very antithesis" of a simple, flexible and fair framework.

He considered that a common sense interpretation would give weight to the fact that employees:

  • may already know of their representation rights;
  • may already have made decisions in accordance with their rights; and
  • may have expended significant time and resources to agreeing on the content of an agreement.

On the other hand, a conclusion of automatic failure of a test based on a technicality fails the legal test and produces a nonsensical outcome.

Watson VP paid particular regard to the High Court decision in the Project Blue Sky case (which dealt with the proper approach to interpretation of provisions concerning the exercise of administrative functions consequential to non-compliance with a statutory requirement).4 There, the High Court found that non-compliance with a mandatory statutory requirement did not automatically lead to invalidity. The consequence of non-compliance with a requirement must be discerned from the legislation in question.

In the present case, the FW Act specifies no consequence. Watson VP found that the late notice was not invalid and the Proposed Agreement did not automatically fail an essential test for approval and to reach such a conclusion would entail reading words into the FW Act which are not there. He found that the lateness of the notice may be relevant to whether the agreement has in fact been genuinely agreed under s 188(c).

However, such a consideration requires a full and objective analysis of the actual circumstances, rather than an automatic failure on the grounds of a technicality (as was held by the majority).


The majority decision has major implications for employers.

It means that employers must ensure strict compliance with the 14 day time frame for issuing NERRs if they wish to establish that an agreement was "genuinely agreed" by the employees who will be covered by it.

If employers are unable to establish this, then the FWC will simply not approve the agreement. It is then (according to Watson VP) back to the drawing board for employers, who must "enter the theatre of the absurd" and restart the entire bargaining process, adding unnecessary costs, delays and resources.

This decision also has significant repercussions for organisations that engage in enterprise bargaining. In particular, it appears there will be a major consideration for organisations currently involved in negotiating enterprise agreements, where NERRs may not have been validly issued. There is also a risk that agreements which were previously approved by the FWC, and did not comply with the 14 day time frame, could be invalidated.


It is understood that Uniline and its representative the Australian Industry Group (AIG) are considering whether to seek judicial review of the FWC Full Bench decision.

If a Full Federal Court finds error in the approach of the majority, the matter will be returned to the FWC to be heard and determined according to the law laid down by the Court. If this aligns with the approach of Watson VP, it would restore a more workable position for employers and all other bargaining participants when negotiating and making enterprise agreements.


1 Uniline Australia Limited [2016] FWCFB 4969 at [3] per Watson VP.

2 Ibid at [109] per Gostencnik DP & Riordan C.

3 Ibid at [104].

4 Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Chambers Asia Pacific Awards 2016 Winner – Australia
Client Service Award
Employer of Choice for Gender Equality (WGEA)

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.