Australia: Improving patient outcomes for our non-English speaking community and the hearing impaired - when do you need to use an interpreter in providing health services?

Biggs v George [2016] NSWCA 113; Hinton v Alpha Westmead Private Hospital [2016] FC

The requirement for clinicians to adequately communicate with their patients is well established for a number of reasons, including:

  • the duty of care to appropriately treat a patient, and, in order to do so, obtain an adequate understanding of the patient's medical history and clinical needs;
  • an obligation to warn of material risks as part of the duty of care: Wallace v Kam (2013) 250 CLR 375; Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479;
  • to obtain appropriate consent for the treatment and as a defence against assault and battery;
  • best practice to obtain optimum patient outcomes;
  • to discharge professional duties to engage in satisfactory professional conduct under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law; and
  • in order to provide services without discrimination.

The Medical Board of Australia - Code of Conduct for doctors in Australia states:

"An important part of the doctor-patient relationship is effective communication, including familiarizing yourself with, and using whenever necessary, qualified language interpreters or cultural interpreters to help you to meet patient's communication needs".

There have been two recent cases which provide guidance on when an interpreter should be used, one dealing with the duty to inform of material risks and the other concerning discrimination.

Biggs v George [2016] NSWCA 113

In November 2009 Ms Sandra George, a Macedonian-speaker with a poor grasp of English, underwent an operation to remove an acoustic neuroma, a tumour on the sheath of an acoustic nerve. The operation was performed following consultations in which Ms George had been assisted by interpreters.

On the first two occasions, held at a clinic run by St Vincent's Hospital in Moree where Ms George lived, a friend translated for her. On the latter two occasions held at St Vincent's Hospital in Sydney, she was provided with an accredited interpreter. During the course of the operation an adjoining facial nerve was severed which resulted in her suffering from facial palsy. In 2012 Ms George commenced proceedings in the District Court claiming damages for negligence against the surgeon, Dr Nigel Biggs, and St Vincent's Hospital Sydney Ltd, for vicarious liability of its medical staff.

The law as concerns the duty owed by a medical practitioner to warn a patient of material risks remains that as set out in the High Court case of Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479 which is "except in cases of emergency or necessity, all medical treatment is preceded by the patient's choice to undergo it" a choice which is "in reality, meaningless unless it is made on the basis of relevant information and advice". That is, the duty to warn a patient of a proposed treatment is to warn of all material risks which a reasonable person in the position of the patient would be likely to attach significance in choosing whether or not to undergo a proposed treatment" (Wallace v Kam (2013) 250 CLR 375)."

The Court Appeal stated "A correct statement of the content of the duty would have involved no more than that the medical practitioners were to take reasonable care to ensure that the material risks attending the surgical procedure were conveyed to the patient. The need for translation may involve an additional element and ..... as may be necessary for the practitioners to satisfy themselves that the substance of the information conveyed has been understood".16

Therefore, medical practitioners (and other clinicians) are required to be satisfied that the substance of the information conveyed has been understood and this may include being satisfied that the translator has properly conveyed the message.

In the Biggs case, the patient saw an ENT registrar. A Macedonian telephone interpreter was booked on that occasion and used via handheld telephone, there being no speaker phone available. The receiver was passed from doctor to patient and back as the conversation preceded. The doctor's notes and oral evidence were of some importance.

The doctor stated: "So when I talk about my incision, I go through anything, any bits and bruises that might be any scars and then go on to problems that, a danger to the nerve, danger to hearing, balance etc. So, with my incision, I say you're going to have an incision around your eye and you're also going to have some mosquito bites on your face that might give you some little bruises. That is going to be from the facial nerve monitor. The reason we need to have a facial nerve monitor is because this tumour wraps around your facial nerve, it's one of the risks that – of removing the tumour, we're peeling the tumour off the facial nerves, that there's a danger of damage to it. The danger is most often temporary. It will recover. Sometimes it can be permanent in which case we will need to repair the nerves."

The operation was eventually carried out. At that stage there had been no fewer than 5 occasions on which, according to the evidence of 3 medical practitioners, the claimant had been given advice concerning the risks attendant on the procedure.

The Court of Appeal held that the claimant did know and understand the risks, therefore, no causation. Claims against both defendants dismissed.

Hinton v Alpha Westmead Private Hospital [2016] FCAFC 107

In Hinton v Alpha Westmead Private Hospital [2016] FCAFC 107, the appellant alleged that Westmead Private Hospital had discriminated against her as an associate of a person with a disability, being her husband, in contravention of various provisions of the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) (the DD Act). The respondent, it was alleged, had refused to provide sign language interpreting services (Aslan) to the appellant's husband, who is deaf, in respect of the scheduled birth of the child of the appellant and her husband at the hospital.

Section 5 of the DD Act states:

"Direct disability discrimination
  1. For the purposes of this Act, a person (the discriminator) discriminates against another person (the aggrieved person) on the ground of a disability of the aggrieved person if, because of the disability, the discriminator treats, or proposes to treat, the aggrieved person less favourably than the discriminator would treat a person without the disability in circumstances that are not materially different.
  2. For the purposes of this Act, a person (the discriminator) also discriminates against another person (the aggrieved person) on the ground of a disability of the aggrieved person if:
    1. the discriminator does not make, or proposes not to make, reasonable adjustments for the person; and
    2. the failure to make the reasonable adjustments has, or would have, the effect that the aggrieved person is, because of the disability, treated less favourably than a person without the disability would be treated in circumstances that are not materially different.
  1. For the purposes of this section, circumstances are not materially different because of the fact that, because of the disability, the aggrieved person requires adjustments."

It was argued that the husband was not the recipient of the services.

The Federal Court decision was a judgment appealing a decision of the Federal Circuit Court summarily dismissing proceedings.

The complaint to the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) expressly said that, although Mr Hinton was not the "patient", in a case where the appellant was an expectant mother arranging to use the respondent's services for birth, "it is unreasonable to exclude Mr Hinton as if he is somehow peripheral". Absent the opportunity to file any pleading to identify all of the material facts on which the appellant relied (an opportunity the primary judge denied the appellant, ...), the application as filed was manifestly sufficient to raise an arguable case that the services in question included services by way of information to the husband so that he could support the appellant during the birth, confer with her as necessary, participate in the making of decisions about the treatment of the appellant and their child and, if necessary, give consent to treatment and procedures if the appellant was unable to do so. ...., communication with the husband was not a separate service but a part of the service being provided to the appellant. This proposition is plainly arguable. Further, ..., even if the service was being provided only to the appellant, it was equally plainly arguable that the associate provision (s 7 of the DD Act) was engaged and that the appellant was treated less favourably than a person whose associate did not have the disability in the same circumstances.

The court held that "the primary judge's observation ... that the respondent was not "present" during the discussion with the Nursing Unit Manager who was said to have informed the appellant that no Auslan interpreter would be provided appears to overlook the potential for the respondent to be found vicariously liable for the conduct of its employee .... It also overlooks the potential application of s 123 of the DD Act which provides that any "conduct engaged in on behalf of a body corporate by a director, employee or agent of the body corporate within the scope of his or her actual or apparent authority is taken, for the purposes of this Act, to have been engaged in also by the body corporate unless the body corporate establishes that the body corporate took reasonable precautions and exercised due diligence to avoid the conduct" (s 123(2)). Again, it appears reasonably arguable on the face of the complaint that s 123(2) might be engaged.

Despite the primary judge's repeated observations to the contrary, the appellant's case does not mean that, for every service sought by the appellant, an interpreter would have to be provided for the appellant's husband. It is obvious that the claim was fact dependent. The primary judge also seems to have overlooked ss 11 and 29A of the DD Act which concern unjustifiable hardship. In short, it is not unlawful discrimination in respect of the provision of a service if avoiding the discrimination would impose an unjustifiable hardship on the discriminator. No such suggestion had been made by the respondent .....

Nor can it reasonably be said that the case was about a "trifle" merely because the appellant ultimately gave birth at another hospital which provided the appellant's husband with an Auslan interpreter. The appellant did not have her child at the hospital she had proposed because it would not provide an Auslan interpreter for her husband. That circumstance gives rise to a reasonably arguable case of unlawful discrimination under the DD Act, whether it be direct or indirect discrimination. The objects of the DD Act, in s 3, are to eliminate, as far as possible, discrimination against persons on the ground of disability in the areas of "the provision of goods, facilities, services and land". It is hardly a "trifle" (and still less, equivalent to buying a "bag of chips") for a woman not to be able to deliver her baby in the hospital of her choice, merely because the hospital refuses to provide her husband with the interpreter required to ensure he can participate in the birth in the same way that a woman with a partner who can hear would be able to participate".

The case has been referred back to the Federal Circuit Court for trial.

Care should be taken when dealing with a request from a patient or a carer of a patient with a communication difficulties to ensure compliance with, amongst other obligations, discrimination laws.

Practical Tips

  • Be aware of your duty of care
  • Use qualified interpreters where relevant.
  • Indicators of when an interpreter may be required are if the patient (or their carer or legal representative):
    • asks for an interpreter;
    • can't answer your questions easily;
    • can't repeat back information accurately;
    • has poor or limited English or is deaf; or
    • uses family or friends to communicate.
  • Practitioners must satisfy themselves that the substance of the information has been conveyed and has been understood by the patient.
  • The best way to ascertain if the information has been understood by a patient (and correctly interpreted by an interpreter) is by the "teach-back" method and to avoid leading questions or questions which invite "yes" or "no" answers. For example, under the "teach-back" method, the patient should be able to repeat back the information accurately. Rather than say "Do you understand?" say "I want to make sure that you understand. Can you tell me in your own words....?"
  • If you believe that an interpreter is not correctly interpreting the message, then you should (except in the case of an emergency) re-schedule the consultation with another interpreter and inform your facility of the problem with the interpreter.
  • Keep adequate notes of the consent process, what was explained.
  • If relevant, use patient information sheets disclosing material risks.
  • Do not rely upon family members to interpret. Patients may not wish to freely explain their condition with family members. Family members may not be bound by confidentiality and are not familiar with medical terminology.
  • Do not use bilingual staff to interpret – they are not credentialed and will be diverted from their other duties.
  • Public facilities must be aware of relevant policies. For example: NSW Health Policies – PD2006_053 Interpreters – Standard Procedure for Working with Health Care Interpreters states that:
    • NSW Legislation requires that public sector agencies and services provide equitable access to people from non-English speaking backgrounds and people who are deaf.
    • Health care interpreters are to be used in all health care situations where communication is essential.
    • Both health care providers and patients/clients have a right to request a health care interpreter.
    • Professional accredited health care interpreters provide interpreting services within the NSW public system. The service is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
    • The need for an interpreter should be recorded in a prominent place on the patients/client's medical record.
    • Consent obtained without the use of a professional interpreter (e.g. a relative or friend) may not be legally valid.
    • Health care interpreters can usually provide short written translations which are directly related to the individual patient/client.
    • Where possible, requests for interpreters should be made in advance.
    • Health care interpreters are professionally trained interpreters and abide by a professional code of ethics.
    • Bilingual health care staff are not to be used as interpreters.

Interpreter services

  • Public hospitals usually have an interpreter service available – refer to your State/Territory Health Department
  • The Translating and Interpreter Services provides interpreting services for medical practitioners: https://tisonline.tisnational.gov.au/RegisterAgency
  • Medical practitioners (defined as general practitioners and medical specialists) are eligible for the Department of Social Services' Free Interpreting Service and access to the Doctors Priority Line (DPL) when providing services that are:
    • Medicare-rebateable
    • delivered in private practice
    • provided to non-English speakers who are Australian citizens, permanent residents, Temporary Humanitarian Stay (subclass 449); Temporary Humanitarian Concern (subclass 786); Temporary Protection (subclass 785); and Safe Haven Enterprise (subclass 790) visa holders.

Footnote

16 Biggs v George [2016] NSWCA 113 at [28]

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions