Australia: CGU Insurance Limited v AMP Financial Planning Pty Limited [2007] HCA 36

Last Updated: 12 September 2007
Article by Andrew Adam

29 August 2007
Gleeson CJ, Kirby, Callinan, Heydon and Crennan JJ

In Brief

  • The High Court has dismissed AMP’s long-running claim against CGU for indemnity for losses caused by two of its representatives.
  • The duty of insurers and insureds to deal with each other in utmost good faith requires them not to act dishonestly, capriciously or unreasonably. The duty requires insurers to determine indemnity promptly.
  • Although not established in this case, an insurer’s absence of good faith or inducing an insured into a course of action may found a right to indemnity outside of the terms of the policy.
  • Parties should be prepared, when in dispute, to rely on a "senior counsel clause", should the policy provide one.


  • AMP was insured against professional risks by CGU. The event insured against was legal proceedings commenced with respect to AMP’s vicarious liability for its representatives.
  • The policy included a "senior counsel clause", under which the parties agreed to attempt to resolve any disputes informally by obtaining the opinion of senior counsel (mutually agreed on) on the merits of any such dispute. The "senior counsel clause" was not activated in this matter.
  • Two of AMP's representatives advised investors to make investments that subsequently failed. The representatives became bankrupt and ASIC banned them from the securities industry.
  • When AMP became aware of these circumstances, it advised CGU and sought indemnity. AMP drafted a claims handling protocol, under which AMP would notify CGU of each claim, together with information relevant to each claim. Under the protocol, CGU would then advise AMP within 14 days whether that claim would be settled or defended.
  • CGU agreed, in principle, to the protocol, but did not decide whether to indemnify AMP. CGU advised AMP to act as a "prudent uninsured". AMP kept CGU abreast of developments in the claims.
  • ASIC pressured AMP to resolve the claims promptly and without obliging the investors to commence proceedings. Additionally, AMP was anxious to protect its commercial reputation, which would likely have been damaged were claimants to have commenced formal legal proceedings against it.
  • Following requests to CGU to determine its liability, AMP proceeded to settle 47 of the claims, paying out $3.24 million. It then sought indemnity from CGU.
  • CGU denied indemnity:
    • relying on the necessity for the commencement of legal proceedings (CGU dropped this objection at trial); and
    • on the basis that the settlements were not reasonable, both as to quantum and as there was a live issue as to AMP’s vicarious liability under s 819 of the Corporations Law 2001.

Federal Court Proceedings

  • AMP commenced proceedings in the Federal Court, claiming:
    • breach of the policy by denial of indemnity;
    • estoppel arising from AMP’s settlement of the claims, allegedly in reliance on CGU’s in principle agreement to the claims protocol; and
    • breach of the duty of utmost good faith from CGU’s delay in determining indemnity.
  • At trial, Heerey J dismissed AMP's claim. He found that:
    • AMP had paid out the investors, not because of any representation on CGU's part that it did not require AMP to prove its liability to the investors, but because AMP considered prompt resolution of the claims to be in its best interests;
    • AMP had failed to show that the settlements with the investors were reasonable;
    • AMP had not considered whether s 819 of the Corporations Law 2001 applied to impose liability on it for its representatives; and
    • breach of the duty of utmost good faith required dishonesty on CGU’s part, of which there was none.

Appeal to Full Federal Court

  • AMP appealed to the Full Federal Court. It found that CGU’s in principle agreement to the protocol may have induced AMP to settle the claims without commencement of proceedings. AMP had suffered detriment since, without such proceedings, it was not entitled to indemnity.
  • The Full Court also found that the duty of utmost good faith is not merely to act honestly. The duty is to act with both honesty and propriety.
  • The Full Court allowed AMP's appeal and remitted the matter back to Heerey J to determine whether AMP had been induced by CGU to resolve the claims informally. CGU’s liability both in estoppel and under the duty of utmost good faith depended on a finding of such inducement.
  • CGU appealed to the High Court.

Appeal to High Court

  • The appeal was successful. Gleeson CJ and Crennan J delivered a joint judgment, as did Callinan and Heydon JJ. Kirby J, delivering a separate judgment, dissented.

Utmost Good Faith

  • Gleeson CJ and Crennan J held that:

"An insurer's statutory obligation to act with utmost good faith may require an insurer to act, consistently with commercial standards of decency and fairness, with due regard to the interests of the insured… and may well affect the conduct of an insurer in making a timely response to a claim for indemnity."

  • However, Gleeson CJ and Crennan J (at [16]) found that a failure to act in good faith, of itself, is not sufficient to make an insurer liable to indemnify its insured. It will not make an insurer liable to indemnify when the contract of insurance would not otherwise have created such indemnity.
  • Kirby J found that dishonesty is not a necessary element of the breach of utmost good faith. Rather, he adopted the criteria in Kelly v New Zealand Insurance Co Ltd (1993) 7 ANZ Insurance Cases 61-197, which stated that the duty of utmost good faith required a party not to engage in "dishonest, capricious or unreasonable conduct." He agreed with the Full Court that a finding of lack of utmost good faith on CGU's part was open on the evidence.
  • Kirby J found that the duty of utmost good faith required an insurer promptly to indicate whether it admitted or denied indemnity to an insured.
  • Although Callinan and Heydon JJ declined to define the content of the duty of utmost good faith, they agreed that it did not only encompass dishonest conduct. In particular, they considered that CGU's temporising in determining whether it would indemnify AMP might well have breached the duty of utmost good faith. Additionally, CGU's initial requirement that the investors' claims be brought by court proceedings could also have been a breach of the duty. They suggested that utmost good faith, in its mutuality, resembled the equitable doctrine that parties must deal with each other with "clean hands", that is act with propriety.
  • However, Callinan and Heydon JJ found that, even if there had been an absence of good faith on CGU's part, this would not entitle AMP to relief. Firstly, AMP did not rely on the Senior Counsel clause. Secondly, AMP had, for its own reasons, expeditiously settled the claims.


  • Gleeson CJ and Crennan J found that there was nothing in the conduct of CGU that induced AMP to resolve the claims in the manner it did. Therefore, no estoppel arose on CGU's part.
  • Kirby J found that, since AMP was indemnified against claims asserted in legal proceedings, the settlement of the investors' claims without commencement of proceedings did not activate the indemnity under the policy. Therefore, if AMP was to succeed, it would have to show that CGU induced it, by its representations, to enter into the settlement agreements and that those settlements were reasonable.
  • Kirby J noted that where one party to contract is in breach, forcing the innocent party into litigation with a third party, the party in breach will be liable for the settlement if, firstly, it is in breach of its obligations and, secondly, the settlement is objectively reasonable. He found this inapplicable in this case as CGU was not in breach of the policy. Given the absence of legal proceedings, no liability to indemnify arose.
  • However, Kirby J found that CGU had induced AMP to believe that claims dealt with under the protocol would be indemnified. CGU had reserved its decision on indemnity until after the protocol was in place. AMP could not then insist on the investors proving their claims (and presumably also commencing proceedings).
  • Kirby J found that the Court was unable, on the material before it, to determine whether s 819 of the Corporations Law 2001 applied to each of the claims. Additionally, he considered it was possible, on the evidence, for AMP to show that each of these settlements was reasonable. Therefore, he would have allowed the matter to be remitted to the trial judge for further consideration.
  • Callinan and Heydon JJ found that CGU was not estopped from denying indemnity to AMP. They found that the trial judge had correctly found that AMP had not suffered any relevant detriment on the basis of CGU's conduct.
  • The content of an insurer’s duty of utmost good faith has long been difficult to define, with intermediate appeal courts offering some guidance. The High Court has now provided further guidance on this important and emerging area of insurance law.
  • Although CGU did not ultimately at trial rely on the absence of legal proceedings by the investors, this case demonstrates the need for insureds to ensure that the terms of their insurance policies are consistent with their business practices and the requirements of external regulators.
  • Interestingly, one reason given by Callinan and Heydon JJ for denying the good faith claim was AMP not having called on the "senior counsel clause". Presumably, this flows from their view that utmost good faith resembles "clean hands". Had AMP invoked the "senior counsel clause" and Callinan and Heydon JJ perhaps found in their favour, AMP would have succeeded in having a trial of the issue of reliance and, possibly, succeeded in its claim.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.