Australia: Technology, Media and Commercial Bulletin

Last Updated: 18 September 2007
Article by Rob Brown, Rachel Jacqueline and Sharon Rowe

Amendments To The Franchising Code Of Conduct

Franchise arrangements are strictly regulated in Australia under the Franchising Code of Conduct (Code). The Code, established under the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), is mandatory. It requires franchisors to follow strict rules and disclose specific information to franchisees/potential franchisees.

Regulations amending the Code were made on 9 August 2007. These regulations are a result of the Franchising Code Review Committee’s report on the Review of the Disclosure Provisions of the Franchising Code of Conduct last year.

The regulations commence on 1 March 2008.

Overview of the amendments

The amendments can be divided into a number of broad categories as follows:

  • Provision to franchisees of additional documents.
  • Provision to franchisees of information, and timeframes for the provision of information.
  • Application of the Code to franchisors.
  • Foreign franchisors.
  • Other amendments.

Provision of additional documents

The Code currently requires a franchisor to provide a disclosure document including a summary of the franchise agreement and any requirements for the franchisee to enter into other agreements.

The amendments now require:

  • The franchise agreement (in the form intended to be signed) to be provided with the disclosure document.
  • Associated documents (such as leases, hire-purchase agreements, guarantees and confidentiality agreements) to be provided at least 14 days before the franchise agreement is signed (or, if not available at that time, when available).
  • A copy of the Code to be provided (there was previously an inconsistency in the Code leading to some doubt as to whether this was a requirement).

Provision of information

The Code currently requires franchisors to disclose whether they or an associate will receive a rebate or other financial benefit. The amendments now require that the names of persons from whom such rebates or other benefits are received must also be disclosed.

The Code currently requires financial information for a franchisor to be provided to franchisees. The amendments now provide that financial information of a consolidated entity to which a franchisor belongs must also be disclosed on request.

In relation to the management and application of marketing and other cooperative funds, franchisors can currently avoid providing financial information on such funds by seeking approval from 75% of their franchisees. The amendments now provide that such approval will last for three years (after which time it will need to be obtained again). Also franchisors will now be required to provide the financial statement and any auditors report (previously this was only on request).

The amendments require franchisors to disclose in the disclosure document the existence and content of an order or undertaking under section 87B of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (TPA) (previously only the date of such an order was required to be disclosed). Section 87B gives the ACCC power to accept written undertakings by companies and these undertakings can subsequently be enforced by the Federal Court. Such undertakings are usually given when the ACCC is concerned that a company may contravene the TPA. Franchisors will now also be required to disclose the matter (where not in the disclosure document) within 14 days (rather than the previous 60) after the making of an order or the giving of an undertaking.

In relation to a franchise history, the amendments require:

  • Franchisors to disclose not just the numbers but (subject to the ex-franchisee the subject of the disclosure requesting otherwise) also the names, locations and contact details of ex-franchisees whose franchises:
    • Were transferred.
    • Ceased to operate.
    • Were terminated by the franchisor or franchisee.
    • Were not renewed on expiry.
    • Were bought back by the franchisor.
    • Were terminated and the franchise business being acquired by the franchisor.

Franchisors will not be required to retain this information for more than three years or, as stated in the Explanatory Statement, update it.

  • The details and the history of the franchise site or territory to be supplied with the disclosure document (presently the Code allows the details to be made available for inspection at a time and place mentioned in the disclosure document).
  • Disclosure of business experience of each officer of the franchisor (presently the Code only requires such information for each director, secretary, ‘executive officer’ or partner of the franchisor who is likely to have management responsibilities). ‘Officer’ is defined by the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) which includes directors, secretaries and persons who make decisions affecting the business of the company.
  • Disclosure by a director of a franchisor of proceedings, a judgment or an award relating to breach of a franchise agreement, the TPA, the Corporations Act 2001, unconscionable conduct, misconduct or dishonesty, and certain proceedings under employment legislation or by franchisees. Previously this information was limited to the franchisor.
  • Provision of information on request in relation to specific matters such as the business experience of each director, secretary or partner, payments to agents or information relating to existing franchises. A franchisor was previously able to opt out of providing this information if it was ‘reasonable to withhold’ it.

The timeframes within which information must be provided have also changed, so that franchisors:

  • Will now have an extra month (now four months):
    • After the end of each financial year within which to update their disclosure document.
    • To prepare an annual statement for marketing or other co-operative funds, and an extra month (now four months) to have it audited.

  • Will have to disclose materially relevant information within 14 days rather than the present 60 days.

Application of the Code

The Code currently provides that it does not apply to a franchise agreement where the franchisor is outside Australia and grants only one franchise or master franchise for operation in Australia. This exception will be removed. All other exceptions remain.

Foreign franchisors

There are amendments allowing foreign franchisors to use auditors in and accounting standards of their own jurisdiction for their foreign operations. Previously, franchisors were required to comply with Australian standards and audit requirements.

Other amendments

Other important amendments include:

  • The current prohibition on franchisors preventing franchisees associating with each other being extended to include prospective franchisees.
  • The introduction of a prohibition on the use of waivers of written representations in franchise agreements and other documents.

There were also a number of clarificatory amendments, as follows:

  • The recurring and isolated payments payable by a franchisee to an associate of the franchisor and disclosed by the franchisor will include real property related payments.
  • The requirement that a current disclosure document is required where a franchisor plans to ‘extend a franchise agreement’ will be clarified by stating that ‘extend’ relates to both ‘term’ and ‘scope’.
  • Whether a short form or long form disclosure document is required will be clarified. Currently, this depends on the expected annual turnover of the franchised business. It is now clear from the amendments that a short form disclosure document can be used when the expected annual turnover of the franchised business over the term of the franchise business is less than $50,000.
  • It will be clear that prospective franchisees who terminate within the ‘cooling off’ period may do so without cost if this is done within seven days after signing the agreement (subject to reasonable expenses or their method of calculation being set out in the franchise agreement).


The amendments to the Code are far reaching and are largely intended to promote greater transparency between the franchisor on the one hand, and potential franchisees and existing franchisees on the other. They remove much of the discretion afforded to franchisors to provide certain information and clear up a number of the discrepancies in the Code.

Franchisors should ensure that their:

  • disclosure document; and
  • business practices,

comply with the amendments prior to their commencement early next year.

Copyright in TV guides: Nine v IceTV

Justice Bennett (Federal Court of Australia) in Nine Network Australia Pty Limited v IceTV Pty Limited [2007] FCA 1172 considered the position of electronic program guides (EPGs), databases and copyright.

The Court considered whether IceTV’s ‘IceGuide’ (a subscription based EPG) infringed Nine’s copyright in its weekly programming information (Weekly Schedule) as a ‘compilation’ literary work within the meaning of the Copyright Act 1968.

The Weekly Schedule was made available to aggregators under licence, who aggregated the Weekly Schedule with information from other television networks. The aggregated guides were publicly available.

Nine asserted that IceTV infringed its copyright in the compilation by:

  • Reproducing the program time, title and date of broadcast information from the Weekly Schedule.
  • Appropriating the ‘skill and labour’ of Nine in compiling those Weekly Schedules.

IceTV accepted the subsistence of copyright in the Weekly Schedule. The Court held that, although Nine had copyright in the Weekly Schedule, the individual aggregators had copyright in the aggregated guides.

IceTV asserted that it did not reproduce the Weekly Schedule in creating and updating the IceGuide, which it asserted was a product of independent research and its predictive programming software. IceTV did not have access to the Weekly Schedule directly, but rather to the aggregated guides incorporating the Weekly Schedule information.

The process by which the IceGuide was created and updated, was found by the Court to be as follows:

  • Initially, the IceGuide was created through independent investigation of the ‘pattern’ of the commercial networks’ programming - with IceTV contending that it watched the broadcast programs and wrote down the title of each program and days and times of broadcast.
  • Each week:
    • A new IceGuide was created using the ‘predictive’ software.
    • IceTV then added its own synopses and extra information based on independent research (for example, information on movies was obtained from the internet and reference sources).
    • IceTV used the publicly available aggregated program guides to verify and amend the schedules before publishing them.

IceTV in establishing the above process deliberately set out to ensure that the IceGuide did not infringe copyright.

The Court found that the IceGuide was not an infringement of Nine’s copyright in the Weekly Schedule, holding that copyright subsisted in the Weekly Schedule as a whole compilation and not in its separate constituents. Accordingly, by reproducing slivers of information in the verifications of its guide, IceTV did not infringe Nine’s copyright as it did not reproduce a substantial part of the Weekly Schedule.

The facts of the case were distinguished from Desktop Marketing Systems v Telstra (2002) (the leading compilation decision in Australia) in that:

  • It was not a ‘whole of universe’ case, where only one mode of arrangement of expression and arrangement of factual information was possible.
  • The IceGuide was a product of independent inquiry and compilation of publicly available information.

The Court observed that, had Nine been successful in establishing copyright infringement, it would have found IceTV guilty of copyright infringement as:

  • Having the text files of the Weekly Schedule in the software would have infringed Nine’s reproduction right.
  • Making the IceGuide available to the public and its users would have infringed Nine’s right to ‘communicate’ the Weekly Schedule to the public.

The decision importantly confirms the application of the principle set out in Desktop Marketing Systems v Telstra - that copyright will protect skill and labour - in the context of compilation works.

ACCC v Google

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has commenced proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia against Trading Post Australia and Google (both the Australian entity and two international entities) for misleading and deceptive conduct. This is said to be the first trade practices action against Google.

The background to the proceedings is that, in a search using Google’s website in 2005, the business names ‘Kloster Ford’ and ‘Charlestown Toyota’ appeared as links on a search results webpage (in the prominent ‘sponsored links’ section of the webpage). When clicked on, these sponsored links took users to the Trading Post website, a direct competitor of Kloster Ford and Charlestown Toyota in the automotive sales industry.

The ACCC alleges that the Trading Post engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct under section 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) (TPA) and also under section 53 (d) of the TPA, by representing that it had an affiliation or approval that it did or does not have.

The allegations under section 52 are two-fold. Firstly, that Google caused specific sponsored links to be published on its website and, secondly, that Google did not and continues to not make an adequate distinction between commercial and sponsored links and those that are ‘organically’ located through searches on its website.

If the ACCC is successful in its claims against the Trading Post and Google, this case is likely to have implications for search engine operators and, potentially, other web based services that provide sponsored links, such as information aggregates and portals.

ACMA issues $149,600 fine for ‘missed call marketing’ under SPAM Act

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) has issued its largest fine to date under the Spam Act 2003 (Cth) (Spam Act). The $149,600 fine against DC Marketing Europe Limited was in response to the ‘missed call marketing’ scheme conducted by the company.

DC Marketing Europe Limited’s ‘missed call marketing’ scheme involved calling mobile phone users for a short period and leaving a ‘missed call’. The scheme relied on the curiosity of users to return the call, where they would be taken to a recorded message informing them that they had won a prize. The user would then have to remain waiting on the phone in order to claim the prize, incurring significant costs on the premium mobile service.

The Spam Act regulates unsolicited commercial electronic messaging in Australia (excluding voice calls or faxes). A commercial electronic message includes emails, SMS/MMS messages and instant messages. The Spam Act stipulates that a commercial electronic message must not be sent without the consent of the recipient, accurately identify information about the sender and contain an ‘unsubscribe’ facility to enable the recipient to opt out from future messages.

The calls made under the ‘missed call marketing’ scheme (which were caught by the Act given there was no voice component to the calls) did not have the required features and accordingly were in breach of the SPAM Act.

This action by ACMA reflects its strong stance against spamming activity in Australia.

Works of artistic craftsmanship: Burge v Swarbrick

In Burge v Swarbrick [2007] HCA 17, the High Court considered the meaning of a ‘work of artistic craftsmanship’ and the interaction between copyright and design protection.

Swarbrick, the designer of a yacht, brought proceedings claiming infringement of the copyright in the ‘plug’ (from which a mould for the hull could be derived) and moulds for a yacht. The plug and moulds were not registered under the applicable designs legislation (which has since been replaced by the Designs Act 2003).

The Copyright Act 1968 provides protection for ‘artistic works’, which is defined in section 10 to include, amongst other things, ‘works of artistic craftsmanship’. The expression ‘work of artistic craftsmanship’ is not defined. The copyright owner has the exclusive right to reproduce an ‘artistic work’, including a ‘work of artistic craftsmanship’.

However, where the design of an ‘artistic work’ is ‘industrially applied’ (that is, to more than 50 items), copyright protection ceases. This principal does not apply to a ‘work of artistic craftsmanship’. Accordingly, if an ‘artistic work’ has been ‘industrially applied’ and no design registration has been sought, it will only be protected by copyright if it is a ‘work of artistic craftsmanship’.

As Swarbrick had not registered a design, he argued that the ‘plug’ and moulds were ‘works of artistic craftsmanship’.

In relation to the ‘plug’, the Court held that it was not a ‘work of artistic craftsmanship’. This was primarily because the design of the yacht was constrained by function and utility concerns (as opposed to the freedom of design choice for a tapestry or jewellery). The Court stated that the more substantial the requirements to satisfy utilitarian considerations, the less artistic scope and, accordingly, the less likely it was a ‘work of artistic craftsmanship’.

In relation to the moulds, the Court held that they were ‘manifestations’ of the ‘plug’ and could not be treated as independent ‘works of artistic craftsmanship’.

The decision highlights the importance for designers of seeking protection under the Designs Act to ensure that they do not lose copyright protection on industrial application where their work does not constitute a ‘work of artistic craftsmanship’.

Crown copyright

In Copyright Agency Limited v State of NSW [2007] FCAFC 80, the full Federal Court considered the ‘Crown copyright’ provisions in Part VII of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) which operate to vest ownership of copyright in the Commonwealth or a state.

The full Federal Court decided in CAL v State of NSW that the 'Crown copyright' provisions:

  • Will not be construed broadly by the Court.
  • Should only be relied upon by the Commonwealth and the states as a last resort.

The ‘Crown copyright’ provisions in the Copyright Act:

  • Vest ownership of copyright in a work in the Commonwealth or a state if the work was made under its direction or control or first published by, or under the direction or control of, the Commonwealth or state (in the absence of an agreement to the contrary).
  • Provide that the Commonwealth or a state will not infringe copyright, if acts performed in respect of a work protected by copyright ‘are for the services’ of the Commonwealth or state. Remuneration for the use of the works is, however, still required to be paid.

The full Federal Court rejected a claim by the NSW government that it was the owner of copyright in survey plans drafted by surveyors as a result of the Crown copyright provisions.

The NSW government argued that the plans were produced to meet its requirements and had been first published by it and, accordingly, that it was the owner of the copyright in the plans.

The Court held that the NSW government would have obtained copyright in the plans if it had been in a position to compel the making of the plans. Instead, the NSW government was only in a position to determine if the plans, once drafted, met regulatory requirements for survey plans. The Court found that it was not Parliament’s intention to give copyright to the Crown ‘simply as a side effect’ of providing regulatory approval.

Although the NSW government did not own copyright in the plans, the Court held that the NSW government had an implied licence to use the plans for the purposes of the regulatory framework governing survey plans. This meant the NSW government was not infringing copyright by its use of the plans and did not need to rely on the Crown copyright provisions.

The decision highlights:

  • The difficulties in relying on Crown copyright.
  • The usefulness to the Crown of implied licences which may arise from the circumstances in which copyright material is provided.

New Zealand SPAM legislation

The Unsolicited Electronic Messages Act comes into force on 6 September 2007.

The Act:

  • Prohibits commercial electronic messages from being sent to a person in New Zealand without their consent.
  • Requires commercial electronic messages to include accurate information about the person who authorised the sending of the message and a functional unsubscribe facility.
  • Restricts the supply, acquisition and use of address harvesting software and any electronic address list produced using that software.

A fuller description of the Act was set out in TMC Bulletin - May 2007.

Performers’ moral rights

The WIPO Copyright Treaty and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty came into force in Australia on 26 July 2007.

Although Australia had already implemented most of the changes necessary to fulfil its obligations under the treaties, amendments relating to performers’ moral rights were dependent on the above treaties coming into force.

The amendments (which came into force on the same date as the above treaties) give a number of new moral rights to individual performers (including conductors), namely:

  • The right of attribution of performership.
  • The right not to have performership falsely attributed.
  • The right of integrity of performership (being the right not to have the performance subjected to derogatory treatment).

The above rights are only in respect of live performances (and sound recordings of live performances) made after the commencement of the amendments.

Phillips Fox has changed its name to DLA Phillips Fox because the firm entered into an exclusive alliance with DLA Piper, one of the largest legal services organisations in the world. We will retain our offices in every major commercial centre in Australia and New Zealand, with no operational change to your relationship with the firm. DLA Phillips Fox can now take your business one step further − by connecting you to a global network of legal experience, talent and knowledge.

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances and no liability will be accepted for any losses incurred by those relying solely on this publication.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.