Following strong economic growth and an election promise to economise the delivery of key infrastructure in Queensland, the State Development and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2006 ("Amending Act") was enacted in December 2006 to amend the State Development and Public Works Organisation Act 1971 ("SDPWO Act").
The function of the SDPWO Act is to facilitate the development of vital infrastructure (and other public works) in Queensland.
Part 5 of the SDPWO Act has since 1981 empowered the Coordinator General to take control of local body approval processes for mineral or energy projects of "major economic significance to the State" (or which require costly or complex infrastructure) which are declared as "prescribed development". This has been a little used provision.
The new Part 5A adds to the jurisdiction of the Coordinator General, by allowing him or her to also take control of the timing of approval processes for declared "prescribed projects" or "critical infrastructure projects". Consistent with the function of the SDPWO Act, the rationale for Part 5A is to identify projects of economic and social significance to the State and ensure those projects are delivered in a timely fashion.
Under Part 5A of the SDPWO Act:
a "prescribed project" includes any project which (in relation to the State or a region) the Minister considers to be "economically or socially significant" or "affects an environmental interest", having regard to the public interest, the likelihood of voluntary environmental agreement or any other matter which the Minister deems relevant; and
A "critical infrastructure project" is a prescribed project that is "critical or essential for the State for economic, environmental or social reasons".
If a State project meets these thresholds, the Coordinator General has jurisdiction under Part 5A to issue certain notices to Government departments, designed to ensure Government decision-makers proceed efficiently.
If a proposal is a prescribed project, the Coordinator General can issue:
A progression notice - this notice places time limits on decision-makers implementing a "prescribed process", which is a process within a prescribed project which is required by law (eg. a process in a stage of Integrated Development Assessment System under the Integrated Planning Act 1997);
A notice to decide - this notice places time limits on decision-makers making "a prescribed decision", which is a decision in relation to a prescribed project that is required by law (eg. a decision about the construction of a prescribed project). With the Minister's approval, the Coordinator General is also empowered under Part 5A to enter into Voluntary Environmental Agreements with persons interested in a prescribed decision. The aim of these agreements is to safeguard aspects of the environment which may be threatened by a project's delivery;
A step-in notice - this notice allows the Coordinator General effectively to "step in" to the shoes of the decision-maker to make the decision on their behalf. Because a step-in notice can only be used after a progression notice or a notice to decide has been issued and effectively replaces the decision-maker with the Coordinator General for a period, this is an option of last resort.
If a proposal is a critical infrastructure project, an applicant can not review the proposal under the Judicial Review Act 1991 (Qld), so far as the application relates to:
The Minister's decision to declare the proposal a prescribed project
A decision of the Coordinator General to issue a progression notice, a notice to decide or a step-in notice
Any decision of the Coordinator General under section 76O of the SPDWO Act; and
Any decisions or conduct "leading up to or forming a part of" any of the above decisions.
Other important steps made by the amendments include:
the creation of "critical infrastructure easements", which are easements over existing public utility easements that are triggered by the declaration of critical infrastructure projects. These easements are designed to utilise capacity in existing public utility easements and therefore minimise the numbers of adversely effected Queensland landowners; and
the ability for more than one person to be appointed Deputy-Co-ordinator General. This amendment is designed to ensure that the Co-ordinator General has sufficient administrative and operational support to meet increased workloads under Part 5A.
On 23 January 2007, the Queensland Government made its first prescribed project declarations, for a number of Water Grid projects in South East Queensland, namely:
The Southern Regional Water Pipeline
The Western Corridor Recycled Water Scheme; and
The South East Queensland (Gold Coast) Desalination Facility.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
It is a common misconception that the grant of mining tenure, whether it be an Exploration Permit, Mineral Development Licence or Mining Lease, will entitle the holder to access all land within it in order to explore or mine.
This briefing note sets out a likely structure for the proposed privatisation of the networks and identifies key issues.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).