Australia: Developments In Liability And Professional Indemnity Claims

Last Updated: 3 July 2007

Article by Scott Kennedy & Clive Curwood1


Since 2002 in New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland legislation has been enacted to compel the greatest change to public liability in decades (the Reform Acts).2 The ultimate impact of the Reform Acts is unknown, however in the past few years the Superior Courts have started to provide guidance on how it interprets these changes.

In the area of public liability, the Reform Acts have mandated changes to the Courts' approach to issues such as:

  1. non economic loss assessments; and
  2. the obviousness of risks.

In the professional indemnity and directors' and officers' classes, the Reform Acts have also mandated changes through the introduction of proportionate liability (as opposed to joint and several liability) throughout Australia.

General Over-View of Claim Numbers and Types

Following the Reforms Acts, the number of claims coming before the Courts continues to fall. At least in theory with the progressive introduction of Proportionate liability throughout Australia since 2004, claims numbers should continue to fall.

Nevertheless, the decline in claim numbers may slow or reverse having regard to:

  1. the pressure to wind back the tort reforms;
  2. the Courts' apparent approach to the Reform Acts; and
  3. the likely increased mobilisation of litigation funders.
  4. First however, the current numbers:

The full presentation can be downloaded here

Where to Now?

Whilst over the past few years new court filings have been at unprecedented levels, one may query whether that situation will remain, in part having regard to:

  1. the pressure to wind back the tort reforms;
  2. the approach of the Courts to the Reform Acts; and
  3. the increased mobilisation of litigation funders.

The Pressure to wind back the Tort Reforms

The Tort reforms are not universally adored. Extra curial comments by senior members of the judiciary include criticisms of the extent of the Tort reform by both the Hon Justice D A Ipp AO who chaired the panel into the legislative reforms, and also by the Hon P de Jersey AC, Chief Justice of Queensland.

Justice Ipp recently stated:

Certain of the statutory barriers that plaintiffs now face are inordinately high.... Small claims for personal injuries are a thing of the past. Establishing liability in connection with recreational activities has become difficult. Stringent caps on damages and costs penalties make most plaintiffs think twice before suing. Public authorities are given a host of novel and powerful defences that are in conflict with the notion that the Crown and government authorities should be treated before the law in the same way as an ordinary citizen. It is difficult to accept that public sentiment will allow all these changes to remain long-term features of the law. 16

Justice de Jersey's comments are even more pointed:

I have spoken previously about the two Queensland statutes of recent years which have significantly interfered with the awarding of compensation to those who have suffered injury because of the actionable fault of another. Now we would all accept that a person injured through the fault of another should be adequately compensated by that other. The issue is whether the legislative reforms went too far. Some change was justified, although legislation was not necessarily the only way of securing it. There had been a shift discernible from court decisions over recent years towards according more primacy to individual responsibility for those engaged in ordinary day-to-day activities. The tripping cases exemplify that.17

Last year I expressed serious reservation whether the so-called "insurance crisis" which led to the Ipp reforms was substantially caused by anything other than lack of prudent financial planning and forecasting by insurance companies, including premiums set uncommercially low for competitive reasons. The President of the Law Council of Australia, Mr John North, recently referred to current high levels of profitability in insurance companies. Many commentators have highlighted what has appeared to be minimal reduction in insurance premiums. Many remain to be convinced that the reduced financial burden on insurers, consequent upon these legislative changes, is benefiting anyone other than those insurers themselves.18

Members of Queensland's judiciary appear to have the most grievance about:

  1. the $250,000 cap on General Damages in Queensland;19
  2. the cap on past and future economic loss to no more than 3 times the average weekly earnings per week;20
  3. the limitation on the award of damages for gratuitous services, being dependant on the provision of services for at least six months and at least six hours per week;21 and
  4. the inflexibility inherent in the new formula for calculating damages.22

Despite comments such as these, there does not appear to be a serious move to wind back the provisions in any real respect.

The Courts approach to the Reform Acts

he New South Wales Court of Appeal approach to the CLA may suggest that that Court does not approach the CLA with enormous warmth, and that approach appears to be shared by the District Court.

In part this can been seen in a recent decision of the District Court, Yu-Mei Chu v State Rail Authority of New South Wales [2007] NSWDC 41. There, the Judge held the State Rail Authority (SRA) liable to compensate a women who broke her ankle falling down stairs at a CityRail station, and then some weeks later at the home of an acquaintance was sexually assaulted when she couldn't escape due to the injury to her ankle.

The plaintiff suffered significant psychological injury, and contended that the sexual assault would not have occurred but for the injury to her ankle, because otherwise she would have been able to successfully repel the man and escape.

After considering the provisions of section 5D of the CLA Goldring DCJ held that but for the injury to her ankle, the plaintiff would not have suffered the sexual assault and its consequences. Goldring DCJ states:

I find, therefore, that the psychological injury to the plaintiff, which she would not have suffered but for the ankle injury, but which she did suffer because of the sexual assault, is within the scope of the defendant's responsibility. In terms of the common law, this would be a foreseeable consequence of the defendant's breach of duty, which led to the ankle injury.

The Judge held that the psychological injury was caused by the sexual assault, rather than the fall, but awarded damages both as a result of the physical injuries and loss sustained as a result of the fall and the psychological harm caused as a result of the rape.

The casual connection as found by the Court could be viewed as a convenient method of circumventing what was otherwise an obstacle in the plaintiff's claim. Not surprisingly, Railcorp has indicated that it will appeal the decision.

Turning to the New South Wales Court of Appeal, if the authorities over the last 12 months are an accurate barometer, the Court's approach is to:

  1. only rarely interfere with the discretion exercised by the Court below on damages for non-economic loss;
  2. to suggest that the CLA does not carry with it any change to the previous test of when reasonable precautions have been taken against a risk of injury;
  3. to indicate that "not insignificant" in the language of the CLA, is essentially the same as the previous test of a risk that is "not far fetched or fanciful"; and
  4. consider that where a risk is obvious that is not a factor that goes to whether or not a duty is owed.

On one view, the Court is interpreting the CLA in light of the previous common law, and reading some of the exclusionary provisions in the CLA, such as the dangerous risk provisions in a fairly narrow fashion.

The potential impact of litigation funders

Whilst litigation funding for claims is not new in Australia, historically, the common law prohibited maintenance (supporting litigation, regardless of the reason) and champerty (supporting litigation in exchange for a share of the proceeds of that litigation), on the basis that they are contrary to public policy. Although recent court decisions have made it plain that litigation funding is now a reality in Australia, the decision in Campbell's Cash & Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd [2006] HCA 41 by the High Court of Australia, there was some uncertainty as to what elements of a litigation funding agreement might render it contrary to public policy and an abuse of process.

The underlying proceeding (a class action) by a number of tobacco retailers against licensed wholesalers for the recovery of state licence fees, was financed by a litigation funder, Firmstone, on the basis that it would take one-third of the proceeds if the case were successful.

The High Court held that where the crimes and torts of maintenance and champerty had been abolished by statute (each of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and the ACT), there was no foundation to conclude that the people seek to profit from assisting in litigation, and seeking out and encouraging litigation could only be maintaining an action could be contrary to public policy.

Moreover, fears concerning the adverse effects on the processes of litigation and the fairness of the agreement between the funder and the plaintiff are not sufficient to justify an 'overarching rule of public policy' that would prohibit funded actions or require funding agreements to meet particular standards concerning the funder's degree of control or reward. Such a rule 'would take too broad an axe to the problems that may be seen to lie behind the fears'. Similarly, fears for the administration of justice (for example, that the funder might inflame the damages or suppress evidence) can be adequately met by existing doctrines of abuse of process, and fears that lawyers might find themselves in positions of conflict are also adequately addressed by the existing rules regulating their duties to the court and clients.

The High Court's decision is likely to encourage the number of litigation funders and funded cases, particularly for class actions which through economies of scale may be seen to offer the best chance of a large return for funders.

A good example is that attached to this paper, being a copy of the investment portfolio of one of Australia's largest litigation funders, IMF Limited. This investment portfolio, which is available on the internet and is announced quarterly to ASIC, lists each of IMF's funded matters and its potential return.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.