Implications of false representations regarding the
connection of brands
Goodwill attached to business names
Assisted by Kirstie Barfoot
California based ridesharing company Uber recently forced a
small Queensland company by the name of 'Muber' to change
their registered business name. Muber general manager, Manne
Padowitz, was contacted by Uber about the similarities between the
names of the companies, in circumstances where Uber is a successful
and internationally recognised brand.
The nature of the business undertaken by Muber is conducted
through a Smartphone application which allows users to order food,
alcohol, and other goods to be delivered directly to their homes
around the Gold Coast. Drivers for the service, similar to Uber,
use their own cars and sacrifice a percentage of their fees to
Whilst Muber did not directly copy the Uber brand or business
model, it intentionally created an association between the
companies in the minds of consumers. Padowitz acknowledged in a
public statement that the name was a deliberate decision, and that
it "gave the public an idea of the concept of the app."
Whilst in this case, the matter did not proceed beyond threats from
Uber's legal representatives; conduct of this nature is a
potential breach of Australian law in the following areas:
If the company has a registered trademark over their company
name, and a name similar to this is used in the same industry, it
may be considered a breach of trade mark laws
The company may be considered attempting to 'pass off'
the goodwill of the another brand by misrepresenting that a
connection exists between the services offered when there isn't
The company may be in breach of Australian Consumer Law if it is
considered that during trade or commerce, the overall impression of
the business is misleading or deceptive, or is likely to mislead or
deceive consumers into believing the brands are connected.
The above consequences are quite serious and could result in
costly and time consuming litigation.
As an established business owner, you should consider
registering a trade mark over your business name. The owner of a
registered trade mark has the exclusive use of the registered name
and can prevent others from using the same or similar name –
it's an important step in ensuring that the goodwill associated
with your brand is fully protected.
If you are starting a new business, whilst it can be appealing
to build off existing success in the corporate world, associating
your brand with the reputation and goodwill of other companies can
hold serious consequences. Prevention is always better than cure -
avoid potential legal ramifications by ensuring that your business
name and any trademarks you intend to register aren't easily
associated with other brands in your industry.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The Ugg boots case revolves around who holds the trade mark rights to the word 'Ugg' in relation to sheepskin boots.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).