Australia: Recent Developments—From A Tax Litigator’s Perspective

Last Updated: 29 January 2007
Article by Paul Wenk

Originally published in Lawyers Weekly.

This article seeks to briefly identify a number of recent developments in the area of tax litigation that are likely to have an impact on the commencement and conduct of tax disputes in the near future:

  • the approach of the Australian Tax Office to litigation
  • promoter penalty legislation
  • Part IVA
  • privilege and access to documents.

The Approach of The Australian Tax Office (ATO) to Litigation

The Commissioner of Taxation is one of the most active litigators in Australia. There has been a great deal of recent focus on the commissioner's compliance and litigation activities. Perhaps the most notable recent items are:

  • ATO Compliance program for 2006/07—released 30 August 2006
  • Inspector General's Report on the Management of Litigation by the ATO (Inspector General's report)—released publicly on 7 August 2006
  • Inspector General's Annual Report 2006—released 10 October 2006.

According to the Inspector General's report, the commissioner was involved in 3,200 appeals and disputes over the past two years. The Inspector General has made a number of observations and recommendations in relation to the commissioner's approach to litigation.

These include:

  • The ATO's own statements indicate that the ATO sees 'litigation as an important element of its compliance program', and 'in clarifying the law'. However, the ATO's conduct of litigation indicates that the ATO primarily uses litigation as a means of validating its own views of the law and ensuring taxayers comply with those views—views which 'may not be the same as the actual terms of the law'. One consequence is that perceptions of the ATO's 'objectivity and fairness in litigation is compromised by a perceived over-emphasis on achieving compliance with its views'.
  • In some cases, 'the ATO is also not giving effect to the results of a litigated case to taxpayers other than the particular taxpayer who has initiated the relevant case'. Again, the ATO's stated objective of clarifying the law through litigation has not been achieved 'because the tax office has refused to follow relevant legal principles which have been established by the case to any other similar case'. In the Inspector General's view, where the ATO fails to follow such cases it 'can be perceived to be in breach of the principles of the rule of law' and this undermines 'the community's confidence in the tax litigation process and the tax office's administration generally'.

The main recommendations flowing from the report are that the ATO:

  • develop and publish policy or guidelines on the conduct of tax litigation
  • give a single ATO area responsibility and authority for litigation management
  • introduce risk management techniques in litigation management
  • communicate the application of court and tribunal decisions to the public.

More recently, the Inspector General stated in his Annual Report 2006 that '[r]elationships with the tax office during the year have been considerably strained in respect of some reviews'.

The ATO has already responded to the Inspector General's Report—for example, the ATO has recently started to publish 'Decision Impact Statements' providing the ATO's view of recent court decisions.

The increased scrutiny placed on the ATO's conduct of litigation, and its response, may have important implications for the ATO's future management of disputes. Any taxpayer involved in tax disputes would be well advised to carefully monitor these developments as they may be important to their overall strategic approach.

Promoter Penalty Legislation

On 6 April 2006, the Tax Laws Amendment (2006 Measures No 1) 2006 Act (Act) became operative. The Act contains a regime dealing with conduct resulting in an entity being a 'promoter' of a 'tax exploitation scheme'.

Under the regime, the ATO will be able to take action against a person whose conduct results in that, or another, person being a 'promoter' of a 'tax exploitation scheme'.

In general terms:

  • a person is a promoter of a 'tax exploitation scheme if they have 'a substantial role' in marketing or encouraging the growth of a scheme, and the person receives consideration in respect of that marketing or encouragement, and
  • a scheme is a 'tax exploitation scheme' if it is reasonable to conclude that a person who entered into (or would enter into) the scheme did so with the dominant purpose of securing a tax benefit. However, the scheme will not be a 'tax exploitation scheme' if it is reasonably arguable that the tax benefit is available.

The ATO will be able to take action by seeking a written undertaking from the person, or by applying to the Federal Court to impose civil penalties or grant an injunction.

It is too early to gauge the precise impact of this legislation. In his speech at the commencement of the legislation, the commissioner stated that the legislation is aimed at 'key promoters who make large profits from abusive tax schemes', and that the legislation is designed to 'apply to arrangements that are clearly beyond the pale'. However, the drafting of the legislation gives it a much wider potential effect.

It remains to be seen whether the ATO will, in practice, use the legislation beyond the areas indicated by the commissioner. Only time will tell—for the present, the ATO has observed (including in its Compliance Program) that this new legislation is one of its key focus areas for this financial year.

Part IVA

Part IVA continues to be a difficult area to apply and advise on. The ATO had a major win in Commissioner of Taxation v Hart (Hart)in May 2004, when five judges of the High Court overturned the decision of three judges of the Full Federal Court and found that Part IVA applied to the particular transaction at hand.

The implications of Hart's case are starting to flow through the courts. The most important case to have considered Hart is the decision of Justice Hill at first instance and the Full Federal Court in Macquarie Finance Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2005] FCAFC 205. Although that case was decided on another issue, each of the judges specifically opined on the operation of Part IVA. Faced with the same facts and statutory test, two judges held Part IVA applied and two judges held that it did not.

Both Justice Hill at first instance and Justice Gyles on appeal considered that because MFL's participation in the transaction was not critical, the tax benefit was the dominant purpose for structuring the scheme in the manner and form it took. Conversely, Justice Hely (with whom Justice French agreed), considered this same factor indicated that the tax purpose was not dominant.

Justice Hely considered that MFL's business aim of on-lending to another entity in the MBL group (with interest) was a relevant consideration when assessing whether the scheme was entered into to obtain a tax benefit. Conversely, Justice Gyles placed little if any emphasis on this.

Justice Hill concluded that the scheme only took the shape and form it did to meet the dual objectives of a share capital raising (commercial purpose) and an interest deduction (tax purpose), but that the tax purpose was predominant. Justice Hely disagreed. His Honour found that the dominant purpose was to secure all of the commercial advantages associated with debt financing (including the tax deduction).

As this and other cases demonstrate, judges at all levels are apt to reach different conclusions about whether there has been tax avoidance, even though dealing with the same facts and same statutory test. A sophisticated understanding of the legal principles and the approaches taken by different judges, together with an intimate understanding of the factual issues surrounding the particular transaction, are imperative if the taxpayer is to have the best chance of success in response to allegations of tax avoidance.

A number of disputes concerning Part IVA are currently being fought out in the courts. Whether the decisions in these cases lead to any greater practical understanding of Part IVA remains to be seen.

Privilege and Access to Documents

A number of cases have been decided both in the tax field and elsewhere that have the potential to impact on claims for privilege and access to documents in a tax litigation context.

In Rio Tinto v Commissioner of Taxation [2006] FCAFC 86 the Full Federal Court held that the commissioner had impliedly waived legal professional privilege over specified documents because his conduct was inconsistent with the continued maintenance of the confidentiality. The commissioner's waiver arose when he stated that 'the matters, things, circumstances and events taken into consideration' in reaching the required state of satisfaction were 'evidenced by' specified documents (including documents that would otherwise have been privileged). The court considered that the commissioner had opened these communications up to scrutiny and acted in a way inconsistent with the maintenance of privilege.

The decision is significant as it potentially opens up to scrutiny documents that the commissioner may previously have held back. Importantly, the court also considered that the issue was not whether the commissioner put his state of mind in issue but whether he put the content of otherwise privileged communications in issue.

In Ingot Capital Investments Pty Ltd v Macquarie Equity Capital Markets Ltd [2006] NSWSC 530, a case dealing with commercial issues, Justice Bergin considered that an AAT proceeding was a 'non adversarial proceeding' and consequently, communications prepared for the purpose of providing professional legal services in relation to proceedings in the AAT were not privileged under the 'litigation privilege' limb of legal professional privilege.

This decision is significant as it restricts the availability of litigation privilege in AAT proceedings and, together with other cases, seriously calls into question the availability of litigation privilege in proceedings before other administrative decision makers, including those involving the Commissioner of Taxation.

While 'advice privilege' will generally be available unless expressly excluded by statute, preparation for any AAT hearing (and arguably in relation to other administrative decision makers) should undoubtedly be approached on the basis that litigation privilege will not be available.

Whether the Ingot decision may lead to taxpayers electing to have their disputes decided by the courts rather than the AAT remains to be seen. In Richardson v Commissioner of Taxation [2006] FCA 1306, the court confirmed that the Statement of Facts, Issues and Contentions (now called 'Appeal Statement') filed by the commissioner was in the nature of a pleading as it defined the controversy the court is asked to decide. As such, members of the public (in this case, the press) were permitted access to the court file to inspect the document. The importance of the case for high profile litigants in particular is clear: it may potentially impact on their willingness to litigate in the courts. One option may be to litigate in the AAT—a hearing of the proceeding before the AAT must be private if the taxpayer so requests. For the future, taxpayers may need to balance the competing interests of privilege and privacy in deciding where to litigate tax matters.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.