Australia: Corporations And Markets Advisory Committee Report On Corporate Social Responsibility

Last Updated: 11 January 2007
Article by Alastair Macphee

What are the implications for directors’ duties?

The Australian Government’s Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee (CAMAC) published its report on ‘The Social Responsibility of Corporations’ on 12 December 2006.

In conjunction with the recent report ‘Corporate responsibility: Managing risk and creating value’ published by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services (PJC) in June 2006, CAMAC’s report provides useful guidance in assessing the likely regulatory and policy measures that may be implemented by the Australian Government in response to the growing focus on ‘corporate social responsibility’ (CSR) within the business community and the public at large.

The growing interest in CSR stems from widely-held concerns regarding sustainability in the era of globalisation, as well as the increased focus on corporate governance generally, itself prompted by a series of high-profile corporate collapses and scandals in Australia and elsewhere.

While acknowledging that issues of social responsibility fall within the broader debate concerning corporate governance, which has itself prompted a number of recent reform proposals, CAMAC did not propose significant changes to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) in response to CSR considerations. In particular, CAMAC concluded that the existing legislative framework of directors’ duties (being the duties imposed on directors and in some cases other officers under Part 2D.2 of the Act) is satisfactory, as it permits directors to take the interests of non-shareholder stakeholders and the broader community into account in corporate decision-making, to the degree appropriate. This accords with the PJC’s view.

CAMAC considered that corporate decision-makers should have an interest in managing external impacts of the company’s business in relation to social and environmental matters that may impinge on its success. However, CAMAC rejected the view that a company should be required to have regard to a range of social and environmental considerations irrespective of the relevance of those matters to the company’s business and its impacts, on the basis that this would be a distraction from its business activities for no real gain. In advancing what it termed the ‘business approach’ to CSR, CAMAC argued that:

[A] company will be seen to be socially responsible if it operates in an open and accountable manner, uses its resources for productive ends, complies with relevant regulatory requirements and acknowledges and takes responsibility for the consequences of its actions. For some companies, this will require them to engage with particular social and environmental issues. [at page iv]

CAMAC’s ‘business approach’ to CSR and its ‘light touch’ view of government’s role in regulating corporate decision-making, activity and disclosure, and facilitating CSR by Australian companies, may disappoint not-for-profits and other stakeholder groups. CAMAC’s position can also be seen as a rejection of calls for widespread reform, viewing them as a disproportionate, ‘knee-jerk’ response to recent scandals, including the James Hardie scandal.

CAMAC’s position may also disappoint corporate officers who are seeking greater clarification about the interests they can and cannot take into account in corporate decision-making, how those interests should be balanced or prioritised and the relative weight that should be given to short-term and longerterm considerations.

Although it currently appears unlikely that the Australian Government will implement significant reforms to the Act in response to the CSR debate, these two inquiries have nonetheless legitimised claims that ‘CSR’ is a multi-faceted but meaningful concept, and that companies are likely to benefit if they integrate CSR into their core business and strategy, and are likely to suffer if they do not. In response, directors should carefully review their company’s operations and existing CSR activities, identify key non-shareholder stakeholders and the existing methods of liaising with them, identify the forms of nonfinancial reporting that the company currently engages in and consider the other opportunities that the growing focus on CSR may offer.

Background to the report

CAMAC’s report was prepared in response to terms of reference dated March 2005 requesting that CAMAC consider and provide advice regarding the issue of CSR and directors’ duties. The terms of reference identified the following matters:

  1. Should the Act be revised to clarify the extent to which directors may take into account the interests of specific classes of stakeholders or the broader community when making corporate decisions?
  2. Should the Act be revised to require directors to take into account the interests of specific classes of stakeholders or the broader community when making corporate decisions?
  3. Should Australian companies be encouraged to adopt socially and environmentally responsible business practices and if so, how?
  4. Should the Act require certain types of companies to report on the social and environmental impact of their activities?

This update predominantly focuses on the first two matters considered by CAMAC.

CAMAC released its ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Discussion Paper’ in November 2005 and received 61 submissions from a broad range of respondents, including large listed companies, academics and researchers, professional advisors, professional bodies and not-for-profit entities. The CAMAC inquiry was held concurrently with the inquiry into ‘Corporate responsibility and Triple-Bottom-Line reporting’ held by the PJC under terms of reference dated 23 June 2005.

Should the existing legislative framework of directors’ duties be clarified or changed?

CAMAC concluded that the established formulation of directors’ duties in Australia is sufficiently clear and permits directors to take the interests of non-shareholder stakeholders and the broader community into account, to the degree appropriate. In particular, CAMAC noted that:

Careful consideration needs to be given to whether any proposals for further change will strengthen, rather than impair, the accountability of corporations and those who conduct their affairs. [at page 15]

CAMAC rejected the proposal that the Act be amended to require directors to take such interests into account in corporate decision-making, on the basis that it would not assist directors in understanding their responsibilities or making corporate decisions, but may instead undermine effective corporate governance by making directors less accountable to shareholders. In CAMAC’s view, accountability to shareholders remains the touchstone of directors’ duties, but does not preclude the directors’ having regard to other interests, values or goals, to the degree relevant to the company’s business and interests.

Finally, CAMAC also observed that where the market is not regarded as adequately responding to the social and environmental impacts of business activity, specific legislation will be a far more effective response than amendments to the Act with respect to the duties of directors and other corporate officers. In addition, the mischief in question may not result solely from corporate conduct.

Rejection of UK Companies Act 2006 approach to CSR and directors’ duties

CAMAC’s view is a clear rejection of the ‘elaborated shareholder benefit approach’, as exemplified in section 172 of the new UK Companies Act 2006. This provision imposes a duty on a director to act in the way that he or she considers, ‘in good faith’, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole. In doing so, a director must have regard ‘amongst other matters’ to 6 specified factors.

Many critics have argued that it would be disastrous for corporate decision-makers, in particular directors, if the UK model was adopted in Australia in response to the CSR debate. Among other concerns, it is claimed that this model would impede efficient and effective corporate decision-making, create significant uncertainty for directors, impact negatively on existing corporate governance standards and increase the risk of claims by the specified non-shareholder stakeholders.

The PJC did not support the adoption of the UK approach, and subsequent comments by the Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer appear to suggest that the Australian Government shares this view. In similarly rejecting the appropriateness of the UK model for Australian company law, CAMAC noted that:

[CAMAC] is not persuaded that the elaboration of interests that, where relevant, can already be taken into account would improve the quality of corporate decision-making in any practical way. A nonexhaustive catalogue of interests to be taken into account serves little useful purpose for directors and affords them no guidance on how various interests are to be weighed, prioritised or reconciled. [at page 111]

Should Australian companies be encouraged to adopt socially and environmentally responsible business practices, and if so, how?

CAMAC considered that government’s principal role lies in providing the public policy settings within which companies operate, including legislation imposing boundaries on corporate behaviour, with regulatory agencies also playing a key role in compliance and enforcement.

CAMAC also outlined a number of ‘light touch’ means by which the Australian Government could promote appropriate engagement by companies with the broader social and environmental context in which they operate. This includes setting an example for the private sector through the governance and disclosure standards that it imposes on the public sector. It is noteworthy that the PJC made similar recommendations regarding voluntary sustainability reporting and green procurement policies for governmental agencies.

Should certain types of companies be required to report on the social and environmental impact of their activities?

CAMAC noted that ‘transparency is a cornerstone of responsibility in the operation of corporate businesses’, and that the form and nature of corporate reporting continues to evolve, with many corporations adopting voluntary disclosure guidelines in one form or another.

CAMAC recommended that the reporting obligations in section 299A of the Act, which requires the disclosure of relevant non-financial information by listed companies, be extended to all listed entities. However, CAMAC rejected the proposal that the Act be further amended at this stage to mandate reporting by companies (or certain classes of companies) on the social and environmental impacts of their activities. CAMAC also recommended against extending the existing statutory regimes that impose liability on companies and corporate officers for providing false, misleading or deceptive statements to specifically address the disclosure of non-financial information by companies.

In the case of listed entities, CAMAC also noted the ASX’s ability to respond to changes in the market’s information requirements in a more flexible manner than legislation through its Listing Rules, Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendations (ASX Principles) and disclosure guidelines. It is noteworthy that the ASX Corporate Governance Council is currently seeking submissions regarding the potential for ‘sustainability/corporate responsibility’ disclosure by listed entities (whether voluntary disclosure or as part of the ‘if not, why not’ regime). The Council’s decision is expected in 2007, and it will be interesting to see whether the Council ultimately proposes a disclosure regime that is more extensive than those endorsed by CAMAC and the PJC.

Other comments of interest

While acknowledging that the activities of large private corporations are highly visible, CAMAC observed that issues of social responsibility are not confined to business corporations, but may also arise for other entities - including public sector bodies and not-for-profit organisations - to the degree that their activities have social and/or environmental impacts.

In canvassing the various means of responding to concerns regarding the social and environmental impact of corporate activity, CAMAC noted that a company’s members could vote to include a ‘social responsibility’ charter or similar set of guidelines in their company’s constitution if they so desired. Rather than unduly restricting corporate decision-making, such an approach could potentially give directors greater comfort in taking the relevant non-shareholder stakeholders’ interests into account going forward.

What should directors do now?

Like the PJC, CAMAC considered that the integration of CSR in core business and strategy, over and above mere technical compliance with legislation regarding social or environmental matters, is likely to benefit companies:

[A] well managed company will generally see it as being in its own commercial interests, in terms of enhancing corporate value or opportunity, or managing risks to its business, to assess and, where appropriate, respond to the impact of its activities on the environmental and social context in which it operates. Companies that fail to do so appropriately may jeopardise their commercial future. [at page 78]

In this regard, CAMAC commended the approach set out in the ASX Principles whereby social and environmental matters may be treated as ‘material business risks’.

Prior to the Australian Government formally responding to both reports, directors should consider the following:

  • Who are the key non-shareholder stakeholders of my company? What level of dialogue currently exists between my company and these stakeholders? What form does it take?
  • To what extent does my company engage in acts of ‘corporate responsibility’ above and beyond strict legal compliance? Who or what determines the nature of these activities, and their scope? Is there a unitary ‘CSR’ and sustainability strategy which is understood and supported by the board, management, staff and non-shareholder stakeholders? Are any systems in place to monitor the impact of these activities on the company’s performance (in dollar terms or otherwise)?
  • To what extent does my company currently report on the sustainability of its operations and its key sustainability risks? What framework or guidelines are used? Does the reporting extend to the activities of entities which are owned or controlled by my company? Is there any independent assessment of such reports? If my company does not currently engage in such reporting, what strategies are in place to implement an appropriate reporting framework if required in response to regulatory change or market expectations?
  • What opportunities does the growing interest in CSR offer my company? How could these opportunities be best identified and captured?

Prudent companies will have systems in place to monitor and promote legal compliance. But companies that show leadership by looking beyond strict legal compliance to focus on issues such as internal and supply chain environmental and social sustainability, zero waste, water and energy efficiency, climate change and social justice and equity issues may stand to benefit over the medium to long term, if not also the short term. For example, a greater focus on CSR and stakeholder engagement generally may provide competitive advantage, and may also assist in minimising or even avoiding future problems in this area (eg activism by shareholders and other stakeholders).

Companies and government agencies that wish to develop or refine a CSR or sustainability strategy should begin by engaging with internal and external stakeholders to identify areas for improvement. DLA Phillips Fox has assisted numerous clients with this process. We are trained in stakeholder engagement by AccountAbility in London. AccountAbility has developed internationally accepted Stakeholder Engagement Guidelines and a practical manual which we can guide you through to develop in-house and specific stakeholder engagement policies and solutions.

Phillips Fox has changed its name to DLA Phillips Fox because the firm entered into an exclusive alliance with DLA Piper, one of the largest legal services organisations in the world. We will retain our offices in every major commercial centre in Australia and New Zealand, with no operational change to your relationship with the firm. DLA Phillips Fox can now take your business one step further − by connecting you to a global network of legal experience, talent and knowledge.

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances and no liability will be accepted for any losses incurred by those relying solely on this publication.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.