Australia: ACCC and competition between ports

The ACCC has clearly signalled its preference that State Governments protect opportunities for competition between spatially proximate port facilities in the context of privatisation.  This article explores some of the difficulties experienced with this model.

What is the ACCC's position?

The ACCC has, most recently, reiterated its warning to State Governments in its 2015 annual Container Stevedoring Monitoring Report1 that Governments should act diligently to protect  opportunities for future competition between port facilities – "for example, by separating (rather than integrating) potentially competitive facilities and avoiding clauses that impede the development of competition".2

The ACCC foreshadows the potential privatisation of the Port of Fremantle, and suggests that the WA Government may wish to consider whether this presents an opportunity to facilitate future competition between the existing container facilities in the inner harbour and possible new facilities in the outer harbour.

The ACCC has been critical of arrangements entered into by the NSW State Government in connection with the privatisation of Port Botany that sought to protect against "substitution risk" (the risk that a competing port facility might be developed as a substitute (i.e. competitor) by "bundling" Port Botany with Port Kembla, as well as providing certain confidential covenants in relation to the potential development of the Port of Newcastle as a competing container terminal.

Facility Optimisation

The ACCC's concerns are well founded to the extent that the adverse consequences of entrenched market structures mean that there may in time be insufficient capacity to service a particular transport and logistics market.

However, the simple notion that spatially proximate port facilities should be left to compete vigorously and freely for port traffic warrants interrogation.   The factual setting must be carefully considered, and certain international experiences support an alternative argument.

Competitor ports?

The factual setting requires an analysis of the inherent characteristics of each facility, and the extent to which they are, in fact, 'equal competitors', or whether in fact they should continue, over time, to remain competing ports.

It is not unusual to find the primary port servicing a city situated in a sub-optimal location. Often this is because of historical reasons – the city simply grew around the port.  The development of the larger ships will also often mean that channel or berth depth of an older port will not meet future demands.  Not all countries can do what Singapore is doing – moving one of the busiest ports in the world to a new location on another part of the island.

In the context of the Port of Fremantle, the inner and outer harbours have very different physical settings (constraints and opportunities for expansion) – including in relation to current and potential landside and harbour-side access, environmental sensitivities, and proximity to residential communities.  It would be imprudent to rule out the notion that they should not compete, but instead, be integrated – over time - to take into account the different physical constraints and opportunities attaching to each site.  This approach is, for example, consistent with the City of Kwinana's "Indian Ocean Gateway" concept to develop the outer harbour which it recommends be part of the divestment terms for the inner harbour.

Competition and inefficient investment

Potentially competing port facilities (i.e. competing for the same trades, in particular, container traffic) could therefore be operated as complementary facilities under a 'facility optimisation model'.

In the context of the potential privatisation of the Port of Fremantle (and the need for a second container facility which can only practically be located in Cockburn Sound in the outer harbour), a further rationale for the optimisation model is that  co-ordinated investment across both port facilities is more likely to produce an efficient allocation of resources to increase the collective capacity of both the inner harbour and the outer harbour.  Put differently, strategic collaboration between an inner harbour facility and outer harbour facility stands a better chance of avoiding unnecessary duplication of infrastructure investment – which is ultimately paid for by consumers.

The Puget Sound example

Recognition of the merits of an optimisation model between spatially proximate ports can be seen internationally in the recent example of Puget Sound.

At Puget Sound, the Port of Seattle and the Port of Tacoma, which sit approximately 30 miles apart (not significantly different from either the potential two port scenarios in Melbourne and Fremantle), have competed for container traffic for a number of years.  Each port authority (i.e. owner) has allowed and encouraged significant expansion of their respective ports in order to compete with the other. 

This has led to significant overcapacity and an overlap in the supply of port services for both ports.  Additionally, while a highly competitive approach has allowed the ports to "steal" each other's customers from time to time, this strategy has seldom generated larger volumes of container traffic from outside the region.3

pugent sound

Moreover, recent market conditions are not helpful.

  • There has been increased regional competition from Canada (at Vancouver and Prince Rupert, B.C.), as well as the West Coast (particularly in Southern California).4 This regional competition has been taking away market share from Seattle and Tacoma.
  • Shipping lines have been consolidating their operations and sharing cargo to eliminate duplication of efforts.  These consolidations have resulted in shipping lines calling on fewer ports, while also allowing them to play off one port against another.5
  • There is an increased demand for much larger 'mega-ships' to be serviced.  These larger ships require significant landside investment.

The pitfalls of an approach focused solely on intra-regional competition, rather than collaboration, seem apparent.  A report commissioned by the Port of Seattle in August 2013 noted that the problem of increased competition for the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma has been exacerbated by a lack of communication and coordination, and the existence of periodic intraregional competition.6 In this respect, while Puget Sound is the USA's third-largest container gateway, the current combined marine terminal utilisation of these ports is less than 50%, with Seattle at just 38%.7 Additionally, while trans-Pacific cargo business grew in 2013 by 2-3%, the combined market share of Seattle and Tacoma fell by 4-5%.8

Against this background, the two ports in 2013 applied for and received antitrust approval from the Federal Maritime Commission to engage in information exchanges aimed at boosting container traffic in the Puget Sound region.  This information sharing revolves around key topics including "container facility planning, development; management, operational costs at container facilities; federal, state, local government co-operation, funding for transport infrastructure; container business rates of return on port-owned terminals, such as rates, tariffs, leases; port facility utilisation; and expenditure of funds for the ports' container business."9 Additionally, although at the time the ports noted that considerations around a future potential merger would not be included in (then) current discussions, they indicated that consolidation of the ports was a matter that should be considered.10 In August 2015, however, the two ports formed the Northwest Seaport Alliance – a marine cargo operating partnership for the joint operation of the two ports, formalising the view that a collaborative approach is needed in order to:

  • rationalise existing investments and streamlining facilities;
  • optimise planning to cater for larger ships that shipping alliances intend to utilise; and
  • counter regional competition from Southern California and from Canada in an effective and co-ordinated fashion. 

The Puget Sound example arguably illustrates the importance of optimisation, and how intra-regional competition and a lack of coordination regarding investment can lead to significant overcapacity and an unsustainable competitive spiral, within which port authorities (or owners) compete for each other's customers, but fail to increase market share.  There may be many reasons why this illustration does not directly relate, in all material respects, to the situation facing Melbourne or Fremantle – in particular that Western Australia (or Victorian) cargo exports are not contestable in the same manner as in Tacoma and Seattle - but we would suggest that the pivotal lesson to be taken is that an optimisation approach and the potential benefits flowing from it should be carefully considered at the outset of a planning process for divestment, and certainly interrogated to the same degree as the proposition that consumers will benefit from vigorous competition between such proximate ports.  (More generally, there has been a move towards the establishment of regional port authorities in other states, particularly Western Australia.11)

Implementing the model

Broadly, there would seem to be two ways to implement the optimisation model:

  • Under a unified ownership structure, in which the parties that control both ports are essentially the same; or
  • Separate ownership structures, but with extensive regulatory or other intervention to ensure that the two ports are individually and collectively economically efficient (much like the Puget Sound example).

A separate ownership structure model would require, in our view, a significant and perhaps practically unworkable level of long term regulatory and policy intervention in order to avoid an inefficient allocation of State resources, substantially different to typical infrastructure regulation.  For example, to avoid the State of Western Australia facing competing demands in due course by separate facility owners and their stakeholders to develop access to both the outer harbour (which is in the contemplation of the Perth Freight Link proposals) and to overcome the last mile-bottlenecks at the inner harbour to allow that facility to be maximised it would seem that we would now need long term planning and development ground-rules which seek to moderate expectations within an enforceable legal framework.

We also wonder whether the stevedoring market in Australia is sufficiently deep to support the competition argument – that is, is the likely scenario for competing spatially proximate ports that ostensibly the same stevedores will operate at both facilities, nullifying (for container traffic at least) the potential benefits of competition?  It is inconceivable to think that current stevedores will not appear in a material way at a new 'second' port in Melbourne or Fremantle when developed.

None of this should be taken to suggest, however, that a unified ownership structure (which, all things being equal, will entrench a natural monopoly) will not require regulatory intervention.  But the intervention necessary – access and pricing oversight, monitoring or setting (whatever is necessary) – is the core business of infrastructure regulation and relevant regulators.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Most awarded firm and Australian deal of the year
Australasian Legal Business Awards
Employer of Choice for Women
Equal Opportunity for Women
in the Workplace (EOWA)

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.