Australia: Australian Regulatory Update - A Review Of Regulatory Developments In Australia’s Gaming And Wagering Industries In 2005 And Issues For 2006.

Last Updated: 29 October 2006
Article by Anthony Seyfort




As forecast last year, 2005 has not been a year of widespread momentus regulatory reform, but rather dominated by a few key issues – betting exchanges, racing product dissemination and the eventual release of proposals for new anti-money laundering legislation. Around these issues and a number of policy reviews and debates, however, circumstances are developing which provide the potential for fundamental change to the competitive landscape for gambling in Australia over the remainder of the decade.

Sharing The Racing And Sport "Product"

The licensing of the Betfair betting exchange by the Tasmanian Government has raised the stakes in the nationwide campaign by racing and sporting bodies, supported to some extent by some governments, to gain a share of betting turnover, revenue or profit, based on their product. Ingredients in the turmoil include initiatives by some state governments to hinder wagering operators’ access to race field data, "sponsorship" and "licence fee" deals between the Australian Football League and each of Tabcorp and Betfair, and the formation of the Coalition of Major Professional Sports (COMPS) to seek government assistance in major sports’ quest to gain a revenue stream from sportsbetting.

While it is relatively easy to conceive a range of economically justifiable outcomes, the possible paths to a rationale outcome are each quite difficult. Pressure will increase, not ease, in coming years with various government policy making processes underway, meaning that one way or another these issues will dominate the regulatory agenda for some time.

Shift Of Regulatory Focus From Consumers To Producers

While smaller initiatives have continued from state to state in the field of "harm minimisation", there is diminishing substantive impact in the debate and efforts concerned with problem gambling.

Much of the focus of gambling "law reform" in 2005 was on business efficiency (and ease of supervision). Some states have also made significant regulatory decisions supporting providers (for example about increased gaming machine numbers) which would not have been anticipated in recent years.

Moreover, the agenda for regulatory review or change is increasingly moving to the competitive position of providers and the interface between previously parallel gambling products. Policy makers, most notably in Victoria in 2006, will be increasingly concerned with how many providers can provide products and within what ambit.

Recent industry consolidation, and the scope for yet more rationalisation, will see most issues being national issues or having national repercussions.

Waning Influences

As anticipated, influences of recent years which have caused a fast pace of regulatory change have not featured significantly in 2005: NCP, new technology, industry rationalisation and political pressures about problem gambling. Legislation and regulation has been considerably modernised throughout Australia, leaving the likely biggest influence on regulatory change to be major policy decisions (of the sort noted above).


The trend in gambling taxation is still upward, although initiatives in 2005 only slightly increased the overall tax burden (and some minor simplification occurred in some limited circumstances).

Investor Issues

There were no major issues for investor protection or disclosure in 2005, after 2004’s spate of sector consolidation.



After very little regulatory change in 2004, the casino sector saw more action in 2005.

NSW gave Star City statutory power to eject smokers, and introduced an array of harm-minimisation initiatives (also applying to EGMs elsewhere in the state) such as new offences relating to inducements, failing to arrange the availability of problem gambling counselling services and failing to display certain notices.

Victoria approved a raft of regulatory changes including easing Crown’s "single purpose" company restriction and other historical company-specific regulations which owed their existence more to Crown’s developmental phase than its current status as a mature business. Reviews of the suitability of a casino licensee will no longer be "triennial reviews", but occur five-yearly with slight changes in approach. The police’s power to give exclusion orders has been extended to the whole casino complex, not just the actual casino.

The ACT has introduced proposed legislation into its Parliament (passed February 2006) to re-write the Territory’s Casino Control Act following a review the existing legislation by the ACT Gambling and Racing Commission. Apart from a few minor harm minimisation initiatives, the new Bill is generally aimed at increasing the efficiency of casino operations and regulatory supervision.

Gaming Machines

In a first in Australia for many years, Queensland has increased the statewide cap on machine numbers from 18,843 to 20,000 (from 1 July 2006) citing population growth and consumer demand, but made the decision in a state budgetary context along with a decision to increase the levy payable on machines.

Despite initiatives in recent years to reduce the presence and availability of EGMs, SA has allowed the establishment of 5 "super pokie venues" for sporting clubs each with 40 machines, an increase on the existing venue limit of 33 machines.

Victoria, by contract, has begun the process to introduce new regional caps on machine numbers.

The ACT has made some changes to simplify the calculation and administration of its tax on gaming machines. Small change to tax rates have also been made with a small lift in machines’ tax free threshold, but also small increases in the top two marginal tax rates to apply from 1 July 2007. Victoria almost doubled a "health" levy on each EGM in the state (including the casino) from $1,533 to $3,033 per annum, with effect from 1 July.

2005 was yet another year of tinkering with the detail of gaming machine legislation or regulations in most jurisdictions, although no changes were momentus. In each of SA, NSW (see 2.1) and Queensland regulation has become more prescriptive, but Queensland’s changes also included some minor steps aimed at business efficiency. ACT has corrected some unintended changes in the law made by its 2004 re-write of its gaming machine legislation.

Victoria’s review of the post-2012 licensing and regulatory arrangements for EGMs (notably the continuation or otherwise of the operator duopoly) did not commence as previously promised, but will kick-off in early 2006 (pushing a conclusion until after the state’s November 2006 election).

SA’s Independent Gambling Authority released its report supporting the introduction of smartcards for EGM play (no action taken). In December the Authority completed its report reviewing the progress toward implementation of the state-wide reduction of machine numbers and its machine entitlement trading system (to be published early 2006).

Version 8.0 of the Australian and New Zealand Gaming Machine National Standard is now generally in force in Australia.

The National Ministerial Council on Gambling made little progress in 2005 on acceleration of research or agreed unanimous harm minimisation initiatives (for example failing to agree to a national approach on regulation of ATM withdrawals).

Racing And Wagering

2005’s biggest development was Tasmania’s enactment of a licensing and regulatory regime for online betting exchanges and the licensing (in January 2006) of the Australian arm of Betfair. The continuing campaign against betting exchanges in the mainland jurisdictions has seen yet more tinkering with legislation about race-field information and administrative action to frustrate unlicensed wagering businesses. An as-yet unexplained curiosity was Victoria’s passage of amending legislation through both houses of Parliament but the deferring of presenting it to the Governor for Royal Assent.

The ongoing legal and commercial battle between Tabcorp’s Sky Channel and ThoroughVision for distribution of race broadcasts has increased anxiety in the racing industry, among venues and with consumers and has had a negative impact on wagering turnover.

The NSW Government rejected Tabcorp’s proposal to merge its NSW (TAB Limited) and Victorian (Supertab) totalizator pools.

Queensland has made yet more changes to the governance and funding arrangements for regional and country racing, and made minor amendments to wagering regulation.

Tasmania has made some "consumer protection" changes to bookmaking rules and has allowed changes, including some ongoing increases, in TOTE Tasmania’s commission. Tasmanian racing and TOTE Tasmania have each also benefited from assistance and concessions from mainland racing and totalizator operators (given in the lead-up to Tasmanian’s decision on betting exchanges).

In Victoria, Racing Victoria Limited issued a number of new sportsbookmaking licences late in 2005 and the Government deferred to early 2006 the commencement of its policy review about post 2012 wagering licence arrangements (notably the monopoly totalizator licence held by Tabcorp) and possible reform of racing industry funding mechanisms. Victoria Police now have the power to ban alleged criminals from Victorian race tracks.

Public Lotteries

The Victorian Government concluded its review of the licensing and regulatory regime for public lotteries in Victoria, and invited applications for selection as a licensee for the 10 year period from 1 July 2007. The Government has left open the possibility of selecting up to 3 licensees, and otherwise made only minor changes to the legislation governing lotteries. A selection decision is not due until early to mid 2006.

NSW has yet to make any announcements about the post 1 July 2007 licensing arrangements for major lotteries, making a decision other than an extension of NSW Lotteries’ monopoly licence unlikely.

Each of Victoria, NSW and WA made minor amendments to its lotteries legislation or regulations, NSW changing the rules about unclaimed prizes. The SA Parliament is contemplating raising the minimum age for purchase of a lottery ticket from 16 to 18 however the necessary legislation has not been passed. No proposed legislation has yet been released or introduced to Parliament in the ACT to act upon the December 2004 recommendations from the Territory’s review of its lotteries legislation (on which consultation occurred in 2005).

Interactive Gambling

Tasmania has established a regulatory regime for online betting exchanges and has licensed Betfair. Steps have been taken in some jurisdictions to strengthen measures to make unapproved online wagering more difficult, for example by further restricting publication of race field information.

The new Australian Communications and Media Authority (which has replaced the ABA) has not announced any steps toward the overdue review of the Internet Industry Association’s Interactive Gambling Code of Practice which is registered under the Act. Neither the Authority nor the Australian Federal Police has taken any publicly discernible enforcement action for offences against the Act.

Minor Gaming

Very little change of substance occurred in 2005 in relation to minor gaming. Notably South Australia moved to restrict the playing of two-up on Anzac Day, but NSW expanded the number of "commemorative" days when it is lawfully available.

In broadranging proposed amending legislation to its omnibus Gambling Regulation Act 2003, Victoria has announced multiple administrative amendments to existing provisions, many of which are designed to strengthen regulation of trade promotion lotteries, bingo centres, commercial raffle organisers and community and charitable organisations. The Bill is expected to pass in early 2006.



The long running work of the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) and the Federal Attorney-General’s Department on an enhanced antimoney laundering regime finally culminated in the release of an exposure draft bill and extracts of draft rules in December 2005. The legislation involves a number of issues which the gambling industry will seek to address over 2006. Finalisation and enactment of the legislation, let alone commencement of the eventual regime, will take some time.


The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has given two "authorisations" under the Trade Practices Act to allow small market players to collectively negotiate with large providers of wagering and race broadcasting services:

  • Australian Hotels Association divisions and members to negotiate with Sky Channel, ThoroughVision and the various totalizator operators;
  • WA TAB agents to negotiate with Racing and Wagering WA.


No particularly notable Australian Taxation Office rulings or actions emerged in 2005. TAB Limited, however, was successful in obtaining Federal Court declarations approving the exclusion of totalizator refunds from GST calculations and recognising tote dividends at the time of declaration rather than payment (contrary to the ATO view).

Privacy Commissioner

No privacy codes applicable to gambling industries have been approved in 2005, with the Australian Casino Association’s draft code still awaiting approval. Gambling businesses have not featured specifically in the Commissioner’s educative, complaint handling or enforcement activities in 2005.


Gambling In The Courts

In Neurizon Pty Ltd v Jupiters Ltd [2005] FCA 1177 a patentor was successful in defending an action by Jupiters that claimed that the invention lacked the "inventive step" necessary to allow patenting. Jupiters claimed they had developed a system in relation to a method of awarding prizes in a gaming system that "anticipated" the invention made by Neurizon. The court held, however, that there was not sufficient evidence from Jupiters about the development of their invention and Neurizon therefore did not lack an "inventive step" to allow patenting.

Tabcorp’s Sky Channel successfully obtained an injunction in the NSW Supreme Court in August against ThoroughVision and pay TV carrier AUSTAR relating to AUSTAR’s proposed broadcast of the TVN service (in breach of contract with Sky Channel).

A problem gambling group based in NSW attempted to invoke the assistance of the courts in accessing information from a variety of gambling businesses, with little joy.

A number of other notorious but not legally significant matters involving gambling businesses or identities consumed some attention of the courts, ranging from the ongoing matter of International All Sports and the CBA to Len Ainsworth bringing defamation proceedings against a former NSW policeman relating to communications with the Nevada Gaming Commission and others in 1993.


The following regulatory developments can be expected in 2006:

  • The result of Victoria’s public lottery licensee(s) selection process, to apply from 2007.
  • A NSW policy decision on its public lottery licensing regime from 2007.
  • Progress with Victoria’s major policy review on the post–2012 arrangements for EGM, wagering and Club Keno licensing in the state and racing industry funding.
  • Development and probable enactment of the proposed new Anti-Money Laundering and Counter –Terrorism Financing ("AML/CTF") legislation.
  • A review of the ACT’s race and sports bookmaking legislation (discussion paper released January 2006).
  • A review of the IIA Interactive Gambling Code of Practice (now well overdue).
  • Further reviews of various gambling codes of practice and guidelines by SA’s Independent Gambling Authority.

2006 will see state elections in each of South Australia, Tasmania and Victoria (followed by others in 2007). To date it does not appear likely that gambling policy or concerns will feature prominently (as in some previous state elections), so these elections should not have significant implications for gambling regulation in Australia.


Anthony Seyfort heads the Lander & Rogers national gaming and wagering practice.

From 1993 to 1998 he was a foundation senior executive of Crown Limited, a period which included its establishment, float, opening of its temporary and permanent casinos and extensive dealings with Government, VCGA, AUSTRAC and other regulators.

Back in legal practice since 1998, Anthony has advised a state government, licensed owners and operators of all types of gambling products, offshore businesses, testers, software suppliers and a variety of related businesses.

Lander & Rogers also counts among its clients some leading racing and sports bodies, and related businesses.

Ian Fullagar was a director of the Australian Sports Commission 1997 to 2000 and is widely regarded as one of Australia’s leading sports lawyers.


As you would expect, this document is necessarily brief (and does not constitute legal advice) but further details can be provided regarding any issue.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.