ARTICLE
8 September 2015

Financial services providers beware: ASIC's regulatory priorities over the next four years

CC
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Contributor

With over 175 years of experience and a team of over 1000 talented professionals, we offer exceptional legal services for major transactions, projects, and disputes. Our client-focused approach and commitment to excellence ensure success for our clients. We connect with top lawyers globally for the best results.
ASIC's Corporate Plan was unveiled, with ASIC detailing its focus areas and market surveillance to ensure compliance.
Australia Finance and Banking

Investment banks, issuers, brokers, lenders, financial market participants, responsible entities, company directors, auditors and insolvency practitioners are all in ASIC's sights for increased regulatory scrutiny over the next four years. These focus areas were unveiled yesterday in ASIC's Corporate Plan, with ASIC also detailing the extensive market surveillance it will undertake to ensure compliance with the law.

ASIC's priorities for the next four years are comprehensive. In short, ASIC is furthering its consumer protection mandate by responding to poor gatekeeper culture and conduct through appropriate regulatory measures. Where ASIC's surveillance measures identify wrongdoing, ASIC will take enforcement action or accept enforceable undertakings. All entities are on notice of ASIC's surveillance areas and should review their compliance with the target areas ASIC has identified. If any deficiencies are discovered it is crucial that immediate action is taken to rectify those deficiencies. We have summarised ASIC's focus areas below.

Entity   

What is ASIC's focus?

Investment banks, issuers, brokers and other service providers

  • Reviewing market practices on confidential information and acting to improve standards and behaviour in handling confidential information.
  • Proactively investigating benchmark manipulation and the practices of investment banks.
  • Monitoring ways investment banks manage conduct risk and identifying potential gaps.
  • "Conduct risk" is the risk of inappropriate or unlawful behaviour by staff.
  • Examining M&A and fundraising activities which may be high conduct risk activities, in particular transactions involving backdoor listings, substantial overseas assets or high levels of intangible assets.
  • Investigating breach reports and reports of misconduct.
  • Targeting market operators and participants to identify weak compliance systems.

Lenders and finance brokers

  • Monitoring lenders' compliance (including finance brokers and margin lenders) with responsible lending and general conduct obligations.  A particular focus will be interest only loans.
  • Assessing and reducing the sale of inappropriate lending products, including compliance with recently introduced interest rate caps and consumer leases.

Responsible entities

  • Considering the adequacy of policies dealing with incentives, conflicts of interest, whistleblowing, complaints handling, remediation, recruitment and training.
  • Reviewing risk management arrangements in the managed funds sector, including conflict management, liquidity and leverage.
  • Reviewing risk-profiled responsible entities with a focus on opaque and complex structures, liquidity, mandate compliance and custody arrangements.
  • Identifying inappropriate conduct by assessing breach reports and reports of misconduct and incorporating culture and incentives more explicitly into risk-based surveillance reviews.
  • Assessing limitations on financial services licensing for responsible managers and responsible officers, especially in the context of the 'licensees-for-hire' business model.
  • Monitoring innovations and new financial products and services.

Directors, auditors and insolvency practitioners

  • Reviewing corporate transaction and fundraising documents lodged with ASIC to improve the quality of information provided to investors and the market.
  • Reviewing the adequacy of financial reports of listed and other public interest entities.
  • Examining audit firm business models to ensure appropriate experience and expertise is applied to increasingly complex clients and businesses, financial reporting judgments and audit approaches.
  • Investigating high-risk insolvency practitioners (including pre-insolvency advisers), focussing on independence, competence, improper gain and remuneration.
  • Reviewing systemic non-compliance by insolvency practitioners with statutory lodgement obligations.

We will continue to monitor any regulatory developments and provide further updates throughout the year. If you have any concerns as to how your business may be impacted by these regulatory priorities for ASIC, please contact a member of our team.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Most awarded firm and Australian deal of the year
Australasian Legal Business Awards
Employer of Choice for Women
Equal Opportunity for Women
in the Workplace (EOWA)

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More