Australia: NT Supreme Court reinstates medical licence for Dr. Nitschke

Last Updated: 12 August 2015
Article by Briohny Coglin and Mark Doepel

Nitschke v Medical Board of Australia [2015] NTSC 39

On 6 July 2015, the Northern Territory Supreme Court reinstated Dr Philip Nitschke's registration to practise medicine. His registration was suspended in July 2014 by the Medical Board of Australia for failing to take steps to prevent the suicide of Nigel Brayley, a 45 year-old Perth man.

The decision was made on the basis of procedural fairness and the Court's interpretation of the Good Medical Practice: A Code of Conduct for Doctors in Australia.

The decision highlights that the Codes apply to health practitioners even outside of the practitioner/patient relationship, however the duty to protect and promote the health of individuals and the community found in the Code does not extend to all members of the public at all times.


Dr Nitschke is the founder of the pro-voluntary euthanasia organisation, Exit International. He is also a supporter of the controversial notion of "rational suicide", according to which healthy people should be able to decide to end their life without being questioned.

Between February 2014 and April 2014, Nigel Brayley purchased a handbook and a Nembutal (a lethal substance that can be self-administered) testing kit from Exit International. In April, he told Dr Nitschke that, despite not being terminally ill, he intended to take his own life within two weeks and that he would send Dr Nitschke a copy of his final statement. Dr Nitschke's response to that disclosure was to simply say: "Thank you very much for your information, and I will be interested in your final statement".

Mr Brayley died after consuming Nembutal on 2 May 2014.

Decision of the Medical Board of Australia

In July 2014, the ABC's 7:30 aired a story about Mr Brayley's death, in which Dr Nitschke was interviewed. Following the program, the Medical Board of Australia received six complaints about Dr Nitschke. Shortly thereafter, the Board met to decide whether or not to take immediate action under   s 156(1) of the National Law. Section 156 permits the Board to immediately suspend a medical practitioner's registration (and therefore the ability to practise his or her profession) if it "reasonably believes" that:

  • because of the registered health practitioner's conduct, performance or health, the practitioner poses a serious risk to persons, and
  • it is necessary to take immediate action to protect public health or safety.

On 23 July 2014, the Board told Dr Nitschke that it was taking immediate action under s 156 and that his registration was suspended. The  reasons given by the Board for forming a belief that it was necessary to take immediate action to suspend Dr Nitschke were that he had:

  • professional responsibilities as a registered medical practitioner, which he failed to appropriately discharge
  • formed a clinical judgment about Mr Brayley's capacity to decide to commit suicide
  • failed to respond in an appropriate manner to Mr Brayley's stated intent to take his own life within two weeks, knowing that Mr Brayley was 45 years old, not terminally ill and had described himself as suffering
  • failed to take steps to obtain much (if any) information from Mr Brayley, assess any medical condition, including depression, or provide treatment for that condition (if Dr Nitschke considered one existed) or refer Mr Brayley to assessment, specialist care or treatment, and
  • not exercised the care and skill expected of a registered heath practitioner under clause 1.4 of the Code, which provides that doctors have a responsibility to protect and promote the health of individuals and the community.

Appeal to the Health Professional Review Tribunal

Dr Nitschke appealed to the Health Professional Review Tribunal and sought to tender a folder containing various articles and correspondence, which he described as "a collection of professional journal articles [that] touch on the issue of rational suicide". The Tribunal refused to accept those materials as evidence on the basis that they were not relevant.

In addition to the reasons given to Dr Nitschke in their decision, the Board also submitted to the Tribunal that the following factors contributed to their reasonable belief that Dr Nitschke posed a serious risk and that immediate suspension was necessary to protect the public:

  • Dr Nitschke overly promotes and provides advice on methods of suicide, including advocating a person's right to choose suicide even if not terminally ill, through the Exit International website and videos published on that and other websites, an online forum on the website, the Peaceful Pill Handbook and Exit Workshops
  • Dr Nitschke makes that information and material available to anyone and advocates for the right of a person to choose suicide, which goes beyond the voluntary euthanasia debate
  • in the case of Mr Brayley, when considered against the backdrop of Dr Nitschke's general advocacy for access to methods of suicide, Dr Nitschke's strong personal view that people have the right to choose suicide has taken over from his responsibility as a doctor, and
  • in this context it is very likely that what occurred with Mr Brayley will occur again and therefore the Board reasonably believed Dr Nitschke posed a serious risk to the health and safety of the public.

These factors were accepted by the Tribunal as relevant. The Tribunal also considered the rights and wrongs of voluntary euthanasia, the ability to make rational decisions about ending one's life and the likelihood of such a person having depression.

The Tribunal treated Dr Nitschke's conduct as "supporting persons such as Mr Brayley (who are not terminally ill) to take their own lives" and therefore "inconsistent with the responsibility to protect and promote their health and promote their life". The Tribunal implied that Dr Nitschke should have enquired as to Mr Brayley's motives, assessed his suffering and the reasons for it, encouraged him to pursue alternatives and entered into some dialogue with a view to further referral or assessment.

Accordingly, the Tribunal upheld the Board's decision and held that Dr Nitschke posed a serious risk to other persons by providing "an alternate pathway to ending life" and that "people may elect to follow the pathway to suicide believing it to be a pathway sanctioned by a medical practitioner and perhaps the medical profession generally".

Appeal to the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

Dr Nitschke successfully appealed the Tribunal's decision on the following grounds:

  • the Tribunal misconstrued the Code in holding that it imposed an obligation on Dr Nitschke to promote or protect the health of Mr Brayley and to assess, treat or refer Mr Brayley in circumstances where he was not a patient of Dr Nitschke
  • in making its decision, the Tribunal denied Dr Nitschke procedural fairness by expanding the "conduct" based upon, which it was argued a reasonable belief had been formed that immediate action was required under s 156, without giving Dr Nitschke opportunity to respond in circumstances where the Board had deliberately confined its case, and
  • the Tribunal erred in the construction of the Code by holding that advocacy about suicide and providing information to persons who might chose to end their own life was in breach of the Code.

The Court also found that:

  • Dr Nitschke was not given adequate opportunity to respond to the broader range of conduct ultimately relied upon by the Tribunal (noting that when he did attempt to tender additional materials, his attempt was refused for the reason that they were not relevant to the issues raised by the Board)
  • the only issues that the Tribunal was required to determine were:
    1. did Dr Nitschke's conduct after he received Mr Brayley's emails in April 2014 breach the Code, particularly cl 1.4, and
    2. as a result of that conduct, whether the Tribunal reasonably believed that:
      1. Dr Nitschke posed a serious risk to persons, and
      2. it was necessary to take immediate action to protect public health or safety
  • the medical practitioner's "conduct" does not have to be connected with medical practice, but rather can occur in whichever capacity the medical practitioner is acting in at the time
  • notwithstanding the above, there was no basis for applying the same general standards to Dr Nitschke and Mr Brayley that apply in a doctor/patient relationship
  • clause 1.4 does not prescribe and identify any specific obligations, including the obligation to promote or protect the health of any person, irrespective of their relationship with the doctor
  • the "responsibility to protect and promote health of individuals and the community" in cl 1.4 of the Code does not impose an obligation, standard or duty—the breach of which would constitute professional misconduct or unprofessional conduct
  • the Tribunal's findings may well be inconsistent with other express provisions in the Code, including supporting the autonomy of a patient to make decisions to obtain or refuse treatment
  • where the allegation is one of a failure to act rather than an action, legal principles or expert evidence would ordinarily be required to establish the existence and content of the duty to act
  • in the absence of any legal principles or expert evidence supporting the allegation that Dr Nitschke had professional obligations to take the steps identified by the Board after receiving Mr Brayley's emails, it cannot be found that such obligations exist, and
  • because there was no evidence that the conduct alleged by the Board could be in breach of the Code or the National Law, the Tribunal could not have formed a reasonable belief that, because of his conduct, Dr Nitschke posed a serious risk to persons and it was necessary to take immediate action to protect public health or safety.

As a result of his successful appeal, the Board's decision was reversed and Dr Nitschke's registration was reinstated.

How this will affect health practitioners

The Supreme Court of the Northern Territory's decision in this matter was based on the facts and circumstances of the Nitschke case. It does not change the need for all practitioners registered to practise a health profession in Australia to abide by the Codes, and not just in the course of a practitioner/patient relationship.

What this matter does highlight is the need for practitioners to be given the opportunity to respond to a complaint, including the conduct and other facts and circumstances relied on by medical Boards and Tribunals, before a decision is made.

It also provides a legal precedent for the proposition that for the Board to take immediate action to suspend a practitioner under s 156, the practitioner's conduct must be capable of being found to be professional misconduct or unprofessional conduct and the Board's decision must be able to be supported by legal principle or expert evidence.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Briohny Coglin
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.