Australia: Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Update

Last Updated: 2 August 2006
Article by Alastair Macphee

Parliamentary Joint Committee report on corporate responsibility

What are the implications for directors’ duties?

The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services (Committee) published its report on Corporate Responsibility: Managing Risk and creating value in June 2006.

The report provides valuable guidance in assessing the likely regulatory and policy measures that may be implemented by the Australian Government in response to the growing focus on ‘corporate social responsibility’ (CSR) within the business community and the public at large. The growing interest in CSR stems both from widely-held concerns regarding sustainability in the era of globalisation, as well as the increased focus on corporate governance generally, itself prompted by a series of high-profile corporate collapses and scandals in Australia and elsewhere.

In particular, the Committee has concluded that the existing legislative framework of directors’ duties is satisfactory and that no amendments to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) are required. The Committee favoured what it terms the ‘enlightened self-interest’ interpretation of directors’ duties, namely that the existing legislative framework already permits directors to take into account the interests of non-shareholder stakeholders in corporate decision-making, to the extent that those interests are relevant to their company.

Background to the report

The Committee’s report was prepared in response to terms of reference dated 23 June 2005 concerning ‘Corporate responsibility and Triple-Bottom-Line reporting’. This update focuses on only one aspect of those terms of reference, namely the extent to which organisational decision-makers do, and should, have regard for the interests of non-shareholder stakeholders and the broader community, and the extent to which the current legal framework governing directors’ duties encourages or discourages this.

The PJC inquiry received approximately 146 submissions from a broad range of respondents, including mining companies, banks, large non-listed companies, academics and researchers, professional advisors, professional bodies and not-for-profit entities. Many subsequently appeared before the Committee to summarise their submissions and answer questions.

This inquiry was held concurrently with the inquiry into directors’ duties and CSR held by the Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee (CAMAC) under terms of reference dated March 2005. The inquiries made reference to each other and in many cases received identical submissions. CAMAC’s final report is expected before year-end.

Does the existing legislative framework encourage or inhibit CSR?

The Committee began by reviewing the drivers and principles of what it terms ‘corporate responsibility’, noting that the concept of corporate responsibility is multi-faceted and a ‘one size fits all’ approach is not appropriate in light of the diverse range of corporate entities, corporate activities and stakeholder interests in Australia today.

The Committee then reviewed the existing legislative framework (being the duties imposed on directors and in some cases other officers under Part 2D.1 of the Act), and assessed its impact. In particular, the Committee identified four general approaches to this framework, being:

  • The directors’ restrictive interpretation, which considers that the directors’ obligation to act in the best interests of their company is paramount and will generally preclude acts of corporate responsibility unless they are clearly incidental to profit generation or legal compliance by the company (the ‘James Hardie’ argument).
  • The shareholders’ restrictive interpretation, which objects to acts of corporate philanthropy and other forms of CSR that are not clearly incidental to profit generation or legal compliance on the basis that corporate funds are the shareholders’ property and should be distributed to them for use as they see fit (including philanthropic acts).
  • The short term interests interpretation, which holds that investment in CSR is permissible under the current framework provided such activities can demonstrate the same ‘return on investment’ (eg enhanced reputation and market share) as purely financial investments.
  • The enlightened self-interest interpretation, which considers that careful and appropriate corporate responsibility is generally in the company’s interests and is therefore permitted under the current legislative framework.

The Committee rejected the first two interpretations as overstating the impact of the Act’s requirements, and identified a number of problems with the third model. The Committee strongly favoured the enlightened self-interest approach, noting that the adoption of this approach by directors is likely to foster their company’s long-term growth (contrary to the claims raised by many opponents of CSR).

Should the existing legislative framework be changed?

Having formed this view, the Committee then considered a number of options for legislative change. These included proposals that the Act be amended to make corporate responsibility compulsory, or to clarify that it is permissible to engage in corporate responsibility, along with arguments that no amendments are required to support the enlightened self-interest interpretation and that a whole-of-law approach is necessary, as corporate regulation is achieved under numerous pieces of state and federal legislation.

The Committee concluded that there was no compelling case for change, and that the proposed ‘mandatory’ and ‘permissive’ amendments to the Act were clearly inappropriate. It argued that the broad range of statutes currently regulating the social and environmental performance of corporations gives further support to its view that no amendments to the Act are required.

It is noteworthy that the Committee soundly rejected the proposed ‘duty to promote the success of the company’, a directive provision contained in the UK Company Law Reform Bill 2005. The Committee considered this to be an inappropriate means of entrenching the enlightened self-interest approach, as it is likely to give rise to considerable uncertainty for directors as well as a ‘compliance culture’ (rather than a true commitment to CSR) within corporations.

The Committee also rejected a proposed ‘ethical judgment rule’, which would offer a ‘safe harbour’ for directors who make decisions based on bona fide and well-founded ethical considerations, even if those decisions have a detrimental effect on their company or its shareholders. The Committee considered that the existing ‘business judgment rule’ contained in the Act is satisfactory, and that the proposed rule may also offer a ‘defence of last resort’ to directors who have in fact behaved improperly.

The Labor members of the Committee agreed in principle that no changes to the directors’ duties provisions in the Act are required, but recommended that this be reconsidered by the Australian Government if any legal barriers to the consideration of legitimate social and environmental issues by directors are subsequently raised.

Other recommendations of interest

In brief, the Committee also recommended that:

  • The influence of 'short-termism' on corporate behaviour could be countered by structuring the remuneration packages of directors, executive officers and managers to include longer-term (ie greater than a 3 to 5 years) and CSR performance measures. It will be interesting to see whether the business community shares this view and makes any significant changes to existing remuneration models.
  • Not-for-profit entities should strive to meet the same corporate responsibility standards as the for-profit sector is expected to meet. Representatives of the NFP sector had submitted to the Committee that NFP's may require greater time and assistance to comply with those requirements than other companies might.
  • The ASX Corporate Governance Council, as part of its review of the Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendations, consult with industry to provide companies with further guidance regarding non-financial reporting. In particular, the ASX Guidance Note should promote the disclosure by companies of their top five sustainability risks and the strategies implemented to manage those risks.
  • Sustainability reporting remain voluntary. The Committee considered it premature to adopt the Global Reporting Initiative Framework as the basis, or a starting point, for voluntary sustainability reporting, but recommended that the Australian Government monitor the national and international uptake of the GRI Framework and provide the business community with guidance on how to apply it. The Committee also recommended that company auditors annually review the extent to which companies make non-financial disclosures in their Operating and Financial Reviews, and advise boards on the adequacy of such disclosure in light of the evolving needs of shareholders and the market in order to evaluate material non-financial performance, risk profile and risk management strategies.
  • The Australian Government play a key role in encouraging and facilitating corporate responsibility through a range of policy initiatives involving education, consultation, promotion of CSR initiatives globally, provision of seed funding and a review of possible regulatory initiatives to encourage CSR. In particular, the Committee recommended that the Australian Government encourage Australian companies to become signatories to the UN Global Compact (where appropriate for them), and should itself show leadership by implementing voluntary sustainability reporting targets and 'green' procurement targets for government agencies, with each agency to report on its targets and performance in its annual report.

Key implications for directors

The Committee’s recommendations may be unpalatable to those who consider that directors require urgent clarification of the scope of their duties and powers - eg clarifying precisely when causing their company to engage in corporate philanthropy (which can involve a broad range of activities, from anonymous donations to long-term sponsorships and community partnerships) will result in them breaching their duties. Activists seeking regulatory change to make CSR a mandatory and explicit component of corporate decision-making may also be disappointed.

However, the Committee’s recommendations, and the existence of the PJC inquiry itself, are a victory for proponents of CSR generally. They legitimise the claims that ‘corporate responsibility’ is a multi-faceted but meaningful concept, and that companies are likely to benefit if they integrate CSR into their core business and strategy - and are likely to suffer if they do not.

Importantly, the Committee stated that: ‘In many cases, it will be clear that corporate responsibility enhances shareholder value. At the very least, it is clear that rampant corporate irresponsibility certainly decreases shareholder value ... Progressive, innovative directors, in seeking to add value for their shareholders, will engage with and take account of the interests of stakeholders other than shareholders.’ (at paragraph 4.59)

The Committee’s report provides valuable guidance as to the Federal Parliament’s likely response to the CSR debate. The response of the public and the business community to the Committee’s report, along with CAMAC’s final report, will also be interesting to monitor.

What should directors do now?

Prior to CAMAC releasing its final report and the Australian Government formally responding to both reports, directors should consider the following:

  • Who are the key non-shareholder stakeholders of my company? What level of dialogue currently exists between my company and these stakeholders? What form does it take?
  • To what extent does my company engage in acts of 'corporate responsibility' above and beyond strict legal compliance? Who or what determines the nature of these activities, and their scope? Is there a unitary 'CSR' and sustainability strategy which is understood and supported by the board, management, staff and non-shareholder stakeholders? Are any systems in place to monitor the impact of these activities on the company's performance (in dollar terms or otherwise)?
  • To what extent does my company currently report on the sustainability of its operations and its key sustainability risks? What framework or guidelines are used? Does the reporting extend to the activities of entities which are owned or controlled by my company? Is there any independent assessment of such reports? If my company does not currently engage in such reporting, what strategies are in place to implement an appropriate reporting framework if required in response to regulatory change or market expectations?
  • What opportunities does the growing interest in CSR offer my company? How could these opportunities be best identified and captured?

Prudent companies will have systems in place to monitor and promote legal compliance. But companies that show leadership by looking beyond strict legal compliance to focus on issues such as internal and supply chain environmental and social sustainability, zero waste, water and energy efficiency, climate change and social justice and equity issues may stand to benefit over the medium to long term, if not also the short term.

Companies and government agencies that wish to develop or refine a CSR or sustainability strategy should begin by engaging with internal and external stakeholders to identify areas for improvement. Phillips Fox has assisted numerous clients with this process. We are trained in stakeholder engagement by AccountAbility in London. AccountAbility has developed internationally accepted Stakeholder Engagement Guidelines and a practical manual which we can guide you through to develop in-house and specific stakeholder engagement policies and solutions.

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances and no liability will be accepted for any losses incurred by those relying solely on this publication.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.