A teacher was pushing a fully laden shopping trolley with her
toddler daughter sitting inside the trolley and her three year old
son holding her hand as they moved towards her car in the car park.
It was another day of hassles for a working mum, and it was about
to get worse.
Suddenly the front wheel of the trolley caught in a pothole. The
trolley tipped over and the mother desperately reached to save her
child in the trolley from being crushed by the tumbling trolley. In
making her instinctive lunge to protect her child the mother of
three fell and the heavy trolley landed on top of her. The teacher
was injured and left with ongoing pain in her neck, shoulder, back,
left hip, leg and knee. The fall left her unable to work and her
frustration and constant pain led to strained relations with her
family and husband.
She sued the council that owned the car park. Her lawyer argued
the council should have repaired the pothole that caused the
accident. The council argued it didn't know about the pothole.
Besides, the council argued, the car park was a vehicle
thoroughfare and therefore was a public road. That meant the
council was protected by section 45 of the Civil Liability Act 2002
that exempts a roads authority from liability if it didn't know
about the pothole. The trial judge agreed, and dismissed the
injured mother's claim.
The injured mother took the case to the Court of Appeal. The
appeal judges ruled the car park was not a public road as the
council never formally classified it as a road. The appeal court
said the trial judge had wrongly relied on council evidence that
some drivers used the car park to get from one road to another.
That didn't make it a road as classified by the Roads Act 1993,
the Appeal Court found, and ruled in favour of the injured
The injured mother was awarded $285,000, and the Court ordered
the council to pay the mother's legal costs for the trial and
the appeal. "Cases like this show the need to have experienced
lawyers specialising in compensation law to fight in court for
you," said Justin Stack of Stacks Law Firm. "This case
hinged on the legal definition of what is a road and how it differs
from a car park where some cars drive through to get somewhere
else. It may seem a quirky legal point, but specialist compensation
lawyers have the experience to win these legal arguments."
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Solicitors should think carefully before disclosing sensitive information to experts in a letter of instruction.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).