Australia: Recent Insolvency Cases - Are You up to Date?

Last Updated: 19 May 2006
Article by David Dowd

We have noticed a gradual increase in the level of insolvency activity over the first quarter of 2006. This is not surprising given that retail and construction have reportedly slowed since December 2005, the Tax Office has publicly declared war on slow tax payers and most recently, the Reserve Bank raised interest rates for the first time in over 12 months and the cost of petrol increased to levels never before seen nor imagined.

With this in mind, we thought it an opportune time to bring you up to date on some recent insolvency related decisions and, in particular, how the Courts are dealing with discretionary applications filed during an external administration. In this, our fourth Insolvency Update for 2006, we review three such decisions by first looking briefly at the facts in each case, followed by an identification of the legal issues at hand and finally, a consideration of the Court’s findings and the practical implications arising from each decision.

Bechara v Sotrip Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 208

This decision demonstrates the Court’s attitude to the use of the voluntary administration regime to avoid liquidation where a company is clearly insolvent.

Bechara applied to the Court to wind up Sotrip. Prior to the hearing of Bechara’s application, Sotrip’s directors resolved to place the company in voluntary administration.

Sotrip owned one parcel of land in Mudgeeraba, Queensland, which was valued at between $620,000 and $800,000. Prior to being placed in administration, Sotrip contracted to sell the land for $660,000 to McInnes Perpetual Pty Ltd, a company wholly owned and controlled by a Mr Cassaniti.

The administrators’ second report to creditors stated that the land was encumbered to the extent of $2,763,000. The report also cited the potential for a liquidator to investigate preferences, insolvent trading and the circumstances surrounding the sale of the land. However, the report recommended the acceptance of a $300,000 Deed of Company Arrangement (DOCA) proposal.

The $300,000 proposal was withdrawn shortly before the second creditors’ meeting and was replaced by a proposal for the establishment of a $50,000 fund that purported to be in addition to the sale proceeds of $660,000.

Sotrip and Mr Cassaniti applied for an adjournment of the winding-up hearing to provide Sotrip’s creditors with time to consider the proposed deed of company arrangement.

Legal issues

The main issue for consideration was whether Sotrip had advanced sufficient evidence under s.440A of the Corporations Act 2001 (the Act) to the extent that a greater dividend would be available to creditors under DOCA compared with a winding up.


Justice Barrett held that the promise of the sale proceeds and the $50,000 fund was ‘illusory and misleading’. When cross examined, Mr Cassaniti could not identify the source of the funds or the time when the funds would become available. Furthermore, the sale proceeds of $660,000 would not be available to creditors as the property was secured for a sum of nearly four times that amount. His Honour was satisfied that the support of creditors for the $50,000 proposal was given on the basis of a wholly misleading description and that their supposed support could be safely ignored.1

Additionally, Barrett J expressed concern that the possibility of a liquidator investigating matters raised in the administrators’ report would be lost if a DOCA was executed. Accordingly, Sotrip failed to establish the requirements of s.440A and the application to adjourn the winding up of Sotrip was dismissed.

Practical implications

This case demonstrates the Court’s attitude to attempts to delay the winding up of hopelessly insolvent companies where the proposed DOCA lacks substance. This case also highlights the general importance of leading sufficient evidence to establish an entitlement to the relief sought in highly contested applications of this nature.

Re Priceright Constructions Pty Limited [2006] NSWSC 324

This was an ex-parte application under s.447A of the Act by the administrators of Priceright to extend the time for an adjournment of a second meeting of creditors beyond the 60 day limit contained in s.439B of the Act and Corporations Regulation 5.6.18(2).

The second meeting of creditors had already been adjourned to 1 May 2006, which reflected the extent of the statutory maximum of 60 days.

The administrators claimed that a further adjournment was warranted because a DOCA was at an advanced stage of formulation and that it had a realistic prospect of offering the company’s creditors 51 cents in the dollar as against a likely range of 8 to 19 cents in the dollar on liquidation (excluding any potential recovery actions).

Legal issues

The issue in this case was whether s.447A could be used to extend the convening period time for a second meeting of creditors beyond the statutory 60 day limit.


Justice Barrett was satisfied that the Court’s power under s.447A was sufficiently wide to allow such relief.2

Barrett J was mindful that the extension sought by the administrators had not been sanctioned by creditors because it had not been foreshadowed at the second meeting of creditors. However, his Honour held that an order under s.447A was ‘still one about how Part 5.3A is to operate in relation to the particular company’.3

Barrett J made the order proposed by the administrators that the second meeting of creditors be adjourned to a date not later than 31 May 2006, reserving leave for any interested person to apply ‘to vary the substantive order upon 24 hours’ notice’.

Practical implications

Although decided on discrete facts, this decision reinforces the ‘magic wand’ effect of s.447A of the Act and in particular, that it can be utilised to obtain an extension of a convening period in excess of the 60 day maximum prescribed by s.439B of the Act.

Leigh re King Bros [2006] NSWSC 315

This case involved an application by a liquidator for Court approval of a litigation funding agreement under s.447(2B) of the Act.

Mr Leigh was the liquidator of 17 entities of the King Brothers group of companies. The companies were subject to various fixed and floating charges held by both the National Australia Bank Ltd (NAB) and entities within the financing division of Toyota.

On 8 April 2003, the directors of the companies resolved to appoint an administrator. NAB and Toyota both appointed receivers and managers to the assets covered by their respective charges. At the second meeting of creditors held on 4 July 2003, it was resolved that the companies be wound up. On 10 September 2003, Mr Leigh reported as liquidator that potential recovery actions were available and that he intended to seek funding from creditors or from a litigation funder if no creditor was prepared to fund. This action was supported by legal advice which was tendered to the Court confidentially at the application.

Mr Leigh attempted to raise funding from two interested creditors, neither of which was ultimately prepared to provide funding.

At a meeting of creditors held in late September 2005, the liquidator identified the ATO and Toyota as potential recovery targets. By January 2006, the liquidator was in possession of a litigation funding proposal from Litigation Lending Services.

The liquidator applied to the Court under s.477(2B) of the Act for approval of entry into the litigation funding agreement.

Legal issues

The issue in this case was in what situations will the Court grant approval for a liquidator to enter into a litigation funding agreement?


Justice Austin approved the litigation funding agreement, being mindful of the need to avoid undue scrutiny or a complete merits review ‘unless there can be seen to be some lack of good faith, some error of law or principle, or real and substantial grounds for doubting the prudence of the liquidator’s conduct’.4

Austin J summarised the relevant factors for consideration as :5

  • The liquidator's prospects of success in the litigation.
  • The interests of creditors other than the proposed defendant.
  • Possible oppression in commencing the proceedings.
  • The nature and complexity of the cause of action.
  • The extent to which the liquidator has canvassed other funding options.
  • The level of the funder's premium.
  • The liquidator's consultations with creditors.
  • The risks involved in the claim (including the amount of costs likely be incurred in the proposed litigation, the extent to which the funder is to contribute to those costs, and the extent to which the funder is to contribute to the costs of the defendant in the event that the action is not successful, or towards any order for security for costs).

In this case, the fact that the liquidator had sought legal advice on the prospects of recovery, the increased potential for returns to creditors, the liquidator’s attempts to negotiate other financing options and the terms of the funding agreement (including a capped recovery for the funder) persuaded Austin J to approve the agreement.

Practical implications

The principles in this case are helpful in determining what the Court will consider when determining whether to approve a litigation funding arrangement under s.447(2B) of the Act.

The principles considered by Austin J in this matter are equally applicable to liquidators determining whether it is viable to pursue litigation using the available funds in the liquidation. Addressing each of the issues identified by the Court, including obtaining independent legal advice, seeking creditor approval and recording consideration given to these issues will help a liquidator deflect any subsequent scrutiny levelled in respect of a decision to pursue particular litigation.


1 .Bechara v Sotrip Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 208 at 15

2. See generally Australasian Memory Ltd v Brien (2000) 200 CLR 270

3. Re Priceright Constructions Pty Limited [2006] NSWSC 324 at 9

4. Re Spedley Securities Ltd (in liq) (1992) 9 ACSR 83 at 85-86 per Giles J

5. Set down in Re ACN 076 673 875 Ltd (rec’r & mgr apptd) (in liq) (2002) 42 ACSR 296

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances and no liability will be accepted for any losses incurred by those relying solely on this publication.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.