Australia: Queensland infrastructure planning and charging framework review - commentary on DSDIP discussion paper released July 2013 - Part 3

Last Updated: 8 April 2013
Article by Ian Wright

This article concludes the discussion in our previous articles Queensland infrastructure planning and charging framework review - commentary on DSDIP discussion paper released July 2013 - Parts 1 and 2.

Offsets and refunds

Current framework

Under the current framework, where a development approval condition requires the provision of trunk infrastructure for a development in respect of which an infrastructure charge is levied, the applicant is entitled to the following:

  • Offset - The value of the trunk infrastructure is to be offset against the infrastructure charge.
  • Refund - Where the value of the trunk infrastructure contribution is higher than the infrastructure charge, a refund is to be provided, on terms to be agreed, from infrastructure charges for the development of premises serviced by the trunk infrastructure.

Offsets and refunds are generally negotiated and set out in an infrastructure agreement.

Reform option

The Discussion Paper identifies the following trunk infrastructure issues in respect of offsets and refunds:

  • Uncertainty - The uncertainty of the scheme of offsets and refunds in the absence of any supporting guidance framework.
  • Undervaluation - The potential for the value of the land and works subject to an offset or refund to be underestimated in the absence of a uniform valuation method.

The Discussion Paper proposes reform options involving the following elements:

  • Valuation of trunk infrastructure - The value of provided trunk infrastructure would be based on either:
    • the planned value in the infrastructure plan;
    • the actual value of the trunk infrastructure determined in accordance with a local government procurement process; or
    • the applicant would be entitled to choose either of the above two options.
  • Standardised land valuation methodology - It is proposed that a standard land valuation methodology be adopted although no particular methodology is stated.
  • Cross crediting of offsets - It is proposed that offsets for a trunk infrastructure network be applied to the proportion of an infrastructure charge applicable to other trunk infrastructure networks.
  • Offset banking - The value of offsets from an earlier stage of the development approval may be retained and valued in demand units not cash for offsetting against infrastructure charges for subsequent stages.
  • Transferable offsets - Offsets may be transferred to other sites owned by the same developer in the respective local government area or a distributor-retailer's geographical area.

Implications of reform option

The reform option for the adoption of a standardised land valuation methodology will provide greater certainty in terms of the preparation of an infrastructure plan and the valuation of offsets and refunds for land contributions for trunk infrastructure.

However the balance of the reform option will have significant implications:

  • Probity and public interest - The proposal that the value of an offset will be the planned value or that the applicant will have the right to apply either the planned value or the actual value will create probity and public interest issues where the actual value of the trunk infrastructure is less than the planned value. In such circumstances, an applicant is receiving a financial benefit in the form of a reduced infrastructure charge or a refund which exceeds the actual cost incurred for the trunk infrastructure. The resulting probity and public interest issues may give rise to broader political issues for a local government and distributor-retailer.
  • Reduced infrastructure charges - The revenue sourced from infrastructure charges will be materially reduced as a result of the value of offsets and refunds being increased by the following:
    • offsets and refunds being calculated either on an actual value which exceeds the planned value; or on a planned value in circumstances where the actual value is less;
    • offsets when held in demand units will escalate in value in accordance with the producer price index applied to infrastructure charges which is generally greater than the consumer price index which would preserve the value of the offset over time;
    • cross crediting the value of trunk infrastructure against infrastructure charges for other trunk infrastructure networks.
  • Risk transference - The proposal that the value of an offset will be the actual value of the trunk infrastructure effectively transfers the risk profile of delivering an item of trunk infrastructure from the developer to the public and also provides the potential for the shifting of some development costs to trunk infrastructure costs.
  • Infrastructure delivery - The likelihood of reduced revenue from infrastructure charges will delay the delivery of trunk infrastructure to service planned development by local governments and distributor-retailers.
  • Development assessment - Local governments and distributor-retailers acting prudently will have to consider the financial implications of a proposed development in terms of the likely offset and refund prior to determining a development application thereby potentially resulting in a delayed assessment process and the potential for increased refusals of development applications.
  • Administrative burden - The transference of offsets will result in an additional administrative burden for local governments and distributor-retailers.

Alternative reform option

The implications of the reform option could be addressed by adopting an alternative reform option involving the following:

  • Valuation of trunk infrastructure - The value of the provided trunk infrastructure should be based on the lower of the following:
    • planned value - calculated by reference to the infrastructure plan and the extrinsic material and studies upon which the infrastructure plan was prepared;
    • actual value - calculated initially in accordance with a local government procurement process prior to the commencement of work with an ability to vary the actual value at the completion of the infrastructure delivery process to take account of variations prior to the claiming of the offset.
  • Valuation of offsets - The value of an offset should be given not in demand units but in cash which should be escalated to preserve its value in accordance with the following:
    • producer price index - if the trunk infrastructure is provided after the planned date of provision in the infrastructure plan; or
    • consumer price index - if the trunk infrastructure is provided before the planned date of provision in the infrastructure plan, so as not to encourage premature development.


Current framework

Under the current system of credits, existing lawful use rights and previous contributions may be taken into account as deductions when infrastructure charges are levied.

Reform option

The Discussion Paper identifies there is no legal requirement to apply credits and there is no standard methodology for calculating the value of a credit if a decision has been made to apply one.

The Discussion Paper identifies the need for a transparent methodology for applying credits that is administratively simple to implement and maintain and supports development feasibility estimates and development planning.

The reform option involves the following:

  • Mandatory credits - Credits are to be provided for existing lawful use rights such that infrastructure charges may only be levied for infrastructure demand that is in addition to the demand provided for under the existing use rights.
  • Register - Local governments and distributor-retailers will be required to provide for a more thorough recording of charges, credits and offsets for each lot. Details of the authority's credits policy must be made available through the authority's infrastructure plan, resolution or board decision.
  • Credit policy - Public access is provided to a credits policy through an infrastructure plan, resolution or board decision.

Implications of reform option

Whilst the Discussion Paper identifies that the reform option imposes additional administrative burdens in terms of maintaining the record of charges for each and every lot within a local government area or a distributor-retailer's geographical area, the benefits of the reform option in terms of improving the accountability of the credits system significantly outweigh the additional administrative costs.

Appeals and dispute resolution

Reform option

The Discussion Paper states that the current system of appeals of dispute resolution is time and resource intensive. To achieve the specified reform objective of reducing the time and cost associated with infrastructure charges and conditions related appeals and dispute resolution the following reform options are identified:

  • Pre-lodgement mediation process - This reform option would retain the rights of appeal under the current system for both planned and capped charges. However for appeals involving only infrastructure charges, a mediated dispute resolution process must be followed prior to an appeal being lodged with the Queensland Planning and Environment Court. Given the small number of appeals which would be affected by this proposal, the Discussion Paper appears to question the need for reform in this area.
  • Widening of appeal rights - This reform option proposes to expand appeal rights to include one or more of the following:
    • the methodology used to calculate an infrastructure charge;
    • whether infrastructure the subject of a condition is trunk or non-trunk;
    • whether a condition related to infrastructure is reasonable and relevant;
    • the calculation of offsets, refunds and credits.

Implications of reform option

The Discussion Paper outlines the following potential implications of the reform options:

  • Higher administrative costs - Both of the above options may lead to higher administrative costs for both the implementation and maintenance of the system.
  • Impact of other reforms - There is the potential for the introduction of reforms to the other areas outlined earlier (e.g. standardised infrastructure planning) to reduce the need for reforms at the dispute resolution stage.

Infrastructure agreements

Current framework

Under the current system, infrastructure agreements are a mechanism by which infrastructure may be provided for and funded outside the maximum charges framework. A condition of a development approval may require compliance with an infrastructure agreement.

Reform option

The Discussion Paper identifies that infrastructure agreements are potentially complex documents that may be expensive to prepare and some local governments avoid the proper utilisation of an infrastructure agreement on this basis. Conversely, some local governments use infrastructure agreements to address issues which may be more appropriately dealt with by another mechanism.

The Discussion Paper proposes a reform option which seeks to retain the flexibility of the existing system while implementing measures to clarify where an infrastructure agreement is appropriate involving the following:

  • Undertaking a review of the SPA sections relevant to infrastructure agreements.
  • The removal of the power of local governments to attach development approval conditions requiring the preparation of an infrastructure agreement.
  • Introducing a time limit on the negotiation of an infrastructure agreement.
  • Preparing a set of guidelines to demonstrate the principles and requirements of an infrastructure agreement.

Alternative reform options

The following are suggested as alternative reform options:

  • Conditioning of infrastructure agreements - The SPA empowers a local government to impose a condition of a development approval requiring compliance with an infrastructure agreement. (See section 346(1)(c) of the SPA.) The SPA does not authorise the imposition of a condition requiring the preparation of an infrastructure agreement and such a condition would, in any event, face significant legal difficulties in terms of satisfying the reasonable and relevant test. (See section 345 of the SPA.) Conditions of this nature can be subject to an appeal and, accordingly, it is suggested that a specific statutory prohibition is not necessary.
  • Time limit for negotiation of an infrastructure agreement - In lieu of the specification of a time limit for negotiation of an infrastructure agreement, which is considered to be impractical, consideration could be given to the inclusion of a statutory duty on local governments, distributor-retailers and applicants to:
    • commence the preparation of an infrastructure agreement as soon as is reasonably practicable;
    • act co-operatively in the preparation of the infrastructure agreement; and
    • negotiate in good faith in respect of the infrastructure agreement.

Deferred payments

Current framework

Under the current system, the payment of infrastructure charges levied by a local government is to be made in accordance with the timeframe set out in the SPA. In respect of reconfiguration of a lot applications, charges are payable before the final sealing of a plan of subdivision. In practical terms this allows the local government to withhold the sealed plans until payment has been received.

Reform option

The Discussion Paper outlines the following potential options for deferring the payment of infrastructure charges until a project is nearer completion as an attempt to provide for a higher likelihood of project success:

  • Mandate earliest payment at plan sealing - Under this option, the earliest that infrastructure charges may be paid is at plan sealing unless otherwise agreed between the parties. Payment may be further deferred by entering into an infrastructure agreement, with early payment being encouraged through the offer of discounts where payment is made early.
  • Deferment until settlement of a lot - This reform option would push the time at which charges are payable back to the settlement stage and an outstanding infrastructure charge for land is to be notified on the title. Each local government would be entitled to decide whether or not to implement deferred payment as an option in their local government area. The Discussion Paper states that this reform option would require 'major adjustments' to the conveyancing process. The Discussion Paper appears to conclude that the benefits of the implementation of this option are outweighed by the potentially negative impacts on the finance industry, development industry and property purchasers.

Implications of reform option

Mandating plan sealing as the earliest date for the payment of infrastructure charges for reconfiguring a lot unless otherwise agreed is unlikely to have significant implications.

However the Discussion Paper does not consider the implications by a local government and distributor-retailer where infrastructure charges are not collected at the specified date due to an administrative oversight.

Alternative reform option

In addition to the specification of an earliest date for payment, consideration could be given to specifying a sunset period after the specified date for payment within which the infrastructure charge may not be collected by a local government or distributor-retailer.

Alternative funding and financing

Current framework

Under the current system of funding and financing infrastructure, local governments provide funding through means such as rates, government borrowing, user charges, public private partnerships and infrastructure contributions and distributor-retailers provide funding through user charges, infrastructure charges and government borrowing.

Reform option

The Discussion Paper identifies a number of proposed alternative funding and financing arrangements for local governments and distributor-retailers, including the following:

  • Local governments:
    • Specific purpose securitised borrowing - Funds are borrowed for a specific project and are repaid out of the project's generated revenue.
    • Value capture levies - The rise in the value of land due to land development or construction of infrastructure is 'captured' to help fund necessary infrastructure.
    • Special purpose levies - These are issued in an area to raise the capital required to fund specific infrastructure in that area.
    • Growth area bonds - These are issued to finance infrastructure in a specific area and the debt is repaid through property tax revenues in that area.
    • Business improvement districts - Businesses within a defined area pay a tax or fee to finance infrastructure in that area.
    • Centralised financing - State and Commonwealth financing provides local governments with a structured debt to optimise borrowing.
  • Distributor-retailers - Specific purpose securitised borrowing.

Implications of reform option

The Discussion Paper identifies that these arrangements are only applicable at the small scale and do not have broad State-wide application. As such they will be confined to having a more ad hoc application outside the existing framework.

Resolutions and distributor-retailer board decisions

Current framework

Under the current framework, infrastructure charges are set by an adopted infrastructure charges resolution or a distributor-retailer board decision. The Discussion Paper identifies concerns that some resolutions do not comply with the SPA.

Reform option

The Discussion Paper requests feedback on whether there is support for a third party review process for resolutions and board decisions or whether an alternative may be suggested.

Transitional arrangements

The Discussion Paper states that DSDIP is to work with key stakeholders to develop transitional arrangements relating to the following:

  • Providing local governments with time to implement these reforms.
  • Providing a stakeholder information program.
  • Providing ongoing support to key stakeholders.

Next steps

DSDIP will review submissions on the Discussion Paper to inform the final content of the reforms. An analysis of the impacts on current capped charges is to take place with key stakeholders concurrently with the finalisation of content. The reform is to be finalised in time for commencement on 1 July 2014.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Ian Wright
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.