Australia: Coffey reheated: Contaminated Sites Committee decision remitted by WA Supreme Court

HG Environment Alert: 5 February 2015
Last Updated: 11 February 2015
Article by Kylie Panckhurst and Sarah Macoun

In 2013 and 2014 the Contaminated Sites Committee (Committee) found Coffey PM Pty Ltd (Coffey) 70% responsible for remediating a contaminated source site and two affected sites. Coffey appealed the Committee's findings to the Supreme Court.

In this Alert, Associate Kylie Panckhurst provides an overview of the Supreme Court's decision and, in particular, the Court's comments on the correct statutory tests for determining responsibility for remediation under the Contaminated Sites Act 2003 (Act).

Key points

  • There are different statutory tests for determining a party's responsibility for contamination remediation depending on the party's relationship to the site.
  • Section 25 of the Act deals with the responsibility for remediation of a person who caused or contributed to contamination.
  • Section 27 of the Act applies to land-owners only. While section 27 allows for a land-owner of the source site to be responsible for sites which the contamination has migrated to in certain circumstances, this mechanism does not extend to other parties.
  • Disputes regarding responsibility for contamination are often protracted and costly. It is important to identify parties' legal rights and responsibilities and prudently manage the issues from the earliest stage possible.

Background facts

A full summary of facts can be located in the 2013 Supreme Court decision (Coffey LPM Pty Ltd v Contaminated Sites Committee (No 2) [2013] WASC 98) but in brief:

  • Coffey is the current owner of an environmental consultancy business, formerly known as MPL Group Pty LTD (MPL).
  • The Osborne Park site (source site) had been used as a petrol station since 1973.
  • Between 1999 and 2004, Wesfarmer Kleenheat Gas Pty Ltd (WKG) leased the source site from WA Seafood Exporters Pty Ltd (WASE). At all relevant times WASE owned the source site.
  • The lease agreement between the WKG and WASE required WKG to provide an environmental assessment before vacating the lease. This assessment was carried out after WKG vacated the site with MPL conducting soil and ground water analysis in August 2004.
  • On 17 August 2004, it is alleged that an MPL employee damaged an underground remote fuel fill pipe with a soil auger, creating a hole in the pipe.
  • Various investigations in 2004 and 2005 revealed contamination of groundwater at the site and led to the identification of the hole in the fill pipe. The hole was repaired in April 2005.
  • The contamination migrated from the source site onto another property and a road reserve (the affected sites).

Committee decisions

The Committee's first decision on 27 August 2013 related to the source site. The Committee found Coffey responsible for 70% of the overall remediation responsibility on the basis that much of the overall responsibility arose from the act of damaging the fill pipe and, to a lesser extent, from the act of failing to notify WKA or WASE of the suspected contact with the pipe during the site investigation. WKG was attributed with the 15% responsibility on the basis that WKG failed to notify relevant parties of the possibility that damage had occurred, or that contamination had been found at the site after MPL notified it of contamination in 18 October 2014. The remaining 15% of the total responsibility was attributed to WASE on the basis that the continuing use of the underground pipe, while damaged, was the act that caused pollution to occur and was committed without authority.1

The Committee's second and third decisions on 5 March 2014 determined responsibility for remediation of the affected sites. The same parties were found responsible, in the same proportions, as for the source site.

Supreme Court appeal

Grounds of appeal – source site

Coffey's grounds of appeal for the source site were based on four questions regarding whether the Committee had:

  • erred in law in finding that MPL had punctured the fill pipe;
  • erred in law in finding that MPL had committed the offence of 'causing pollution' contrary to section 49(3) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA) (EPA);
  • erred in law in finding that MPL had 'allowed' pollution to be caused contrary to section 49(3) of the EPA; and
  • misconstrued or misapplied section 25(3) of the Act.2

The Court noted that the four questions were said to involve approximately 80 errors of law categorised in twelve categories identified by Coffey.3 The Court noted that the categorisation did not make it easy to deal with the issues in the case and did not succeed in avoiding the criticism made in BP Australia Pty Ltd v Contaminated Sites Committee regarding prolix, repetitive and confused grounds of appeal which fail to identify a question or questions of law upon which the Committee has erred.

Grounds of appeal – affected sites

Coffey submitted 5 grounds of appeal for the affected sites. The first question was whether the Committee had misconstrued and misapplied section 27 of the Act. The Court considered that the second, third and fourth grounds of appeal effectively repeated the first ground.4 The fifth ground of appeal repeated the four questions submitted in relation to the source site.

Supreme Court appeal findings

Chaney J rejected all four grounds of appeal in relation to the source site without difficulty and dismissed the appeal in its entirety.

In relation to each of the affected sites' appeals, grounds 1 to 4 were condensed into the question of: whether the Committee erred in law by applying section 27 of the Act to determine the responsibility of Coffey for remediation of the affected sites.5

Section 27 of the Act deals with land-owners' responsibility for remediation. Sub-sections 27(1) and 27(2) provide two different ways a person, who became an owner of a site before the commencement of the Act, may be responsible for remediation of a source site.

Sub-section 27(2a) provides that:

A person who, under subsection (1) or (2), is responsible for remediation of a site that is a source site is also responsible for remediation of a site that is an affected site to the extent that —
  1. the contamination of the affected site is caused, or contributed to —
    1. by contamination; or
    2. by a substance,
which has migrated to the affected site from the source site...6

The Committee in the affected site decisions applied section 27 (the Court assumed the Committee's reasoning relied on sub-section (2a)) to conclude that persons who caused and/or allowed contamination to occur at the source site (i.e. WASE, WKG and Coffey) also caused and/or allowed contamination to occur at the subject site, with the same shares applying.7

The Court found that the Committee's approach was incorrect as section 27 does not apply to persons other than land owners of the source site.

The only basis upon which Coffey or WKG could be found responsible for remediation of the affected sites under the Act was pursuant to sub-section 25(3). The Court found that the Committee had misconstrued section 27 as not requiring a separate consideration of responsibility for remediation of each of the affected sites under sub-section 25(3).

Section 25(3) of the Act provides that:

A person who caused, or contributed to, the contamination of a site before the commencement of this Act is responsible for remediation of the site only to the extent that the person caused, or contributed to, that contamination by an act that was done without lawful authority.

Although the Act was passed in November 2003 and the contamination occurred in 2004, the contamination occurred before the operative provisions of the Act came into force on 1 December 2006. It is worth noting that if the contamination had occurred after the commencement date of the Act, section 25(1) of the Act would apply instead of section 25(3).8

The Court remitted the matter to the Committee pursuant to section 78(1)(c) of the Act, to allow the Committee to consider responsibility for remediating the affected sites under sub-section 25(3). The Court emphasized that the Committee was bound to consider Coffey's submissions regarding the apportionment of responsibility for the affected sites under sub-section 25(3) of the Act.

Justice Chaney warned that, had the Committee applied the correct statutory test for determining non-landholder responsibility for the affected sites, it may have reached the same apportionment. Equally the Court acknowledged that the Committee may have reached a different conclusion based on the parties' submissions.

Ground 5 of the affected sites appeal was dismissed on the same reasoning as the source site questions.

This case has developed over a period of over ten years and is an example of the difficulties that arise in determining responsibility for contamination remediation. While the pipe was repaired in 2005 which stopped the fuel leak, it is likely that the source site and affected sites have remained contaminated as the parties await a determination regarding who is responsible, in what proportion, for the remediation. This period has been protracted. Contamination which is not contained may migrate further afield which will again increase remediation costs. Property owners and operators also face restrictions in dealing with properties classified as "contaminated – remediation required".


1Coffey LPM Pty Ltd v The Contaminated Sites Committee [2014] WASC 504, see a summary at paras[36]-[65]

2Op. cit., para [17]

3Op. cit., para [18]-[20]

4 Op. cit., para [129]

5 Op. cit., para [129]

6 The remainder of the sub-section is unnecessary for the grounds of appeal.

7 Op. cit., para [130]

8Section 25(1) addresses responsibility of people who caused or contributed to contamination after 1 December 2006. Section 25(3) addresses the same matters but prior to 1 December 2006.

© HopgoodGanim Lawyers

Award-winning law firm HopgoodGanim offers commercially-focused advice, coupled with reliable and responsive service, to clients throughout Australia and across international borders.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Kylie Panckhurst
Sarah Macoun
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.