Australia: Transfer Pricing - the ATO reconstruction power in Taxation Ruling 2014/6

Last Updated: 27 November 2014
Article by Stuart Edwards and Daren Yeoh

1. Introduction

On 12 November 2014 the ATO issued its long awaited Taxation Ruling TR 2014/6 titled: "Income tax: transfer pricing – the application of section 815-130 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997" (the "Act"). The ruling provides the Australian Taxation Office's ("ATO") view on how it will determine whether an entity derives a transfer pricing benefit from the "actual" commercial or financial cross-border dealings of a taxpayer when compared to the outcomes from those same dealings that "might be expected" to have arisen between independent entities dealing at arm's length.

TR2014/6 addresses the Commissioner's controversial power to reconstruct a taxpayer's actual transactions. The ruling was originally issued in draft 1 form in April 2014 and we then stated, oftentimes there are no comparable transactions (with arm's length parties) against which a taxpayer may benchmark its dealings simply because a parent company will generally only deal with a subsidiary. It follows that hypothesising what independent parties would or would not have done at the time of the taxpayer's 'actual' transactions will, no doubt, lead to some highly controversial transfer pricing disputes.

The challenges with hypothesising what independent parties would or would not have done in comparable circumstances are many. On the one hand, the hypothesis will take place with the benefit of hindsight, many years after the event; further, as alluded to above, it is exceptionally challenging and subjective to make comparisons and draw conclusions in relation to transactions where there are no arm's length comparables; and arguably, most importantly, underlying every business decision is an appetite for risk and this appetite differs from one taxpayer to the next. The potential for dispute is real and substantial.

2. Section 815-130 and the 'basic rule'

The objective of Subdivision 815-B is to ensure that the amount brought to tax in Australia reflects the arm's length contribution that might be expected to be derived by comparable independent entities.

The key provision is Section 815-130(1), this section sets down the so-called "basic rule". The basic rule, has regard to both the form and substance of a transaction and requires the identification of arm's length conditions based on the "actual" commercial or financial relations as they operated; that is, in essence, one determines an arm's length price based on the actual dealings as transacted.

The ruling states: "In most cases, it is expected that the identification of the arm's length conditions will be able to be accomplished by applying the 'basic rule' and determining the arm's length contribution made by the Australian operations based upon the form and substance of the commercial or financial relations in connection with which the actual conditions operate." 2

3. Arm's Length Conditions, Form and Substance

The identification of arm's length conditions, conditions being the commercial or financial arrangements which ultimately affect the entity's economic or financial position, is critical as it is this process that evaluates the form and substance of the commercial or financial relations and determines the conditions that independent entities dealing wholly independently in comparable circumstances "might be expected" to have operated under 3 . This evaluation is to the completed so as to achieve the highest level of consistency with OECD Guidelines 4 .

The "form" of the commercial or financial relations describes the legal characteristics of the dealings between entities; generally, although not always, these are the documented contractual terms of the arrangement.

The ruling states that the "substance" of the commercial or financial relations "...describes the economic reality or essence of those dealings and is determined by examining all of the relevant facts and circumstances...from a practical and business point of view..." 5

4. Exceptions to the "basic rule"

As noted, the ruling states that in most cases the form of transactions will be consistent with their substance and the basic rule will apply; like the OECD Guidelines, however, the ruling states that in "...exceptional circumstances..." the basic rule, will not apply.

In the case of the OECD Guidelines we note that the word 'exceptional':

" similar in meaning to 'rare' or 'unusual'. It reflects that in most cases it is expected that the arm's length principle...can be satisfied by determining arm's length pricing for the arrangement as actually undertaken and structured." 6

Whilst the language of the OECD Guidelines appears to closely align with Section 815-130 I suggest that the OECD Guidelines, as presently drafted, would be less likely to countenance reconstruction than appears to be the case in TR 2014/6.

The exceptions to the basic rule, there are three of them, only come into play if a taxpayer derives a transfer pricing benefit or advantage from the dealings. The exceptions operate to potentially disregard the actual transaction, or part thereof, and enable the ATO to hypothesise and substitute what it believes are arm's length dealings. The three exceptions are:

  1. First Exception: Where the legal "form" of the actual commercial or financial relations is inconsistent with the "substance" of those relations. In these circumstances the form of the actual dealings are "recharacterised" or "disregarded", to the extent of the inconsistency and arm's length conditions are based on the 'modified' commercial or financial relations that accurately reflect their substance7.
  2. Second Exception: Where independent entities "would have" entered into other commercial or financial relations which differ in substance from the actual dealings the behaviour of independent entities, acting in a commercially rational manner in comparable circumstances, is hypothesised and may replace the actual arrangements.8
  3. Third Exception: Where independent entities in comparable circumstances "would not" have entered into any commercial or financial relations, one disregards the actual conditions with the result that one hypothesises that "nothing would have occurred"9and this scenario may replace the actual dealings.

The reconstruction provisions make clear the fact that taxpayers are well advised to address their possible application; to this end taxpayers should consider evaluating:

  • Whether the substance of their business dealings accords with that documented;
  • Why it is they have continued to suffer losses (perhaps by illustration to forecast results, new competitive forces and so on);
  • How their business strategy, perhaps a market penetration strategy, may justify their current year's operating performance;
  • What are the business options realistically available and why does the option adopted make 'commercial sense';
  • Whether independent parties dealing at arm's length might reasonably be expected to have entered into the transactions in question and whether the basic rule or one or other of the three exceptions applies or does not apply.

Taxpayers should address issues such as those above, where relevant, in their transfer pricing documentation when they self-assess whether or not a transfer pricing benefit has or has not been derived. This documentation will comprise a critical element of a taxpayers transfer pricing 'risk assessment' process as a failure to comprehensively review and document this analysis will result in significantly greater penalties in the event that an adverse transfer pricing adjustment is successfully prosecuted against them.

ATO representatives have stated that the evidentiary requirement for it to apply Section 815-130 is a 'pretty steep hurdle' (insofar as it requires one to conclude that independent parties 'would' or 'would not' have done something); the process that taxpayers are effectively required to follow is somewhat opaque, tortuous and lacking in guidance 10 . There is an argument, however, that if a taxpayer satisfies the 'basic rule' one should not be required to evaluate the three exceptions thereto. The appendix to the ruling does not support this view; it states that:

"The use of the word 'despite' in subsections 815-130(2) to 815-130(4) means that entities must determine whether the circumstances described in one of those subsections apply and, as a result, whether the commercial or financial relations in connection with which the actual conditions operate are disregarded for the purposes of identifying the arm's length conditions." 11

Having regard to the great controversy surrounding Section 815-130 and TR 2014/6, the ATO today announced that it is currently preparing a practice statement requiring the approval of an ATO senior executive prior to the use of that provision. The practice statement will further require the ATO senior executive to consult with the International Division of the ATO before agreeing to the use of 815-130. 12 It is to be hoped that this development will temper the otherwise potentially inadvertent application of this provision.

In the final analysis, the relevant question for taxpayers is whether independent entities behaving in a commercially rational manner and acting in their own best commercial and economic interests would have dealt with one another in the same way they have actually acted having regard to the options realistically available to them; if they satisfy this hurdle and the transacti ons have substance, they should make 'commercial sense' and not fall foul of Section 815-130.

5. Arm's Length Debt Deductions and Thin Capitalisation

The interaction of Subdivision 815-B with the thin capitalisation provisions is dealt with in the ruling and restates the legislative position in relation to the pricing of debt deductions.

Section 815-140 modifies the debt deduction calculation methodology (where a transfer pricing benefit has been derived) and details how Division 820,(dealing with the thin capitalisation provisions), interacts therewith.

Section 815-140 requires that the interest rate to be applied is determined on the basis that the arm's length conditions operated; the arm's length rate so determined is then applied to the debt "actually" issued by the entity. Following this analysis, Division 820 may then apply to further reduce debt deductions (if and to the extent the thin capitalisation provisions have been breached). A good example of this interaction is provided in the ruling.

6. Examples and Consequential Amendments

Many examples illustrating the ATO interpretation of Section 815-130 are provided in the appendix to the ruling and two examples are enshrined within the ruling itself. One of the examples in the ruling, (adopted from a like example in the OECD Guidelines), is illustrated in further detail later in the Appendix (as Example 5) to the ruling.

This example deals with the sale, under a long term contract, of intellectual property rights arising from future research, for a lump sum payment and seeks to illustrate the second exception noted above. Based on the analysis in the ruling the ATO states that it is reasonable to conclude that independent entities would not have entered into the actual commercial and financial relations, rather it would have entered into other arrangements. The example proceeds to state that it could be the case that the taxpayer's taxable income was less that it should be and that a transfer pricing benefit was derived. Accordingly, " might be appropriate to adjust the terms of the agreement in a commercial and rational manner as a continuing research agreement and identify the arm's length conditions on that basis." 13 This position is justified 14 on the basis that:

  1. There is no market based evidence of comparable transactions;
  2. The unusual nature of the 'lump sum' pricing arrangement;
  3. It does not make commercial sense to sell the IP for a lump sum; and
  4. The structure of the transaction impedes the identification of an appropriate transfer price.

This begs the question: what about the actual transactions that have taken place (recognition of assessable income or capital gain on the sale of the contractual rights, potentially royalty payments for the right to use IP etcetera). In the ruling compendium 15 the ATO states: " may be the case that the Commissioner would make a determination under Section 815-145 to provide a consequential adjustment to a disadvantaged entity." 16

We submit that if a transfer pricing benefit is found to have been derived by the taxpayer the example should provide greater clarity and certainty as to how and under what circumstances the ATO proposes to make a consequential adjustment. Having said that, taxpayers have the right, under Section 815-145, to request that the Commissioner make such a determination and they have rights of objection and appeal in relation thereto. 17 In addition, taxpayers can take some solace from OECD Guidelines or 'guidance' (that the Commissioner is directed 18 to consider), wherein it states: "...any non-recognition of the restructuring arrangement would need to reflect that a transfer of such property occurred between the two parties, although it may be appropriate to replace the character of the transfer with an alternative characterisation that comports as closely as possible with the facts of the case..." 19 .

7. The Double Taxation Quandary

On the other side of each and every reconstruction, annihilation, substitution or restatement of a taxpayer's transfer pricing business arrangements resulting from the application of Section 815-130 is another taxpayer and a foreign tax jurisdiction(s). The potential for disagreement with the foreign jurisdiction is readily apparent and the OECD recognises the restructuring dilemma in the OECD Guidelines wherein it states:

"In other than exceptional cases, the tax administrations should not disregard the actual transactions or substitute other transactions for them. Restructuring of legitimate business transactions would be a wholly arbitrary exercise the inequity of which could be compounded by double taxation where the other tax administration does not share the same views as to how the transaction should be structured." 20

In the absence of relevant tax treaties containing compulsory binding arbitration clauses, and very few do so 21 , in the author's view the possibility of double taxation will prove not only a frustration but a serious financial burden faced by taxpayers. This is so given nearly all Australia's tax treaties include a mutual agreement article that merely requires that competent authorities "...shall jointly endeavour to resolve by mutual agreement..." or "...endeavour... to arrive at a satisfactory conclusion..." and so on. There is no requirement to come to an agreement (and, in the author's experience, agreement by Competent Authorities is not always reached in transfer pricing disputes).

One possible way to address the want of an arbitration clause in our tax treaties is for the Australian Government to agitate in its various roles at appropriate OECD and G20 meetings for inclusion of an arbitration clause in the "multinational instrument" proposed by the OECD as a part of Action 15 of the OECD Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. The intention is that a proposed multinational instrument in question would amend all bilateral tax treaties in one fell swoop.

We note that the OECD has concluded that it is both desirable and feasible to develop and introduce a multinational instrument which will have the same effect as the "...simultaneous renegotiation of thousands of bilateral tax treaties". 22 Whether or not our Government (and treaty partners) have the 'willpower and metal' to enter into such an 'instrument' remains to be seen.

8. Date of Effect

The ruling applies to income tax years commencing on or after 29 June 2013. More importantly, Subdivision 815-B "...applies to transactions or arrangements that occurred "before" 29 June 2013, to the extent that those transactions or arrangements affect an entity's Australian tax position on or after 29 June 2013." 23

The fact that subdivision 815-B applies to transactions that have a "flow-through" impact to taxpayers for years commencing on or after 29 June 2013 creates a very onerous obligation upon taxpayers; that being, to give some consideration as to whether a transaction that may have taken place some years earlier, such as the sale of intellectual property rights, has or may have resulted in a transfer pricing benefit in the current year. Arguably, the possibility of such adjustments raises the question as to the legitimacy of such legislation as in essence it is retrospective in effect 24 .

9. Conclusion

The reconstruction powers enshrined in Subdivision 815-B of the Act introduces a power that is expected to prove both highly contentious, time consuming and complex to administer as taxpayers self-assess whether or not they have derived a transfer pricing benefit and, in particular, whether any of the reconstruction provisions may apply (in the current year or, because of the flow-through effect of a transaction or transactions, entered into in some prior year).

The provisions are contentious because of the inherently subjective nature of any reconstruction of actual dealings to purportedly align them with 'hypothetical' arm's length dealings and because they will lead to double taxation as the OECD Guidelines and our tax treaties presently stand; in this regard, the ATO is to be commended for advising that the use of these provisions will be restricted to senior officers of the ATO and that consultation within the ATO International Division is required before the provisions can be applied.


1 Refer TR 2014/D3
2 Refer TR 2014/6 Paragraph 40
3 Refer Section 815-125 of the Act
4 OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations published on 22 July 2010 ("OECD Guidelines")
5 TR 2014/6 Paragraph 39
6 OECD Guidelines Paragraph: 9.168
7 Section 815-130(2) of the Act
8 Section 815-130(3)] of the Act
9 Section 815-130(4) of the Act
10 Further guidance on the documentation requirements will be provided when the ATO finalises the draft ruling (TR 2014/D4) on transfer pricing documentation requirements. This was originally planned for publication in fi nal form at the same time as TR 2014/6 and is expected out any day now.
11 TR 2014/6 Paragraph 123. Subsections 815-130(2) to 815-130(4) each commence with the words: "Despite paragraph (1)..." or "Despite subsection (1)..."
12 Correspondence from the ATO dated 20 November 2014
13 TR 2014/6 Paragraphs 55-57
14 TR 2014/6 Paragraph 162
15 Refer TR 2014/6EC Paragraph 1
16 TR 2014/6EC – Issue 1. A like statement is also made at paragraph 165 of TR 2014/6
17 Refer Section 815-145(7) and (8)
18 Refer Section 815-135 of the Act
19 OECD Guidelines paragraph 9.187
20 OECD Guidelines Paragraph 1.64
21 Refer for example to Article 25 in Australia's tax treaty with New Zealand
22 Refer OECD "Developing a Multinational Instrument to Modify Bilateral Tax Treaties" Published 16 September 2014. Page 9
23 TR 2014/6 Paragraph 78
24 Refer for example to the lecture given to the Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne by the Hon Justice Gordon of the Federal Court on 29 August 2012 wherein she states: "...the retrospective alteration of taxation liabilities "may" (I do not say must) reach a point where some question of the acquisition of property (within the meaning of Section 51 of the Constitution) arises.Section 5I(xxxi) of the Constitution is an important limitation of power; an implied guarantee. A guarantee of property rights...a constitutional guarantee of 'just terms'." [Page 10]

This publication is issued by Moore Stephens Australia Pty Limited ACN 062 181 846 (Moore Stephens Australia) exclusively for the general information of clients and staff of Moore Stephens Australia and the clients and staff of all affiliated independent accounting firms (and their related service entities) licensed to operate under the name Moore Stephens within Australia (Australian Member). The material contained in this publication is in the nature of general comment and information only and is not advice. The material should not be relied upon. Moore Stephens Australia, any Australian Member, any related entity of those persons, or any of their officers employees or representatives, will not be liable for any loss or damage arising out of or in connection with the material contained in this publication. Copyright © 2014 Moore Stephens Australia Pty Limited. All rights reserved.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.