Australia: Can ASIC Obtain Your Privileged Communications? — Implications of the James Hardie Bill

Last Updated: 21 December 2004

Article by Geoff Healy, Luke Hastings, Andrew Eastwood and Cameron Hanson

The James Hardie (Investigations and Proceedings) Act 2004 (Cth) (James Hardie Act) came into force on 15 December 2004. The effect of the James Hardie Act is, in general terms, to abrogate legal professional privilege with respect to investigations and proceedings commenced by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) in relation to the James Hardie group of companies.

The implications of the James Hardie Act for other companies are important.

For some time there has been uncertainty about ASIC's ability to gain access to documents protected by legal professional privilege. For example, the High Court in Daniels case in 2002 held that the ACCC was not entitled to require the production of privileged documents. It also expressly doubted the correctness of its earlier 1991 decision in Yuill's case, in which it had held that legal professional privilege was not a 'reasonable excuse' for failing to comply with a notice to produce documents issued by the Corporate Affairs Commission of New South Wales, one of the predecessors of ASIC. The James Hardie Act emphasises this uncertainty. Accordingly, a recipient of an ASIC notice seeking privileged documents should give serious consideration as to whether to accept ASIC's view that it can require production of that material.

The James Hardie Act indicates the willingness of the legislature to take dramatic steps, such as abrogating a fundamental common law right, where it considers there may have been serious corporate malpractice. It may also indicate a willingness to abrogate legal professional privilege with respect to regulatory investigations entirely.


ASIC has the power, for certain purposes, to issue notices requiring persons to produce specified documents (see, for example, section 30 of the ASIC Act 2001 (Cth)). An intentional or reckless failure to comply with such a notice is an offence, unless the person has a 'reasonable excuse' (section 63 of the ASIC Act).

Since the High Court's decision in Corporate Affairs Commission of NSW v Yuill (1991) 172 CLR 319 (Yuill), ASIC has taken the view that legal professional privilege is not a 'reasonable excuse' for the purposes of section 63 of the ASIC Act. In Yuill, the High Court held, by a 3–2 majority, that legal professional privilege did not constitute a reasonable excuse to refuse to produce documents in response to a notice to produce issued by an inspector under section 295(1) of the now repealed Companies Code.

Yuill has been followed in subsequent cases dealing with provisions of the ASIC Act (see Australian Securities Commission v Dalleagles Pty Ltd (1992) 36 FCR 350; Corporations and Securities Panel v Bristile Investments Pty Ltd [1992] WASC 183; 32 ACSR 677).

However, recent decisions of the House of Lords and the High Court have cast considerable doubt over whether Yuill is still good law. That doubt is confirmed by the terms of the James Hardie Act.

Doubts cast over the reasoning in Yuill

The reasoning of the majority in Yuill, in reaching the conclusion that legal professional privilege did not constitute a reasonable excuse, had regard principally to two matters:

  • the fact that at the time the Companies Code was enacted legal professional privilege was seen as being confined in its scope to judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings, and
  • the existence and terms of section 308 of the Companies Code (which was identical in terms to the current section 69 of the ASIC Act, which, in general terms, provides that if ASIC issues a notice to a lawyer requiring the lawyer to disclose privileged communications, the lawyer is entitled to refuse to comply with the requirement unless the relevant client consents).

As to the first point above, given that the ASIC Act was enacted after the High Court made it clear that legal professional privilege is not a mere rule of evidence and is not limited in its application to judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings (Attorney General (NT) v Maurice (1986) 161 CLR 475 at 490; Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52), this argument is no longer applicable.

As to the second point above, at least two of the judges in the majority in Yuill considered that the existence of such a provision manifested an intention not to extend the full protection of legal professional privilege beyond a legal practitioner. However, as the House of Lords explained in R (Morgan Grenfell & Co Ltd) v Special Commission of Income Tax [2003] 1 AC 563, in construing a similar provision in the Taxes Management Act 1970 (UK), the section is explicable as preserving the duty of confidence owed by a lawyer to his or her client, by providing that disclosure of information or production of a book by a lawyer cannot be required without the client's consent. In this way, the section is properly to be interpreted as being consistent with, or at least not inconsistent with, the preservation of legal professional privilege.

Daniels case

Further doubt was cast over the reasoning and precedent value of Yuill by the statements made by the High Court in Daniels Corporation International Pty Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2002) 213 CLR 543 (Daniels).

In Daniels, the High Court held unanimously that section 155 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) did not authorise the ACCC to require production to it of information and documents to which legal professional privilege attaches. In so finding, the High Court variously:

  • reiterated that legal professional privilege is a fundamental common law immunity and, as such, a statute will only abrogate a claim to legal professional privilege to the extent made necessary by express word or necessary intendment
  • confined Yuill to its facts, namely a case dealing with section 295(1) of the Companies Code, and
  • doubted the correctness of Yuill.

The James Hardie Act

The James Hardie Act came into force on 15 December 2004.

The effect of the James Hardie Act is to abrogate legal professional privilege in relation to 'James Hardie material' for the purposes of, or in connection with, an investigation by ASIC into the James Hardie group of companies, and any associated proceeding commenced by ASIC or the Director of Public Prosecutions.

The James Hardie Act expressly states that section 69 of the ASIC Act (see above) does not apply in relation to 'James Hardie material'. That is, even if the client does not consent, lawyers can be required to produce legally privileged material, for the purposes of an ASIC investigation or associated proceeding.

The fact that the Commonwealth Government has considered it necessary to introduce a new piece of legislation to expressly abrogate legal professional privilege with respect to the James Hardie group, supports the doubts referred to above as to the continuing authority of Yuill. This is confirmed by the text of the Explanatory Memorandum to the James Hardie Bill, which states:

'The Bill will confirm a longstanding interpretation of ASIC's investigative and enforcement powers which was cast into doubt by the decision of the High Court in 2002 in the Daniels case. That case created some uncertainty as to whether the 1991 decision of the High Court in the Yuill case would be followed today if a request by ASIC to produce material subject to legal professional privilege was to be challenged.'


In letters accompanying notices issued under section 30 of the ASIC Act, ASIC still maintains that legal professional privilege is not a reasonable excuse for failing to produce documents in response to such a notice.

However, given the developments referred to above, a person who receives a notice from ASIC should give serious consideration as to whether to simply accept ASIC's position that privileged documents are required to be produced. In particular, given the Daniels case and the James Hardie Act, a challenge in the courts to ASIC's entitlement to such documents would appear to have real prospects of success.

The James Hardie Act is also significant for at least two other reasons.

First, it indicates that the legislature is willing to take dramatic steps, such as the abrogation of a fundamental common law right, in instances where it considers there may have been serious corporate malpractice.

Second, it suggests that, in the future, the legislature might be prepared to abrogate legal professional privilege, with respect to regulatory investigations, entirely. In that regard, it is relevant to note that the Explanatory Memorandum to the James Hardie Bill states:

'As recognised by the High Court in the Daniels case, legal professional privilege is not merely a rule of substantive law but an important common law right. Nevertheless, there are situations in which its abrogation is justified in order to serve higher public policy interests. One such situation is the effective enforcement of corporate regulation.' (emphasis added)

As such, the James Hardie Act is a worrying development for corporations and their legal advisers. If regulators, such as ASIC, are entitled to require legally privileged materials to be produced, the inevitable result will be the encouragement of:

  • legal advisers giving verbal legal advice, which is impracticable in complex factual matters and which will result in the client not being fully appraised of its true legal position
  • a reluctance on the part of the client to be open and honest in giving instructions, for fear that the legal advice it receives may be used against them, or
  • no legal advice being sought.

In our view, the encouragement of these outcomes is inimical to the effective administration of justice.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.