Australia: In brief: Legal changes around the competition world in Belgium, COMESA, European Union, France, Netherlands, United States

Belgium: New Competition Act takes effect

In September 2013, Belgium's new Competition Act came into force. It involves a number of significant institutional and procedural changes, intended to improve the effectiveness of national competition law enforcement in Belgium. Key changes include:

  • The amalgamation of the existing Competition Council and Directorate General for Competition into a new single competition authority, to be known as the Belgian Competition Authority (Autoritié belge de concurrence / Mededingingsautoriteit). This is similar to the development in the United Kingdom, where the existing Competition Commission and Office of Fair Trading are to be amalgamated into a new single authority, the Competition and Markets Authority;
  • There is to be a settlement procedure for investigations under the prohibition on anti-competitive agreements;
  • The new authority will have the power to impose fines on individuals, as well as on companies, for cartel infringements;
  • There will be new strict timetables for investigations under the prohibitions on anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominance; and
  • In merger control, there will also be a stricter timetable, with the simplified procedure shortened from 20 to 15 working days.

COMESA (Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa): COMESA merger control overrides national merger control

In much the same way that, within the European Union, a merger filing (notification) to the European Commission removes the need for filings to national competition authorities in the EU Member States, so too the COMESA Court of Justice has ruled that a merger filing (notification) to COMESA's Competition Commission will remove the need for filings to national authorities in the COMESA Member State.

At the end of August 2013, the COMESA Court of Justice issued a ruling in the case of Polytol v Mauritius43 about the applicability of the COMESA Treaty within COMESA Member States, including those Member States that have not yet adopted the Treaty as domestic law in their national jurisdictions.

Several Member States – including Kenya, Mauritius and Zambia – had taken the position that, in the absence of domestication into national law, the COMESA competition regulations are not enforceable in their jurisdictions – the result being that (in their view) parties to M&A transactions that are notifiable to the COMESA Competition Commission must also notify the national authorities in those countries where their notification requirements are triggered by the transaction concerned.

The COMESA Court of Justice rejected this view:

"The argument of [the Government of Mauritius] that the [COMESA] Treaty is not directly enforceable in some jurisdictions... is misconceived. It is indeed true that there are differences in legal systems regarding their position towards the domestication of international law. In some Member States, treaties become directly applicable; in others they require another domestic legal instrument for their incorporation. Notwithstanding the differences in domestic legal systems, the [COMESA] Treaty objectives can be achieved when all Member States fulfil their obligations under the Treaty. Any Member State that acts contrary to the Treaty cannot, therefore, plead the nature of its legal system as a defence when citizens or residents of that State are prejudiced by its acts."

It seems, therefore, that parties to an M&A transaction that are notifiable to the COMESA Competition Commission can now resist any requirement to make notifications to national competition authorities within COMESA. That said, the enforcement of the COMESA Court of Justice's judgments still requires the cooperation of national courts, and it is unclear at this stage how national courts which have not domesticated the COMESA Treaty will treat this judgment.

European Union (EU) – the European Commission adopts new measures to streamline its merger review process

The European Commission announced on 5 December 2013 that it had adopted a package of measures to simplify the procedures for notifying transactions under the EU Merger Regulation (EUMR). These reforms came into effect on 1 January 2014 and attempt to streamline the process for the notification and review of mergers, particularly with regard to the following:

Simplified Procedures Notice: the Commission will provide greater leeway to notifying parties whose combined market shares fall below certain thresholds:

  • Parties can file shorter notification forms under the Commission's simplified procedure if their combined market share is less than 50% and where the increase in their combined market share as a consequence of the transaction is low (defined as a delta of less than 150 in the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index). However, the Commission reserves the right to consider whether such transactions qualify for the simplified procedure on a case-by-case basis.
  • The Commission has raised by 5% the market share thresholds for markets to qualify as "affected markets" for which detailed information must be provided. Markets in which the parties' combined share is less than 20% in horizontal relationships (previously 15%) or 30% in vertical relationships (previously 25%) will no longer be considered affected markets. Markets not meeting the "affected market" threshold will face less scrutiny by the competition authorities.

Taken together, the above changes are expected to increase the percentage of deals reviewed under the Commission's simplified process by around 10%, to a total of 60-70% of transactions notified. This widening of the scope of the simplified procedure should reduce the burden on businesses and related costs associated with merger notifications.

Amendments to the Implementing Regulations: The Commission has also streamlined the requirements for submission of internal documents accompanying the "Form CO" – the notification document used in the EUMR process:

  • For example, the Commission no longer requires internal board presentations analysing options for acquisitions other than that eventually pursued and internal business reports assessing affected markets only are required for the last two years, as opposed to three years under the previous rules.
  • Notifying parties will also have more discretion in deciding whether to engage in pre-notification contacts and whether to apply for waivers to produce certain information, such as providing lists of acquisitions made by the parties in the last three years. Merging parties will be encouraged to request waivers in these categories, rather than compiling such information in anticipation of a waiver not being granted.
  • Additionally, changes to the Implementing Regulations allow for a reduction in the information required from companies that request a referral of a case from the Commission to one of the EU's member states.

The Commission's new measures are expected to shorten the time needed for pre-notification contacts. According to the Commission's own analysis, these changes may affect around 25% of cases notified.

All "plausible" markets: The Commission has provided more guidance on what to consider "plausible" product market and geographic market definitions, in effect suggesting these be limited to those considered in prior decisions or industry reports, market studies or internal business documents. This guidance might be useful for parties seeking to reduce the scope of information they provide, although precedents in many sectors have considered a wide range of market definitions without reaching any firm conclusions. In such sectors, the new guidance would imply parties still need to consider a wide range of alternatives.

Remedies standard texts: Certain mergers require remedies or commitments to remove competition problems in order to allow a transaction to proceed. The Commission has updated its model texts for commitments to divest assets (first published in 2003) to bring them in line with the policy approach contained in the 2008 Notice on Remedies. Although these model texts are not legally binding, they will provide more legal consistency and predictability in commitment agreements.

Notifying parties will benefit from the Commission's revisions, particularly by making more deals eligible for the simplified procedure, and reducing the volume of internal documentation that companies are required to provide. However, these improvements will not change the fundamental challenges of the EUMR process, namely that it is a frequently slow and burdensome process requiring significant information on areas which often turn out to be of no concern to market participants.

France: Limitation periods for private antitrust enforcement

In France, there is a legal limitation period of ten years for bringing a private enforcement action in the court for damages as a result of antitrust or competition law infringements. A June 2013 ruling of the Paris Court of Appeal – in the case of Central Parts v JCB Service44 - has held that the period starts with the infringement itself (or, at least, with the victim having reasonable knowledge of the facts). Although a private action can only be brought on the basis of a decision by a competition authority (whether the European Commission or the French national competition authority), it is not necessary to wait until all routes of appeal have been exhausted and there is a final unappealable decision; indeed, in the case concerned, because the claimant (plaintiff) had waited for the outcome of an appeal against the European Commission decision to the EU Courts, it was entitled only to damages for part of its losses, with damages for earlier losses being time-barred.

This principle seems to be consistent with the statute of limitations regime that came into force in France in June 2008, under which the triggering event is the "reasonable knowledge of the facts" by the victim. Such knowledge is presumed to occur at the latest on the date of the initial finding of the infringement by a competition authority, regardless of the bringing of any appeals.

The Netherlands: Information exchange by public announcement – the mobile telecoms case

In November 2013, the Netherlands competition authority, the Autoriteit Consument en Markt (ACM), announced the conclusions of its investigation into the country's mobile operators – and, in doing so, pushed forward the frontiers of the concept of unlawful information exchange.

It is well-established in antitrust and competition laws around the world that it is restrictive of competition (and unlawful) for competitors to pass to each other competitively sensitive information, for example about proposed pricing, customers being targeted, or business and marketing strategies. Generally, such unlawful information exchanges occur through private communications – conversations at trade associations meetings, exchanges of emails between sales managers in different companies, etc.

In this case, however, the ACM took the view that even public statements about future market behaviour could carry antitrust risks. The AMC announced that "statements made in public (for example, at conferences or in trade journals)" about planned price increases could – if competitors took note and followed such publicly made statements – lead to collusive behaviour.

On this basis, the ACM required the three major mobile network operators in the Netherlands – KPN, T-Mobile and Vodafone – to make a commitment that they would refrain from making such public statements so as to avoid any risk of unlawful collusive behaviour in future.45

The ACM's view represents a development of thinking in competition law in Europe. At EU level, the European Commission's 2011 Guidelines on horizontal cooperation agreements state that "where a company makes a unilateral announcement that is... genuinely public, for example through a newspaper, this generally does not constitute" an infringement of the prohibition on anti-competitive agreements – although with a caveat that "where such an announcement was followed by public announcements by other competitors" the possibility of finding an infringement "cannot be excluded".46 Nearly thirty years earlier, the European Commission, in its decision on the Wood Pulp case,47 had found an infringement when a number of producers of wood pulp had made quarterly public price announcements in advance, giving other producers sufficient time to announce their own corresponding new prices before the start of the new quarter and so making the market artificially transparent. On appeal, however, the EU's Court of Justice had overturned the European Commission decision, holding that the Commission had failed to present enough evidence that there was concentration.

Most recently, in late November 2013, the European Commission began proceedings against a number of container liner shipping companies alleging infringement of the EU prohibition on anti-competitive agreements, Article 101.48 The alleged infringement consisted of the fact that, since 2009, the companies concerned had been making regular public announcements of price increase intentions through press releases on their websites and in the specialised trade press. The European Commission is concerned that this practice "may allow the companies to signal future price intentions to each other and may harm competition and customers by raising prices on the market for container liner shipping transport services on routes to and from Europe".

United States: New protections proposed for employees who "blow the whistle" on antitrust infringements

A Bill to introduce whistle-blower protections for employees who report antitrust law infringements is progressing through the US Congress. On November 4, 2013, the Senate unanimously approved a draft of the Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Act of 2013 (S.42).

The proposed legislation provides that employers will be prohibited from dismissing or discriminating against a whistle-blower in its terms and conditions of employment because either (i) the whistleblower provided to the employer or to the US federal government information related to the violation of an antitrust law or other criminal law committed in conjunction with a violation of antitrust law or (ii) the whistle-blower participated in an investigation of such a violation. Any employees who do suffer retaliation by way of dismissal or discrimination in such a case will be entitled to receive reinstatement, back pay, special damages and legal fees and costs.


43 COMESA Court of Justice (First Instance Division), Polytol Paints & Adhesives Manufacturers v Republic of Mauritius, ref. 1 of 2012, judgment of August 31, 2013.
44 Judgment of June 26, 2013.
45 Netherlands competition authority, Autoriteit Consument en Markt, Case 13.0612.53, press release, "Investigation into mobile operators concluded", November 21, 2013.
46 European Commission Communication, Guidelines on the applicability of Article 101... to horizontal cooperation agreements (2011/C11/01), OJ 2011 C11/1, paragraph 63.
47 European Commission decision 85/202, Wood Pulp, OJ 1985 L 85/1.
48 European Commission press release IP/13/1144, "Antitrust: Commission opens proceedings against container liner shipping companies", November 22, 2013.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions