Australia: In brief: Legal changes around the competition world in Belgium, COMESA, European Union, France, Netherlands, United States

Belgium: New Competition Act takes effect

In September 2013, Belgium's new Competition Act came into force. It involves a number of significant institutional and procedural changes, intended to improve the effectiveness of national competition law enforcement in Belgium. Key changes include:

  • The amalgamation of the existing Competition Council and Directorate General for Competition into a new single competition authority, to be known as the Belgian Competition Authority (Autoritié belge de concurrence / Mededingingsautoriteit). This is similar to the development in the United Kingdom, where the existing Competition Commission and Office of Fair Trading are to be amalgamated into a new single authority, the Competition and Markets Authority;
  • There is to be a settlement procedure for investigations under the prohibition on anti-competitive agreements;
  • The new authority will have the power to impose fines on individuals, as well as on companies, for cartel infringements;
  • There will be new strict timetables for investigations under the prohibitions on anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominance; and
  • In merger control, there will also be a stricter timetable, with the simplified procedure shortened from 20 to 15 working days.

COMESA (Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa): COMESA merger control overrides national merger control

In much the same way that, within the European Union, a merger filing (notification) to the European Commission removes the need for filings to national competition authorities in the EU Member States, so too the COMESA Court of Justice has ruled that a merger filing (notification) to COMESA's Competition Commission will remove the need for filings to national authorities in the COMESA Member State.

At the end of August 2013, the COMESA Court of Justice issued a ruling in the case of Polytol v Mauritius43 about the applicability of the COMESA Treaty within COMESA Member States, including those Member States that have not yet adopted the Treaty as domestic law in their national jurisdictions.

Several Member States – including Kenya, Mauritius and Zambia – had taken the position that, in the absence of domestication into national law, the COMESA competition regulations are not enforceable in their jurisdictions – the result being that (in their view) parties to M&A transactions that are notifiable to the COMESA Competition Commission must also notify the national authorities in those countries where their notification requirements are triggered by the transaction concerned.

The COMESA Court of Justice rejected this view:

"The argument of [the Government of Mauritius] that the [COMESA] Treaty is not directly enforceable in some jurisdictions... is misconceived. It is indeed true that there are differences in legal systems regarding their position towards the domestication of international law. In some Member States, treaties become directly applicable; in others they require another domestic legal instrument for their incorporation. Notwithstanding the differences in domestic legal systems, the [COMESA] Treaty objectives can be achieved when all Member States fulfil their obligations under the Treaty. Any Member State that acts contrary to the Treaty cannot, therefore, plead the nature of its legal system as a defence when citizens or residents of that State are prejudiced by its acts."

It seems, therefore, that parties to an M&A transaction that are notifiable to the COMESA Competition Commission can now resist any requirement to make notifications to national competition authorities within COMESA. That said, the enforcement of the COMESA Court of Justice's judgments still requires the cooperation of national courts, and it is unclear at this stage how national courts which have not domesticated the COMESA Treaty will treat this judgment.

European Union (EU) – the European Commission adopts new measures to streamline its merger review process

The European Commission announced on 5 December 2013 that it had adopted a package of measures to simplify the procedures for notifying transactions under the EU Merger Regulation (EUMR). These reforms came into effect on 1 January 2014 and attempt to streamline the process for the notification and review of mergers, particularly with regard to the following:

Simplified Procedures Notice: the Commission will provide greater leeway to notifying parties whose combined market shares fall below certain thresholds:

  • Parties can file shorter notification forms under the Commission's simplified procedure if their combined market share is less than 50% and where the increase in their combined market share as a consequence of the transaction is low (defined as a delta of less than 150 in the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index). However, the Commission reserves the right to consider whether such transactions qualify for the simplified procedure on a case-by-case basis.
  • The Commission has raised by 5% the market share thresholds for markets to qualify as "affected markets" for which detailed information must be provided. Markets in which the parties' combined share is less than 20% in horizontal relationships (previously 15%) or 30% in vertical relationships (previously 25%) will no longer be considered affected markets. Markets not meeting the "affected market" threshold will face less scrutiny by the competition authorities.

Taken together, the above changes are expected to increase the percentage of deals reviewed under the Commission's simplified process by around 10%, to a total of 60-70% of transactions notified. This widening of the scope of the simplified procedure should reduce the burden on businesses and related costs associated with merger notifications.

Amendments to the Implementing Regulations: The Commission has also streamlined the requirements for submission of internal documents accompanying the "Form CO" – the notification document used in the EUMR process:

  • For example, the Commission no longer requires internal board presentations analysing options for acquisitions other than that eventually pursued and internal business reports assessing affected markets only are required for the last two years, as opposed to three years under the previous rules.
  • Notifying parties will also have more discretion in deciding whether to engage in pre-notification contacts and whether to apply for waivers to produce certain information, such as providing lists of acquisitions made by the parties in the last three years. Merging parties will be encouraged to request waivers in these categories, rather than compiling such information in anticipation of a waiver not being granted.
  • Additionally, changes to the Implementing Regulations allow for a reduction in the information required from companies that request a referral of a case from the Commission to one of the EU's member states.

The Commission's new measures are expected to shorten the time needed for pre-notification contacts. According to the Commission's own analysis, these changes may affect around 25% of cases notified.

All "plausible" markets: The Commission has provided more guidance on what to consider "plausible" product market and geographic market definitions, in effect suggesting these be limited to those considered in prior decisions or industry reports, market studies or internal business documents. This guidance might be useful for parties seeking to reduce the scope of information they provide, although precedents in many sectors have considered a wide range of market definitions without reaching any firm conclusions. In such sectors, the new guidance would imply parties still need to consider a wide range of alternatives.

Remedies standard texts: Certain mergers require remedies or commitments to remove competition problems in order to allow a transaction to proceed. The Commission has updated its model texts for commitments to divest assets (first published in 2003) to bring them in line with the policy approach contained in the 2008 Notice on Remedies. Although these model texts are not legally binding, they will provide more legal consistency and predictability in commitment agreements.

Notifying parties will benefit from the Commission's revisions, particularly by making more deals eligible for the simplified procedure, and reducing the volume of internal documentation that companies are required to provide. However, these improvements will not change the fundamental challenges of the EUMR process, namely that it is a frequently slow and burdensome process requiring significant information on areas which often turn out to be of no concern to market participants.

France: Limitation periods for private antitrust enforcement

In France, there is a legal limitation period of ten years for bringing a private enforcement action in the court for damages as a result of antitrust or competition law infringements. A June 2013 ruling of the Paris Court of Appeal – in the case of Central Parts v JCB Service44 - has held that the period starts with the infringement itself (or, at least, with the victim having reasonable knowledge of the facts). Although a private action can only be brought on the basis of a decision by a competition authority (whether the European Commission or the French national competition authority), it is not necessary to wait until all routes of appeal have been exhausted and there is a final unappealable decision; indeed, in the case concerned, because the claimant (plaintiff) had waited for the outcome of an appeal against the European Commission decision to the EU Courts, it was entitled only to damages for part of its losses, with damages for earlier losses being time-barred.

This principle seems to be consistent with the statute of limitations regime that came into force in France in June 2008, under which the triggering event is the "reasonable knowledge of the facts" by the victim. Such knowledge is presumed to occur at the latest on the date of the initial finding of the infringement by a competition authority, regardless of the bringing of any appeals.

The Netherlands: Information exchange by public announcement – the mobile telecoms case

In November 2013, the Netherlands competition authority, the Autoriteit Consument en Markt (ACM), announced the conclusions of its investigation into the country's mobile operators – and, in doing so, pushed forward the frontiers of the concept of unlawful information exchange.

It is well-established in antitrust and competition laws around the world that it is restrictive of competition (and unlawful) for competitors to pass to each other competitively sensitive information, for example about proposed pricing, customers being targeted, or business and marketing strategies. Generally, such unlawful information exchanges occur through private communications – conversations at trade associations meetings, exchanges of emails between sales managers in different companies, etc.

In this case, however, the ACM took the view that even public statements about future market behaviour could carry antitrust risks. The AMC announced that "statements made in public (for example, at conferences or in trade journals)" about planned price increases could – if competitors took note and followed such publicly made statements – lead to collusive behaviour.

On this basis, the ACM required the three major mobile network operators in the Netherlands – KPN, T-Mobile and Vodafone – to make a commitment that they would refrain from making such public statements so as to avoid any risk of unlawful collusive behaviour in future.45

The ACM's view represents a development of thinking in competition law in Europe. At EU level, the European Commission's 2011 Guidelines on horizontal cooperation agreements state that "where a company makes a unilateral announcement that is... genuinely public, for example through a newspaper, this generally does not constitute" an infringement of the prohibition on anti-competitive agreements – although with a caveat that "where such an announcement was followed by public announcements by other competitors" the possibility of finding an infringement "cannot be excluded".46 Nearly thirty years earlier, the European Commission, in its decision on the Wood Pulp case,47 had found an infringement when a number of producers of wood pulp had made quarterly public price announcements in advance, giving other producers sufficient time to announce their own corresponding new prices before the start of the new quarter and so making the market artificially transparent. On appeal, however, the EU's Court of Justice had overturned the European Commission decision, holding that the Commission had failed to present enough evidence that there was concentration.

Most recently, in late November 2013, the European Commission began proceedings against a number of container liner shipping companies alleging infringement of the EU prohibition on anti-competitive agreements, Article 101.48 The alleged infringement consisted of the fact that, since 2009, the companies concerned had been making regular public announcements of price increase intentions through press releases on their websites and in the specialised trade press. The European Commission is concerned that this practice "may allow the companies to signal future price intentions to each other and may harm competition and customers by raising prices on the market for container liner shipping transport services on routes to and from Europe".

United States: New protections proposed for employees who "blow the whistle" on antitrust infringements

A Bill to introduce whistle-blower protections for employees who report antitrust law infringements is progressing through the US Congress. On November 4, 2013, the Senate unanimously approved a draft of the Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Act of 2013 (S.42).

The proposed legislation provides that employers will be prohibited from dismissing or discriminating against a whistle-blower in its terms and conditions of employment because either (i) the whistleblower provided to the employer or to the US federal government information related to the violation of an antitrust law or other criminal law committed in conjunction with a violation of antitrust law or (ii) the whistle-blower participated in an investigation of such a violation. Any employees who do suffer retaliation by way of dismissal or discrimination in such a case will be entitled to receive reinstatement, back pay, special damages and legal fees and costs.


43 COMESA Court of Justice (First Instance Division), Polytol Paints & Adhesives Manufacturers v Republic of Mauritius, ref. 1 of 2012, judgment of August 31, 2013.
44 Judgment of June 26, 2013.
45 Netherlands competition authority, Autoriteit Consument en Markt, Case 13.0612.53, press release, "Investigation into mobile operators concluded", November 21, 2013.
46 European Commission Communication, Guidelines on the applicability of Article 101... to horizontal cooperation agreements (2011/C11/01), OJ 2011 C11/1, paragraph 63.
47 European Commission decision 85/202, Wood Pulp, OJ 1985 L 85/1.
48 European Commission press release IP/13/1144, "Antitrust: Commission opens proceedings against container liner shipping companies", November 22, 2013.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.