Australia: Planning Law Perspectives

Building and Construction Alert: 9 October 2013
Last Updated: 10 October 2013
Article by David Nicholls and Olivia Williamson

Issue 2

Welcome to the second issue in a rolling series of Alerts offering planning law perspectives on issues relevant to the building and construction industry.

Building Certifiers and the Court's declaratory jurisdiction

We have noticed in recent years an increase in resorting to the Planning and Environment Court's (Court) declaratory jurisdiction to attack approved buildings which have either been completed or are under construction.

The Court's declaratory jurisdiction arises under section 456 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA) or, formerly, section 4.1.21 of the Integrated Planning Act 1997 (IPA). It is invoked by making an originating application to the Court seeking a declaration that aspects of the development of a building are unlawful, as well as consequential orders restraining development from proceeding.

The Court's decision in Stevenson Group Investments v Nunn and Ors [2012] QPELR 392 is perhaps the high water mark (albeit an ultimately unsuccessful one) for resorting to this type of remedy, as it sought to have a building which had been completed for several years declared unlawful because of alleged errors by the certifier who approved it. Unusually, the applicant in this case owned several apartments in the building at Tangalooma on Moreton Island since its completion. Most of the purchase contracts for the apartments were signed before or while the building was under construction.

Declarations were sought that:

  1. The certificate of classification for the building was void due to alleged building defects which the certifier had not detected;
  2. The building permit was void because:
    1. The certifier referred the application to the Queensland Fire and Rescue Service (QFRS) outside the time prescribed for the referral under the IPA;
    2. The building was not generally in accordance with the underlying planning approval for the resort at Tangalooma; and
    3. The certifier did not impose a condition mandated by the IPA and the Standard Building Regulations 1993 precluding certain stages of the building work until engineering drawings and details were supplied.

After protracted proceedings in the Court and an aborted hearing, the Court awarded summary judgment to the respondents and dismissed the application. The Court's decision was subsequently upheld by the Queensland Court of Appeal, as were the costs orders made by the Court against the applicant.

There are three key legal points arising from the case:

  • Firstly, in an early preliminary hearing the first ground was struck out by the Court (Judge Durward in Stevenson Group Investments Pty Ltd v Nunn & Ors [2011] QPELR 133) on the basis that the Court had no jurisdiction to decide the allegation that the certificate of classification was invalid, because that did not concern matters done or to be done under the IPA, but rather related to matters affected by the Building Act 1975 and the Standard Building Regulations.
  • Secondly, the Court and the Court of Appeal held that none of the alleged statutory contraventions deprived the certifier of jurisdiction to grant the building approval, despite the use of apparently mandatory language in the IPA such as "must". The result was that the development permit was not a nullity from the outset, as contended for by the applicant.
  • Thirdly, both the Court and the Court of Appeal considered that there were strong discretionary considerations against granting the relief sought. A declaration is a "discretionary" remedy. Finding an error of law or other breach of a statutory requirement does not automatically result in the Court making a declaration in the terms sought. The applicant's substantial delay in bringing the proceedings, combined with the effect of a declaration on third party owners of apartments in the subject building, were significant factors. Justice McMurdo in the Court of Appeal said:
  • "The application for the declaration was an extraordinary form of relief to seek five years after the permit was issued and more than three years after the building was completed."

The Court's decision in Stevenson Group Investments v Nunn & Ors case can be contrasted with its decision in Livingstone Shire Council v Brian Hooper and M3 Architecture & Ors [2004] QPELR 308, in which the Court declared that the private certifier's approval of a development application was invalid because the Council had not approved a material change of use of land required under the planning scheme for a building of the height proposed. The case also involved a failure to refer the building application to the QFRS. The bases upon which the decision in Hooper's case was distinguished by the Court and the Court of Appeal were that in Hooper's case:

  • The building was still under construction;
  • No innocent third parties were affected;
  • There was no delay in bringing the proceedings;
  • The applicant had sought to bypass the Council as assessment manager;
  • The declaration was sought by the Council;
  • QFRS sought to be a party to the proceeding in order to assess the application; and
  • It was considered most unlikely that the Court would excuse the non-compliances.

Essentially, the alleged breaches of the law in Hooper's case were deliberate and designed to secure an advantage for the developer, and the proceedings were brought early by the Council as the custodian of the public interest to enforce compliance with the planning scheme.

There have been several attempts to use the Court's declaratory jurisdiction to stop the construction of dwellings that were thought to exceed the maximum allowable height under a planning scheme1. In each case the declarations were refused principally because the applicant's case needed to be supported by expert opinion about matters relevant to the development's treatment under the relevant planning scheme. In declaratory proceedings, the Court will not usually have the same degree of latitude as it has in merit appeals in the application of expert evidence to the outcome. It will usually not be a case of simply preferring the evidence of one expert over that of another. Where matters of degree and judgment are involved, and there are competing expert opinions about the relevant considerations, it is usually impossible to conclude that a certifier's decision is manifestly unreasonable to the degree required under administrative law principles. In these cases it will usually be necessary to show that the certifier did not act in good faith, or that he acted arbitrarily or capriciously, misdirected himself on matters of law, failed to take relevant considerations into account, took into account irrelevant considerations, or that his decision was so unreasonable that no reasonable private certifier could have arrived at it. Such factors would be unusual in most cases, which explains why declaratory proceedings alleging errors by assessment managers (particularly private certifiers) are, more often than not, unsuccessful.

The Court's recently expanded costs powers are a relevant consideration for parties contemplating such proceedings. In Stevenson Group Investments v Nunn & Ors case costs were awarded to respondents under the previous costs rules, which limited an award of costs to circumstances where the proceeding was frivolous or vexatious. The power to award costs is now completely discretionary and is a factor that should be taken into account before prosecuting such proceedings, particularly having regard to the inherent difficulty for third parties in achieving success.

The above comments should not be taken as suggesting that declaratory proceedings in the Court are not a useful remedy in cases of plainly unlawful development. The risks involved in resorting to the Court's declaratory jurisdiction will obviously depend upon the facts in each case. The main point to be taken from this publication is that processing errors by certifiers may be subsequently excused by the Court, and affected approvals are likely (in most cases) to survive attack in circumstances where the certifier has acted honestly and reasonably. Nevertheless, by taking care to avoid such errors private certifiers will undoubtedly save applicants the time, expense, anxiety and risk arising from litigation.

1See for example, Newing & Ors v Silcock & Ors [2010] QPELR 692, Di Marco v Brisbane City Council & Ors [2006] QPELR 731; Cox & Ors v Maroochy Shire Council & Ors [2006] QPELR 628; Glastonbury & Anor v Townsville City Council & Ors [2012] QPELR 216; Bon Accord v Brisbane City Council & Ors [2010] QPELR 23; Pine Mountain Court Pty Ltd & Ors v Valente [2000] QPELR 265

© HopgoodGanim Lawyers

Award-winning law firm HopgoodGanim offers commercially-focused advice, coupled with reliable and responsive service, to clients throughout Australia and across international borders.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

David Nicholls
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.