Already tense relations between the ACCC and supermarket giant
Woolworths, have reached new heights. On 6 June 2013, the ACCC
announced that it would oppose Woolworths' acquisition of a
single undeveloped supermarket site in the Western Sydney suburb of
Glenmore Park. This decision is important both for the ACCC and the
supermarket chains as it is the first time the ACCC has opposed the
acquisition of an undeveloped site.
Why did the ACCC Block Woolworths' Acquisition?
The ACCC determined that Woolworths' acquisition would be
anti-competitive in eliminating the only opportunity for a
competing supermarket to open in the local suburb of Glenmore Park.
The ACCC determined that if Woolworths did not acquire the site at
Glenmore Park, another supermarket operator would be likely to open
at the site and stimulate local competition.
Looking at the facts and the ACCC's decision more closely,
the only other supermarket in Glenmore Park is a Woolworths'
supermarket, a new Aldi store will open in Glenmore Park but not
until 2014, the next closest supermarket is another Woolworths'
supermarket in South Penrith, and a 10 to 15 minute drive away in
Penrith, there are various supermarkets including a Woolworths, a
Coles, two Franklins, an ALDI, and a Foodworks supermarket.
Interestingly, the ACCC departed from its traditional approach
that supermarkets within a radius of 3 to 5 km of the target site
are in the same local market. Instead, the ACCC determined that the
supermarkets located in South Penrith and Penrith (which are within
a 5km radius) did not provide sufficient constraint to be in the
same local market as the supermarkets in Glenmore Park. The ACCC
justified this because it is harder for consumers to shop in
neighbouring suburbs as Glenmore Park is bound by the M4 Motorway
and non-residential areas.
Why is this Decision Significant?
Tensions between Woolworths and the ACCC are already high given
the ACCC's continuing enquiry into the grocery sector –
this decision is likely to add to this tension. Woolworths has
refused to agree to notify the ACCC upfront of its store
acquisition and development plans and is reportedly critical of the
ACCC for allegedly taking too long to make decisions. In response,
the ACCC took the rare step in relation to this matter to publicly
comment that it had, in effect, completed its review of
Woolworths' proposal to acquire the Glenmore Ridge site by
October 2012 but had suspended its investigation timeline on a
number of occasions at Woolworths' request.
For Woolworths, being unable to acquire a single supermarket
site at Glenmore Ridge will not significantly impact an aggressive
expansion plan it has in place. (Woolworths plans to open 34 new
supermarkets in the financial year to 30 June 2013 and already
operates 872 Woolworths stores across Australia. ) However, this
decision is important because it may set an important precedent for
future competition assessments by the ACCC. It is now plausible for
instance that the ACCC would oppose Woolworths opening a second
supermarket in a suburb that has only one other operator.
Woolworths is also likely to be concerned about the narrower
approach to defining the boundary of local markets that the ACCC
has taken on this occasion.
Woolworths is reportedly considering challenging the ACCC's
decision in the Federal Court.
The assistance of Fadi Metanios, Solicitor, of Addisons in
the preparation of this article is noted and greatly
In some cases these fees or surcharges are higher than what a bank charges to these merchants for use of the system.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).