Late yesterday evening Federal Treasury issued an urgent email
to interested stakeholders giving clarification as to the boundary,
in monetary terms, between Small Amount Credit Contracts (SACCs)
and Medium Amount Credit Contracts (MACCs).
A SACC is a credit contract where the "credit limit"
is $2,000 or less. Over that amount the credit contract becomes a
The issue for stakeholders, has been determining whether the
"credit limit" for a SACC, is inclusive or exclusive of
the "permitted establishment fee" and the initial first
"permitted monthly fee" where those fees are
Treasury has now clarified this point in an announcement issued
at 7.05 pm on Thursday 6 June 2013 in the following terms:
"...it is understood there are different views on
whether the definition of a SACC means that the amount of credit
the consumer can receive in hand is $2000, or only a lesser amount
(according to whether or not any of the permissible establishment
and monthly fees are financed). Given that lenders cannot charge
interest on establishment and monthly fees Treasury considers they
are not to be treated as part of the amount of credit
...Treasury will therefore look to shortly address this
issue through regulations to make it clear, in relation to small
amount credit contracts, that in all cases the credit limit
equates to the adjusted credit amount, so that the adjusted credit
amount can be an amount up to $2000. "
Credit providers with small amount credit contracts can now
proceed with certainty in planning for commencement of the new laws
dealing interest rate caps and other related matters which take
effect from 1 July 2013.
However, there is at least one issue that still needs to be
clarified by Treasury in relation to the upper monetary limit of a
MACC, which is defined as a credit contract where the credit limit
is between $2001 and $5000 and where an establishment fee of $400
may be charged.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The Sportscraft refunds and returns policy limitations went beyond consumer's rights under the Australian Consumer Law.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).