Australia: 2012 Down Under – A sample of Interesting Cases for Brand Owners

Last Updated: 19 May 2013
Article by Karen Hayne

Parallel imports, overseas brands and the registrability of building names came under scrutiny from the Australian courts last year. As some of these cases demonstrate, the application of even long-established trademark protection principles can evolve

The Australian courts were busy considering a number of key issues for rights holders throughout 2012. This article covers some of the most significant and discusses their likely impact.

Parallel imports

The Full Federal Court of Australia considered the issue of parallel importation of goods and trademark infringement in several cases. The following decisions should serve as a warning to importers and assist rights holders in an area that has in the past proved difficult to police in Australia.

Round 1 – shark attack

Paul's Retail Pty Ltd v Sporte Leisure Pty Ltd ([2012] FCAFC 51) involved the use of the trademarks GREG NORMAN and SHARK on clothing imported and offered for sale in Australia by Paul's Retail. The marks were owned by Great White Shark Enterprises and licensed to Greg Norman Collections, which licensed an Indian company to manufacture and sell goods bearing the marks in India.

Paul's Retail purchased goods bearing the marks from the Indian manufacturer, arguing that the marks had been applied with the rights holder's consent. It sought to rely on the defence to infringement set out in Section 123 of the Trademarks Act 1995, which provides that there is no infringement "if the trade mark has been applied to, or in relation to, the goods by, or with the consent of, the registered owner of the mark".

The primary judge and the Full Court determined (Sporte Leisure Pty Ltd v Paul's International Pty Ltd (No 3) [2010] FCA 1162) that the marks had been applied to goods which were offered for sale outside the designated territory, and that the rights holder had not consented to this use. As a result, the goods were not "genuine" and Paul's Retail was unable to rely on Section 123.

Paul's Retail sought special leave to appeal the decision of the Full Federal Court to the High Court of Australia. However, this was refused.

Round 2 – enter Lonsdale

Lonsdale Australia Ltd also commenced proceedings in 2012 against Paul's Retail for trademark infringement (Lonsdale Australia Limited v Paul's Retail Pty Limited [2012] FCA 584). Lonsdale owns the Lonsdale trademarks in Australia. Lonsdale Sports Limited (LSL) owns the Lonsdale trademarks in Europe (both are part of the Lonsdale Group).

Paul's Retail purchased Lonsdale-branded goods. LSL's marks (or substantially similar marks) had been applied to the goods by a licensee of LSL in Europe, which was licensed to use the LSL marks in Europe. When Paul's Retail imported the Lonsdale goods into Australia, they were seized by Customs and Lonsdale subsequently commenced proceedings for trademark infringement.

Paul's Retail again relied on Section 123 (among others), arguing that goods bearing a trademark that had been applied with the consent of the rights holder should not be prohibited from entering into Australia. The primary judge determined that the proper question to be asked was whether Lonsdale's rights in the Lonsdale marks had been infringed by Paul's Retail. Paul's Retail bore the onus of proving that the marks used by the licensee had been applied with the consent of Lonsdale and was unable to establish this.

Paul's Retail appealed to the Full Court (Paul's Retail Pty Limited v Lonsdale Australia Limited [2012] FCAFC 130) on the grounds that the marks had been applied to goods with the consent of LSL, a related entity of Lonsdale.

The Full Court dismissed the appeal. In so doing it found that the consent provided by LSL to its European licensee was limited to Europe. The sale of the relevant goods in Australia amounted to unauthorised use of the Lonsdale marks.

The risks of adopting overseas brands

Winnebago – 25 years too long?

Winnebago Industries Inc, which is based in the United States, has manufactured recreational vehicles (RVs) since the 1960s. It has the following registered trademark in the United States:

In 1982 Knott Investments Pty Ltd commenced manufacturing and selling RVs in Australia under the trading name Winnebago and used the Winnebago US mark.

In 1985 Winnebago first became aware that Knott was using the Winnebago US mark to promote the sale of RVs in Australia. However, it was not until 1991 that Winnebago made contact with Knott, which resulted in a settlement agreement under which Knott agreed not to register WINNEBAGO in Australia and Winnebago agreed not to sue Knott in the United States. Further, Winnebago reserved its rights to take action in the future against Knott in Australia.

Despite the settlement agreement, in 1997 Knott registered the mark WINNEBAGO in Australia.

In 2010 Winnebago decided to enter the Australian market and demanded that Knott cease using the WINNEBAGO mark. When Knott refused to do so, Winnebago commenced proceedings against it for passing off and misleading and deceptive conduct. Winnebago had no registered trademark in Australia on which to rely (Winnebago Industries, Inc v Knott Investments Pty Ltd (No 2) [FCA] 785).

A key question in the proceeding was whether Winnebago had a sufficient reputation in Australia as of June 1 1982, when Knott commenced carrying on the business of Winnebago. There was no doubt that the Winnebago brand had gained an extensive reputation in the United States and other territories by that date.

Winnebago submitted that many Australians travelled to the United States and other relevant territories before June 1 1982 (and after). Due to the significant reputation of the Winnebago brand in those territories, Australians would have become aware of the Winnebago brand.

Winnebago also established that a considerable number of international publications, in which Winnebago's RVs and brand appeared or were referred to, were accessible in Australia before and after June 1 1982.

In cross-examination, Mr Binns, a director of Knott, stated that: "I chose the name because they [Winnebago] were a respected company in America and they produced a good product."

The above statement and other evidence led the court to conclude that Knott "intentionally hijacked the WINNEBAGO marks in Australia in a bold attempt to pre-empt Winnebago opening its doors here".

The court was satisfied that Australians were aware of the Winnebago brand as of June 1982 and that the public was likely to be confused into thinking Knott was related to Winnebago.

The court acknowledged that there had been an extraordinary delay on Winnebago's part in taking steps to protect its brand. However, the court determined that Winnebago had taken steps to protect its position through the settlement agreement. It referred to the settlement agreement as creating a "standstill" effect, which allowed Winnebago to enforce its rights in the future, and that the conduct complained of was continuing and therefore not out of time.

The court ordered the cancellation of the WINNEBAGO mark, and that Knott and its dealers be restrained from using it.

Knott has been granted leave to appeal to the Full Court – the appeal was heard in March 2013 and judgment has been reserved. The outcome of this matter is clearly the result of a unique factual background. The primary judge placed a significant amount of weight on the settlement agreement and Winnebago's reservation of its rights, regardless of the fact that the action was commenced 25 years after the first knowledge of the infringing conduct and 18 years after the settlement agreement. It will be interesting to see how the Full Court views this matter.

Tivo and Vivo – more than a coincidence?

In another matter involving an overseas brand, the Full Court again considered spill-over reputation into Australia and the honesty of selecting a name as important factors in infringement and removal matters.

In 1999 Tivo Inc, a US-based company known for its Tivo digital video recorder, commenced selling its product in the United States and registered TIVO as a trademark in Australia. However, it was not until July 2008 that Tivo commenced selling the Tivo product in Australia. In 2007 Vivo International Corporation Pty Ltd commenced selling various home-entertainment products branded VIVO in Australia. In February 2008 Vivo successfully registered its VIVO trademark in Australia. In January 2011 Tivo commenced proceedings against Vivo seeking cancellation of the VIVO mark and an injunction (Tivo Inc v Vivo International Corporation Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 252).

As to the issue of reputation, the court was required to consider the reputation of the TIVO mark in Australia before the priority date (or use) of the VIVO mark. The evidence showed that Tivo's products had been referred to:

  • in newspapers and magazines that were widely circulated in Australia (including evidence of sales of nearly 86 million copies of those publications including a reference to Tivo before the relevant date);
  • in popular television programmes and movies;
  • on internet sites (including news and other websites); and
  • by consumers in Australia who were fans of Tivo and its products.

Notwithstanding the lack of trading by Tivo in Australia, the spillover reputation was found to be extremely significant.

The primary judge was satisfied that the director of Vivo was aware of Tivo's reputation and its brand in overseas territories, and adopted the similar VIVO mark in Australia to benefit from the spill-over reputation (similar to Winnebago). The court ordered the cancellation of the VIVO mark and injunctive relief.

Vivo appealed the decision to the Full Court (Vivo International Corporation Pty Ltd v Tivo Inc [2012] FCAFC 159), with the appeal focusing primarily on the similarity (particularly aurally) of the two marks. The Full Court also disagreed with the primary judge that a finding of an intention to adopt the VIVO mark (to take advantage of Tivo's reputation) led to a likelihood of confusion and deceptive similarity. The Full Court ultimately found that the VIVO mark infringed the TIVO mark and dismissed the appeal, agreeing that it was appropriate to cancel the registration of the VIVO mark.

The case also dealt with a number of other important aspects of trademark law, providing a helpful clarification on these issues.

These overseas brand cases again demonstrate the importance of selecting a unique name and highlight that if a brand is well known in other jurisdictions, its reputation may spill over into Australia, even though the goods or services may not currently be offered there.

What's in a name?

Part 1 – Building names can be trademarks

In Mantra IP Pty Ltd v Spagnuolo (2012, FCA 769) the Federal Court considered whether an onsite letting agent could register the name of the building as a trademark for the provision of accommodation and related services. Mantra, the onsite letting agent of the iconic Q1 residential building located on the Gold Coast, Queensland, applied to protect the mark Q1 for the provision of accommodation and related services.

Spagnuola, the owner of two apartments in the Q1 building who also provided services as a letting agent for other apartments in the Q1 building, opposed Mantra's registration. Registration was refused on the grounds that the name Q1 had geographic connotations and that owners of apartments in the Q1 building may wish to use the name of the building to market and promote the availability of their apartments.

Mantra successfully appealed the decision to the Federal Court. The court found that Q1 was a name coined by the building developer and had no inherent meaning or association with a geographical place. It thus allowed the registration of Mantra's Q1 mark. Spagnuola has been granted leave to appeal to the Full Court.

Part 2 – are you sure you own your building name?

In another battle for rights in a building name, the Federal Court has highlighted the importance of the chain of title in a trademark.

Kingsgate Hotel owns a KINGSGATE HOTEL mark for accommodation services. Kingsgate opposed the registration of the following trademark filed by Millennium & Copthorne International Ltd for related services:

Kingsgate's opposition was successful and Millennium appealed to the Federal Court (Millennium & Copthorne International Ltd v Kingsgate Hotel Group Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1022).

A key issue considered by the court was the earlier and continuous use which Kingsgate submitted it had made of a similar mark since 2011. This included use by its predecessor. However, it was unable to prove any transfer or assignment of the similar mark to Kingsgate.

Millennium also argued that it had prior continuous use of its Millennium mark before the Kingsgate mark's priority date. Millennium was able to establish that a related entity to Millennium used the Millennium mark before the Kingsgate mark's priority date. Although it failed to establish that the rights in that mark had been transferred to it, Millennium was able to show sufficient honest concurrent use. The court therefore allowed the registration of the Millennium mark.

This case deals with various other issues, but also serves as a warning to any party acquiring a business or asset to which intellectual property may attach to ensure that all rights are properly identified and transferred to the new owner.

The above represents only a small sampling of interesting matters dealing with brand owners' rights that were decided in Australia in 2012. These cases also show that the application of long-established trademark protection principles does evolve and that these are utilised in new and interesting ways when the facts of the case allow. WT

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Karen Hayne
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.