Australia: Terminating and suspending industrial action in the post-Qantas environment

Key Points:

The Fair Work Act has created a high bar for suspension or termination of protected action.

Practitioners will agree that the lockout by Qantas on Saturday, 29 October 2011, which was terminated by a Full Bench of Fair Work Australia (FWA) in the early hours of Monday, 31 October 2011,1 was one of the most dramatic events seen since the introduction and evolu­tion of enterprise bargaining and protected industrial action. Qantas' high risk, high reward strategy of locking out approximately 3000 employees, potentially affecting hundreds of thousands of passengers globally, has given rise to many questions, and new perspectives, for parties experiencing protracted industrial disputation.

The purpose of this article is to examine the legisla­tive powers of FWA to intervene in industrial disputes. This article assesses FWA's current jurisdiction to sus­pend or terminate protected action under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), and in doing so, explores how FWA has administered its powers to date in the cases. As will be shown, the scheme enacted by the Fair Work Act has created a high bar for suspension or termination of protected action, and when properly considered, the events in Re Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations2 (Qantas) were a direct con­sequence of it.

Suspending or terminating protected industrial action under the Fair Work Act: Avenues, outcomes and grounds

Compared to predecessor industrial legislation, the Fair Work Act has altered and expanded upon each mechanism to suspend or terminate protected industrial action. The intention behind the mechanisms has also been clarified. As the Explanatory Memorandum describes:

"The [Fair Work Act] recognises that employees have a right to take protected industrial action during bargaining. These measures recognise that, while protected industrial action is legitimate during bargaining for an enterprise agreement, there may be cases where the impact of that action on the parties or on third parties is so severe that it is in the public interest, or even potentially the interests of those engaging in the action, that the industrial action cease — at least temporarily.

It is not intended that these mechanisms be capable of being triggered where the industrial action is merely causing an inconvenience. Nor is it intended that these mechanisms be used generally to prevent legitimate protected industrial action in the course of bargaining."3

The revised rules are prescriptive and complex. In order to demystify it, it is useful to categorise the key requirements into the following categories:

  • "avenues" (pathways that can lead to the protected action ceasing),
  • "outcomes" (how the protected action can cease); and
  • "grounds" (circumstances that give rise to the jurisdiction to cease the protected action).

Under the scheme, avenues and outcomes differ depending upon each ground.

Avenues for suspending or terminating protected action

There are five "avenues" in which protected action could be suspended or terminated under Pt 3-3 of the Fair Work Act. They are:

  1. upon an application to FWA by the parties (ie. the employer or trade union);
  2. upon an application to FWA by a third party;
  3. on FWA's own initiative;
  4. upon application to FWA by the Federal Minister for workplace relations or a state/territory minister with responsibility for workplace relations; or
  5. by a ministerial declaration by the Federal Minister for workplace relations (without application to FWA).


There are three "outcomes". Protected action can be terminated, and the right to protected action is quashed. FWA is then able to arbitrate the dispute (termed a "workplace determination") if the parties have yet to negotiate an agreement after a 21 day period (extendable to 42 days).4 Secondly, it can be suspended for a defined period of time that FWA determines as appropriate.5

Thirdly, FWA can order a cooling off if satisfied that it would assist the parties in resolving the dispute at hand. Only one extension of the period of suspension or cooling-off is available.6 Importantly, if one of these outcomes is ordered, it applies to all the protected action on foot in the dispute, not just the protected action that is the subject of the application.7


The three outcomes, through the five avenues, can only be triggered if certain "grounds" are occurring or are likely to occur. There are six separate grounds. The grounds have mostly been adapted from the successive reforms to industrial legislation, in that they focus on harm to health, safety and the economy, but they have been slightly expanded in each case. In its short history, FWA has been required to decide upon each ground brought under almost every avenue.

A summary of each ground, along with the major cases that have been brought under them, is offered below.

Ground 1: Significant economic harm to the employer and employees (s 423)

FWA discretion and criteria

Under section 423, FWA has discretion to suspend or terminate protected action should it be causing "signifi­cant economic harm" to the employer and employees. Applications may be made under all avenues, except by application from a third party. The following elements must be met:

  1. FWA must be satisfied that the protected action is causing, or threatening to cause, significant eco­nomic harm to the employer and employees;8
  2. the protected action must be occurring and have occurred for a protracted period of time;9
  3. the dispute that is subject of the protected action will not be resolved for a protracted period of time;10 and
  4. if the significant economic harm has not yet eventuated, the risk of it occurring must be imminent.11

If the protected action is a retaliation in response to other protected action (for example, a lockout in response to employee protected action), then FWA will only consider the harm that is borne by the employees in such action.12 In determining what constitutes "significant economic harm", the factors that FWA have regard to include the following:

  1. the source, nature and degree of harm suffered or likely to be suffered;
  2. the likelihood that the harm will continue to be caused;
  3. the capacity of the person (ie. employee or employer) to bear the harm inflicted upon them;
  4. the views of the person and the bargaining repre­sentatives for the agreement;
  5. whether the bargaining representatives have met the good faith bargaining requirements during negotiations;
  6. whether the bargaining representatives have not contravened any bargaining orders in relation to the agreement;
  7. the objective of promoting and facilitating bargain­ing for the agreement; and
  8. if FWA is considering terminating the protected action (rather than suspend it):
    1. whether the bargaining representatives genu­inely are unable to reach agreement on the terms that should be included in the agreement; and
    2. whether there is no reasonable prospect of agreement being reached.13

Cases before FWA

At the time of writing section 423 had been considered five times by FWA,14 and in all but one case the application has failed. This can be explained by the fact that employees will usually collectively endorse the pro­tected action, despite any suffering that may be inflicted, and will campaign against such an order.15 In those circumstances, and noting that employee harm is a prerequisite to an order even when employer harm is evident, it is difficult to establish that protected action is causing significant economic harm upon employees.

In Schweppes Australia v United Voice, the only successful case to date, this issue was overcome when a number of employees wrote to FWA (on an anonymous basis) to ask that the protected action stop. Based on the contents of those letters, Kaufman SDP summonsed the parties to FWA. After an affidavit was filed confirming the thrust of those letters, his Honour terminated the protected action on his own motion.16

Ground 2: Endangering the life, safety or wellbeing of the population (section 424(1)(c))

Nature of ground

Under s 424(1)(c), FWA must suspend or terminate protected action if satisfied that the action is or is going to endanger life, personal safety, health or welfare of the population or part of it. Applications may be made under all avenues, except by application from a third party. The concepts of "endanger", "life", "health", "safety" and "welfare" are not defined in the Fair Work Act, and the Explanatory Memorandum is of little assistance. The concepts take their ordinary English meaning.

FWA cases

At the time of writing, FWA has been called upon to interpret section 424(1)(c) 12 times, and six applications have resulted in either suspension or termination.17 Cases to date have concerned service providers of essential goods such as health care and utilities, and accordingly, FWA has taken a more sensitive and inter­ventionist approach. FWA has not looked favourably upon a failure to customise protected action in order to limit any potential harm that may be caused to life, safety or wellbeing.18

Ground 3: Significant harm to a third party (section 426)

Nature of ground and tests

FWA must suspend, but not terminate, protected action should it be causing significant harm to a third party, being a person that is not the employer, employees or bargaining representative. Only two avenues, being upon application by a third party or application by the Minister, are available under this ground. Whilst the inquiry is directed at "significant harm", and not "sig­nificant economic harm" (as in section 423), FWA has equated the tests to be of the same nature.19

To gain such an order FWA must be satisfied of the following:

  1. the protected action must be causing significant economic harm to a third party;20
  2. the protected action must be "adversely affecting" either the employer or the employees;21 and
  3. protected action must be on foot (rather than merely threatening, pending or probable).22

FWA must also be satisfied that the suspension is "appropriate", by taking into account:

  1. whether the suspension would be contrary to the public interest or the objectives behind the Fair Work Act; and
  2. any other matter that FWA considers relevant.23

In assessing significant harm, FWA is again entitled to take account of any matter it considers relevant, but can consider the extent that the protected action threat­ens to:

  1. damage the ongoing viability of the third party's enterprise;
  2. disrupt the supply of goods or services to the third party;
  3. reduce the third party's capacity to fulfill a con­tractual obligation; and
  4. cause any other economic loss caused to the person.24

Woodside case

This ground has only been determined once, unsuc­cessfully, in Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Woodside Burrup Pty Ltd (Woodside).25 In Woodside, a Full Bench of FWA confirmed how the suspension and termination provisions generally operate in light of the legislative intention behind the Fair Work Act, and has proved to be the most significant decision concerning suspension or termination of protected action to date. In an expansive interpretation, the Full Bench concluded that "substantial harm to third parties is a common consequence of effective industrial action,"26 and went on to hold:

"the word "significant" indicates harm that is excep­tional in its character or magnitude when viewed against the sort of harm that might ordinarily be expected to flow from industrial action in a similar context. In this way, an order will only be available under section 426 in very rare cases ... Unless the harm is out of the ordinary then suspension would contrary to the legislative intention that suspension should not be able to used generally to prevent legitimate protected industrial action in the course of bargaining.27 (emphasis added)".

The Full Bench reasoned that the basis for such a high threshold was justified once the right to strike, as enshrined in international law and reflected in the Fair Work Act's extrinsic materials, was duly considered and applied.28 Arguably (and perhaps owing to the expanded intention behind the Fair Work Act, outlined above), this reasoning goes beyond that of the High Court in Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd v AIRC,29 which said the following when called upon to interpret very similar statutory language in predecessor legislation:

"[T]he nature of the threat as to which a decision-maker must be satisfied under [the predecessor legislation] involves a measure of subjectivity or value judgment ... The presence of the words "significant" and "important" in [the predecessor legislation] indicate that the decision-maker must have some basis for his or her satisfaction over and above generalised predictions as to the likely conse­quences of the industrial action in question."30

The reasoning in Woodside has been influential in subsequent decisions and partly explains the number of failed applications across each ground.

Ground 4: If FWA considers that a cooling-off is appropriate (section 425)

Under section 425, FWA must to suspend protected action for a cooling-off period if FWA is satisfied it is appro­priate. Only one avenue, being an application by the bargaining representatives, is available. In determining such an application, FWA is to take into account:

  1. whether the suspension would be beneficial to the bargaining representatives in assisting in the reso­lution of outstanding matters;
  2. the duration of the protected action;
  3. whether the suspension would be contrary to the public interest or inconsistent with the objects of the Fair Work Act; and
  4. any other matters that FWA considers relevant.

Applications to FWA

At the time of writing, six applications for a cooling off have been made before FWA, and only one has been granted.31 The general trend of FWA decisions under section 425 has been to refuse a cooling-off "unless there was a finding that a cooling-off period would assist in the resolution" of an agreement.32 However, and taking the holdings of Woodside to their full extent, it could be argued that the existence of the possibility of protected action "has the effect of reducing the differences between the parties and making agreement more likely."33 So construed, it seems that cooling-off will only be ordered by FWA if there is a real and probable prospect that such an order would shepherd the parties to agreement.

Ground 5: Significant damage to the Australian economy or an important part of it (section 424(1)(d))

Nature of ground and terms

Under section 424(1)(d), FWA is obliged to suspend or terminate protected action if satisfied that the action is or is going to cause significant damage to the Australian economy or an important part of it. Again all avenues may be used under section 424(1)(d), save by application by a third party. The terms "significant damage" and "impor­tant part [of the Australian economy]" are not defined and thus take their ordinary meaning.

Applications to FWA

Applications under section 424(1)(d) have been brought before FWA three times, and two have been success­ful.34 Cases brought under this ground commonly involve economic forecasting as to how protected action will impact on parts of the Australian economy, and are thus necessarily imprecise.35 Whilst the Qantas dispute could have been brought under any number of different grounds, it was pleaded under section 424(1)(d). This was due to the fact that the Federal Minister had to act immediately, and evidence of damage to the Australian economy was readily available by calling senior public officials with expertise in affected sectors of the economy.36

Ground 6: If the Federal Minister is satisfied that a threat to health, safety, welfare or economic damage exists (section 431)

Declaration by Federal Minister

The final ground for intervention is through a decla­ration published by the Federal Minister under section 431, which is effected if the minister is satisfied that:

  1. the protected action is being engaged in, or is threatened, impending or probable; and
  2. the protected action is threatening, or would threaten:
    1. to endanger the life, the personal safety or health, or the welfare, of the population or a part of it; or
    2. to cause significant damage to the Australian economy or an important part of it.37

A declaration can only terminate and not suspend protected action. The Federal Minister must publish the declaration in the Government Gazette and make all bargaining representatives aware of the declaration as soon as practicable.38 The Fair Work Act does not provide a mechanism to review a declaration; however, judicial review would be available.

Administrative process

Such a declaration has not yet been made, and the Gillard government came under some criticism for refraining from issuing a declaration during the Qantas dispute.39 However, a declaration made under section 431 is an administrative process, subject to the principles of pro­cedural fairness and natural justice. If it is assumed that the government was notified of the lockout at the same time the public was, the urgent application to FWA would have produced a quicker outcome. That applica­tion, made on the evening of Saturday, 29 October 2011, and listed by FWA for 10:00 pm that night, is analysed in our article to be published in the next issue of the Employment Law Bulletin.


1 Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations, Re [2011] FWA 7444; BC201170021.

2 Above,n1.

3 Explanatory Memorandum, Fair Work Bill 2008, 267–268.

4 Section 266 Fair Work Act.

5 Sections 423–427 Fair Work Act.

6 Section 428 Fair Work Act.

7 National Tertiary Education Industry Union v University of South Australia (2010) 194 IR 30; [2010] FWAFB 1014 at [11].

8 Section 423(2) Fair Work Act.

9 Section 423(6)(a) Fair Work Act.

10 Section 423(6)(b) Fair Work Act.

11 Section 423(5) Fair Work Act.

12 Section 423(3) Fair Work Act.

13 Section 423(4) Fair Work Act.

14 Successful cases: Schweppes Australia Pty Ltd v United Voice (B2012/461, Kaufman SDP, 10 February 2012) (Schweppes). Unsuccessful cases: Prysmian Power Cables and Systems Australia v NUW [2010] FWA 9402; Nyrstar Port Pirie v CFMEU [2009] FWA 1148 and Schweppes Australia Pty Ltd v United Voice [2011] FWA 114; POAGS Pty Ltd v MUA [2012] FWA 114.

15 See for example Prysmian Power Cables and Systems Austra­lia v NUW [2010] FWA 9402 [47], [92] where a unanimous resolution was passed by employees requesting the Tribunal not to order a termination of the protected action. Cargill C concluded that the resolution indicated that the protected action did not meet the requisite magnitude to be significant for employees.

16 Schweppes, PN5-15, at [503]–[530].

17 Successful cases: Ambulance Victoria v LHMU (2009) 187 IR 119; [2009] FWA 44; NTEU v University of South Australia (2010) 194 IR 30; [2010] FWAFB 1014; Re Pelican Point Power Ltd [2010] FWA 8666; Tyco Australia Pty Ltd v CEPU [2011] FWAFB 1598; Victoria v CPSU [2011] FWA 9245; Victorian Hospitals Industrial Association v ANF [2011] FWA 8165. Unsuccessful cases: Minda Incorporated v LHMU [2010] FWA 3753; Minda Incorporated v LHMU [2010] FWA 3217; Geo Group Australia Pty Ltd v United Voice [2011] FWA 9025; St John Ambulance Australia (NT) Inc v United Voice [2011] FWA 4782; Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd v AMWU [2011] FWA 6268; G4S Custodial Services Pty Ltd v HSU [2011] FWA 5902.

18 See University of South Australia v NTEU [2009] FWA 1535, [39] where SDP O'Callaghan was implicitly critical of the NTEU's refusal to modify a ban on marking student assess­ments to accommodate graduating students.

19 The test under section 423, while setting out a greater number of factors, does not direct that FWA consider only the listed factors. As such, it can be inferred that FWA has discretion to consider anything additionally relevant, akin to the test in section 426. See Prysmian Power Cables and Systems Austra­lia v NUW [2010] FWA 9402 at [84] per Cargill C.

20 Section 426(3) Fair Work Act.

21 Section 426(2) Fair Work Act.

22 Section 426(1) Fair Work Act.

23 Section 426(5) Fair Work Act.

24 Section 426(4) Fair Work Act.

25 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Woodside Burrup Pty Ltd (2010) 198 IR 360; [2010] FWAFB 6021 (Woodside).

26 Above, n 25 at [44].

27 Above, n 25 at [44].

28 Above, n 25 at [37]–[44].

29 Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd v AIRC (2000) 203 CLR 194; 174 ALR 585; [2000] HCA 47; BC200005034.

30 Above, n 29. at [28] per Gleeson CJ, Gaudron and Hayne JJ.

31 Successful cases: Nyrstar Port Pirie v CFMEU [2009] FWA 1144. Unsuccessful cases: Tas Paper Pty Ltd v AMWU [2009] FWA 1872; Transit Australia Pty Ltd v TWU [2011] FWA 5006; Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd v CFMEU [2010] 4389; Patrick Stevedores Holdings Pty Ltd v MUA [2011] FWA 3059; CEPU v Carter Holt Harvey Wood Products Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FWA 101.

32Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd v CFMEU [2010] FWA 4389 at [27] per McCarthy DP; applied in CEPU v Carter Holt Harvey Wood Products Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FWA 101 at [6] per Blair C.

33 Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd v CFMEU [2010] FWA 4389 at [31] per McCarthy DP.

34 Successful cases: Qantas; Sucrogen v AWU [2010] FWA 6192. Unsuccessful cases: Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd v AMWU [2011] FWA 6268.

35 Cf Sucrogen v AWU [2010] FWA 6192, where protected action was suspended to prevent a sugar harvest from being compro­mised, with Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd v AMWU [2011] FWA 6268, where a suspension order was refused despite protected action potentially delaying a refit of plant equipment. The delay in the latter case eventuated in a stand down: AMWU v Toyota Boshoku Australia Pty Ltd [2012] FWA 1135.

36 Re Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations [2011] FWAFB 7444; BC201170021 (Qantas).

37 Section 431(1) Fair Work Act.

38 Section 432 Fair Work Act. While unclear, it seems that publication in the Government Gazette is not a precondition for the declara­tion to take effect. The declaration takes effect on the day that it is "made", rather than published: section 43 1(2) Fair Work Act.

39 Eric Abetz MP, "Qantas Evidence is Clear: Government Could Have Acted But Didn't" (Media Release, 4 November 2011).

Clayton Utz communications are intended to provide commentary and general information. They should not be relied upon as legal advice. Formal legal advice should be sought in particular transactions or on matters of interest arising from this bulletin. Persons listed may not be admitted in all states and territories.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.