Australia: When a tax write-off becomes a complete write-off: The duties of a financial adviser in providing advice

Curwoods Case Note
Last Updated: 5 January 2013
Article by Paul Garnon and Nicholas Lawrence

Tomasetti v Brailey [2012] NSWCA 399

Judgment date: 11 December 2012
Jurisdiction: New South Wales Court of Appeal1

In Brief

  • When providing financial advice, a financial adviser must look at all aspects of the products and the circumstances of each client in order to ensure they are not negligent or misleading in their advice.
  • A court will look at the entire context and content of representations in order to determine if they are misleading or negligent; it is insufficient to rely simply on the use or misuse of one term where the concept is conveyed through other representations.
  • A husband and wife will not be considered a single financial entity unless they have specifically given instructions that this is so or provided a guarantee over one another's investments.
  • The limitation period relating to financial products may commence from a variety of different times, depending on the nature of the product, but it is necessary that an actual loss is ascertainable before time will commence to run.


In 1998, Mr Tomasetti engaged Mr Brailey to act as his tax agent, accountant and financial adviser. Between 2000 and 2005, Mr Brailey recommended that Mr Tomasetti, his wife, Ms Cordony, and Tomasetti Investments Pty Ltd as trustee for the Tomasetti Superannuation Funds (TSF), Mr Tomasetti's self-managed superannuation fund, (collectively the Claimants) invest in various schemes for the growing of timber, almonds, grapes and citrus (Schemes). For a variety of reasons these investments were unsuccessful, resulting in a loss for the Claimants allegedly exceeding $4,000,000.

The Schemes each operated in a slightly different manner but, broadly speaking:

  • The investor would be granted a lease over a parcel of land by the promoter, along with a management agreement by which the promoter would establish, maintain and harvest and sell the produce.
  • An initial fee was payable to cover the cost of establishing the plantation and the initial rent of the land. The promoters also offered investors the opportunity to obtain financing for this sum to be paid under a loan agreement.
  • There were ongoing expenses for the investor which could include rent, maintenance, licence fees, insurance and pruning services.
  • The investor was entitled to a tax deduction for the amounts of the initial payment and ongoing rent and management expenses, together with interest on any associated borrowings.
  • Between 5 and 13 years after the initial investment, the lots would be harvested and the investor would obtain a distribution from the pooled proceeds of sale from the harvest.
  • The promoters of each of the Schemes published a prospectus or product disclosure statement (PDS), included in which was an application in the form of a power of attorney which was to be endorsed in order for the investment to be made.

The Claimants commenced proceedings against Mr Brailey, amongst others, in the Supreme Court of New South Wales alleging, as confined by the time of the appeal, that Mr Brailey:

  • engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct in contravention of s 42 of the Fair Trading Act 1987 by representing to Mr Tomasetti and TSF that the investments were sound, prudent and sensible commercial investments and making other representations, including that the investments would make reasonable commercial returns over time (FTA Claim);
  • acted negligently and in breach of a duty of care that he owed to Mr Tomasetti and TSF in recommending the investments (Negligence Claim);
  • contravened s 42 and acted negligently in recommending the investments to Ms Cordony as prudent and sensible for her personal circumstances (Ms Cordony Claim).

In the initial judgment, RA Hulme J rejected all of the Claimants' claims, essentially finding that Mr Brailey had apprised the Claimants of the risks associated with the Schemes by providing Mr Tomasetti with the PDSs. With regards to the unique claim for Ms Cordony, his Honour's primary reasoning was based on her inability to recall the terms of the conversations that she had with Mr Brailey. The Claimants appealed.

Mr Tomasetti and TSF's claims

As to the FTA Claim and the Negligence Claim, neither party challenged the primary judge's finding that, given Mr Tomasetti's circumstances, the investments that Mr Brailey recommended to him were not inherently unsound. The Claimants did argue, though, that Mr Tomasetti and TSF invested in the Schemes without Mr Brailey properly informing them of the associated risks.

At trial, Mr Tomasetti had given evidence that Mr Brailey did not orally inform him of the risks involved in the Schemes despite being aware that Mr Tomasetti would not be reading the PDSs. Mr Brailey gave evidence that he had both orally advised Mr Tomasetti of the risks involved in the Schemes and pointed him to the PDSs for details. The primary judge made various findings as to the credibility of the witnesses, finding that he was unable to rely on either party's account, although he found that PDSs were usually provided by Mr Brailey.

On appeal, the parties agreed that the risks associated with the Schemes were adequately described in the prospectuses. However, Macfarlan JA, with whom the other judges agreed, noted that the primary judge had appeared to find that it was enough to disprove misleading and deceptive conduct if Mr Brailey simply provided the PDSs, even if he did not tell Mr Tomasetti to read them, or have any basis for thinking that Mr Tomasetti would read them.

Macfarlan JA found that more needed to be established than this and the whole of the circumstances needed to be considered. If an oral representation would otherwise have a misleading character, then the provision of a written qualification at the same time would only affect the character of that representation if a reasonable person in the position of the person providing the document would have expected the other party to read the document in such a manner as to apprise themselves of the relevant qualification. Thus, if it was shown that Mr Brailey's conduct was otherwise misleading and deceptive, he would need to show that a reasonable person would have expected that Mr Tomasetti would have reviewed the PDSs so as to understand the risks inherent in the Schemes.

Considering the broader picture, the Claimants argued that that Mr Brailey had made admissions in cross-examination which proved that Mr Brailey had recommended investments in an unqualified fashion without informing Mr Tomasetti that they did not conform to his earlier instructions. Mr Brailey's admissions were that:

  • he did not inform Mr Tomasetti some of the PDSs described their respective schemes as "speculative";
  • his instructions in 1998 were to avoid investment in anything speculative, and those instructions did not change until at least 2003;
  • Investments would not be sound, prudent and sensible if they were aptly described as speculative.

Macfarlan JA found that this argument erred in placing too much importance on the term "speculative". It was unnecessary for Mr Brailey to use the term "speculative" so long as he conveyed the concept of there being considerable risks associated with the Schemes. Mr Brailey had consistently maintained that he apprised Mr Tomasetti of the risks associated with the Schemes and Mr Tomasetti failed to prove otherwise. Therefore, the FTA Claim could not be sustained.

For the Negligence Claim, the principle relied upon was that it would have been a breach of Mr Brailey's duty to have put the Schemes forward without the Claimants being aware of the risks. Thus, the Negligence Claim turned on the same issues as the FTA Claim and had not been proven.

The Ms Cordony Claim

The Ms Cordony Claim was unlike the other claims, in that it was premised on the Schemes recommended by Mr Brailey being inherently unsuitable for her personal circumstances regardless of her knowledge of the risks involved.

Ms Cordony had been in a long-term relationship with Mr Tomasetti since 1993; married him in 2003; and worked part-time for him as his personal assistant from 2002. Ms Cordony's gross income was approximately $60,000 for the 2003/2004 financial year and approximately $68,000 the following year (compared to Mr Tomasetti's income of $954,000 on average per year from 2000-2005). Ms Cordony had serious health problems of which Mr Brailey was aware.

Macfarlan JA found that in light of Ms Cordony's health issues, age, income, and the long-term nature of the Schemes rendering her liable for ongoing expenses irrespective of income, Mr Brailey was not justified in recommending the Schemes to her. Furthermore, Macfarlan JA found that it would have been unreasonable for Mr Brailey to assume that Mr Tomasetti and Ms Cordony functioned as a single financial unit without a firm basis for such an assumption and instructions from Ms Cordony to act on it. As such, Mr Brailey had engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct and been negligent under the Ms Cordony Claim.

Macfarlan JA then found that reliance is, in at least one sense, established by the fact that Mr Brailey, acting as Ms Cordony's financial adviser, recommended Ms Cordony invest in the Schemes and she did so in response to that advice.

However, the question of causation was remitted to the primary judge for determination. Macfarlan JA noted that for all of the claims the question remained of whether the Claimants would have refrained from investing in the Schemes if the representations had been suitably qualified. It was particularly relevant that it was very important for Mr Tomasetti to obtain the tax deductions that the Schemes provided. However, this issue was not explored in sufficient detail at first instance to make a final decision on appeal.

Limitation period

In obiter, Macfarlan JA considered Mr Brailey's argument that portions of the FTA Claim and the Negligence Claim were statute barred as the Schemes had been entered into more than 6 years before the claim was brought. (Note that the Ms Cordony Claim only related to Schemes invested in after the limitation date.)

Macfarlan JA found that even though a price had been paid at the time of investment in the Schemes, they were not inherently worth less than the price paid at the time, and so only created a contingent loss or liability. Therefore, the Claimants did not suffer a loss until such a time as the contingency was fulfilled and the loss became actual.

Even in these circumstances, where the Claimants included in their damages amounts relating to the initial payments and payments made on the Schemes prior to the limitation date, the causes of action did not accrue until it became ascertainable that the Claimants had suffered an overall loss on each investment.

Proportionate liability

Mr Brailey had contended that he and TJC Financial Planning Pty Limited (TJC), a company owned in part by Mr Brailey which conducted his financial planning business rather than his tax agency and accounting business, were "concurrent wrongdoers", the consequence of which would be that Mr Brailey's liability was limited to the proportion of the loss that the Court considered just having regard to Mr Brailey's degree of responsibility for the loss.

Macfarlan JA found that neither the liability of Mr Brailey nor TJC was limited by the proportionate liability provisions. Mr Brailey was, in effect, TJC and the acts and omissions of Mr Brailey in advising the Claimants were the corporate acts of TJC. Thus, Mr Brailey and TJC were each fully responsible for the losses.


In litigation regarding financial advice, it is critical to consider the financial products as a whole. In circumstances such as in this case, products may be designed to make a loss for a period of time in order to serve a tax purpose and subsequently generate a return. In these cases all functions of the product must be considered.

Equally, all financial products will carry different degrees of risk and these risks will mean different things for different investors. The term "speculative" does not carry a universal meaning and must be considered in regards to the product as a whole as well as the circumstances of the individual receiving advice. Furthermore, even if advice is being given to a husband and wife, you cannot consider them a single financial unit unless instructions or guarantees were given to that effect.

In determining misleading and deceptive conduct, the courts will not look to a single statement or document in isolation. The whole character of conversations and the content of the representations will be assessed in more detail than simply looking to individual terms or phrases. Equally, one cannot rely on a qualification to a representation provided in a document unless a reasonable person would expect the party who received the document to read and understand that qualification.

To determine the limitation period for financial products, one must consider the date at which a loss occurred or was ascertainable. If a product is designed to make a loss before it generates income, it carries a contingent loss which will only crystallise when the contingency occurs and the product fails to perform as expected. Alternatively, if at the date a product is purchased, it is actually worth less than was paid due to negligence or misleading conduct, the damage has occurred at the moment of purchase.

Finally, proportionate liability will not have a role to play where 2 entities share the same mind and acts. If the acts and omissions of a person and a company are the same, and the person is the directing mind and will of the company, the Court will treat both as equally and wholly responsible for the loss.


1 McColl, Campbell and Macfarlan JJA

Ranked No 1 - Australia's fastest growing law firm' (Legal Partnership Survey, The Australian July 2010)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.