Australia: Blameless Pedestrian Darts Out

Curwoods Case Note
Last Updated: 21 October 2012
Article by Ian Jones

Axiak v Ingram [2012] NSWCA 311

Judgment date: 27 September 2012

Jurisdiction: Court of Appeal1

In Brief

  • The expression fault of any other person refers only to the tortious conduct of that person and does not include the injured person whose fault in the form of non-tortious contributory negligence is excluded from the definition of a blameless motor accident in s 7A of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act.
  • Division 2 of Part 1.2 will still have work to do in such circumstances where the injured person is a child if a third party is found to be the cause of a motor accident but unable to meet any damages awarded to the injured person.
  • It is impossible to determine the degree of fault which is to be attributed to a blameless driver in determining the injured person's contributory negligence under s 7F. The court is not required to assess the degree of culpability of each party in determining contributory negligence. 2
  • Contributory negligence in a blameless motor accident is to be assessed on the basis of a value judgement of the extent to which an injured person has failed to conform to the standard of care of the reasonable person in their position. All of the circumstances, including an injured person's age will reflect in the evaluative judgement of the percentage reduction to be applied.


On 27 June 2008, the first plaintiff, aged 14 years, was injured in a motor vehicle accident when, as a pedestrian, she crossed Sackville Road, Ebenezer after disembarking from a school bus.

When the school bus pulled to a stop, the first plaintiff and her sister alighted and walked around to its rear. The school bus then commenced to pull away from the kerb and, as this was occurring, the first plaintiff and her sister darted from behind the back of the school bus across its lane of travel and into the path of the defendant's motor vehicle being driven in the opposite direction.

It was accepted that the defendant had a completely obscured view of the first plaintiff and her sister by the school bus. The defendant had slowed to a speed of 40 km/h upon seeing the school bus but was unable to avoid colliding with the first plaintiff after she emerged from behind the bus in front of his motor vehicle.

The first plaintiff suffered a traumatic brain injury in the accident rendering her eligible for participation in the Lifetime Care and Support Scheme. She initially commenced proceedings in the Supreme Court through her tutor against the defendant for damages for the injuries sustained in the accident on the grounds that the defendant was at fault. This pleading was subsequently abandoned by the first plaintiff with an allegation that the accident was a "blameless motor accident" within the meaning of the definition of that expression in s 7A of the Act.

Section 7A provides:

"Blameless motor accident means a motor accident not caused by the fault of the owner or driver of any motor vehicle involved in the accident in the use or operation of the vehicle and not caused by the fault of any other person."

The defendant contended in the Supreme Court that the fault of any other person extended to the first plaintiff by her failure to take reasonable care for her own safety. Her conduct not only caused the accident but was its sole cause.

At trial, Justice Adamson accepted the defendant's argument and the first plaintiff's claim failed in its entirely. That meant that the nervous shock claims brought by the second and third plaintiffs also failed.

Court of Appeal Decision

The first plaintiff contended that her Honour erred by:

  • failing to accord to the word fault in s 7A its defined meaning in s 3 of negligence or any other tort;
  • failing to read all of the provisions of Division 1 in context and, in particular, failed to take account of s 7F, which makes specific provision in relation to contributory negligence generally, the definition of fault recognising that the term negligence when used in the expression contributory negligence has a meaning different from that where negligence is used in the sense of constituting a cause of action; and
  • failing to give effect to the totality of the definition of fault and, in particular, the words any other tort, contributory negligence not being a tort, irrespective of whether the relevant conduct caused or contributed to the accident as distinct from the injured person's injuries.

Justice Tobias, who delivered the lead judgment with Justices Beazley and Sackville agreeing, accepted the first plaintiff's submissions. His Honour noted that the stated purpose of the amendments to the Act on 1 October 2006 was to provide compulsory third party scheme entitlements to persons injured in motor vehicle accidents where there was no fault in the sense that the driver of the motor vehicle involved in the motor accident could not be made tortiously liable to the injured person for damages.

Tobias J accepted that the expression fault of any other person only refers to the tortious conduct of that person and cannot include the injured person whose fault in the form of non-tortious contributory negligence is excluded from the definition of a blameless motor accident. In reaching this conclusion, his Honour referred to a passage in the High Court decision of Astley v Austrust Limited 3 dealing with what contributory negligence is at common law. In particular, the High Court in Astley stated:

"Although conduct amounting to contributory negligence may also constitute the breach of a duty which the plaintiff owes to the defendant, a plaintiff can also be guilty of contributory negligence notwithstanding that he or she owes no duty to the defendant or any third person. A pedestrian, for example, owes no duty to a speeding driver to avoid being run down but is guilty of contributory negligence if he or she fails to take reasonable care to keep a proper lookout for speeding vehicles ..."

His Honour's conclusion that the injured person's non-tortious contributory negligence is excluded from the definition of a blameless motor accident was stated to be reinforced once the words of the definition of fault are inserted into the definition of blameless motor accident in the manner suggested by Justice McHugh in Kelly v The Queen 4 . This gives the effect of s 7A reading as follows:

"Blameless motor accident means an ... accident involving the use ... of a motor vehicle that causes ... injury to a person where the ... injury is a result of and is caused during the driving of the vehicle ... [but] is not caused by the negligence or any other tort of the driver of [the] vehicle involved in the accident or the negligence or any other tort of any other person."

His Honour stated that when the definition of blameless motor accident is read this way, it is evident that the expression any other person excludes the person who has been injured.

While Tobias J acknowledged an anomaly appears in the use of the word fault in s 7K(1), the trial judge erred in construing the word negligence in the definition of fault for the purposes of s 7A as including non-tortious negligence such as the first plaintiff's contributory negligence. On that basis, it was held that the first plaintiff is entitled to rely upon Division 1 of Part 1.2 of the Act and to claim modified common law damages.

Once determined that the first plaintiff was entitled to rely upon Division 1 of Part 1.2 of the Act, the issue of contributory negligence under s 7F arose. The first plaintiff had conceded that should she be entitled to claim modified common law damages such should be reduced by her contributory negligence. Tobias J confirmed that the only heads of damage affected by s 7F are those of future economic loss and non-economic loss, the first plaintiff being a student at the time of this accident and accepted as a lifetime participant in the Lifetime Care and Support Scheme entitling her to reimbursement of her treatment and care needs.

In the Supreme Court, the trial judge went on to consider contributory negligence in the alternative and found that the first plaintiff's damages ought to be reduced by 100% on the basis she was the sole cause of the accident. In reaching this finding, the trial judge had regard to the provisions of the Civil Liability Act and Prodrebersek in conducting a comparison both of culpability and of the relevant importance of the acts of the parties in causing the damage.

It was conceded by the defendant on appeal that the exercise called for in Prodrebersek has no application to contributory negligence in a blameless motor accident. Comparisons of culpability and of the relevant importance of the acts of the parties in causing the first plaintiff's injuries are inappropriate.

Tobias J held that the degree of the first plaintiff's contributory negligence can only be assessed upon the basis of a value judgement as to the extent to which her conduct failed to conform to the standard of care expected of a 14-year old girl in her position. His Honour stated that one cannot postulate that a 14-year old girl, no doubt keen to get home, would in every case adhere to a parental admonition that upon alighting from a bus no attempt should be made to cross the road until the bus drives off.

His Honour found that, taking into account all the circumstances, the first plaintiff's damages should be reduced due to her contributory negligence by 50%.


The Court of Appeal decision effectively creates a no fault scheme for all pedestrians, regardless of age. The extent to which a pedestrian will be entitled to recover modified common law damages in a blameless motor accident will involve an evaluative judgement of the pedestrian's contributory negligence.

The interpretation provided of the blameless accident provisions by the Court of Appeal does not appear to have been contemplated by the Parliament with the introduction of the amendments to the Act on 1 October 2006. In the Second Reading Speech it was stated that the Bill would extend to provide CTP cover for a person injured in a motor accident where "no-one is found to have been at fault in causing their injury".

Prior to Axiak, pedestrians were required to prove fault of the driver of the motor vehicle with which they collided to recover damages and such circumstances were never considered in the common law to give rise to an inevitable or blameless accident.

Pedestrians will now need to simply allege a blameless motor accident at question 14 of the CTP Personal Injury Claim Form and by s 7C the onus of proof will rest with the CTP insurer to establish fault of its own insured or a third party. Such an exercise would only be of value to the insurer where the reduction for contributory negligence would likely be higher on the Prodrebersek test than an evaluative judgement.


1 Beazley, Sackville and Tobias JJ
2 See Prodrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Limited (1985) 59 ALJR 492
3 [1999] HCA 6
4 [2004] HCA 12

Ranked No 1 - Australia's fastest growing law firm' (Legal Partnership Survey, The Australian July 2010)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions