Australia: Australian High Court confirms that IINET did not Authorise Copyright Infringement

Last Updated: 6 July 2012
Article by Nicholas Tyacke and Nicholas Cole

During April, in an eagerly anticipated decision, the High Court of Australia unanimously held that Internet Service Provider (ISP) iiNet had not authorised the infringement of copyright in the appellants' films by its customers.


In November 2008, 34 film and television studios (collectively Roadshow), with the assistance of the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT), commenced proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia against iiNet alleging that it had authorised the infringement of copyright in Roadshow's films by its customers. The Federal Court held that iiNet had not authorised that infringement. The Full Federal Court, in a 2:1 judgment, dismissed the appeal from that decision. That decision was then appealed to the High Court.


In a unanimous decision, by way of two separate judgments, the High Court dismissed the appeal from the Full Federal Court.


French CJ, Crennan and Kiefel JJ identified the circumstances that Roadshow relied on to support their argument that iiNet had authorised its customers' infringing acts as including:

  • The provision by iiNet to its customers (and to other users of those customers' accounts) of access to the internet, which can be used to access BitTorrent peerto-peer file sharing networks (BitTorrent System)
  • The infringement of the copyright in Roadshow's films by customers of iiNet, who made the films available online in whole or in part using the BitTorrent System
  • The knowledge by iiNet of specific infringements, as drawn to its attention by notices from AFACT
  • The technical and contractual power of iiNet to terminate the provision of its internet services to customers infringing copyright
  • The failure by iiNet to take reasonable steps to warn identified infringing customers to cease their infringements and, if appropriate, to terminate the provision of its services to them.

Gummow and Hayne JJ, in turn, characterised Roadshow's case as:

"in essence, ... iiNet authorised the ... [i]nfringements of its customers by 'standing by' and 'allowing [this] to happen without doing anything about it".


In reaching its decision, the High Court reaffirmed that, in determining whether there has been authorisation of copyright infringement in a film, a court must take into account the factors identified in section 101(1A) of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Copyright Act). As applied to the facts of this case, this required the court to consider the:

  • Existence and extent of iiNet's power to prevent its customers' infringement
  • Extent to which reasonable steps to prevent that infringement included warnings, suspension or termination of those customers' accounts
  • Impact of the nature of the contractual relationship between iiNet and those customers on those factors.

The High Court noted further that those factors must be considered in the context of section 112E of the Copyright Act, which states that an ISP is not to be taken to have authorised copyright infringement of a film merely because it provided facilities for making the film available online by an infringer.


Did iiNet have the power to prevent infringement by its customers?

The High Court reaffirmed that the power to prevent primary infringement is a requirement for a finding of authorisation of that infringement. It considered iiNet's technical and contractual power to prevent its customers infringing another's copyright and held that iiNet did have a limited, indirect power to prevent infringement in that it could terminate the contractual relationship that it had with its customers.

The High Court found that iiNet:

  • Had no technical power to prevent a customer from using the BitTorrent System to download Roadshow's films, or to control or alter any aspect of the BitTorrent System (including BitTorrent System clients)
  • Did not assist its customers to locate BitTorrent System clients or .torrent files
  • Cannot monitor the steps taken by its customers using the BitTorrent System
  • Cannot filter the communication of infringing material over its internet service
  • Did not have any power to prevent its customers from using other internet services.

Due to this, the Court found iiNet had no direct power to prevent a copyright infringement but could only achieve that result indirectly by terminating the contractual relationship it had with its customers.

Did reasonable steps to prevent infringements (after receipt of AFACT notices) include warnings and subsequent suspension or termination of the accounts of identified customers?

The High Court held that both the nature of the internet and of the BitTorrent System and the absence of an industry code of practice adhered to by all ISPs needed to be taken into account in assessing whether iiNet took reasonable steps to prevent copyright infringement by its customers, given its indirect power to prevent that infringement.

Considering these factors, the Court noted that threatening to terminate, or terminating, the account of an accused infringer would have done little to prevent continuing infringement as that customer could merely obtain internet access from another ISP, and continue using the BitTorrent System to infringe another's copyright.

The Court also referred to the fact that the AFACT notices did not approximate the standard of evidence expected to be filed in a civil proceeding for copyright infringement and that, if iiNet were to terminate the account of a customer accused of copyright infringement based on an AFACT notice, it could be exposed to liability for breach of contract.

French CJ, Crennan and Kiefel JJ concluded that the AFACT notices did not provide iiNet with a reasonable basis to send notices to customers accused of copyright infringement threatening to suspend or terminate their accounts, stating that the inference to be drawn from iiNet's failure to send such notices in the circumstances:

"was not the indifference of a company unconcerned with the infringement of the appellants' rights ... [but rather] that iiNet was unwilling to act because of its assessment of the risks of taking steps based only on the information in the AFACT notices."


The case confirms that a party, such as an ISP, will not be liable for authorising copyright infringement by a third party, including its customers, where it does not have the power to prevent that infringement. The case also indicates that there are a number of factors to be considered when assessing the reasonableness of the steps taken or not taken by a party to prevent infringement. These include:

  • Whether that party had a reasonable basis for taking those steps (such as whether an infringement notice provided sufficient information to give a reasonable basis for terminating an infringing customer's account)
  • The effectiveness of those steps to achieve that result (such as whether that infringing customer could continue infringing by merely changing to another ISP)
  • The legal risk it might face if it took those steps (such as whether the ISP may potentially face contractual liability for wrongfully terminating a customer's account on the basis of a notice of infringement).

The implications from the case, so far as an ISP's role in reducing the volume of copyright infringement occurring by means of the internet is concerned, was directly addressed by French CJ, Crennan and Kiefel JJ, who concluded that the:

"concept and principles of the ... tort of authorisation of copyright infringement are not readily suited to enforcing the rights of copyright owners in respect of widespread infringements occasioned by peer-to-peer filesharing ..."

See the box titled "Where to from here" to find out more about how their Honours comments may result in changes to the Australian legal landscape.


For all the benefits that digital technology delivers, the reality is that it also makes it easier for copyright infringement to occur on a massive scale. For content owners, the challenge is to find effective ways of reducing such infringement, be it by technical, legal and/ or commercial means.

Below is our snapshot of key potential reforms/developments in this area:

  • Legal reform: In their judgment, French CJ, Crennan and Kiefel JJ refer to the legislative solutions employed in other jurisdictions for addressing this issue, citing specifically the Digital Economy Act 2010 (UK) and the Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Act 2011 (NZ). Potentially, Parliament will respond to the iiNet case with reforms of this nature.
  • Development of an industry code: The High Court also acknowledged the futility of iiNet terminating the account of a customer accused of infringing copyright in the absence of an ISP protocol that would prevent that customer from shifting to another ISP. Content owners and ISPs may thus continue to work together to establish industry codes that address issues such as copyright infringement in an effective manner.
  • Further court action: Content owners could revert to taking direct action against internet users who share their content without authorisation, as they have done in the United States, rather than attempting to hold ISPs liable for authorising that infringement.
  • Commercial: Content owners may continue to develop new business models that reduce the reasons for copyright infringement. This may include content owners working with ISPs to implement such business models.
  • Technical: Though technical solutions envisaged to date, such as filtering, have not proved effective, technology may well play a role as a solution to this problem of digital copyright infringement.

© DLA Piper

This publication is intended as a general overview and discussion of the subjects dealt with. It is not intended to be, and should not used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. DLA Piper Australia will accept no responsibility for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this publication.

DLA Piper Australia is part of DLA Piper, a global law firm, operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. For further information, please refer to

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.