Australia: Medical negligence: Dobler v Halverson & Ors; Dobler v Halverson (by his Tutor)

Last Updated: 22 November 2011
Article by Robert Samut

The Facts

On 11 February 2001 Kurt Halverson (the plaintiff) suffered cardiac arrest and hypoxic brain damage, leaving him with catastrophic injuries. On 2 occasions prior to February 2001 the plaintiff suffered syncopal events. Syncope is a brief loss of consciousness. The plaintiff suffered a further syncopal event on 4 February 2001. It was ascertained after the plaintiff's cardiac arrest that the cause of the syncopal events was arrhythmia of his heart.

Dr Dobler treated the plaintiff for approximately 2 weeks prior to 11 February 2001. On 1 February 2001, when consulted concerning a migraine, Dr Dobler identified a heart murmur.

The plaintiff and his father, mother and sister (the plaintiffs) brought proceedings against Dr Dobler alleging that Dr Dobler should have considered a possible cardiac problem, carried out an ECG and referred the plaintiff to a cardiologist prior to 11 February 2001. The plaintiffs alleged that in failing to do so Dr Dobler breached his duty of care and that if those steps had been taken the plaintiff's arrhythmia would probably have been identified and appropriate measures taken which would have avoided the cardiac arrest and its consequences.

The Decision at Trial

The trial judge found that Dr Dobler breached his duty to the plaintiff and failed to establish the defence provided under section 5O of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW). Section 5O provides that a professional will not be negligent for providing a professional service if the professional acted in a manner that was widely accepted in Australia by their peers as being competent professional practice.

The trial judge also found that, on the balance of probabilities, an ECG administered after 4 February 2001 would have revealed the plaintiff's arrhythmia, that this condition would have been effectively managed and a cardiac arrest and consequent brain damage would have been avoided. On that basis, the plaintiffs had established causation and were entitled to damages that had been agreed.

Dr Dobler appealed.

The Decision on Appeal

Dr Dobler submitted on appeal that the trial judge was in error in holding that section 5O operated as a defence. He also contended that the plaintiff had the onus of proving that the provision of the professional services by him was not widely accepted in Australia by peer professional opinion as competent professional practice. He contended, in effect, that section 5O defined the content of the duty of care owed by Dr Dobler.

The Court of Appeal agreed with the trial judge that apart from section 5O, a court would continue tod etermine the standard of care, guided by evidence of acceptable professional practice. However, section 5O has the effect that if a defendant professional's conduct accords with professional practice widely accepted by peer professional opinion as competent professional practice, then subject to that opinion being rational, the professional practice in effect, sets the standard of care.

The plaintiff may call expert evidence to the effect that a defendant professional's conduct fell short of acceptable professional practice. The plaintiff, however, is not required by section 5O to present evidence negating a different professional practice favourable to the defendant. The defendant professional may call expert evidence to establish the defence provided under section 5O which, if accepted, will provide a defence.

According to the Court of Appeal section 5O may, in effect, determine the defendant's standard of care, but the standard of care will otherwise be that determined by the court with guidance from evidence of acceptable professional practice. To require the plaintiff to establish the negative would distort the language of section 5O.

The Court of Appeal considered that the trial judge had approached the issue of breach of duty in the correct manner. First, the trial judge considered whether Dr Dobler satisfied the requisite standard of care which the trial judge had determined. Once the trial judge had concluded that Dr Dobler fell short of that standard, he then considered whether Dr Dobler nevertheless was not liable because he acted in a manner widely accepted by peer professional opinion as competent professional practice. The trial judge found that this defence was not established and that Dr Dobler was therefore liable.

Having upheld the trial judge's general approach to liability, the Court of Appeal then considered challenges to the trial judge's conclusions regarding breach of duty and causation.

The Court of Appeal noted that the expert opinions accepted by the trial judge were to the effect that the history of syncopal events, where a neurological cause had been excluded, plus the unexplained heart murmur, required Dr Dobler to investigate a cardiac cause. Such a cause was at least a possibility and carried a serious risk. The Court of Appeal was not satisfied that error had been shown in the trial judge's preference for the expert evidence led by the plaintiffs.

As for the defence under section 5O, it was contended by Dr Dobler that even if the trial judge's preference for the plaintiffs' expert evidence was accepted, the expert evidence led on behalf of Dr Dobler was nevertheless evidence that Dr Dobler's conduct was considered competent professional practice by peer professional opinion. The Court of Appeal noted that the trial judge had not accepted that this defence was established because of various inadequacies in the approaches of Dr Dobler's experts. There had been inappropriate assumptions about facts, significant events in the plaintiff's medical history had been considered in isolation and the experts had failed to recognise that when Dr Dobler saw the plaintiff on 4 occasions in February 2001, it was in a hospital where an ECG could have been easily obtained.

The Court of Appeal reviewed the evidence and upheld the trial judge's decision. The Court of Appeal concluded that the trial judge considered that the evidence of the experts called by Dr Dobler should not be accepted as establishing that Dr Dobler's conduct constituted widely accepted professional practice. According to the Court of Appeal, it was open to the trial judge to come to that view.

As for issues of causation, Dr Dobler challenged the trial judge's approach, which was generally that causation in a legal context was established by the application of common sense to the evidence as a whole. The Court of Appeal considered that the authorities established that proof sufficient for legal responsibility is on the balance of probabilities and may be established by circumstantial evidence or inference short of scientific certainty. The fact that the issue of causation could not be answered with scientific certainty did not prevent the trial judge determining that issue as a matter of legal proof.

On the issue of causation, the Court of Appeal again considered that the trial judge was entitled to come to the conclusion that he did, and that Dr Dobler's submission was essentially a contention that of the differing expert opinions in evidence, the trial judge should have preferred the opinion favourable to Dr Dobler. The Court of Appeal considered that no error had been demonstrated in the trial judge's preference for the expert evidence of the plaintiffs.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.