Australia: Oil Basins rises from the ashes? Westport Insurance Corporation & Ors v Gordian Runoff

Last Updated: 11 October 2011
Article by Jessica Kinny and Greg Moss

On 5 October 2011, the High Court of Australia (HCA) handed down its decision in Westport Insurance Corporation & Ors v Gordian Runoff Limited1. By majority joint judgment, Chief Justice French and Justices Gummow, Crennan and Bell set aside the earlier arbitral award on the basis of a manifest error of law within the meaning of section 38(5)(b)(i) of the Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (NSW) (the Arbitration Act)2.

The outcome is one of importance for arbitration practice in Australia because the primary ground of appeal was the adequacy of the reasons given by the arbitral tribunal in relation to its interpretation of section 18B of the Insurance Act 1902 (NSW) (the Act).

The appellants argued that the tribunal failed to explain why it was reasonable that the reinsurers should indemnify Gordian Runoff Limited in the circumstances and thus had failed to provide reasons in support of their award to the standard required by section 29(1)(c) of the Arbitration Act. Relying upon the Victorian case of Oil Basins Ltd v BHP Billiton Ltd3, the appellants argued that the NSW Court of Appeal (NSWCA) was wrong to find that section 29(1)(c) of the Arbitration Act does not require reasons to the same standard as would be required of a judge.

The love affair begins...

In our earlier update entitled The end of Oil Basins - NSW rekindles love affair with arbitration (click here) on the NSWCA decision in Gordian Runoff Limited v Westport Insurance Corporation4, we discussed how the NSWCA had distanced itself from the Victorian Court of Appeal decision in Oil Basins Ltd v BHP Billiton Ltd5 (Oil Basins), which had arguably equated the arbitral tribunal's duty to give reasons under the uniform Commercial Arbitration Acts 1984-5 with that of a judge. Our previous update set out the background to the dispute and we have not repeated those facts here.

The key issue for the arbitral tribunal was whether the application of the Act operated to prevent Westport from denying Gordian's claim on the basis that the FAI policy did not fall within the terms of Gordian's reinsurance. On 10 October 2008, in an arbitration conducted under the Arbitration Act the arbitrators delivered their written award in favour of Gordian. They found that section 18B of the Act applied and had the effect of requiring Westport to pay claims notified to Gordian under the policy issued to FAI within a three year period.

Under s 29(1) of the Arbitration Act, the New South Wales Supreme Court found that the arbitrators were required to make the award in writing, sign the award and include in the award a statement of the reasons for making that award. Accordingly, Justice Einstein gave leave to appeal finding that the arbitral tribunal had misunderstood section 18B of the Act and set aside the arbitral award.

The NSWCA noted that the submissions made on section 18B of the Act demonstrated a contestable argument rather than a 'prima facie case of error'6. The NSWCA commented that an error of law must be: 'evident or obvious; there must be powerful reasons leaving little or no doubt on a preliminary basis, without any prolonged adversarial argument, that there is on the face of the award an error of law.'7 Accordingly, it was held that the terms of the Arbitration Act supported the finality of the arbitral award, on the ground that in circumstances where the hearing of substantive arguments before granting leave to appeal increases the likelihood that arbitral awards will be subject to judicial review, the hearing of the application for leave to appeal and the appeal together should not be encouraged8.

The love affair ends...

The HCA disagreed with the NSWCA's strict position that the performance of the arbitral function is a purely private matter of contract, in which the parties have given up their rights to engage judicial power, and is wholly divorced from the exercise of public authority.9 The majority decision held that the arbitrators gave inadequate reasons for their decisions, paving the way for the above discussed appeal process.

In reaching this decision, their Honours unanimously agreed that section 38(5) of the Arbitration Act required a manifest error of law that appears on the face of the Award, and that this was the case in this appeal10. The failure of the arbitrators to give reasons for the section 18B finding was held to be an adequate manifest error of law. Their Honours made particular reference to the statement by Justice Giles in R P Robson Constructions Pty Ltd v D & M Williams11 that the statement of reasons the arbitrator was required to give under s 29 was: 'necessary in order that it can be seen whether or not the arbitrator was in error on any question of law arising out of the award'. 12

It was held that the arbitrators were obliged to succinctly note the considerations relating to all aspects of the pleadings13 and a failure to do so was both a manifest error of law on the face of the award and strong evidence that the arbitrators made an error of law, which may add substantially to the certainty of commercial law14. Ultimately, the HCA overturned the decision of the NSWCA and reinstated orders of the primary judge setting aside an arbitral award.

The significance of this decision was indicated by the presence at trial of the Commonwealth, the Australian Centre for International Commercial Arbitration Limited, the Australian International Disputes Centre Limited, the Institute of Arbitrators and Mediators Australia Limited and the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (Australia) Limited who were given leave to appear as amici curiae.

Or does it?

The decision effectively means that arbitrators will be subject to scrutiny if the reasons given for an award do not reflect consideration of all the issues presented by the parties in dispute. The Court found that arbitrators are not necessarily subject to the same scrutiny as judges. When discussing Westport's asserted meaning of Oil Basins, their Honours observed that:

'the reference in Oil Basins to the giving by the arbitrators in that dispute of reasons to a 'judicial standard' and cognate expressions placed an unfortunate gloss upon the terms of s 29(1)(c). More to the point were observations in Oil Basins to the effect that what is required to satisfy that provision will depend upon the nature of the dispute and the particular circumstances of the case.' 15

Such commentary suggests that although judges and arbitrators are not subject to the same requirements when giving their reasons, an arbitrator's reasons will be subject to a level of scrutiny sufficient to achieve justice for the parties and to ensure that there has been no inadequate consideration of the issues on part of the arbitrator.

The Judges, particularly Justice Heydon lamented the fact that arbitration in this instance hardly delivered its intended purpose. Despite being in dissent, Justice Heydon observed:

'The arbitration proceedings began on 15 October 2004 when Gordian served points of claim. This appeal comes to a close seven years later. The attractions of arbitration are said to lie in speed, cheapness, expertise and secrecy... But it must be said that speed and cheapness are not manifest in the process to which the parties agreed... The proceedings reveal no other point of superiority over conventional litigation. One point of inferiority they reveal is that there have been four tiers of adjudication, not three. Comment on these melancholy facts would be superfluous.'16

A final observation

Increasingly, it appears that the highest courts of the States and Territories and the highest court of the nation have quite different interpretations of the law.

On the date that the HCA set aside this NSWCA decision, their Honours also set aside three other NSWCA decisions17. The last decision in which an appeal was not allowed was on 7 September 201118, ten judgments away from the HCA's most recent decision on 6 October 201119. Although, it is noted that many more cases would have been refused leave to appeal in the first instance.

The reason for this disparity, whether it will prove to be endemic, or the full breadth of its implications is not clear. However, what is certain is that given the interpretive disparity at the highest level, every day legal practitioners are finding it increasingly difficulty to provide certainty in their advice to their clients.

Footnotes

1 [2011] HCA 37

2 per French CJ, Gummow, Crennan and Bell JJ at [36].

3 ((2007) 18 VR 346)

4 [2010] NSWCA 57.

5 [2007] VSCA 255; 18 VR 346.

6 Gordian Runoff Limited v Westport Insurance Corporation [2010] NSWCA 57 at [128].

7 Gordian Runoff Limited v Westport Insurance Corporation [2010] NSWCA 57 at [116].

8 Gordian Runoff Limited v Westport Insurance Corporation [2010] NSWCA 57 at [109] and [112].

9 per French CJ, Gummow, Crennan and Bell JJ at [20].

10 per Kieffel J at [163].

11 (1989) 6 BCL 219.

12 (1989) 6 BCL 219 at 221.

13 per French CJ, Gummow, Crennan and Bell JJ at [56].

14 per French CJ, Gummow, Crennan and Bell JJ at [57].

15 per French CJ, Gummow, Crennan and Bell JJ at [53].

16 per Heydon J at [111].

17 Shoalhaven City Council v Firedam Civil Engineering Pty Limited [2011] HCA 38; Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; Tasty Chicks Pty Limited & Ors v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2011] HCA 41.

18 Jemena Asset Management (3) Pty Ltd v Coinvest Limited [2011] HCA 33.

19 AB v Western Australia [2011] HCA 42.

For more information, please contact:

Sydney



Ray Giblett

t (02) 9931 4833

e rgiblett@nsw.gadens.com.au

Wendy Blacker

t (02) 9931 4922

e wblacker@nsw.gadens.com.au

This report does not comprise legal advice and neither Gadens Lawyers nor the authors accept any responsibility for it.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centres
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions