Australia: Oil Basins rises from the ashes? Westport Insurance Corporation & Ors v Gordian Runoff

Last Updated: 11 October 2011
Article by Jessica Kinny and Greg Moss

On 5 October 2011, the High Court of Australia (HCA) handed down its decision in Westport Insurance Corporation & Ors v Gordian Runoff Limited1. By majority joint judgment, Chief Justice French and Justices Gummow, Crennan and Bell set aside the earlier arbitral award on the basis of a manifest error of law within the meaning of section 38(5)(b)(i) of the Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (NSW) (the Arbitration Act)2.

The outcome is one of importance for arbitration practice in Australia because the primary ground of appeal was the adequacy of the reasons given by the arbitral tribunal in relation to its interpretation of section 18B of the Insurance Act 1902 (NSW) (the Act).

The appellants argued that the tribunal failed to explain why it was reasonable that the reinsurers should indemnify Gordian Runoff Limited in the circumstances and thus had failed to provide reasons in support of their award to the standard required by section 29(1)(c) of the Arbitration Act. Relying upon the Victorian case of Oil Basins Ltd v BHP Billiton Ltd3, the appellants argued that the NSW Court of Appeal (NSWCA) was wrong to find that section 29(1)(c) of the Arbitration Act does not require reasons to the same standard as would be required of a judge.

The love affair begins...

In our earlier update entitled The end of Oil Basins - NSW rekindles love affair with arbitration (click here) on the NSWCA decision in Gordian Runoff Limited v Westport Insurance Corporation4, we discussed how the NSWCA had distanced itself from the Victorian Court of Appeal decision in Oil Basins Ltd v BHP Billiton Ltd5 (Oil Basins), which had arguably equated the arbitral tribunal's duty to give reasons under the uniform Commercial Arbitration Acts 1984-5 with that of a judge. Our previous update set out the background to the dispute and we have not repeated those facts here.

The key issue for the arbitral tribunal was whether the application of the Act operated to prevent Westport from denying Gordian's claim on the basis that the FAI policy did not fall within the terms of Gordian's reinsurance. On 10 October 2008, in an arbitration conducted under the Arbitration Act the arbitrators delivered their written award in favour of Gordian. They found that section 18B of the Act applied and had the effect of requiring Westport to pay claims notified to Gordian under the policy issued to FAI within a three year period.

Under s 29(1) of the Arbitration Act, the New South Wales Supreme Court found that the arbitrators were required to make the award in writing, sign the award and include in the award a statement of the reasons for making that award. Accordingly, Justice Einstein gave leave to appeal finding that the arbitral tribunal had misunderstood section 18B of the Act and set aside the arbitral award.

The NSWCA noted that the submissions made on section 18B of the Act demonstrated a contestable argument rather than a 'prima facie case of error'6. The NSWCA commented that an error of law must be: 'evident or obvious; there must be powerful reasons leaving little or no doubt on a preliminary basis, without any prolonged adversarial argument, that there is on the face of the award an error of law.'7 Accordingly, it was held that the terms of the Arbitration Act supported the finality of the arbitral award, on the ground that in circumstances where the hearing of substantive arguments before granting leave to appeal increases the likelihood that arbitral awards will be subject to judicial review, the hearing of the application for leave to appeal and the appeal together should not be encouraged8.

The love affair ends...

The HCA disagreed with the NSWCA's strict position that the performance of the arbitral function is a purely private matter of contract, in which the parties have given up their rights to engage judicial power, and is wholly divorced from the exercise of public authority.9 The majority decision held that the arbitrators gave inadequate reasons for their decisions, paving the way for the above discussed appeal process.

In reaching this decision, their Honours unanimously agreed that section 38(5) of the Arbitration Act required a manifest error of law that appears on the face of the Award, and that this was the case in this appeal10. The failure of the arbitrators to give reasons for the section 18B finding was held to be an adequate manifest error of law. Their Honours made particular reference to the statement by Justice Giles in R P Robson Constructions Pty Ltd v D & M Williams11 that the statement of reasons the arbitrator was required to give under s 29 was: 'necessary in order that it can be seen whether or not the arbitrator was in error on any question of law arising out of the award'. 12

It was held that the arbitrators were obliged to succinctly note the considerations relating to all aspects of the pleadings13 and a failure to do so was both a manifest error of law on the face of the award and strong evidence that the arbitrators made an error of law, which may add substantially to the certainty of commercial law14. Ultimately, the HCA overturned the decision of the NSWCA and reinstated orders of the primary judge setting aside an arbitral award.

The significance of this decision was indicated by the presence at trial of the Commonwealth, the Australian Centre for International Commercial Arbitration Limited, the Australian International Disputes Centre Limited, the Institute of Arbitrators and Mediators Australia Limited and the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (Australia) Limited who were given leave to appear as amici curiae.

Or does it?

The decision effectively means that arbitrators will be subject to scrutiny if the reasons given for an award do not reflect consideration of all the issues presented by the parties in dispute. The Court found that arbitrators are not necessarily subject to the same scrutiny as judges. When discussing Westport's asserted meaning of Oil Basins, their Honours observed that:

'the reference in Oil Basins to the giving by the arbitrators in that dispute of reasons to a 'judicial standard' and cognate expressions placed an unfortunate gloss upon the terms of s 29(1)(c). More to the point were observations in Oil Basins to the effect that what is required to satisfy that provision will depend upon the nature of the dispute and the particular circumstances of the case.' 15

Such commentary suggests that although judges and arbitrators are not subject to the same requirements when giving their reasons, an arbitrator's reasons will be subject to a level of scrutiny sufficient to achieve justice for the parties and to ensure that there has been no inadequate consideration of the issues on part of the arbitrator.

The Judges, particularly Justice Heydon lamented the fact that arbitration in this instance hardly delivered its intended purpose. Despite being in dissent, Justice Heydon observed:

'The arbitration proceedings began on 15 October 2004 when Gordian served points of claim. This appeal comes to a close seven years later. The attractions of arbitration are said to lie in speed, cheapness, expertise and secrecy... But it must be said that speed and cheapness are not manifest in the process to which the parties agreed... The proceedings reveal no other point of superiority over conventional litigation. One point of inferiority they reveal is that there have been four tiers of adjudication, not three. Comment on these melancholy facts would be superfluous.'16

A final observation

Increasingly, it appears that the highest courts of the States and Territories and the highest court of the nation have quite different interpretations of the law.

On the date that the HCA set aside this NSWCA decision, their Honours also set aside three other NSWCA decisions17. The last decision in which an appeal was not allowed was on 7 September 201118, ten judgments away from the HCA's most recent decision on 6 October 201119. Although, it is noted that many more cases would have been refused leave to appeal in the first instance.

The reason for this disparity, whether it will prove to be endemic, or the full breadth of its implications is not clear. However, what is certain is that given the interpretive disparity at the highest level, every day legal practitioners are finding it increasingly difficulty to provide certainty in their advice to their clients.


1 [2011] HCA 37

2 per French CJ, Gummow, Crennan and Bell JJ at [36].

3 ((2007) 18 VR 346)

4 [2010] NSWCA 57.

5 [2007] VSCA 255; 18 VR 346.

6 Gordian Runoff Limited v Westport Insurance Corporation [2010] NSWCA 57 at [128].

7 Gordian Runoff Limited v Westport Insurance Corporation [2010] NSWCA 57 at [116].

8 Gordian Runoff Limited v Westport Insurance Corporation [2010] NSWCA 57 at [109] and [112].

9 per French CJ, Gummow, Crennan and Bell JJ at [20].

10 per Kieffel J at [163].

11 (1989) 6 BCL 219.

12 (1989) 6 BCL 219 at 221.

13 per French CJ, Gummow, Crennan and Bell JJ at [56].

14 per French CJ, Gummow, Crennan and Bell JJ at [57].

15 per French CJ, Gummow, Crennan and Bell JJ at [53].

16 per Heydon J at [111].

17 Shoalhaven City Council v Firedam Civil Engineering Pty Limited [2011] HCA 38; Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; Tasty Chicks Pty Limited & Ors v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2011] HCA 41.

18 Jemena Asset Management (3) Pty Ltd v Coinvest Limited [2011] HCA 33.

19 AB v Western Australia [2011] HCA 42.

For more information, please contact:


Ray Giblett

t (02) 9931 4833


Wendy Blacker

t (02) 9931 4922


This report does not comprise legal advice and neither Gadens Lawyers nor the authors accept any responsibility for it.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.