Australia: Contractors v Employees: The differences and why it matters - Part 3

Industrial and Employment Law
Last Updated: 9 March 2011
This article is part of a series: Click Contractors v Employees: The differences and why it matters - Part 2 for the previous article.

Article by Andrew Tobin, Partner

7. 'Failing to plan': The decision in Ripley v Ingles Marketing

Numerous cases illustrate the consequences of failing to plan or properly implement a plan for undertaking a contracting arrangement. Various examples are mentioned throughout this paper.

I have chosen to highlight the decision in the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission in Ripley v Ingles Marketing Pty Ltd36, for a few reasons, not the least of which is that I had some background involvement in the proceedings. The case is typically illustrative of the way in which disputes about the status of workers might unfold and how, in the litigious environment, such a dispute is resolved.

The case concerned a claim by Mr and Mrs Ripley, both of whom were real estate agents, for unpaid award wages and other employment-based entitlements from Ingles Marketing. They claimed to have been engaged as employees, to staff display homes constructed by Ingles Marketing in the course of land and house selling activity undertaken by Ingles Marketing. Their claims were for sums said to be outstanding on account of wages, sales commissions, annual leave entitlements and payments in lieu of notice upon 'termination', and they also maintained a claim for unpaid superannuation contributions under the Superannuation Guarantee Scheme.

For its part, Ingles disputed the claims on the basis that Mr and Mrs Ripley had never been employees but were engaged as independent contractors, so none of the claims were valid.

Ultimately, the Commission dismissed the claims, finding that Mr and Mrs Ripley had in fact been engaged as contractors rather than employees, although that determination was by no means a straightforward one. The relevant factors identified by the Commission as being indicative of an independent contractor relationship were these:

  1. Prior to any dispute occurring between the parties, all of the documentation passing between Ingles Marketing and its own solicitors, relating to the type of engagement that Ingles Marketing had in mind, spoke primarily of an independent contractor engagement. Ingles had actually engaged solicitors to prepare a formal contract setting out the terms of the proposed arrangement, although the contract they prepared was never put by Ingles to Mr and Mrs Ripley on the basis that Ingles' promoters thought that the document their solicitors had drafted was 'too complicated'. In any event, the Commission thought it relevant that the correspondence between Ingles Marketing and its solicitors, including the draft but never finalised agreement, was indicative of Ingles' intention to establish a contracting arrangement rather than to engage Mr and Mrs Ripley as employees, which went some way toward a determination of the issue.
  2. If Mr and Mrs Ripley had been clear about the terms and conditions under which they sought to work for Ingles, it was unusual that Ingles would have pursued a different type of arrangement.
  3. No taxation arrangements were made between the parties and Mr and Mrs Ripley had made no complaint about that subject.
  4. While there was a dispute between the parties about the elements of the agreed remuneration, for example whether it included GST or not, ultimately the elements were found to have included a component for GST (Ingles treated part of all payments as GST). The payment of GST was inconsistent with an employer/employee arrangement.
  5. Payments by Ingles Marketing were made to Mr and Mrs Ripley though a company controlled by them called Ripley Enterprises Pty Ltd. Again, while that mode of payment was the subject of a dispute between the parties, the manner of payment was not indicative of a normal employment arrangement.
  6. No mention was ever made between the parties about payment by Ingles Marketing of superannuation contributions, without any complaint by Mr and Mrs Ripley.
  7. Mr and Mrs Ripley undertook their work as licensed real estate agents under Ripley Enterprises Pty Ltd, itself a licensed real estate sales company. They were required to maintain this licensing structure by Ingles Marketing. The Commission noted that these arrangements would not have been necessary had Mr and Mrs Ripley been employees of Ingles Marketing.
  8. Mr and Mrs Ripley were both free to employ others to fill in for them when they were unavailable to work and had done so on occasion.
  9. Mr and Mrs Ripley exercised control over the primary focus of their engagement (ie selling real estate).

In contrast, other features of the parties' circumstances tended to indicate an employer/employee relationship existed. These included:

  1. Ingles exercised some degree of control over various aspects of the work undertaken by Mr and Mrs Ripley. For example, control was exercised over where they worked and their hours and days of work.
  2. Ingles supplied Mr and Mrs Ripley with various materials and support relating to their engagement.
  3. When terminating the arrangement, Ingles referred to termination of 'employment', although this was attributed to inadvertence rather than any indication of the true nature of the relationship between the parties.
  4. Mr and Mrs Ripley had never been required to issue tax invoices to account for GST.
  5. During a period of illness, Mrs Ripley had forwarded a medical certificate to Ingles to account for her inability to work.

In the illustration of technical issues provided by the Ripley decision and the way in which the various 'indicators' interacted to produce a particular outcome, the existence of the draft formal agreement which Ingles had had prepared at the outset of the engagement added an interesting twist. Despite the assessment by Ingles very early on in the engagement to the effect that the draft agreement prepared was 'too complicated', it is interesting that the terms of the agreement were trundled out and referred to at the hearing of Mr and Mrs Ripley's wages' claims. I suspect that Ingles will not again so casually dismiss the utility of a formal agreement designed to clearly set out the nature of the parties' intended relationship and the various feature of the relationship which go to its characterisation.

As an adviser working in this area, I would almost always advocate the use of a formal agreement to achieve these ends.

8. Drafting an independent contracting agreement: Terms and conditions

Schedule 3 contains a checklist of relevant considerations and issues, including those that fall out of the discussion above.

Schedule 1: Other cases referring to the 'control test'

Humberstone v Northern Timber Mills (1949) 79 CKR 389

The High Court in this case held that a lorry driver was an independent contractor. In reaching this decision it exemplified the application of the 'control test' in such a case as being:

Whether ultimate authority over the man in the performance of his work resided in the employer and not whether in practice the work was in fact done subject to a direction and control exercised by an actual supervision.

Federal Commissioner of Taxation v J Walter Thompson (Australia) Pty Ltd (1944) 69 CLR 227

This case dealt with the distinction between authority to control and the actual exercise of control, especially in relation to skilled workers. Latham CJ stated:

The fact that the artists are skilled does not make it impossible for them to be in the relation of servants to an employer. If they are subject to detailed control in the manner in which they do their work, they must be servants... The real character of the relationship must be determined.

Zuijs v Wirth Bros Pty Ltd (1955) 93 CLR 561

This case also concerned a highly skilled worker. The judgment made it clear that even though the work to be done involves the exercise of a particular skill or individual judgment or action, this does not mean the other party cannot in fact control or interfere in its performance:

Those engaged to perform the functions may nevertheless work under a contract of service. The fact that the performance of a task depends on a natural gift or on some laboriously acquired accomplishment does not necessarily mean that the performer cannot be a servant. It is only in the most mechanical operations that anyone can dictate absolutely the mode of performance.

Roy Morgan Research Centre Pty Ltd v Commission for State Taxation [2003] SASC 342

In this case, the South Australian Supreme Court held that interviewers who were engaged by Roy Morgan Research Centre were independent contractors for the purpose of payroll tax. Justice Perry found that interviewers:

  1. contracted with RMRC on the basis that they were independent contractors;
  2. could refuse assignments from RMRC;
  3. were not entitled to be paid until each assignment was completed;
  4. had to provide their own motor vehicle and telephone; and
  5. did not receive sick leave or annual leave.

Justice Perry stressed that it is the totality of the relationship between the parties to which attention must be paid. In doing so, his Honour effectively accorded less weight to the element of control itself. On the facts, Justice Perry found that RMRC had no practical ability to control the performance of the interviewers' work. If there was scope for control it was only in respect of incidental matters and should be accorded less weight.

Finally, His Honour stated that the fact that the parties contracted on the basis that the interviewers were independent contractors 'is not a matter which can lightly be put aside'.

Schedule 2: Checklist: Employee or independent contractor?

Click here to view checklist

Schedule 3: Checklist: Drafting a contracting agreement

  1. Who is the principal?
  2. Who is the contractor/consultant?
    1. Corporate contractor with nominated person(s)
    2. Individual contractor
  3. What is the commencement date?
  4. Is the contract on-going/fixed term?
  5. To whom does the independent contractor or contractor's representative report?
  6. What are the independent contractor's services?
  7. What is the independent contractor's fee and any extras?
  8. Is the fee inclusive of GST or is GST imposed on top?
  9. Are there required hours for provision of the services?
  10. From what place are the services provided?
  11. How much notice of termination is required?
  12. Are the termination provisions fair (eg will termination without adequate notice cause significant financial loss to the contractor)?
  13. In what circumstances can a party terminate the contract immediately?
  14. Do 'on costs' apply? Who pays?
    1. Superannuation
    2. PAYG withholding
    3. Payroll tax
    4. Workers' compensation
  15. Is the contractor required to provide insurance and/or an indemnity?
  16. Intellectual property:
    1. Who will own any intellectual property produced in the services?
    2. Have the contractor's 'moral rights' in copyright works been considered and dealt with?
    3. Should the principal's confidential information/intellectual property be protected?
  17. Principal's business goodwill:
    1. Should the principal be protected from the contractor poaching business, customers or staff from the principal after the contract ends?
    2. How will those obligations be imposed on third parties engaged by the contractor in the performance of the services?
  18. Have the tax implications of the arrangement been properly considered by the contractor?
  19. To what extent, if at all, is the contractor required to comply with the principal's HR and other organisational policies?
    1. Equal opportunity
    2. Workplace harassment/bullying
    3. Occupational health and safety
    4. Privacy
    5. Others?

36. (2002) 171 QGIC 256.

© HopgoodGanim Lawyers

Gold Employer of Choice - ALB magazine, April 2010
Finalist, Brisbane Law Firm of the Year, ALB Australasian Law Awards 2010

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

This article is part of a series: Click Contractors v Employees: The differences and why it matters - Part 2 for the previous article.
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.