Australia: iiNET wins but the door is left ajar for copyright owners

Last Updated: 27 February 2011
Article by Joshua Henderson and Ben Coogan

The Full Federal Court of Australia yesterday dismissed an appeal by Hollywood film studios that Australia's third largest internet service provider (ISP), iiNet, had authorised copyright infringement by not suspending or terminating user's accounts in cases of copyright infringement.1 However, the Full Court left the door open for ISPs to be liable for this conduct in the future by explaining how ISPs could be liable.

The Full Court, which consisted of Justices Emmett, Jagot and Nicholas, all delivered separate and lengthy reasons for judgment. They were not all in agreement. However, they all softened and, in parts, significantly disagreed with the trial judge's reasoning.2 Both Emmett and Nicholas JJ agreed that the appeal should be dismissed but Jagot J dissented. The consequences of this decision will resonate with copyright owners, ISPs, technology innovators and internet users throughout the world. In particular:

  • ISP policies: ISPs need to take stock of their policies and procedures in dealing with complaints of copyright infringement. In particular, ISPs will need to adopt a system for the issuing of warnings and, if appropriate, the termination or suspension of accounts of users who are likely to have infringed copyright (provided that the copyright owner is able to properly explain its complaint). ISPs will also need to make sure that they have proper policies so that they can come within the 'safe harbour' provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Act).
  • Onus on copyright owners to explain infringement: If copyright owners are able to properly explain why they believe copyright has been infringed (and the methods used to reach that conclusion), then ISPs may be liable for authorising the infringement. It may also be necessary for owners to offer to pay for the costs of verifying the infringement and indemnifying the ISP from any liability incurred for suspending or terminating a subscriber (this was suggested by Emmett J).
  • Owners focus on ISPs: Copyright owners' attention may focus further on enforcing their rights against ISPs rather than users. This is welcomed news for owners as suing users is an inefficient exercise. Indeed, in late 2008 the Recording Industry of America said that it would abandon mass lawsuits.3
  • BitTorrent: The Court has confirmed that copyright can be infringed by users who use BitTorrent to upload (and possibly download) copyright works, as the works had been communicated to the public by being made available online or electronically transmitted. A new infringement occurs every time the user logs onto the internet. This may result in copyright owners also focusing attention onto technology innovators, who design software which enable infringement.
  • Law reform: There is likely to be strong lobbying from copyright owners to amend the Act, to ensure that ISPs are more easily caught in relation to authorising copyright infringement. This is also likely to be met with strong resistance. There is also likely to be pressure on ISPs to agree to a policy as to how to deal with copyright infringement.

The facts

Many internet subscribers use a system known as BitTorrent to upload and download films from the internet.

This is software which allows the creation of a torrent file as well as access to groups of computers that share that particular file. These groups of computers are known as 'swarms' and each computer in a swarm is a 'peer'. Torrents are small files that contain metadata about the computer file including the number of pieces into which it was divided, the order in which it should be re-created and the location of the tracker (which locates a particular swarm). Therefore, in order to download or upload a file the user will access the swarm and obtain small pieces (torrents) from each peer in order to obtain a full copy of the file.

iiNet has no control over and is not responsible for the BitTorrent system. However, it was certainly aware of the large scale infringement that was occurring online by its users. iiNet receives allegations of infringement involving in excess of 5,000 IP addresses per week.

Representatives of the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT), acting on behalf of the Appellants, opened an account with iiNet and subsequently, using BitTorrent, downloaded and uploaded a number of films and television programs. The AFACT representatives determined, through the use of specialised software, that a number of iiNet users were downloading pieces from one or more of the files that they were sharing in the swarm.

AFACT sent a number of notices of copyright infringement to iiNet which outlined the works said to be infringed, the date and time of infringements and the IP addresses of iiNet customers it had identified who had engaged in the impugned conduct. The notices also included a demand for iiNet to cancel or suspend the customers' accounts if they failed to cease their infringing conduct. Importantly, the notices did not explain the method of how copyright infringement was determined and also did not offer to pay for the costs of verifying the infringement and indemnifying the ISP from any liability incurred for suspending or terminating a subscriber. iiNet did nothing in relation to these allegations.

Key reasons for the Full Court's decision

The main issue both at trial and on appeal was whether by failing to take any steps to stop the infringing conduct identified by AFACT, iiNet had authorised copyright infringement of its users.

Primary infringement

Prior to determining whether copyright infringement has been authorised, the Court needs to ascertain whether infringement has actually occurred. Pursuant to section 86 of the Act, copyright in a film is infringed if it is communicated to the public. Communicate can mean 'making the film available online' or 'electronically transmitting' it. The Full Court found that:

  • By uploading a film to the swarm the user had made the film available online. Importantly, each of the Judges disagreed with the trial Judge's decision that this infringement occurred only once. Their Honours all agreed that the film is made available online every time the user logs on to the internet. This means that there are (many) repeat infringements.
  • The BitTorrent system means that only small parts of the film will be taken from a large number of users. In order for copyright to be infringed, a substantial part of the work needs to be copied. The Full Court unanimously agreed that, on the evidence, they could not find that a substantial part of any of the films were electronically transmitted to the public. Therefore, in any future litigation in order to prove that a user 'electronically transmits' the film, the plaintiff will need to provide expert evidence that proves that a substantial part of a film has been transmitted by a particular user (or group of users).


The test for authorisation is whether the defendant sanctioned, approved or countenanced copyright infringement.

At first instance, the trial judge determined that iiNet had not provided the 'means' of copyright infringement because the mere provision of access to the internet does not constitute 'means' of infringement.

By a majority, the Full Court found that authorisation had not occurred. However, the Full Court unanimously disagreed with the trial judge's reliance on this 'threshold requirement'. Rather, their Honours found that the conduct must be assessed with reference to the test and to the factors under section 101(1A) of the Act. This section required the Court to take into account the following factors:

  • The extent (if any) of the person's power to prevent the doing of the act. The trial judge found that iiNet had no power over any aspect of the BitTorrent system. The Full Court disagreed and found that iiNet had power to prevent the infringement. iiNet could, for example, warn, suspend or terminate the user's access to the internet.
  • The nature of any relationship existing between the person and the person who did the act. There was a commercial, contractual relationship between iiNet and the users and pursuant to that contract users are required not to engage in acts of copyright infringement.
  • Whether the person took any other reasonable steps to prevent or avoid the doing of the act, including whether a person complied with any relevant industry code of practice. The Full Court differed in relation to the final factor. The Appellants argued that iiNet had not taken the appropriate reasonable steps and that iiNet should have implemented a scheme for notification, suspension and termination of customer accounts. Emmett J found that the cost of setting up such a scheme would be immense (particularly given the number of allegations iiNet received) and as the Appellants had not offered to pay for the costs of investigating then it was reasonable for iiNet not to take steps. Nicholas J concluded that iiNet had not been provided with enough information by AFACT to determine whether copyright had been infringed (and it was not its responsibility to seek that information out). Jagot J disagreed and held that iiNet had the technical capabilities and contractual right to control the use of its services but elected not to do so.

Defences and safe harbours

The Full Court agreed that no defence or safe harbour was available:

  • In relation to section 112E of the Act4 the Full Court re-confirmed this provision's very limited relevance as in order to take advantage of this defence it must be shown that the defendant had no knowledge of the infringements occurring on its facilities.
  • The safe harbour provisions in the Act are for carriage service providers who adopt and reasonably implement a policy that provides for termination, in reasonable circumstances, of the accounts of repeat infringers. At first instance the trial judge found that iiNet's (not wholly written) policy was enough to activate these provisions. The Full Court unanimously disagreed and found that iiNet did not have any such policy. This has raised the bar for ISPs to put in place appropriate policies to deal with these matters.

Where to now?

It is unlikely that this is the end of this dispute. Given the importance of this decision for internet users, ISPs and copyright owners, we expect that special leave will be sought to appeal this matter to the High Court. If leave is granted and the matter reaches the High Court, then that Court's decision will just be the tip of the iceberg as the fight will continue between users, software developers (like BitTorrent), ISPs and copyright owners. This may be through copyright owners delivering more extensive infringement notices (and litigating if those notices are not complied with), agreement through industry policies (as to how to deal with infringement notices), through litigation between software developers and copyright owners or it could occur through legislative reform.

1 Roadshow Films Pty Limited v iiNet Limited [2011] FCAFC 23.

2 See our review of the decision at first instance, Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Limited [2010] FCA 24 here:

3 See 'Music Industry to Abandon Mass Suits' The Wall Street Journal (December 2008), viewed 24 February 2011.

4 Section 112E of the Act provides: 'A person (including a carrier or carriage service provider) who provides facilities for making, or facilitating the making of a communication is not taken to have authorised any infringement of copyright in an audio-visual item merely because another person uses the facilities so provided to do something the right to do which is included in the copyright.'

© DLA Phillips Fox

DLA Phillips Fox is one of the largest legal firms in Australasia and a member of DLA Piper Group, an alliance of independent legal practices. It is a separate and distinct legal entity. For more information visit

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.