Australia: Back to the Future? A Shift in the Scope of Challenging an Adjudicator’s Determination under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act

Last Updated: 21 October 2010
Article by Scott Laycock and Kevin R Pathinather

The New South Wales Court of Appeal's decision in Chase Oyster Bar v Hamo Industries [2010] NSWCA 190 (Chase) has altered the judicial power of review in relation to an adjudicator's determination made under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) (Act).

The adjudication process

An adjudicator can be appointed by an authorised nominating authority under the Act to determine a dispute falling within the ambit of the Act.

Typically, the steps leading to an adjudicator making a determination are as follows:

  • the claimant (usually the party hired to provide construction-related services) serves a payment claim upon the respondent;
  • the respondent then has 10 business days to serve a payment schedule either affirming or disputing the amount claimed;
  • should the respondent provide a payment schedule for a lesser amount than the payment claim, the claimant has 10 business days to make an adjudication application;
  • if the respondent fails to provide a payment schedule, the claimant can seek to recover the amount claimed as a judgment debt under section 15 of the Act, or notify the respondent of its intention to make an adjudication application within 20 days of the due date for payment;
  • in either of the scenarios for adjudication outlined above, the respondent then has 5 business days to provide an adjudication response or 2 business days following the adjudicator's acceptance of his or her appointment;
  • the adjudicator then has 10 business days after accepting the application to deliver a determination.

The tight timeframes outlined above are in keeping with the legislature's intention that the Act is meant to prevent the starvation of cashflow for builders, subcontractors and the like.

Challenging an adjudicator's determination

The New South Wales Court of Appeal's decision in Brodyn Pty Ltd v Davenport (2004) 61 NSWLR 421 (Brodyn) was the leading authority for determining the scope to challenge an adjudicator's decision. The Court set down the following tests, being whether the adjudicator failed to:

  • comply with the "basic and essential requirements" of the Act; and/or
  • failed to exercise power in "good faith" or with "natural justice".

The "basic and essential requirements" were identified by as being:

  • the existence of a construction contract (or related arrangement); service by the claimant on the respondent of a payment claim;
  • making an adjudication application by the claimant to an authorised nominating authority;
  • acceptance of the adjudication application by an eligible adjudicator; and
  • determination by the adjudicator of the amount of the progress payment, the date which it becomes due and the rate of interest payable.

The effect of Brodyn was that exact compliance with all requirements of the Act were not essential. Failure to comply with all requirements of the Act would not invalidate a determination provided there had been compliance with the "basic and essential requirements". Since Brodyn, challenging an adjudication determination for non-compliance with the Act has been very difficult, and the majority of challenges unsuccessful.

Distinguishing Brodyn

Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission [2010] HCA 1

In February, the High Court handed down its decision in Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission [2010] HCA 1 (Kirk), in which it was asked to consider whether the Supreme Court had the power to review a decision of the Industrial Relations Commission.

The High Court reaffirmed the Supreme Court's power to review decisions of inferior Courts or bodies with judicial authority, such as authorised nominating authorities. The High Court importantly held that state legislature could not take away a state Supreme Court's power to review errors of jurisdiction.

What is jurisdictional error?

In the context of the Act, jurisdictional error will occur where there is a failure by the adjudicator to identify compliance with those aspects of the Act that are necessary towards the adjudicator making determination. These elements include whether a claimant or respondent had complied with the Act's requirements. However, because of Brodyn and its relatively flexible approach to "basic and essential requirements", strict jurisdictional error did not generally result in the adjudicator's determination being overturned.

Chase Oyster Bar v Hamo Industries [2010] NSWCA 190

As a result of the High Court's reasoning in Kirk, it was probably only a matter of time before Brodyn was challenged. This occurred in Chase.

Chase distinguishes Brodyn by extending the ambit of challenge to an adjudicator's determination.

The parties entered into a construction contract for fitout work at the "Chase Oyster Bar" in Chatswood Chase. On 31 December 2009, Hamo served a payment claim under the Act, the due date for the payment claim being 13 January 2010. Chase failed to serve a payment schedule in response and failed to pay the amount claimed by Hamo.

Hamo made an adjudication application under s17 of the Act. Hamo served notice under s17(2)(a) but outside the required 20 business day period for which the Act provides. Hamo then lodged an adjudication application.

The adjudicator determined Hamo was entitled to the claimed amount and interest, and determined that Hamo had given notice within the time limits provided under section 17(2)(a).

Chase commenced proceedings in the Supreme Court seeking a declaration that the adjudicator's determination was void on the basis that the adjudicator did not have jurisdiction due to Hamo's failure to comply with the notice requirements under section 17(2)(a), and accordingly any finding by the adjudicator amounted to jurisdictional error, citing Kirk.

The Supreme Court referred the decision to the Court of Appeal for determination of three questions:

  1. whether the determination by the adjudicator that he had jurisdiction to determine the adjudication application should be set aside or quashed for jurisdictional error in circumstances where he incorrectly concluded that Hamo had complied with the notice requirements under section 17(2)(a);
  2. whether in light of Kirk, the decision in Brodyn should not be followed or was decided incorrectly insofar as it held that the Supreme Court was not entitled to determine the existence of jurisdictional error and quash an adjudicator's determination on this basis or, make orders in the nature of certiorari (granting relief in circumstances of a breach of legislation); and
  3. whether the Act, by expressly or impliedly limiting the Supreme Court's power to review an adjudicator's determination for jurisdictional error, is inconsistent with the requirement of the Constitution that there be a state court with jurisdiction to grant relief in the nature of certiorari.

In answer to these questions, the Court of Appeal held that:

  • determinations by adjudicators can be reviewed by a Supreme Court if there is non-compliance with the requirements of the Act and if found to be invalid, set aside; and
  • Brodyn should not be followed insofar as it limited the power of a State Supreme Court to determine the existence of jurisdictional errors, or make orders in the nature of certiorari; and
  • the Act does not limit the power of the New South Wales Supreme Court to review an adjudicator's determination for jurisdictional error.


Chase effectively returns claimants and respondents to a pre-Brodyn situation and it is likely that there will now be an increased number of challenges to determinations asserting jurisdictional error or non-compliance with the Act. Hopefully, it will not again result in the "tsunami of litigation" that existed pre-Brodyn.


Parties (ie. claimant or respondent) must ensure that they comply with the strict procedures and time frames under the Act. Failure to comply may invalidate an adjudication application or determination. It remains to be seen whether this decision poses a threat to the quick enforcement of the adjudication process under the Act.

For more information, please contact:


Scott Laycock

t (02) 9931 4865


Kevin Pathinather

t (02) 9035 7103


The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.