Australia: BA Trial: OFT’s Cartel Offence Disrupted But Not Grounded

Last Updated: 22 September 2010
Article by Peter Scott
This article is part of a series: Click Transport and Aviation for the previous article.

On 10 May 2010, the Office of Fair Trading's (OFT) high profile criminal prosecution of four current or former British Airways executives for price-fixing (under the "cartel offence") unexpectedly collapsed when the OFT decided not to offer any evidence because of concerns that it might be unfair to continue the proceedings following the discovery of a significant amount of new evidence after the trial had begun.

Although the UK's cartel offence has been in force since June 2003, the trial of the "BA four" was the first real test of the OFT's criminal powers.1 It is therefore surprising that the case has failed in this manner. However, although a significant blow to the OFT, cartelists should not be celebrating by lighting-up an extra cigar or two in their "smoke-filled rooms"; the OFT remains committed to bringing criminal prosecutions against individuals who engage in price-fixing, and increasing use of its director disqualification powers, not to mention bringing administrative proceedings against their employers leading to the imposition of ever larger fines.


  • Under the UK cartel offence, broadly, an individual commits a criminal offence if he "dishonestly agrees" with one or more competitors to enter into any of a specified list of prohibited arrangements - which are price-fixing, limiting supply, market sharing and bid-rigging - and possible sanctions are: (i) up to five years imprisonment; (ii) unlimited fines; and (iii) disqualification from being a company director in the UK for up to 15 years.2
  • Businesses also face fines of up to 10 per cent of their worldwide turnover and exposure to third party damages actions for "hard-core" infringements such as price-fixing.3
  • In 2006, following a tip-off from Virgin Atlantic, the OFT began civil and criminal investigations into alleged price-fixing between BA and Virgin regarding fuel surcharges for long-haul passenger flights to and from the UK. By blowing the whistle, Virgin secured immunity from fines for itself and immunity from prosecution for its personnel.
  • In August 2007, the OFT announced an early resolution agreement with BA whereby BA agreed to pay a penalty of Ł121.5 million in relation to the civil investigation.4
  • A year later - in August 2008 - the OFT charged Martin George, Andrew Crawley, Alan Burnett and Iain Burns with dishonestly agreeing with others to make or implement arrangements which fixed the price of passenger air transport services by BA and Virgin between July 2004 and April 2006 (when all four worked for BA).
  • Also in 2008, BA and Virgin settled a class action law suit brought in the USA to refund passengers overcharged as a result of the airlines' conduct.

The BA trial

After earlier preliminary hearings, the BA trial began on 22 April 2010 but was beset by delays before its collapse when a significant volume of additional evidence was discovered - essentially a year's worth of emails relating to former Virgin executive Paul Moore. The OFT decided that to continue with the trial would be potentially unfair.

However, while acknowledging the acquittal of all four defendants, the OFT stated that the discovered emails did not fundamentally undermine its case and almost all were irrelevant. If discovered earlier, the OFT believes that the trial would have proceeded.

Prior to the trial's collapse, a number of interesting allegations emerged during opening submissions - including that:

  1. BA and Virgin executives discussed intended increases in fuel surcharge levels - with some discussions allegedly preceded by words along the lines of "this is a conversation we aren't going to have".
  2. Some discussions may have taken place around a cricket match between BA and Virgin executives at Sir Richard Branson's estate - and the release to the media of photographs of this event may have been deliberately delayed to avoid coinciding with fuel surcharge increases.
  3. Virgin executives may have felt pressured to admit their wrongdoing; if they denied everything they risked exclusion from Virgin's leniency award for failing to cooperate with the investigation and therefore faced potential prosecution under the cartel offence themselves (and possibly under similar US laws), whereas by admitting their guilt (even if they did not believe they had done anything wrong) they were guaranteed immunity. There was great concern expressed on this point by counsel for the defendants that the incentives of the Virgin witnesses were so distorted that their evidence could not be considered reliable.

Virgin's leniency status

The OFT is considering whether, by failing to provide the relevant emails earlier, Virgin contravened its leniency obligation to provide "complete and continuous cooperation". It was suggested that Virgin's advisers had failed to identify these emails at an earlier stage due to corruption of the relevant databases. A possible consequence is that Virgin could lose its leniency protection (potentially exposing it to civil fines and its relevant personnel to criminal liability), although this seems unlikely as:

  • The OFT has acknowledged its part in this oversight;
  • It appears likely that Virgin made a genuine mistake (as opposed to deliberately concealing evidence); and, most importantly,
  • The OFT will be very conscious of not jeopardising its leniency programme; the secretive nature of cartels makes detection difficult and the vast majority of the OFT's cartel investigations are triggered by leniency applications. Attacking a leniency applicant - and so discouraging future applications - could have a serious impact on future cartel enforcement.

BA's early resolution agreement

The OFT believes that the trial's collapse has no bearing on BA's early resolution agreement - however, BA is reportedly considering its options:

  • While the OFT has indicated that the additional material is largely irrelevant, reports suggest that at least one email shows that Virgin was considering a unilateral fuel surcharge increase - suggesting there may have been no agreed increase on that occasion.
  • Even if this material does not undermine the entire case, it could impact on the duration of the conduct - which could significantly reduce the level of BA's fine.

Consequences for the OFT and the cartel offence

While the collapse of the BA trial is a significant blow to the OFT, this is not the end of the cartel offence. The OFT has publicly stated its commitment to criminal prosecutions - as demonstrated by recent and ongoing staffing and procedural developments. Indeed, the OFT has since announced that it is pursuing two other cartel offence cases - in the automotive and agricultural sectors.5

This is consistent with the OFT's broader policy of pushing competition law compliance up the corporate agenda, as also shown through the recently revised guidance on disqualifying company directors involved in competition law offences and repeated public statements that the competition authorities will not be sympathetic towards "crisis cartels". In this context - and given that the bar is set relatively low as to when the sharing of pricing and other commercially sensitive information can constitute an infringement - businesses and individuals must remain vigilant.

Peter Scott is a partner and Mark Daniels is an associate in the Anti-trust, Competition and Regulatory team, Norton Rose LLP, London.


1. The only previous successful prosecutions relate to the marine hose cartel - however, in that case, the three individuals concerned had all entered into plea bargain agreements with the US authorities and so did not contest their liability. In June 2008, the three individuals were convicted - with two sentenced to three years in prison and one sentenced to 30 months, but reduced to 30 months, 24 months and 20 months by the Court of Appeal in November 2008. All three have also received director disqualification orders - two for seven years duration and the third for five years.

2. Under sections 188 to 190 Enterprise Act 2002.

3. In breach of Article 101 of the TFEU and/or the Chapter I prohibition under the Competition Act 1998.

4. Unusually, BA settled the civil case prior to the OFT issuing a Statement of Objections (SO) - a formal document setting out the OFT's provisional allegations and, unless the parties can refute the allegations, a precursor to a final infringement decision. Before BA's penalty becomes payable, the OFT must still issue an SO (which was delayed pending the conclusion of the criminal case) and then an infringement decision.

5. See: (i); and (ii)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

This article is part of a series: Click Transport and Aviation for the previous article.
This article is part of a series: Click The Zero-Rating Of Aircraft for the next article.
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.