United Kingdom: Goldacre (Offices) Limited - When Post Administration Rent Is Payable As An Expense

Last Updated: 27 January 2010
Article by Rita Lowe, Steve Davis, Pranai Karia and Inga West

Facts Of This Case

Prior to administration, Nortel had entered into two long leases with the landlord, Goldacre, in respect of two properties. Following administration, Nortel continued to use part of the premises in both of the demises for the benefit of the administration. All rents were paid up-to-date, albeit late so far as the September quarter rent was concerned. This case concerned the payment of future rent and addressed three questions:

  • Whether future rent was payable as an administration expense?
  • If so, whether the rent so payable should be restricted by reference to the company's period of administration occupation, or whether it extended to the full amount of quarterly rental payments falling due during the administration occupation?
  • Whether any obligation to pay rent as an administration expense should be limited by reference to the proportion of the premises actually occupied or used by Nortel, or whether it extended to the whole of the demise.

To view the article in full, please see below:




Full Article

In a landmark reversal of current opinion, HHJ Purle QC decided in the recent case of Goldacre (Offices) Ltd v Nortel Networks UK Ltd [2009] EXHC 3389 (Ch) that rent falling due while a company in administration retains possession or use of any part of leasehold premises for the purposes of the administration will now normally be payable as an administration expense

Background

Liabilities incurred by a company before administration are generally treated as unsecured debts of the company.  They do not normally enjoy priority as an administration expense unless the administrator adopts the contract.  Prior to this case, that was the starting position for leasehold liabilities, which derive from contracts entered into by the company before the administration.  Often administrators and landlords would negotiate terms, and landlords would sometimes seek to improve their position by seeking consent to forfeit the lease of premises occupied by a company in administration (which requires the administrator's or the court's consent because of the administration moratorium).  If the landlord was refused consent to forfeit, it would sometimes be granted the right to a payment of rent referable to the period of the administration occupation.  In other examples, the landlord's payment might be based on what was considered to be equitable in the circumstances.

Prior to 2003, the administration expenses regime was regarded as altogether different from the liquidation expenses regime.  The general view was that the old administration expenses regime involved some discretion, taking account of liabilities incurred for the benefit of the administration, and balancing the interests of the creditors as a whole.  However, there was a big change in the administration regime in 2003 when the Enterprise Act 2002 new style administration was introduced.  The new administration expenses regime contained in paragraph 99 of Schedule B1 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and Rule 2.67 of the Insolvency Rules 1986 introduced wording very similar to that of the existing liquidation expenses regime, contained in Rule 4.218.  Even so, many practitioners continued to interpret administration expenses principles as distinct from liquidation expenses principles on the basis that the purpose of administration (i.e. company rescue) is different from that of liquidation.

Following this case, it appears that the distinction between the two expenses regimes might be becoming more blurred.

Facts Of This Case

Prior to administration, Nortel had entered into two long leases with the landlord, Goldacre, in respect of two properties. Following administration, Nortel continued to use part of the premises in both of the demises for the benefit of the administration. All rents were paid up-to-date, albeit late so far as the September quarter rent was concerned.  This case concerned the payment of future rent and addressed three questions:

Whether future rent was payable as an administration expense?

If so, whether the rent so payable should be restricted by reference to the company's period of administration occupation, or whether it extended to the full amount of quarterly rental payments falling due during the administration occupation?

Whether any obligation to pay rent as an administration expense should be limited by reference to the proportion of the premises actually occupied or used by Nortel, or whether it extended to the whole of the demise.

The Decision

Purle HHJ agreed with the landlord's submissions that this case should be considered exclusively by reference to the Insolvency Rules 1986 (the "Rules") and that if it could be argued that the rental liabilities fell within the Rules, they would be payable as a matter of mandatory obligation and not as a matter of discretion, either on the part of the administrators or on the part of the court. 

The Judge also relied on Lord Hoffman's judgment in the House of Lords decision in Re Toshoku Finance UK PLC [2002] 1 WLR 671, which related to a company in liquidation, and, in particular, the application in that case of the Lundy Granite principle (or salvage principle as it is otherwise known). Under that principle, it was held that liquidators should pay rent as a liquidation expense where the company in liquidation makes use of or retains, for the benefit of the liquidation, possession of leasehold premises.   It followed that in a liquidation, rent, where the Lundy Granite principle applies, will ordinarily fall within Rule 4.218(a) as an "expense properly chargeable or incurred by the official receiver or the liquidator in preserving, realising or getting in any of the assets of the company".

The equivalent rule, so far as administration is concerned, is Rule 2.67(1) and the two relevant subparagraphs are: 

  • Subparagraph (a) that deals with "expenses properly incurred by the administrator in performing his functions in the administration of the company"; and
  • Subparagraph (f) that deals with "any necessary disbursements by the administrator in the course of the administration (including any expenses incurred by members of the creditors' committee or their representatives and allowed for by the administrator under Rule 2.63, but not including any payment of corporation tax in circumstances referred to in sub-paragraph [2.67(j)])..."

Purle HHJ favoured the view that the rental liabilities to which the Lundy Granite principle applied would fall within the administration expense category in Rule 2.67(1)(a) as 'expenses properly incurred by the administrators'.  However, the case of Exeter v Bairstow suggested otherwise.  This did not matter because, Purle HHJ found that if the rental payments did not fall under Rule 2.67(1)(a), then they would be captured by Rule 2.67(1)(f) as a 'necessary disbursement', by the application of the Lundy Granite principle.  In construing what is 'necessary' in this context, Purle HHJ agreed with remarks of Briggs J in Lehman Brothers International (Europe) [2009] EWHC 2545 that necessity extends to a payment that ought to be made in fairness and justice and was not confined to a situation in which there had been a specific threat of, in this context, forfeiture proceedings.  Purle HHJ was therefore of the view that the word "necessary" in Rule 2.67(a)(f) is plainly apt to extend to a case where the Lundy Granite principle applies.

Having decided that rent for premises occupied or used by a company in administration was payable as an administration expense, the Judge then turned to the question of the amount of the expenses claim. He considered, following the case of Re Levi & Co. Ltd [1919] 1 Ch 416 as applied to administrations, that an administrator electing to hold leasehold premises could do so only on the terms and conditions contained in the lease. As such, any liability incurred while the lease is being enjoyed or retained by the company in administration would be payable in full as an administration expense.

The Judge also referred to Sunberry Properties Ltd v Innovate Logistics Ltd [2009] 1 BCLC 145, because it was argued that the case required him to exercise discretion in considering how much it would be fair for the administrators to pay in respect of rental liabilities. If he had been required to undertake that exercise, Purle HHJ explained that he would have concluded that it was fair for the administrators to pay the entire rent for the forthcoming quarter.  However, the Judge considered that he was not bound to follow the judgment and exercise such a discretion because that part of the Court of Appeal's judgment in Sunberry was based on a concession and he was not bound by it.

As a final point, Purle HHJ explained that if the sufficiency of the realisable assets was in doubt, the landlord may have to wait and see to what extent the assets will be enough to satisfy its claim, as there may be other claims also having priority as an administration expense. There is in that sense, no immediate right to payment and, had this been relevant in this instance, then the question as to whether rental liabilities fall within 2.67(a) or 2.67(f) of the Rules would have had to have been determined. 

Comment

Following this case, it is now clear that where an administrator retains possession or use of leasehold premises for the benefit of the administration, rental payments falling due during the administration occupation will be an expense of the administration.

The judgement does, however, raise further concerns and in some respects uncertainty in relation to a number of issues, most notably the following:    

  1. What order of priority should be attributed to rental liabilities within Rule 2.67 itself?  This would be relevant if there are insufficient assets to pay all the administration expenses in full.  It is possible that some administrations are now in this situation as a result of this decision because administrators had not previously anticipated having to pay rental liabilities in full.
  2. If rental liabilities only become payable as an administration expense on the date they are due, can administrators benefit from this by starting the administration just after a quarter date and simply vacating the premises just before the next quarterly rent payment is due?   
  3. The decision leaves open the question of what, if anything, landlords are entitled to where arrears of rent have accrued prior to the administration and the company continues to occupy the premises for the benefit of the administration, but vacates before the next rent payment date.
  4. Is it just and equitable to allow all liabilities under an adopted lease (especially dilapidation liabilities that are incurred prior to administration) to be granted administration expense priority?
  5. Where administrators allow buyers of the assets or business of the company to occupy leasehold premises as licensee, is it now open to a landlord to claim rent as an expense of the administration for each quarter? Administrators will need to carefully consider firstly the termination dates of such licences and secondly ensure that the licence fees are collected on time and upfront, on a quarterly basis, if that is what the lease provides.
  6. Often, landlords will look to previous tenants for payment, especially where the outcome of the administration may not be known - indeed as they have only six months to make those claims, landlords may have no choice but to do so. Thought will, therefore, need to be given to whether such claims might also rank as administration expenses? 

What is clear from this case is that administrators should consider, where possible, what premises are required for the administration before taking appointment and settle a strategy in advance. Banks looking to make appointments will, therefore, need greater planning advice from their insolvency practitioners and lawyers. In some instances this ruling may have the effect of making administration itself a less attractive option and alternatives, such as a CVA, may be considered as a more suitable way forward.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 25/01/2010.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Rita Lowe
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
Accounting and Audit
Anti-trust/Competition Law
Consumer Protection
Corporate/Commercial Law
Criminal Law
Employment and HR
Energy and Natural Resources
Environment
Family and Matrimonial
Finance and Banking
Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Government, Public Sector
Immigration
Insolvency/Bankruptcy, Re-structuring
Insurance
Intellectual Property
International Law
Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Privacy
Real Estate and Construction
Strategy
Tax
Transport
Wealth Management
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.