Australia: Be Alarmed Be Very Alarmed: Class Action Reforms Mooted

Key Point

  • The suggested changes run counter to the legislative aims of the class action procedure and would sweep away the remaining safeguards that protect defendants.

In 2006, the Victorian Law Reform Commission (VLRC) was asked to review that State's civil litigation system. Specifically, the Civil Justice Project was asked to consider how to reduce the cost, complexity and speed of civil proceedings. As part of that review, it has considered class action proceedings. Victoria is the only Australian State to have a specific class actions procedure in its Supreme Court.

On 28 May 2008 the VLRC issued its Civil Justice Review Report, which includes recommendations it says would make class actions in Victoria cheaper, simpler and fairer.

Our conclusion is different. We think that the recommendations give manufacturers and distributors of goods real cause to be alarmed. While at this stage the recommendations are limited to Victoria, it seems that what is intended is to reform class actions in a way that would make even more plaintiff-friendly than the United States. What safeguards there are for defendants in the current class action framework would be removed.

What are the recommendations?

The VLRC has identified access to justice to remedy mass wrongs, including through class action procedures in the Victorian Supreme Court as a priority area for review. The recommendations include:

  • removing any legal requirement that all class members have individual claims against all defendants, provided that all class members have a legal claim against one defendant.
  • making clear that a class may comprise only those who have consented to the conduct of proceedings on their behalf.
  • conferring on the Court discretion to order cy-près-type remedies (explained below)
  • setting up a new funding body, the Justice Fund, to facilitate access to justice by (a) providing financial assistance to parties with meritorious civil claims and by (b) providing indemnity for any adverse costs order or order for security for costs made against the party assisted by the fund. In return, the Justice Fund would be entitled to a share of any settlement or judgment.
  • consideration being given to the introduction of proportionate and other types of fees in class action proceedings, specifically fees based on the work actually done with a multiplier.

Why the proposals are wrong

There are many criticisms that could be made of these proposals. In summary, our main concerns are:

  • Preservation of the existing legal requirement that all class members have legal claims against all defendants in class action proceedings is essential to ensuring the efficient conduct of class action litigation. It is a cornerstone of the present regime. The requirement that each group member should have a claim against each respondent operates to ensure some degree of commonality in class actions and should be preserved in the interests of efficiency and ensuring fairness for all parties. Individual issues of fact and law are exacerbated in a class action involving numerous group members and multiple defendants.
As Clayton Utz' submission to the VLRC said:
"Congruence in the type and attachment of alleged causes of action as between group members and defendants is more than a statutory nicety. A party brought into a class action as a respondent, but in respect of a different claim by different group members, faces the prospect that its claim will not be determined in a speedy, just and efficient manner. However, by reason of its joinder, that respondent will incur costs associated and generated by their mere (long term) presence in the proceedings."
  • Allowing a class to comprise of a select group who have consented to being class members has the disadvantage that plaintiff lawyers will have ability to cherry-pick the clients with the greatest possible success. It would be counter to the objective of promoting efficiency in the use of court resources if multiple class actions could be brought by self-aggregated groups each differently represented. While it is possible that such multiple actions could be consolidated and/or heard together, the multiplicity of actions seems contrary to the underlying philosophy of class actions.
  • Cy-près means "as near as (possible)". It embodies the idea that where something cannot be carried out exactly, then it should nevertheless be carried out in substance, as close as possible to the desired result. In the context of class actions, for example, it allows a court to award "approximate justice" and to make orders, for example, price rollback relief or an award to a nominated organisation where all injured persons cannot be identified. In the US, application of the doctrine has been criticised. For example, Judge Richard Posner of the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has criticised cy-près awards as having a punitive effect.
We have a number of difficulties with this recommendation. First, it would enable the courts to make what are subjective public policy determinations as to where moneys might allocated. As we said in our submission to the VLRC, it seems to us that this is more properly a matter for the legislature.
Further, the VLRC has proposed that the court's powers be largely unfettered. For example, the VLRC has said that the court's power should not be limited to distribution of money only for the benefit of persons who are class members or who fall within the class description, and the court's general discretion to make such orders should not be limited to any proposal or agreement of the parties to the class action proceeding.
  • Any establishment of a civil Justice Fund must only encourage litigation. It is not clear how such a fund will prevent the inefficiencies and difficulties associated with legal aid funding in the past. Further, until recently, with the High Court's recognition of commercial litigation funding as permissible, no win-no fee and uplift costs agreements were the normal method of funding a class action in Australia. While some plaintiff lawyers also used other strategies to maximise the amount they could charge under the professional conduct rules, these prohibitions and caps have prevented Australian plaintiff lawyers from receiving the enormous fees reportedly earned by plaintiff lawyers in class actions in the United States. Adoption of the VLRC's proposals would provide a windfall for plaintiff lawyers, increasing the incentive to bring more speculative actions.

Is there a need for reform?

The Civil Justice Report proceeds on the unstated assumptions that there is a need to reform the law, that there are lacunae in the current regulations and that civil justice funding is presently inadequate. This is yet to be demonstrated.

The VLRC's proposals have been criticised as "read[ing] like a wish list for plaintiff lawyers" and "would make Victoria a veritable nirvana for plaintiff lawyers" - indeed, Dr Cashman has agreed that the proposed changes would attract class actions to the State of Victoria. In our view, the changes that have been suggested run counter to the legislative aims of the class action procedure and would sweep away the remaining safeguards that protect defendants.

We do not think that there is any need for reform. Judicial statements have been made to the effect that the class action mechanism is not to be construed narrowly so as to make it difficult to commence class actions or place barriers in the way of so doing. As a result, when key procedural issues have come before the courts (relating to the definition of the group, the role of the class applicant, identification and notification of group members concerning commonality, funding and security for costs, the court's power to terminate class actions, and court approvals of settlements), the court has been willing to facilitate the bringing of class actions, except in a very limited number of cases where they were manifestly inappropriate.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Sign Up
Gain free access to lawyers expertise from more than 250 countries.
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Country
Position
Industry
Mondaq Newsalert
Select Topics
Select Regions
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions