Australia: Freedom Of Information Act And Legal Professional Privilege:Secretary To The Department Of Justice V Osland [2007] VSCA 96

Last Updated: 25 May 2007
Article by Rachel Walsh

The Court of Appeal has recently reinforced the importance of maintaining the protection of legal professional privilege and has clarified the ‘public interest’ test in determining whether the privilege should be overridden in an FOI application.


In 1996, Heather Osland was convicted of the murder of her husband. She unsuccessfully appealed to the High Court. In the context of her claim that her husband had subjected her to sustained and severe domestic violence, Ms Osland’s conviction, and sentencing to 14 and a half years in prison, generated significant public interest in her case and agitation for law reform in defences to homicide and battered women’s syndrome.

In 1999, Ms Osland sought a pardon from the Governor on six grounds. In 2001, the Attorney-General announced that the Governor had refused Ms Osland's petition for mercy. The Attorney-General announced in a press release that he had recommended that the Governor deny the petition and that he had based his recommendation on a memorandum of advice provided by three senior counsel. The joint advice, he said, ‘recommend[ed] on every ground that the petition should be denied’.

Ms Osland later requested access, under the Freedom of Information Act 1982, to the joint advice and other advices provided to the Government in relation to her petition. The Department refused access to the relevant documents, claiming that they were exempt under section 32 of the Act on the grounds of legal professional privilege.

The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal upheld Ms Osland’s application for review of this decision and ordered that the documents be released. The Department appealed. The Court of Appeal has now allowed the appeal and held that access to the documents be refused.

Maintaining the privilege

In its decision, the Court clarifies the law relating to waiver of legal professional privilege and its relationship with section 32 of the FOI Act. This has mixed implications for Government and its agencies.

First, the Court has accepted that waiver of the privilege is relevant to whether an exemption can be upheld under section 32. This is a question of fact. If an agency behaves in a way that is inconsistent with maintaining the confidentiality in a legal professional privileged document, the agency will be held to have waived the privilege and to have lost the capacity to claim an exemption under section 32.

The Court has also clarified and narrowed the test for determining whether particular behaviour has resulted in waiver of the privilege. The Court has moved away from previous decisions that suggested that, where the ‘gist or conclusion’ of legal advice is disclosed, the privilege is waived. In the present case, the Court has established a test requiring a factual examination of the degree to which the content of the advice was revealed and the context in which the statements were made. The Court will examine whether the person claiming privilege has behaved inconsistently with the claim for privilege.

The Court found that, under this test of inconsistency, it is possible ‘in appropriate circumstances’ to disclose publicly that one is ‘acting on advice and what the substance of that advice is, without being at risk of having to disclose the confidential content of the advice’.

For Government and its agencies, this means that it is possible to refer publicly to having relied on legal advice and the gist of that advice, as the Attorney-General did in this case, without losing the privilege in the document, or the ability to claim an exemption under section 32 should an FOI application be made.

Restricting the public interest override

The Court’s decision also addresses the application of the ‘public interest override’ under section 50(4) of the FOI Act. The Court confirmed that the Tribunal should not override an exemption unless the public interest truly demands release of the information. In so finding, the Court concluded that ‘the case for access must be irresistible’.

The Court also found that, in balancing the competing public interests of access to information and privileged communication, ‘[t]he public interest factors which underpin the privilege support all privileged documents uniformly’. Accordingly, a privileged document is not more susceptible to being released depending on its ‘content’ or ‘current relevance’. Once privilege attaches, it attaches forever until waived. In applying the public interest test, the Tribunal should not find that the exemption is overridden because a privileged document is somehow ‘less privileged’ in certain circumstances; it must find that the public interest requires the privilege that exists be overridden.

The Court also emphasised that the fact that the public is interested in an issue - as media coverage suggested sections of the public were in Ms Osland’s case - is not, by itself, relevant to the question of whether the public interest requires disclosure of a related document under section 50(4). The FOI applicant’s personal interest in release of a document is also irrelevant to that question, even where, as in Ms Osland’s case, that personal interest is ‘intense’ and ‘wholly understandable’.

Finally, the Court also held that abstract considerations of policy - such as the ‘desirability of greater transparency in decision-making by the executive’ - are not relevant to the analysis to be performed under section 50(4). Rather, in order to invoke the override, the Tribunal must be satisfied that, if access is not granted to the document, the public interest will suffer or be diminished in some concrete respect. Related to this, the Court noted that transparency is not necessarily desirable in respect of all executive decision making. If the decision to which a document relates is not reviewable - such as, for example, the decision to deny Ms Osland’s petition for mercy - an argument that the public interest in greater transparency in respect of the decision is unlikely to be a sufficient basis for invoking the override. Decisions that are outside both the justice system and the statutory scheme for review of administrative decisions are likely to fall into this category.

Implications for Government and its agencies

By emphasising the importance of legal professional privilege as integral to the public interest, the Court has provided a useful reminder of the status of the section 32 exemption and the need for FOI officers to be alert to the possibility of exemption under section 32 when dealing with legal advice to the department or agency.

By confirming that age, currency and content are irrelevant to the question of whether or not a document is exempt under section 32, the Court has also made it easier for FOI officers to determine the question of exemption under that section. If the circumstances of the creation or receipt of a document mean that it satisfies the definition of a legally privileged document, it is irrelevant that the document is, for example, ‘of historical interest only’ rather than being ‘under active consideration’. Once privileged, a document is privileged for all time until the privilege is waived; and no one privileged document is more privileged than another.

Finally, the Court has clarified the parameters of the section 50(4) override and narrowed its potential application.

Phillips Fox has changed its name to DLA Phillips Fox because the firm entered into an exclusive alliance with DLA Piper, one of the largest legal services organisations in the world. We will retain our offices in every major commercial centre in Australia and New Zealand, with no operational change to your relationship with the firm. DLA Phillips Fox can now take your business one step further − by connecting you to a global network of legal experience, talent and knowledge.

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances and no liability will be accepted for any losses incurred by those relying solely on this publication.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions