United States: Massachusetts Court Holds That Job Changes Do Not Necessarily Nullify Non-Competition/Non-Solicitation Agreements

Last Updated: November 21 2005

By Wilfred J. Benoit, Jr., James W. Nagle, Robert M. Hale and Bradford J. Smith

Originally published November 17, 2005

Some Massachusetts Superior Court decisions over the past two years have suggested that changes in job responsibilities, such as promotions and demotions, can nullify existing non-competition/non-solicitation agreements, and that employers who want the protection of such restrictive covenants must have their employees sign new agreements every time such changes take place. As noted in our April 5, 2004 client alert, Recent Massachusetts Court Decisions Highlight the Importance of Careful Drafting and Fact-Specific Analysis in Connection with Enforcement of Non-competition Agreements," a per se rule to that effect would appear to be inconsistent with earlier, higher court precedent.

In a recent decision in the case of Getman, et al. v. USI Holdings Corp., et al., Superior Court Judge Ralph Gants rejected such a per se rule. Judge Gants held that an employeeís promotions were not inconsistent with the agreement he had signed several years before, and did not preclude enforcement of the restrictive covenants contained in that agreement. The decision also provides useful guidance on a number of other issues, including the extent to which a successor employer can enforce its predecessorís restrictive covenants, what constitutes "solicitation" by a former employee, and the enforceability of restrictions on "accepting" business from a former employerís customers or clients.

Case Background

The plaintiff in the Getman case, Carl Getman, began working as an insurance agent for the Hastings-Tapley Insurance Agency ("Hastings-Tapley") in 1986. In 1989, while still an agent, Mr. Getman executed an employment agreement with Hastings- Tapley which could be terminated without cause on 60 days notice and which prohibited him, for three years after the termination of his employment, from competing with Hastings-Tapley, from soliciting its clients, or from accepting insurance business from its clients. Subsequently, he was promoted to Senior Account Executive and then to Vice President. In 2003, USI Holdings Corp. ("USI") acquired Hastings-Tapley, and Mr. Getman became a USI insurance agent. Mr. Getman did not sign another employment agreement after the acquisition.

On July 13, 2005, Mr. Getman voluntarily resigned to work for a smaller insurance agency, Cleary Schultz Insurance ("Cleary"). Mr. Getman and Cleary filed suit seeking a declaratory judgment that the restrictive covenants in Mr. Getmanís 1989 employment agreement were unenforceable. USI and Hastings-Tapley responded by moving for an injunction enforcing those contractual restrictions.

Material Changes in Employment Terms

Mr. Getman argued that several "unilateral changes" in the employment relationship made by his employer "materially" affected the terms and conditions of his employment and thus nullified his 1989 employment agreement. To support this argument, he pointed to his promotions, changes in the method of calculating his compensation, turnover on his staff, and changes in the identity of the manager to whom he reported. The court rejected this argument.

Judge Gants concluded, however, that USIís purchase of Hastings-Tapley did constitute a "material change" which impacted, but did not completely nullify, the 1989 agreement. Mr. Getman had agreed not to compete against Hastings-Tapley; he "did not agree not to not compete against a much larger insurance brokerage firm such as USI." Since the scope of the non-compete provision was materially changed with USIís purchase of Hastings-Tapley, the court declined to enforce it against Mr. Getman.

Non-Solicitation Issues

Judge Gants ruled that, while USIís purchase of Hastings-Tapley rendered the noncompetition clause unenforceable, it did not affect the agreementís non-solicitation clause, which barred Mr. Getman from soliciting or accepting business from his former clients. The scope of that restriction remained unchanged because Mr. Getman "reasonably would have understood when he signed the 1989 agreement that it would apply to solicitation of his own clients, regardless of whether Hastings- Tapley had merged into or been purchased by a larger firm."

The court next grappled with the issue of "whether the contract provision barring Mr. Getman from soliciting or accepting insurance business from his former clients at USI for three years was unenforceable because it is unreasonable in its time, space, or scope." Similar to a covenant not to compete, a non-solicitation provision generally is enforceable only to the extent that it is necessary to protect the legitimate business interests of the employer. Legitimate business interests include trade secrets, confidential information, and good will. Trade secrets were not an issue. The only "truly important" confidential information was a client list identifying names, addresses, telephone numbers, and current insurance policies, which Judge Gants ordered Mr. Getman to return to USI.

In deciding whether USI had a legitimate interest in enforcing the restrictions against solicitation or acceptance of business, Judge Gants focused on USIís protectable good will. "The good will at stake is the prior history of reliability, integrity, knowledgeability, insurance experience, and prompt service that would cause present insurance clients to renew their existing insurance policies through USI, to procure new policies through USI, and to refer their friends and colleagues looking for insurance brokerage services to USI, as well as USIís reputation in the community, which may cause other potential clients to come to USI to meet their insurance needs." USIís good will interests, however, extended only so far. The court distinguished between USIís legitimate preservation of its "own good will" and the good will earned by the employee that "fairly belongs to the employee." Judge Gants noted that an employerís good will and an employeeís good will are "inevitably intertwined," and that the restrictions on Mr. Getmanís future dealings with his former USI clients were reasonable and enforceable only to the extent that they struck a "fair balance between protecting [USIís] confidential information and the good will it earned as a company vs. taking the good will earned by and belonging to Mr. Getman individually."

Noting the difficulty in discerning between good will belonging to the employer and good will belonging to the employee, Judge Gants attempted to craft such a "fair balance" through a careful evaluation of the specific facts in the Getman case. In particular, he distinguished the insurance business in question from certain service businesses, "like financial advisors, [where] the product may be handcrafted for the client, as with a stock portfolio, and the client may mistakenly believe that the employee [with whom he deals directly] is also the person primarily responsible for crafting it." In Mr. Getmanís case, "the Ďproductsí are not created by the agency; the agency primarily steers the client to the insurance company offering the required policies at the lowest price, assists the client with claims, and makes sure the policies do not expire without the clientís Ö approval." Judge Gants found that in this situation "most, although not all, of the good will belongs to the agent himself." 1

In balancing the competing good will interests, the court ruled that Mr. Getman could not solicit his former clients for a period of one year (not three), but that he would be allowed to accept their unsolicited business. The court found that one year was sufficient time for USI to convince Mr. Getmanís clients that "the service they enjoyed during Mr. Getmanís tenure was more the result of the collective efforts of USIís employees than of Mr. Getmanís individual efforts" and that they should remain USI clients. The "fair balance" also would allow Mr. Getman to contact USI clients who were not his specific former clients to seek their insurance business for Cleary. "Since [Mr. Getman] never handled these accounts personally, there is no risk that these clients will confuse his good will with that of USI."

The question remained as to what constitutes solicitation. While it acknowledged that, "[a]s a practical matter, the difference between accepting and receiving business is more metaphysical than real,"2 the court found that Mr. Getman was not engaged in solicitation when he notified his clients that he was leaving USI to join Cleary and provided them with his new contact information. Nor did he engage in solicitation when his former clients initiated contact with him and he explained why he left USI and joined Cleary, and described in general terms the work he performed in his new job and the nature of the work performed by Cleary. Judge Gants cautioned, however, that solicitation could occur depending on how such a conversation materialized and exactly what was said, especially if Mr. Getman had praised Cleary or deprecated USI or "otherwise encourage[d] the client to bring his business" to Cleary.

Conclusions

The Getman decision is significant in several respects. First, it helps dispel the notion that any significant job change, such as a promotion or a demotion, will vitiate a noncompetition/ non-solicitation agreement. Second, it provides useful guidance as to what does, or does not, constitute "solicitation." Third, the courtís conceptual analysis regarding the ownership of good will between the employer and the employee raises an issue that is likely to provoke further case law developments. The courtís finding that the prohibition against accepting business from former clients was unenforceable was limited to the unique nature of the insurance business in the Getman case in the context of a request for injunctive relief arising out of a noncompete that was put in place in exchange for a limited commitment to continued employment. It remains to be seen whether appellate courts will follow the good will analysis in Getman or whether that analysis will be refined in the fact-specific context that drives the outcome of non-competition litigation.

Endnotes

1 The proposition that employees, such as sales representatives, who are hired expressly for the purpose of developing ongoing business relationships for their employer, are entitled to consider those relationships their own, has been the subject of discussion in various trial court decisions, but there is no appellate authority that resolves this question.

2 On this point, Judge Gants quoted from a Massachusetts Appellate Court decision in Alexander & Alexander v. Danahy. In that case, the court enforced an agreement by a former employee (entered into in the context of the sale of a business) not to "solicit . . . or receive" business from customers of the former employer.

Goodwin Procter LLP is one of the nation's leading law firms, with a team of 700 attorneys and offices in Boston, Los Angeles, New York, San Diego, San Francisco and Washington, D.C. The firm combines in-depth legal knowledge with practical business experience to deliver innovative solutions to complex legal problems. We provide litigation, corporate law and real estate services to clients ranging from start-up companies to Fortune 500 multinationals, with a focus on matters involving private equity, technology companies, real estate capital markets, financial services, intellectual property and products liability.

This article, which may be considered advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions, is provided with the understanding that it does not constitute the rendering of legal advice or other professional advice by Goodwin Procter LLP or its attorneys. © 2005 Goodwin Procter LLP. All rights reserved.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
In association with
Related Video
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
Accounting and Audit
Anti-trust/Competition Law
Consumer Protection
Corporate/Commercial Law
Criminal Law
Employment and HR
Energy and Natural Resources
Environment
Family and Matrimonial
Finance and Banking
Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Government, Public Sector
Immigration
Insolvency/Bankruptcy, Re-structuring
Insurance
Intellectual Property
International Law
Law Practice Management
Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Privacy
Real Estate and Construction
Strategy
Tax
Transport
Wealth Management
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.comís content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltdís services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) Ė meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with ďno disclosureĒ in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a userís hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friendís name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our usersí information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a userís personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that userís personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the ďYour ProfileĒ page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.