United Kingdom: The Market Reform Group publishes ‘Contract Certainty Code of Practice’

Last Updated: 24 October 2005
Article by Nick Paul and Maxine Cupitt

FSA regulation of "contract certainty" is a critical issue for insurers and authorised insurance intermediaries. Market processes are being restructured whilst individual firms are conducting internal projects to meet FSA's standards, and awaiting FSA's decision on whether to impose additional regulation.

See below for the full article containing:

  • news on latest developments
  • the "contract certainty" timetable
  • an explanation of FSA regulation and the background to the Contract Certainty initiative.


Full Article

FSA moves towards decision time on Contract Certainty - update on FSA Regulation Timetable and recent developments

December '06: Final date set by FSA for market compliance.

December '05: Formal 'stocktake' by FSA to determine whether sufficient progress has been made to meet the December 2006 challenge and/or whether to introduce further specific regulation. FSA has a wide range of options including additional capital weightings, restrictions on firms and further specific contract certainty rules.

November '05: Key meeting at which the industry will report progress achieved to FSA ahead of the December stocktake.

October '05: London Market Reform Group publishes its Contract Certainty Code of Practice.

September '05: Dane Douetil chairman of the Lloyds' Market Association announces that the inability of insurers to provide accurate loss estimates following Hurricane Katrina is the clearest evidence that contract certainty must happen. Chartered Insurers Institute launches contract certainty certificate which is welcomed by FSA.

August '05: LMBC produce guide to assist brokers to develop their own detailed implementation plans and Contract Certainty Guidance note highlighting FSA threat of rule-based measures unless at least 85% of placements will achieve contract certainty by 31 December 2006. Lloyd's extends mandate of LMP guidelines to preparation of lineslips. "LMP lineslip – June 2005" proposes a standard format and market standard from 1st October.

July '05: Third FSA meeting on contract certainty, Progress Reports from Nick Prettejohn and Duncan Boyle for the Subscription Market and Non-slip Market respectively. FSA highlighted the vital importance of market engagement and cultural change. FSA to:

  • Assess the progress of individual firms over next six months
  • Ensure unmitigated risks (operational/legal) are considered within Individual Capital
  • Market Reform Group addressing volume targets for achievement this year. FSA to assess monitoring of complex aspects of implementation and infrastructure providers.

Contract certainty – what's it all about?

FSA became responsible for the entire insurance industry this year. Its main statutory objectives are "market confidence" and "the protection of consumers". It is concerned about inadequate contracts and documentation in the industry because it poses risks to those objectives. Current practices within firms and at a market level pose operational and legal risks for insurers and intermediaries and unacceptable uncertainty for their clients and insureds. FSA authorised firms are already subject to a range of requirements which may be breached if contractual documentation is inadequate. These include high level standards, such as PRIN and SYSC, more detailed business standards such as PRU* and specific requirements in ICOB and CASS. It is also a key issue in the context of FSA's personal regulation of individual senior managers (approved persons) under APER.

(*e.g. PRU 7.1.30 - A firm should pay close attention to the wording of its policy documentation to ensure that these wordings do not expose it to more, or higher, claims than it is expecting. In so doing, the firm should consider:

  1. whether it has adequate in-house legal resources;
  2. the need for periodic independent legal review of policy documentation;
  3. the use of standardised documentation and referral procedures for variation of terms;
  4. reviewing the documentation used by other insurance companies;
  5. revising documentation for new policies in the light of past experience; and
  6. the operation of law in the jurisdiction of the policyholder)

FSA has a range of "tools" available to combat poor documentation ranging from enforcement action for breaches of existing requirements through to the introduction of new rules or requirements. These includes disciplinary action against senior managers leading to fines, particularly if internal systems are inadequate. Recently FSA has raised the prospect of additional capital requirements (to reflect operational and legal risk) and ultimately it has the power to vary a firm's permissions to restrict or apply conditions to underwriting or mediation business. In short, FSA "holds all the cards" in the current debate about contract certainty.

Contract certainty

FSA is alarmed about the standards of documentation in the insurance industry, particularly when compared to other markets which FSA regulates. It has attacked a "deal now, detail later" culture which poses a clear and identifiable risk to FSA's objectives. In short, FSA's concern is that firms and market participants tolerate substantial operational risk and poor protection for their clients and seem to find it easier to pay the cost of "clearing up the mess" after the event, rather than investing in systems and training to mitigate the risk up front.

"Contract certainty" under the FSA Handbook extends across a range of agreements and processes. This includes contracts of insurance and policies but extends to a wide range of commercial agreements, particularly those which govern the role of the different participants in the chain, such as binding authorities, agency agreements for the collection of premium, outsourcing, claims handling and so on. It also extends to record keeping and systems necessary to maintain related evidence such as material information disclosed to underwriters.

In the London Market, traditional market mechanics (primarily relating to subscription risks) pose substantial risks. FSA has given notice that these risks must be eliminated. Alarmingly from FSA's perspective, the precise terms of an insurance contract can be uncertain at the time of the "placing" and can remain so after "inception" and for a considerable time thereafter. Indeed, some insureds (and insurers) find that when a claim is made, there is still no policy in existence and they have to instruct lawyers to gather evidence and to litigate in order to determine, forensically, the extent of coverage or other terms. The consequences of poor contract certainty were shown by the Silverstein case last year, which followed the World Trade Center terrorist attacks. The policies had not been finalised and insurers held conflicting records of the terms. As a consequence, the parties had to rely on the courts to decide retrospectively what the terms of the contract were intended to be.

Industry Initiatives

A steering group is reporting to FSA on contract certainty. There are two streams beneath the steering group. The MRG is responsible for the slip/subscription/London Market (which includes the International Underwriting Association, the Lloyd's Market Association and London Market Insurance Brokers' Committee).

(MRG announced in July that it was re-establishing its executive committee, the MRGE (whose task it is to convert reform strategy into deliverable projects that have market-wide buy-in) with a new board, the Market Reform Implementation board (MRIB) will be responsible for implementation. MRIB has initially taken on the implementation of the account and settlement (A&S) and claims reform. MRG has also established a Performance Monitoring Group.)

The second stream that reports to the FSA steering group, deals with the non-subscription side of the industry and is headed by Duncan Boyle. This stream has proposed a code of practice to FSA. It has been surveying the market to establish the extent of contract certainty issues in non-subscription business.

Developments in the London Market

There are particular challenges in the London market because of the way business has traditionally been conducted. In essence, slip signing and policy production have taken place 'after the event" – as illustrated by the following timeline/sequence:

Placement -> Inception -> finalisation of slip/queries resolved ->closing/slip signed -> policy produced -> policy reviewed -> finalisation of policy/issues resolved -> policy signed -> policy sent to broker - broker sends policy to client.

This sequence often means policies are not finally produced until well into –sometimes nearing the end - of the period of coverage or, in some cases they have not been produced at all.

MRG – Contract Certainty Code of Practice

The MRG members have now produced a Contract Certainty Code of Practice. This extends the original definition of "contract certainty" – "contract certainty is achieved by the complete and final agreement of all terms (including signed down lines) between insured and insurers before inception" – by adding "In addition:

  1. The full wording must be agreed before any insurer formally commits to the contract
  2. An appropriate evidence of cover is to be issued within 30 days of inception"

Targets have been set for the % of contracts meeting this definition:

  • 30% (of monthly volume) by end O5
  • 60% by end June 06
  • 85% by end 06

Aggregate market progress will be reported to FSA; each firm remains responsible to FSA for its own performance.

The Code of Practice has 8 Principles each with accompanying guidance and definitions:

  1. Brokers will provide submissions that satisfy the contract certainty definition and checklist to obtain firm quotes and place firm orders.
  2. Each insurer will be satisfied that the submission meets the contract certainty definition and checklist before formally committing to the contract, ensuring that any conditions or subjectivities are clearly expressed.
  3. Brokers will notify all terms to their client and obtain their client's agreement before inception.
  4. Brokers will calculate signed lines by inception and notify them to each insurer no later than 30 days after inception date, or by inception date on request.
  5. Brokers and insurers will not take part in post-inception over-placing.
  6. Brokers and insurers will ensure that post-inception amendments are documented and agreed as endorsements.
  7. Brokers and insurers will each collect and maintain data on their contract certainty performance at individual contract level.
  8. Brokers and insurers will ensure that appropriate evidence of cover, including security, is issued within 30 days of inception.

The new structure builds on previous work in the London Market including:

  • The LMP slip and improving compliance with LMP slip requirements;
  • De-linking i.e. the separation of payments and invoicing from slips/policy production (part of accounting and settlements (A&S)); and
  • Other developments in market systems/infrastructure, including those involving Xchanging and Kinnect.

This new timetable has significant consequences for firms because it pushes policy drafting/conclusion from the leisurely world of back office "admin" into a more commercially sensitive/time critical arena. This will require significant investment to deliver the skills necessary to move policy wording out of the darker areas of the back office.

Policy wordings

MRG have listed 9 attributes in their MRG Contract Certainty Measurement:

  1. Wording (e.g. consistent, coherent and complete);
  2. Law, jurisdiction and arbitration (e.g. choice of law and jurisdiction defined);
  3. Commercial terms (e.g. premium and brokerage defined);
  4. Risk disclosures (e.g. clear reference to supporting information);
  5. A single agreed version (e.g. available to all, definitive, timely);
  6. Compliance (e.g. meets relevant regulatory requirements);
  7. Sound legal basis (e.g. several liability clearly established);
  8. Comprehensible (e.g. plain English); and
  9. Duties clearly allocated (e.g. basis of agreement to contract changes).

FSA has also emphasised the potential legal risks in policy drafting and the need for expert legal advice and regular reviews of policy wordings against market sector practise. The widespread use of "standard wordings" brings potential benefits but also risks which need to be addressed. Standard wordings are particularly important as the basis for subscription business and reduce costs and potentially untested "bespoke" drafting. The dangers, however, are demonstrated by cases such as Dornoch Ltd and Others v Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Plc, where a number of standard clauses had been used which made no sense in combination; in that case the Court of Appeal refused to re-write standard clauses to give them a purposive or business common sense construction.

Another danger is the uncertain provenance and quality of some standard market wordings; the origins of some may be lost, a "standard" is not necessarily an indication of good drafting and to what extent is there reliable guidance on how the particular wording can be used? Finally, whilst FSA may see the benefits of industry standards, the European Commission remains concerned about the potential effect on competition. The use of standard wordings is subject to specific competition law rules (in the EU insurance block exemption) and the latest EU investigation into commercial insurance may lead to these requirements being tightened further.

Beyond policy wordings, there are a wide variety of commercial arrangements which have traditionally been very poorly documented or not documented at all. One example, which led FSA to adopt specific rules, was the agreements between insurers and intermediaries concerning the basis on which premiums and claims monies are held. It transpired that there was widespread uncertainty. The industry has recently been criticised by FSA for failing to have the necessary documentation in place by the summer deadline (when certain client money transitional rules expired). Another example of poor documentation is the lack of written agreements apportioning responsibility (e.g. for product or sales process design or fulfilment of other regulatory or commercial obligations) between the different participants in the insurance "chain".

Conclusion

Contract certainty has to be addressed at two levels:

  • market reform and market initiatives
  • action within individual firms. All firms should by now have a well established contract certainty project or initiative. FSA is reviewing progress by individual firms ahead of its stock take in December '05.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 24/10/2005.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Nick Paul
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
Accounting and Audit
Anti-trust/Competition Law
Consumer Protection
Corporate/Commercial Law
Criminal Law
Employment and HR
Energy and Natural Resources
Environment
Family and Matrimonial
Finance and Banking
Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Government, Public Sector
Immigration
Insolvency/Bankruptcy, Re-structuring
Insurance
Intellectual Property
International Law
Law Practice Management
Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Privacy
Real Estate and Construction
Strategy
Tax
Transport
Wealth Management
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.