United States: Lessons from Disney

Last Updated: August 26 2005
Article by Michael G. O'Bryan

On August 9, 2005, the Delaware Chancery Court issued its post-trial opinion in In re The Walt Disney Company Derivative Litigation. The facts of the case are set out in detail in the opinion. What follows is a preliminary analysis of some of the key messages that can be drawn from the opinion.

General Holding

The court found that the Disney directors did not violate their fiduciary duties or commit waste in the 1995 hiring and 1996 termination of Michael Ovitz as president of Disney.

Fiduciary Duties and the Business Judgment Rule

Directors Should Take Comfort from the Business Judgment Rule. The court acknowledged the risks inherent in business and the advantages of allowing boards to accept risks. The business judgment rule accordingly prevents courts from second-guessing business decisions. Redress for bad business decisions "must come from the markets, through the actions of shareholders and the free flow of capital," rather than from courts.

Section 102(b)(7). Similarly, the court noted that one of the primary purposes of Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law is to "encourage directors to undertake risky, but potentially value-maximizing, business strategies, so long as they do so in good faith." A Section 102(b)(7) provision in a certificate of incorporation will prohibit recovery of monetary damages from directors for shareholder claims exclusively based on a violation of the duty of due care.

"Best Practices" May be a Step Beyond Fiduciary Duties. The court observed that "many aspects of the defendants’ conduct … fell significantly short of the best practices of ideal corporate governance." In particular, with respect to Mr. Eisner, the court found that:

Eisner’s actions in connection with Ovitz’s hiring should not serve as a model for fellow executives and fiduciaries to follow. His lapses were many. He failed to keep the board as informed as he should have. He stretched the outer boundaries of his authority as CEO by acting without specific board direction or involvement. He prematurely issued a press release that placed significant pressure on the board to accept Ovitz and approve his compensation package in accordance with the press release. To my mind, these actions fall far short of what shareholders expect and demand from those entrusted with a fiduciary position. Eisner’s failure to better involve the board in the process of Ovitz’s hiring, usurping that role for himself, although not in violation of law, does not comport with how fiduciaries of Delaware corporations are expected to act.

The court noted that, while it could "encourage" best practices, it could not require them, and did not attempt to describe best practices in detail. The court also noted that best practices may evolve over time, but that fiduciary duties should be constant.

Required Steps are Proportional. The actions required of directors are proportionate to the circumstances. The court distinguished the sale of the company at issue in the 1985 Van Gorkom case, in which directors were found to have violated their duty of care, from the compensation issues in Disney as, "[f]irst and foremost, …orders of magnitude more important."

Directors are Judged Individually. The court, citing the 2004 Emerging Communications decision, noted that both the nature of any breach and eligibility for exculpation may differ between individual directors.

The Duty of Good Faith

Still Not Entirely Clear. The court noted that the Delaware Supreme Court and other Chancery Courts have not been clear as to whether good faith is a separate duty, or as to exactly what good faith is. Issues of good faith are "inseparably and necessarily intertwined with the duties of care and loyalty," which themselves are "but constituent elements of the overarching concepts of allegiance, devotion and faithfulness that must guide the conduct of every fiduciary." The court nonetheless found that the distinction between these duties is significant because of the limits imposed by Sec. 102(b)(7). A showing that directors acted in bad faith also will overcome the presumption of the business judgment rule.

Requirements. The court felt it easier to define bad faith rather than good faith, but stated the requirements of good faith as follows: "To act in good faith, a director must act at all times with an honesty of purpose and in the best interests and welfare of the corporation…. [G]ood faith … includes not simply the duties of care and loyalty…, but all actions required by a true faithfulness and devotion to the interests of the corporation and its shareholders."

Potential Violations. The court expressly avoided trying to create a "definitive and categorical definition" of acts that would constitute bad faith. Instead, the court provided a short, non-exclusive list of examples of bad faith (with emphasis on the intentional nature of the acts added):

  • "[I]ntentionally act[ing] with a purpose other than that of advancing the best interests of the corporation"
  • "[A]ct[ing] with the intent to violate applicable positive law"
  • "[I]ntentionally fail[ing] to act in the face of a known duty to act, demonstrating a conscious disregard for duties" (which seems to cover the widely cited standard from the 2003 decision of "consciously and intentionally disregard[ing] their responsibilities, adopting a ‘we don’t care about the risks’ attitude concerning a material corporate decision" (with emphasis in the original 2003 decision))

The Duty of Loyalty

The only duty of loyalty question addressed by the court was whether Ovitz breached his duty by negotiating his own termination. The court found, though, that Ovitz did not breach that duty because he did not "improperly interject[] himself into the corporation’s decisionmaking process [or] manipulate[e] that process." Indeed, the court found that Ovitz played "no part" in the decisions to terminate his employment or to make the termination not for cause, and that once terminated he was entitled to receive the benefits he had negotiated before he became a fiduciary.

What Directors Should Do

The opinion’s conclusions emphasize a number of actions that the court felt directors generally should take. These actions should not be considered to be a check list and may not be appropriate in every situation.

Prepare for Meetings and Discussion.

  • Receive sufficient advance notice of meetings and topics
  • Receive in advance written materials, including term sheets or definitive agreements

The amount of notice, and the finality or formality of the written materials, will depend in part on the matters under consideration and the availability of those materials.

Board Discussions. Informal discussions among board members can help, but too much reliance on one-on-one discussions between board members and management has been criticized for lack of uniformity of information and absence of collegiality and deliberation.

Minutes. The court observed that, under the circumstances of this case, it would have been helpful if the minutes had indicated that the discussion related to Ovitz’s employment was longer and more substantial than the discussion of other topics on the agenda at a compensation committee meeting. However, that observation should not be taken as a general admonition to prepare detailed minutes reflecting discussions at committee or board meetings. What is important is that the minutes reflect the fact that material issues were considered and (if true) voted upon. The minutes also should indicate any materials or reports received by the board in connection with the meeting, and, where appropriate, that such materials were provided in advance of the meeting.

Be Proactive. Review materials and ask questions.

Red Flags and Yellow Flags. Watch for actions or inactions that may harm the corporation. Ask about important matters, even if not on the agenda, and, where appropriate, request that they be considered by the board itself. Some of these flags may occur to a director because of information that director has through experience outside the board, and not through materials prepared by the company or its advisors.

Try to Follow "Best Practices." Even if not required, these are encouraged by the court, and it will not always be easy to distinguish between the requirements of best practices and fiduciary duties. Best practices may differ between companies. Once a practice is established, however, it should be followed.

Beware the "Imperial CEO." The court noted that Eisner’s actions in "stacking" the Disney board and preempting its role may have handicapped the board’s decisionmaking abilities. The court also noted that the concept of good faith may "prove highly meaningful" in a company with "an imperial CEO or controlling shareholder with a supine or passive board."

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Michael G. O'Bryan
 
In association with
Related Video
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
Accounting and Audit
Anti-trust/Competition Law
Consumer Protection
Corporate/Commercial Law
Criminal Law
Employment and HR
Energy and Natural Resources
Environment
Family and Matrimonial
Finance and Banking
Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Government, Public Sector
Immigration
Insolvency/Bankruptcy, Re-structuring
Insurance
Intellectual Property
International Law
Law Practice Management
Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Privacy
Real Estate and Construction
Strategy
Tax
Transport
Wealth Management
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.