The Ecuadorian Congress has recently approved the publication of interpretative Law No. 2002-88 in Official Register No. 689 on October 23, 2002. This new law holds that Article 113 of the Ecuadorian Labor Code entitles employees to a "fourteenth" bonus; equivalent to one basic unified salary for general laborers.
The establishment of this additional remuneration stems the family wage earner’s economic needs during the back-to-school period, which are often not met by the employee’s normal monthly salary.
Although the Organic Legislative Functions Law establishes that the Ecuadorian Congress can interpret laws (and thus the above mentioned interpretative law has presumably complied with the prerequisites when it was published in the Official Register), the passage of this law has engendered political controversy. Because interpretive laws are deemed to have retroactive effect, the economic consequences of this new law to employers and the government are substantial, as neither of these sectors has budgeted for this global bonus. This law, although now in effect, will mostly be appealed to the Constitutional Tribunal. This entity will then have the duty to determine whether of not interpretative Law No. 2002-88 violates the Ecuadorian Political Constitution.
Constitutional arguments will be based on the assertion that this law is not just interpretative but a substantial modification to the Labor Code. For in light of the fact that minimum salary (as established by the code) has not been overturned, the law should have been presented to the President for his approval or partial/total veto.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Argentine law governs all labor activities in Argentina, regardless of where the employee was first hired or where the employment contract was entered into or signed, as well as the employee’s nationality.
In a case examined by the 9th Panel of the Regional Labor Court of the 3rd Region the claimant alleged that each employee had a number on their shirts and when the defendant needed to call the workers, it called them by numbers in a totally impersonal way.
Argentine law governs all labor activities in Argentina,
regardless of where the employee was first hired or where the
employment contract was entered into or signed, as well as the
The 2nd Panel of the Superior Labor Court upheld an appeal filed by an employee of the company Siemens do Brasil Ltda., who had his employment contract suspended since he was assigned temporarily to work on the same company in Italy.
If the employer provides the most favorable condition for their employees, for example, reduced working hours, the advantage is incorporated into the employment contract.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”