The Ecuadorian Congress has recently approved the publication of interpretative Law No. 2002-88 in Official Register No. 689 on October 23, 2002. This new law holds that Article 113 of the Ecuadorian Labor Code entitles employees to a "fourteenth" bonus; equivalent to one basic unified salary for general laborers.
The establishment of this additional remuneration stems the family wage earner’s economic needs during the back-to-school period, which are often not met by the employee’s normal monthly salary.
Although the Organic Legislative Functions Law establishes that the Ecuadorian Congress can interpret laws (and thus the above mentioned interpretative law has presumably complied with the prerequisites when it was published in the Official Register), the passage of this law has engendered political controversy. Because interpretive laws are deemed to have retroactive effect, the economic consequences of this new law to employers and the government are substantial, as neither of these sectors has budgeted for this global bonus. This law, although now in effect, will mostly be appealed to the Constitutional Tribunal. This entity will then have the duty to determine whether of not interpretative Law No. 2002-88 violates the Ecuadorian Political Constitution.
Constitutional arguments will be based on the assertion that this law is not just interpretative but a substantial modification to the Labor Code. For in light of the fact that minimum salary (as established by the code) has not been overturned, the law should have been presented to the President for his approval or partial/total veto.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
This was made after reviewing two opposing resolutions issued by two different Circuit Courts, namely the resolutions issued by the 16th Labor Court of the First Circuit and the 1st Labor Court of the Nineteenth Circuit.
One of the areas that we consistently see foreign companies operating in Chile struggle with is understanding labour laws and how they are applied. In a country like Chile, where courts tend to be pro-worker, it is essential for management teams understand the laws in order to minimise risk.
El 27 de abril de 2016, se publicó en el Diario Oficial de la Federación, el Decreto por el que se reforman y adicionan los artículos 39, 44 y 55 de la Ley del Instituto del Fondo Nacional de la Vivienda para los Trabajadores.
On April 28, 2016, President Enrique Peña Nieto sent to
the Senate two bills for amendments to Articles 107 and 123 of the
Mexico's Federal Constitution and for additions to the Federal
Labor Law covering ..
El Presidente Nicolás Maduro anunció, nuevamente, un aumento del treinta por ciento (30%) sobre el salario mínimo mensual para los trabajadores y un aumento en la base de cálculo del "Cestaticket Socialista"...
On January 29th, 2016, the Supreme Court issued a ruling, that changed the criteria regarding the requirements that trigger the entitlement to the statutory benefit known as "full week" which applies to employees who are remunerated based on a fixed salary and a variable compensation.
El Poder Ejecutivo continuando con su política de lucha contra el alcohol y las drogas en el día de la fecha aprobó un nuevo decreto reglamentario que prohíbe consumir o tener en su poder alcohol...
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).