UK: The Offshore Community In The Year 2001 - Confidence Grows Again

Last Updated: 27 April 2001

In the year 2000 offshore centres were emerging from being regarded as tax havens into serious international business centres. This was against the background of them actually having progressed, in most cases, from this trivial pursuit into more serious activities. It has taken perhaps as long as ten years before the general perception has caught up with reality. Political and media perception lags even further behind. In line with most comments made at the start of the Millennium the mood was optimistic about the future. Does such a positive attitude prevail a year later?

In the last year offshore business has again changed considerably. This has been due, principally, to the offshore centres' governments taking the activities of the international agencies more seriously than before. Perhaps a stream of criticism, most unjust and ineffectual, over the years has lead to the feeling that if nothing is done the critics will tire and go on to something else. This has not happened this time. The deliberations of the Financial Action Task Force continue. We have not heard the last from them by any means although there the remedy is simple: install anti-money laundering laws and procedures and get onto the list of co-operative countries. That is straightforward even though it may be ineffectual. That is not the fault of the offshore centres. If the anti-criminal money regimes which have been given gospel status have been misconceived and superficially directed at the fringes of the activities that is not the offshore community's fault. The blatant cases of vast amounts of criminal money passing with apparent ease through London and New York are regrettable but of less concern than a rumoured offshore trust and company structure being used by a public figure who is then branded as a likely crook. But that is the way of the world or, at least, the way of the offshore world.

Plenty of other things have happened. The Edwards Report passed quietly into history after having considerable influence that was generally beneficial to the jurisdictions examined. Their reputations have been enhanced with the now implied approval of the UK government. The game is on to get international approvals. It is not only a public relations campaign but also a real challenge. The reward is acceptance by an international community of non-offshore experienced prophets. The game isn't compulsory. Some may choose to remain aloof and ride out the storms of enquiry, confident of their positions and enduring appeal of their advantages. This needs a position of strength, which is denied to many aspiring centres and which depends on preserving their reputation. This is sometimes difficult: the criteria so often seems to require a highly developed regulatory system which, in emerging centres, is not required or practical. Local knowledge is often more effective than a formal framework riddled with loopholes. Nevertheless, standards are global. Big or small, the offshore centres have to attain them. The international supervisors have to look at the substance rather than the form of regulation. How often have we heard that before but applied to condemn an over-elaborate tax structure? Can it be sustained to criticise excessively formal regulation?

The emergence of the OECD's activities at the beginning of 2001 is the dominating offshore influence. Many offshore centres have not yet come to terms with the OECD's modified programme. Time is short. By June the labels will be issued and more than one offshore centre will find itself branded in the wrong half of the offshore world by default. By October 2000 the way forward was clear. Low tax itself is no longer condemned. This was a great breakthrough following constructive criticisms of the OECD's position on legal , economic and political grounds. Many offshore centres ignored the issue and now seem to be taking up the cause when the issue is over. The need now is to work positively and constructively to achieving an acceptable position, or staying out altogether and taking what comes.

There was little expectation of the problems that the first OECD Report would cause. The whole concept put forward by them of harmful tax regimes at first was received quietly by the offshore centres. They were somewhat stunned. There was the OECD, an organisation of prosperous states, apparently, pointing a finger at the lowly offshore jurisdictions with the implication that these offshore jurisdictions were robbing the main industrial countries of their rightful taxation. Of course, it was nothing of the sort. At the best, it was perhaps a public relations miscalculation by the OECD and, at worst, it was probably a misunderstanding by the OECD countries, the majority of which have a civil law background, of the way in which offshore centres are managed. After a while criticisms became plentiful. Ample economic, political and legal arguments were brought out to show that the worst interpretations of the OECD's intentions were a disaster for international relationships. Sovereignty appeared to be kicked aside. But this is no place to analyse the "harmful tax" concept. It is enough, thankfully, to note that matters seem now to be calming down. The criteria are now clarified even if the actions looked for are not acceptable. However the offshore centres react it will not be immediately appreciated and will be seen by the sensation seekers of the mainland press as merely panic measures of a technical nature. Rather than argue now about the role of the OECD the offshore centres should attempt to enlist the public relations efforts of the international agencies to improve the image of those who meet the requirements. But there is far more going on than a mere resistance or bad feeling towards the offshore centres campaign - the situation has a more global dimension.

On the one hand the industrial countries have seen their revenue from corporation tax decrease. There has been certain desperation by some of the OECD members' attempts to mop up what extra revenue they can find. Perhaps the offshore centres have been too successful. If they have, then tax advantages have played their part but had not been the entire reason for their success. Of course, to save tax, or even to defer it, is an attraction. But, contrary to the worst interpretation on the harmful tax regime theorists, they are not pits of tax evaders although the media may have thought otherwise. Offshore trusts and IBC's have become synonymous with tax evaders and international fraudsters. This is journalism at its best and ignorance at its worst.

To engage in these debates is a pointless activity. It is a permanently boring aspect of international finance. Point out to any critic that in any list of multinational companies the majority will have a complex international structure. This normal business practice is lost upon them. The tax advantages of these multinationals are controlled by some powerful legislation. Double tax treaties and controlled foreign company legislation are two areas that keep the taxation of international structures under control. The unitary taxation system of California was, at one time, an anti-avoidance regime which could have been adopted elsewhere, but little is now heard of this. Fashions change. The debate goes on year after year. But, where are we now? It certainly seems that we are entering into calmer waters. The offshore centres have found a new vigour. Their defence of their integrity and sovereignty has produced results. The result has been to illustrate that all offshore centres are not utterly pure and that when calmly expressed, the OECD's real objection has some justification. It would be going too far to suggest that they are entirely justified.

We must not forget that the OECD finger has also been pointed at their own members. It is not an anti-offshore centre campaign. At least the current principles of the OECD thinking are to look for transparency in each jurisdiction, from which offshore activities are carried on, the identity of the beneficial owners of the activities are known to someone in the jurisdiction and that, subject to proper application being made to that jurisdiction, information can be transferred abroad provided a just cause is made out and that the correct procedures are followed.

Rather more controversial is the "anti-brass plate" campaign. The OECD look for some substantial operation in a jurisdiction where a company or other vehicle is set up. This is clearly aimed at the abuses of the international business companies. This will prove more difficult to resolve.

Are IBCs Abused?

This will depend on how one looks at the concept of abuse. The old-fashioned offshore answer would be that IBCs are formed, managed and used according to the law of the jurisdiction in which they are incorporated. Sovereignty is all. On the other hand, other countries might feel that they are losing revenue because of these privileges and could conclude that they are insubstantial and contrived. No-one has dared yet to come up with the concept of a "sham" company, but it will not be long before they do.

At least both sides are now talking. Although the declaration looked for by the OECD of a firm intention to aim towards achieving their objectives by 2005 will remove an offshore from public damnation, there is still a difficult time ahead.

Then, there is the difficult spectre of money laundering and this is a personal topic. The test is whether an offshore centre has been co-operative with the FATF. This raises other questions. The FATF list has stimulated more questions than it has answered. Some of the comments entered against co-operative countries seem to be more severe than the reasons why others have been omitted from that list. Money laundering is another anomaly which exists between onshore centres and the big boys. Russian manipulation of several billion dollars through US banks can escape money laundering prosecutions in the US whereas offshore centres are called upon to justify some minor procedures. The anti-money laundering campaign is another example of the onshore countries trying to mould the offshore centres as they think they should be. Again, this may change. Despite the careful law enacted in offshore centres and its conscientious administration, money laundering continues undiminished. But where does the money go? It certainly does not go offshore in any large amounts. If even a fraction of the money went where the press claim it to go, it would be easily visible. Transparency is a grand name but in offshore communities, by their nature and size, are such that everybody knows what is going on in a small island economy. This is village life. This is something which the Whitehall warriors have long forgotten.

Strangely enough these and other campaigns have done much to strengthen the resolve of offshore centres. They will ultimately be the beneficiaries. They have shown that their intentions are as honourable and their actions are rather more efficient than those of their critics. Another result is that the offshore centres have joined the real world. No longer are offshore centres hidden behind a palm tree curtain. Their qualities have been revealed and they have willingly produced capable and real defences to allegations made against them. This is the real progress and the real promise. This is why we can again be confident that the future is bright and, in the offshore world, the sun never sets.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions