UK: Non-Residence - Latest Developments

Last Updated: 25 February 2010
Article by Daniel Feingold


Since my last Article, there have been more twists and turns (in the form of two big cases) on the issue of how to achieve Non-Residence.

This is both troubling and unhelpful, since Non-Residence is perhaps the most effective way for High Net Worth Individuals to avoid the 50% Tax hike coming in April and is under consideration by many City Workers, Entrepreneurs and High Income earners.

Over Christmas, the First Tier Tax Tribunal Decision in the case of Hankinson –v- HMRC 2009 TC 00319 was published.

This concerned a successful Entrepreneur who held his shares in Bison Limited (his UK Company) via Non-Resident Trusts.

The method chosen to extract the gain tax free was for Mr Hankinson to spend 15 months working full-time in a Dutch Subsidiary of the Company.

The Capital Gains Tax at stake was just over £30m without adding a penalty and 11 years of interest!

The principal issue in the case was whether Mr Hankinson was Ordinarily Resident in the UK at the time the capital gains crystallised in March 1999.

Mr Hankinson would need to rely on Section 2.2 of IR20 that would treat him as Non-Resident and Ordinarily Resident if he was working abroad full-time for a period covering a whole tax year.

On the facts, the Tribunal found that he did not appear to work full-time for the Dutch Subsidiary and continued to do work in England for the main Bison Company and his other investment Companies. Further, on 2nd January 1999 he took ill on a flight to Barbados and returned to the UK on 30th April 1999 and never returned to the Netherlands to work.

His appeal on these issues were dismissed.

Yet again, this case (which came to light by means of a discovery assessment made in January 2005) demonstrates evidence of bad advice and poor execution.

This case is the product of an approach by some Advisors (I'm still seeing today) that Clients only had to pay "Lip Service" to being Non-Resident and that sticking to "day counting" would suffice.

The only glimmer of hope for Mr Hankinson is that the Tribunal Judge appears to have made a clear "faux pas" in relying not on the Opinion of the Dutch Tax Authorities or an Independent local Tax Lawyer as to their rules on Tax Residence, but on a letter from the Client's Dutch Tax Advisors written in March 1998. (That letter should in my view, never have been seen by the Tribunal, anyway).

Although the Tribunal Judge then gives Mr Hankinson the benefit of the doubt and proceeds to analyse whether the Tie-breaker Clause in the Treaty would protect him; his conclusion, (probably correct) is that it would not.

Mr Hankinson has already embarked on a Judicial Review and will no doubt appeal this decision.

There is a clear lesson here that taking good advice and sticking to it can pay dividends, especially where large amounts of tax are at stake.

The long running saga of Robert Gaines-Cooper (Davies & Anor, R (on the application of) –v- HM Revenue Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 83 (16 February 2010) culminated in the Court of Appeal dismissing his Judicial Review application on the ability to rely on HMRC's Guidance Booklet on Residence (IR20) as to the treatment of Taxpayers claiming Non-Residence.

Gaines-Cooper joined forces with two other appellants Davies and Wilkie (UK Property Developers) who were claiming to be Non-Resident for 2001-2002 on the same grounds as Mr Hankinson; full-time work abroad but this time in Belgium.

Gaines-Cooper's case revolved around whether he needed to make a "Distinct Break" with the UK or could rely on the Guidance in IR20 which appears to refer only to the number of days spent in the UK in a tax year.

Whilst Davies and Wilkie's issue, the ability to rely on IR20 appeared identical (from the greater sympathy for Davies and Wilkie particularly from Lord Justice Ward) it appears that joining their appeals with Gaines-Cooper may not have been the wisest strategy, except of course from a costs perspective.

Gaines-Cooper is someone who maintained a large house, collection of cars, guns, a wife and child in the UK and, in my view did not have any realistic chance of success as the finding of facts against him in the Special Commissioners were essentially fatal to his case.

There was a claim (backed up by several expert witnesses) that HMRC changed their approach to Residence Cases and in particular IR20 from the tax year 2004-2005.

In fact, the evidence points (and my personal experience concurs with this) that the change in policy occurred in 2001 and in particular, from the April 2001 publication of an Article (Personal Residence "Mobile Workers" Living in the UK in Tax Bulletin 52) on Mobile Workers. This supposedly impacted on those claiming Non-Residence under Section 2.2 but the reality is that this is when HMRC changed their approach on the "Distinct Break" issue as well!

Lord Justice Moses did not think this amounted to sufficient grounds to protect any of the Clients and the confusion of the expert witnesses in focussing on the wrong dateline was not (in my view) helpful.

The Appellants will appeal to the Supreme Court but hopefully separately!

HMRC will no doubt see this as an absolute victory and it will lead to more Enquiries and Challenges on Residence status where Capital Gains Tax and Income Tax from UK activities are at stake.

My view is that the Court of Appeal has actually made it clear that HMRC must stick to their position as stated in IR20 (or HMRC 6 its successor), if the Taxpayers fall within the relevant section. Falling within the terms of either full-time employment or achieving the "Distinct Break" are therefore critical.

The other problem I have with the Court of Appeal Decision is that HMRC's Counsel has persuaded the Courts that the old and contradictory cases on Residence have clear and consistent principles that are of wide application and that IR20 (and therefore HMRC 6) accord (more or less) with those principles. That is just simply not true and it seems only the Supreme Court will be able to clarify this key legal issue . Hopes of a statutory definition on Residence being introduced as an alternative solution, is also extremely unlikely.


The end result is that any Client contemplating Non-Residence for tax purposes needs clear Tax Law advice from an Expert on the "Distinct Break" (as I advocated in my earlier Article dated 1st December 2009 ). Another level of protection can be added by making sure that the Client is Resident under local Tax Law in a Country with a Double Tax Treaty with the UK: And would be treated as such under the Tie-breaker Clause on Residence, in that Treaty!

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions