United States: Supreme Court Expands Liability For False Statements Under The Federal Securities Laws

 On March 27, the Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision addressing whether someone who is not the "maker" of a misstatement can nonetheless be primarily liable for fraud under the federal securities laws, when the misstatement is the only deceptive conduct at issue. Lorenzo v. SEC, 2019 WL 1369839 (U.S. Mar. 27, 2019).

The Court held that liability for misstatements is not limited to "makers," instead ruling that those who "disseminate" false or misleading statements can also be primarily liable under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, as well as under Section 17(a)(1) of the Securities Act, the primary antifraud provisions under the federal securities laws. By holding that liability exists for those who "disseminate" false statements, the Supreme Court potentially expanded the reach of the antifraud provisions well beyond the narrow confines of "maker" liability, which the Court had delineated in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders, 564 U.S. 135 (2011).


In 2013, the SEC found that Francis Lorenzo had violated Rule 10b-5, Section 10(b), and Section 17(a)(1) based on e-mails he had sent to potential investors in his capacity as the director of investment banking at an SEC-registered brokerage firm. Specifically, at his boss's direction, Lorenzo e-mailed potential investors to solicit their participation in a debt offering being managed by his firm. Lorenzo's boss composed the content of the e-mails, which Lorenzo "copied-and-pasted" into the messages he sent. The SEC found that Lorenzo's e-mails not only falsely reported that the issuer had "confirmed assets" of over US$10 million, but also that Lorenzo knew at the time he sent the e-mails that the issuer's assets totaled less than US$400,000.

Lorenzo appealed the SEC's decision, both on the basis that he lacked "scienter" (which the Supreme Court has held embraces an intent to deceive, manipulate, or defraud) and that he was not the "maker" of the e-mail statements

—since he was acting at his boss's direction—and thus could not be held liable under the federal securities laws consistent with the Supreme Court's Janus ruling. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected Lorenzo's scienter argument but agreed with Lorenzo that he was not the "maker" of the statements as defined in Janus. The Circuit Court nonetheless sustained the SEC's action and found that Lorenzo had violated subsections (a) and (c) of Rule 10b-5 and Section 17(a)(1), which largely parallels the language of Rule 10b-5(a).

Supreme Court's decision

Lorenzo appealed the Circuit Court's holding that he could be liable under the foregoing antifraud provisions when the only challenged conduct concerned misstatements. Critically, Lorenzo did not appeal the Circuit Court's ruling on scienter. Thus, in issuing its decision, the Supreme Court could "take for granted that he sent the e-mails with 'intent to deceive, manipulate, or defraud' the recipients." 2019 WL 1369839, at *4.

With scienter thus assumed, the majority had no trouble concluding that Lorenzo could be liable under subsections (a) and (c) of Rule 10b-5, as well as the relevant statutory texts, for the "dissemination of false or misleading statements." Id. at *4. The Court reached its conclusion based primarily on its common sense reading of the words used in the rule and the statutes. As the Court observed, it was "obvious that the words in these provisions are, as ordinarily used, sufficiently broad to include within their scope the dissemination of false or misleading information with the intent to defraud." For example, the Court concluded that the e-mails were a "device," "artifice," and "scheme" to defraud (prohibited under Rule 10b-5(a)) and that Lorenzo had engaged in an "act," "practice," and "course of business" that operated as a fraud or deceit (prohibited under Rule 10b-5(c)).

The Court rejected Lorenzo's statutory interpretation argument, in which he contended that that each subsection of Rule 10b-5 should be read as mutually exclusive, governing only a non-overlapping sphere of conduct. Thus, in his view, because Rule 10b-5(b) outlaws the "making" of an untrue statement, it was the exclusive means to prosecute frauds premised on false or misleading statements and such frauds could not be addressed under subsections (a) and (c). The majority dismissed this exclusivity argument as inconsistent with the language of the subsections, which the Court found to clearly overlap with each other; with precedent, which recognized the overlapping nature of the provisions; and with the purpose of the securities laws, in which Congress adopted a belt-and-suspenders approach to stamping out fraud, providing that each succeeding provision of the securities laws was "'meant to cover additional kinds of illegalities—not to narrow the reach of the prior sections.'" Id. at *5.

The Court had an only slightly more difficult time reconciling its ruling that "disseminators" could be liable under subsections (a) and (c) of Rule 10b-5 with its Janus decision, which limited liability under Rule 10b-5(b) to the "makers" of a false or misleading misstatement, whom it defined as the persons "with ultimate authority over the statement, including its content and whether and how to communicate it." Janus, 564 U.S. at 142.

Based on Janus, Lorenzo made two arguments. First, he contended that a finding of liability for his conduct would render Janus a dead letter. But the Court found otherwise, noting that Janus addressed only whether liability under Rule 10b-5(b) extended to persons who drafted a misstatement as opposed to those who made them; Janus said nothing about the liability of those who "disseminate" false information. Thus, the Court found that Janus "would remain relevant to (and preclude liability) where an individual neither makes nor disseminates false information." Lorenzo, 2019 WL 1369839, at *6 (emphasis added). The Court failed to explain, however, how anyone subject to liability under Rule 10b-5(b) would not also be liable under subsections (a) and (c), in which event not only would lawsuits under Rule 10b-5(b) be unnecessary, but the limits imposed by Rule 10b-5(b), as found by the Court in Janus, would not constrain suits under Section 10(b).

Lorenzo's second argument was that the Court's narrow construction of Rule 10b-5(b) in Janus was driven, in part, by its desire to draw a clean line between primary and secondary ("aiding and abetting") liability under Section 10(b), permitting primary liability and prohibiting secondary liability. According to Lorenzo, that line would be blurred beyond recognition if conduct that only qualified as secondary liability under subsection (b) of the rule could be found to constitute primary liability under subsections (a) and (c).

Once again, the Court dismissed Lorenzo's argument, explaining that there is nothing unusual about a person being primarily liable for an offense under one statute and secondarily liable for an offense under another. The Court noted, by way of example, that A might sell an unregistered firearm to B to help him rob a bank, making A primarily liable for the gun sale and secondarily liable for the bank robbery. Id. at *7. The Court's analogy, however, goes only so far. As the dissent pointed out, unlike prosecutions under separate statutes, the three subsections of Rule 10b-5 implement only the single provision of Section 10(b). Accordingly, under the Court's reasoning, the same conduct can support either primary or secondary liability under Section 10(b), even though there is a private right of action only for the former and not the latter. Id. at *13.


What is clear from the Court's Lorenzo decision is that the reach of Rule 10b-5 for false or misleading statements extends beyond simply those persons who "make" such statements. What remains uncertain is how broadly Rule 10b-5's net will be cast now that those persons who "disseminate" false or misleading information may also be held liable.

The Court's decision does offer some insights. For example, the Court noted that liability for "actors tangentially involved in dissemination"—such as a "mailroom clerk"—would "typically be inappropriate." Id. at *5. But, as the dissent observed, the Court's opinion offers "no legal principle" to distinguish between actors who are too tangentially involved in the dissemination of information and those who are not. Id. at *13.

Similarly, the Court's opinion raises questions concerning the possible liability of so-called "speechwriters" and other persons who knowingly supply false information for incorporation into a public statement. Under Janus, those persons fall outside the narrow scope of "makers" and thus are not subject to liability under Rule 10b-5(b). Now, however, their potential immunity under Section 10(b) is not so clear.

The Court did note, in distinguishing its holding in Lorenzo from its prior Section 10(b) decisions, that "Lorenzo's conduct involved the direct transmission of false statements to prospective investors intended to induce reliance." Id. at *7. The Court's reference to reliance harkens back to some of its precedents, in which the Court found that a distinguishing feature of primary liability under Rule 10b-5(b) should be whether investors knew the identity of—and thus could rely upon—the speaker. Janus, 564 U.S. at 144. Nonetheless, the Court did not make investors' reliance a criterion for the application of its Lorenzo holding.

As is often true with Supreme Court decisions that break new ground, it remains to be seen how the expansion of liability under Section 10(b) to persons who "disseminate" false and misleading information will evolve in the courts. We predict, however, that the plaintiffs' bar will actively press the boundaries of "dissemination" liability to assert claims against corporate insiders and advisors who previously had enjoyed a litigation reprieve under Janus. As a consequence, the already high cost of securities litigation will continue apace.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions