Guernsey: Saunders v Vautier In The Channel Islands - Guidance From Guernsey

Last Updated: 15 April 2019
Article by Rupert Morris and Sarah Brehaut

Can the beneficiaries of a discretionary trust require the trustees to terminate the trust and distribute the trust property, in circumstances where a power to add further beneficiaries exists? In Rusnano Capital AG (in liquidation) v Molard International (PTC) Limited and Pullborough International Corp [2019] GRC 011 (the "Judgment") the Guernsey Royal Court has held that in Guernsey they can. In doing so, the court also provided a welcome clarification of the relationship between section 53 of the Trusts (Guernsey) Law, 2007 (the "Trusts Law") and the so-called 'rule' in Saunders v Vautier.


The Applicant was an entity within a wider group structure which invested in the nanotechnology industry. One such investment was shares in an English healthcare technology company (the "Shares"). A trust was established in 2014 (the "Trust"), with Molard International (PTC) Limited (the "Trustee") as trustee, and Pullborough International Corp (the "Appointor") as 'enforcer' and 'appointor', onto which the Shares were settled.

The only beneficiary designated by the trust instrument was the Applicant which was named specifically therein. However, the Trust instrument gave the Appointor the power to add persons or classes of persons as beneficiaries (and to exclude classes or members of a class from being beneficiaries). That power had not been exercised. The Trust instrument also provided that the Trustee was to appoint the trust fund and/or its income to "all or such one or more of the such shares...and in such matter generally as the Appointor shall in its absolute discretion from time to time by instrument direct."

The Applicant applied under section 53 of the Trusts Law to require the Trustee to terminate the Trust and distribute its assets. Section 53(3) of the Trusts Law states:

"Without prejudice to the powers of the Royal Court under subsection (4), and notwithstanding the terms of the trust, where all the beneficiaries are in existence and have been ascertained, and none is a minor or a person under legal disability, they may require the trustees to terminate the trust and distribute the trust property among them."


In Bond v Equiom Trust (Guernsey) Limited (4 June 2018, Guernsey Judgment 24/2018), McMahon DB had observed that section 53(3) could be regarded as a codification of the so-called rule in the case of Saunders v Vautier (1841) 4 Beav 115, 49 ER 282, and approved the summary of the 'rule' in Lewin on Trusts (19th edn), at 24-009:

McMahon DB clarified at paragraph 15 of the Judgment that his primary task concerning the application was to interpret the relevant provisions in the Trusts Law. Whilst section 53(3) may be a codification of the 'rule' in Saunders v Vautier, "such codification does not necessarily mean that the principles developed in other jurisdictions as to how to give effect to that rule are applicable under the 2007 Law". Instead, he stated that "What matters is how to give effect to the statutory regime that operates in Guernsey, using the definitions found in the 2007 Law itself and giving the other words their meanings through applying usual principles of statutory interpretation."

The key question for the court therefore was: in circumstances where the Trust document had designated only the Applicant as a beneficiary, but a power to add beneficiaries to the Trust existed, was it correct to say that "all the beneficiaries are in existence and have been ascertained"?

McMahon DB held that it was. At paragraph 22 of the Judgment he stated that "just because there is a real possibility that the power to appoint additional beneficiaries might be exercised, it does not follow that anyone who [the Appointor] has in mind is a beneficiary for the purposes of the 2007 Law, and, more particularly section 53(3)."

In so finding, he drew upon the distinction drawn by the Royal Court of Jersey in In re Exeter Settlement 2010 JLR 169. In that case, the court had commented on the difference between being a beneficiary and merely being someone in respect of whom a power to add beneficiaries could be exercised. In particular, the Jersey court had stated that "a person who is a possible object of a power to add beneficiaries is not in fact a beneficiary unless or until the power is exercised in his favour and he is added as a beneficiary."

McMahon DB confirmed that this distinction is also applicable in Guernsey. He also found that there was no basis for interpreting the phrase "all the beneficiaries" in section 53(3) of the Trusts Law as meaning "all the potential beneficiaries". Given those principles, McMahon DB was therefore satisfied that the Applicant was the sole beneficiary of the Trust, and (being in existence and ascertained), was entitled to invoke section 53, terminate the Trust, and receive the Trust property.

In opposition to the application, the Trustee and Appointor had raised authorities concerning the application of the 'rule' in Saunders v Vautier which put in issue the extent to which beneficiaries may terminate a trust when a power to appoint further beneficiaries exists. In his discussion of these submissions, McMahon DB quoted at length an extract from Orb ARL v Ruhan [2015] EWHC 262 (Comm) in which Cooke J had considered the question "as to whether or not, in circumstances where there are two named beneficiaries, but the trustees have power to appoint additional beneficiaries, there can be said to be a closed class at any point in time before the trust comes to an end." Cooke J had concluded that "it is not clear, on the current state of the law, whether the class is in fact a closed class at any point in time where the trustees have not made such a direction [to add a person to the class of beneficiaries]", and held that it must be at least arguable that the class was closed such that the beneficiaries could call in the trusts under the 'rule' in Saunders v Vautier.

McMahon DB held, however, that whilst "interesting", it was a "fundamental flaw" to attempt to introduce such issues into Guernsey law insofar as they departed from the wording of section 53(3) of the Trusts Law. As he reiterated, "the way to interpret section 53(3) turns on whether or not there is any other beneficiary who does not join in with the Applicant in requiring the [Trust] to be terminated, which would defeat the Application." He did not therefore consider that what was required was a further inquiry into whether or not the class of beneficiaries was a "closed class" as discussed in the Orb case, because that is "not the way section 53(3) reads."

Wider Considerations

There are two further particular points of interest arising from the judgment. The first is that (whilst not relevant to the court's decision) McMahon DB did go so far as to raise at paragraph 32 the point that even if the Saunders v Vautier 'closed class' issue discussed in the Orb case were to be applied to the present facts, "it strikes me as arguable...that such an exercise needs to crystallise at any given point in time and the question of whether the class is closed should not be rejected simply on the basis that just about anyone in the whole world might at some future date be added as a beneficiary by the Appointor." This is a notable addition to the discussion of the relevance of the existence of a power to add beneficiaries to the ability of the existing beneficiaries to terminate a trust under Saunders v Vautier, which may be drawn upon by courts in jurisdictions not covered by the Trusts Law.

Secondly, the court also considered the implications of the Judgment to so called "Red Cross" or "Black Hole" trusts, in which 'primary' beneficiaries are not included in the trust at the point of its creation, and are instead left to be added at a later date, with a 'default' beneficiary (often the Red Cross) sustaining the structure as the named beneficiary. McMahon DB noted that the Judgment confirms that such default beneficiaries may likely have the power to terminate the trust and claim the trust fund under section 53 of the Trusts Law before the 'principal' beneficiaries are added. He suggested, however, that charities regularly used as 'default' beneficiaries (a) "will not know about the settlor's possible bounty", and (b) may in any case choose not to terminate the trust out of concern that it would subsequently no longer be the preferred charity in such cases: "an immediate windfall may not be a sound longer-term strategy."


This case therefore establishes the important point that section 53 of the Trusts Law creates an independent statutory mechanism for the termination of trusts by beneficiaries which, whilst derived from the 'rule' in Saunders v Vautier, must be interpreted by its own wording, and without importing into Guernsey law authorities dealing with Saunders v Vautier which are not relevant to that wording. Under Guernsey law therefore (and arguably also in Jersey where section 43(3) of the Trusts (Jersey) Law, 1984 is on substantially similar terms), the existence of a power to add beneficiaries will not prevent the beneficiaries of a trust from terminating the trust under section 53 of the Trusts Law.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centres
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions